Effect of loxapine on electrical brain activity, intracranial pressure, and middle cerebral artery flow velocity in traumatic brain-injured patients

Octopamine signaling in the metazoan pathogen Schistosoma mansoni: localization, small-molecule screening and opportunities for drug development

Schistosomiasis is a tropical disease caused by a flatworm trematode parasite that infects over 200 million people worldwide. Treatment and control of the disease rely on just one drug, praziquantel. The possibility of drug resistance coupled with praziquantel's variable efficacy encourages the identification of new drugs and drug targets. Disruption of neuromuscular homeostasis in parasitic worms is a validated strategy for drug development. In schistosomes, however, much remains to be understood about the organization of the nervous system, its component neurotransmitters and potential for drug discovery. Using synapsin as a neuronal marker, we map the central and peripheral nervous systems in the Schistosoma mansoni adult and schistosomulum (post-infective larva). We discover the widespread presence of octopamine (OA), a tyrosine-derived and invertebrate-specific neurotransmitter involved in neuromuscular coordination. OA labeling facilitated the discovery of two pairs of ganglia in the brain of the adult schistosome, rather than the one pair thus far reported for this and other trematodes. In quantitative phenotypic assays, OA and the structurally related tyrosine-derived phenolamine and catecholamine neurotransmitters differentially modulated schistosomulum motility and length. Similarly, from a screen of 28 drug agonists and antagonists of tyrosine-derivative signaling, certain drugs that act on OA and dopamine receptors induced robust and sometimes complex concentration-dependent effects on schistosome motility and length; in some cases, these effects occurred at concentrations achievable in vivo The present data advance our knowledge of the organization of the nervous system in this globally important pathogen and identify a number of drugs that interfere with tyrosine-derivative signaling, one or more of which might provide the basis for a new chemotherapeutic approach to treat schistosomiasis.This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

The role of systematic reviews in pharmacovigilance planning and Clinical Trials Authorisation application: example from the SLEEPS trial

BACKGROUND

Adequate sedation is crucial to the management of children requiring assisted ventilation on Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICU). The evidence-base of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in this area is small and a trial was planned to compare midazolam and clonidine, two sedatives widely used within PICUs neither of which being licensed for that use. The application to obtain a Clinical Trials Authorisation from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) required a dossier summarising the safety profiles of each drug and the pharmacovigilance plan for the trial needed to be determined by this information. A systematic review was undertaken to identify reports relating to the safety of each drug.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) were obtained for each sedative. The MHRA were requested to provide reports relating to the use of each drug as a sedative in children under the age of 16. Medline was searched to identify RCTs, controlled clinical trials, observational studies, case reports and series. 288 abstracts were identified for midazolam and 16 for clonidine with full texts obtained for 80 and 6 articles respectively. Thirty-three studies provided data for midazolam and two for clonidine. The majority of data has come from observational studies and case reports. The MHRA provided details of 10 and 3 reports of suspected adverse drug reactions.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

No adverse reactions were identified in addition to those specified within the SmPC for the licensed use of the drugs. Based on this information and the wide spread use of both sedatives in routine practice the pharmacovigilance plan was restricted to adverse reactions. The Clinical Trials Authorisation was granted based on the data presented in the SmPC and the pharmacovigilance plan within the clinical trial protocol restricting collection and reporting to adverse reactions.

Beneficial effects of loxapine on agitation and breathing patterns during weaning from mechanical ventilation

INTRODUCTION

Interruption of sedation during weaning from mechanical ventilation often leads to patient agitation because of withdrawal syndrome. We tested the short-term efficacy and tolerance of loxapine in this situation.

METHODS

Nineteen mechanically ventilated patients with marked agitation after sedation withdrawal were included. Three agitation scales, the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS), the Motor Activity Assessment Scale (MAAS), and the Ramsay and physiological variables (respiratory rate, airway occlusion pressure during the first 0.1 second of inspiration (P0.1), heart rate and systolic arterial blood pressure) were recorded before and after loxapine administration.

RESULTS

Loxapine dramatically improved all agitation scores (RASS and MASS decreased from 2 +/- 0 to -1.1 +/- 2.3, and 5.4 +/- 0.5 to 2.7 +/- 1.6, respectively; Ramsay increased from 1.0 +/- 0 to 3.5 +/- 1.5, 60 minutes after loxapine administration, P < 0.05 for all scores) as well as P0.1 (6 +/- 4.2 to 1.8 +/- 1.8 cm H2O; P < 0.05) and respiratory rate (from 31.2 +/- 7.2 to 23.4 +/- 7.8; P < 0.05) without hemodynamic adverse events. No side effects occurred. Sixteen (84%) patients were successfully managed with loxapine, sedation was resumed in two others, and one patient self-extubated without having to be reintubated.

CONCLUSIONS

Loxapine was safe and effective in treating agitation in a small group of mechanically ventilated patients and improved respiratory physiologic parameters, enabling the weaning process to be pursued. A multicenter trial is under way to confirm these promising results.

Agitation and/or aggression after traumatic brain injury in the pediatric population treated with ziprasidone. Clinical article

OBJECT

Agitation and aggression are common after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and can hamper recovery and rehabilitative efforts. To date, there is no consensus on pharmaceutical intervention for these conditions after TBI. Ziprasidone has been reported efficacious in this population but the evidence is limited. The authors report their experience of using ziprasidone to treat posttraumatic brain injury agitation in 20 consecutive pediatric patients. A secondary objective of this case series was to attempt to establish an age-specific dosage and identify possible side effects of this medication.

METHODS

This case series study was performed at a university hospital and pediatric trauma center. Over an 18-month period, all patients who presented to the pediatric intensive care unit with TBI and later developed agitation and/or aggression were treated with ziprasidone as the sole intervention. Pre- and posttreatment scores on the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS) were recorded along with demographic data.

RESULTS

Twenty children received ziprasidone for agitation and/or aggression during the immediate recovery period from TBI. The median patient age was 8 years (range 9 months-17 years). Children were stratified into 4 age groups: <2 years old (Group 1), 2-6 years old (Group 2), 7-12 years old (Group 3), and >or=13 years old (Group 4). The SAS score, before and 24 hours after the initiation of ziprasidone, demonstrated a significant reduction after initiation of the medication (p<0.001). The initial dose for Groups 1-4 was 1.7, 0.9, 0.7, and 0.6 mg/kg, respectively, with final doses of 1.8, 1.5, 1.7, and 0.07 mg/kg, respectively. The duration of therapy for Groups 1-4 was 5, 8, 6, and 3 days, respectively. All patients received continuous cardiac and blood-pressure monitoring. No adverse events were reported in any of the age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this limited patient series, ziprasidone appears to be safe and effective in pediatric patients with closed head injuries who develop agitation and/or aggression in the immediate postinjury period. Ziprasidone consistently lowered SAS scores and did so in all age groups. There were minimal dose adjustments and the duration of therapy was relatively brief. No adverse events were reported. A prospective trial of ziprasidone in this population appears warranted.

[Sedation and analgesia for the brain-injured patient]

Sedation-analgesia occupies an essential place in the specific therapeutic arsenal of the brain-injured patients. The maintenance of the perfusion of the brain, its relaxation and its protection are the fundamental objectives whose finality is to avoid the extension of the lesions and to preserve the neuronal capital. Sedation is instituted when patients are severely agitated or present a deterioration of their state of consciousness (GCS< or =8). Under cover of mechanical ventilation, sedation is the first line treatment of intracranial hypertension, a common pathway of various acute brain diseases of traumatic, vascular or other origin. The use of the combination of hypnotic and opioids is the rule. The combined action of these two classes reinforces and improves their sedative effects. Midazolam is the 2 benzodiazepine of reference. Propofol is more and more frequently added to the combination of hypnotic and opioids. The "propofol infusion syndrome" is a severe limitation to its long term administration in particular among patients presenting a severe septic or inflammatory state. Propofol will be imperatively stopped in the event of metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, acute renal insufficiency, hyperkaliemia or increase in the blood triglyceride levels. The use of thiopental is restricted to the most severe cases. Its use as a monotherapy at high doses is abandoned to the profit of a co-administration with midazolam or even with the combination of midazolam and propofol. Thiopental overdose is very frequent in the event of associated hypothermia. Etomidate does not have its place apart from induction in fast sequence. The neuro-protective effects of ketamine require to be demonstrated in man before being recommended routinely. Withdrawal of sedation can be responsible for a state of agitation which can be controlled by neuroleptics.