A prospective randomized study to evaluate the antipyretic effect of the combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen in neurological ICU patients

A Case Series of Clinical Limitations to the Clinical Course of Neurogenic Fever

Nurses play a vital role in the care of neurocritical patients. Fever is a common and dangerous occurrence, and there is a substantial lack of consistency in how to maintain normothermia in these patients. We present five cases in which patients were confirmed to have neurogenic fever (NF) and the documented interventions. In all five cases, temperature and interventions were not documented consistently, making it difficult to assess how nurses acted to avoid hyperthermia in these patients. Additional research is needed to determine interventions, processes, procedures, and documentation of NF in neurocritical patients.

Comparative Analysis of Single and Combined Antipyretics Using Patient-Generated Health Data: Retrospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Fever is one of the most common symptoms in children and is the physiological response of the human immune system to external pathogens. However, effectiveness studies of single and combined antipyretic therapy are relatively few due to lack of data. In this study, we used large-scale patient-generated health data from mobile apps to compare antipyretic affects between single and combination antipyretics.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to establish combination patterns of antipyretics and compare antipyretic affects between single and combination antipyretics using large-scale patient-generated health data from mobile apps.

METHODS

This study was conducted using medical records of feverish children from July 2015 to June 2017 using the Fever Coach mobile app. In total, 3,584,748 temperature records and 1,076,002 antipyretic records of 104,337 children were analyzed. Antipyretic efficacy was measured by the mean difference in the area under the temperature change curve from baseline for 6 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, and 12 hours after antipyretic administration in children with a body temperature of ≥38.0 ℃ between single and combination groups.

RESULTS

The single antipyretic and combination groups comprised 152,017 and 54,842 cases, respectively. Acetaminophen was the most commonly used single agent (60,929/152,017, 40.08%), and acetaminophen plus dexibuprofen was the most common combination (28,065/54,842, 51.17%). We observed inappropriate use, including triple combination (1205/206,859, 0.58%) and use under 38 ℃ (11,361/206,859, 5.50%). Combination antipyretic use increased with temperature; 23.82% (33,379/140,160) of cases were given a combination treatment when 38 ℃ ≤ temperature < 39 ℃, while 41.40% (1517/3664) were given a combination treatment when 40 ℃ ≤ temperature. The absolute value of the area under the curve at each hour was significantly higher in the single group than in the combination group; this trend was consistently observed, regardless of the type of antipyretics. In particular, the delta fever during the first 6 hours between the two groups showed the highest difference. The combination showed the lowest delta fever among all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Antipyretics combination patterns were analyzed using large-scale data. Approximately 75% of febrile cases used single antipyretics, mostly acetaminophen, but combination usage became more frequent as temperature increased. However, combination antipyretics did not show definite advantages over single antipyretics in defervescence, regardless of the combination. Single antipyretics are effective in reducing fever and relieving discomfort in febrile children.

Evaluation of Evidence-Based Guidelines for Fever Management in Critically Ill Adult Patients With Brain Injury

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of evidence-based guidelines for fever management of critically ill adult patients with brain injury.

METHODS

We used a pretest-posttest design with 48 patients 19 years or older admitted to an intensive care unit after surgery for brain injury. We applied evidence-based guidelines only to an experimental group of 24 patients and compared with 24 control patients who did not receive evidence-based guidelines. Experimental and control groups were matched 1:1 using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score. Data included the proportion of patients with reduced fever and time to normalized temperature.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients whose temperature fell to normal after fever was 4.5 times higher in the experimental group than in the control group. The time it took the patients' highest fever to fall to normal during their intensive care unit stay was 4.84 times faster in the experimental group than in the control group (hazard ratio, 4.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.79-13.11; P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Evidence-based guidelines for fever management in patients with a brain injury can be used in nursing practice with rapid response, improving healthcare efficiency and contributing to better outcomes for critically ill patients.

Comparison of Antipyretic Efficacy of Intravenous (IV) Acetaminophen versus Oral (PO) Acetaminophen in the Management of Fever in Children

OBJECTIVE

To assess the dynamics of the onset of antipyretic efficacy of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen vs. oral (PO) acetaminophen in the management of fever in children.

METHODS

This observational single-dose study was conducted at Department of Pedriatrics, Army Hospital (Research and Referral), a multispecialty tertiary care center in New Delhi in fever patients to assess the antipyretic efficacy of IV acetaminophen 15 mg/kg/dose vs. PO acetaminophen 15 mg/kg/dose over 6 h. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either IV acetaminophen (n = 200) or PO acetaminophen (n = 200).

RESULTS

Demographics and baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups and were normally distributed. Allergic reaction was found in 7 (3.5%) patients in IV acetaminophen group and was absent in PO acetaminophen group. Onset of constipation and dry mouth was found in 8 patients (4%) in IV acetaminophen group and was absent in PO acetaminophen group. Additional dose was required in 6 patients (3%) in intravenous acetaminophen group and 10 patients (5%) in oral acetaminophen group respectively. Statistically significant differences in the rate of fall in temperature through 180 min were observed in favor of the IV acetaminophen group when compared to those receiving PO acetaminophen.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of intravenous acetaminophen is safe and effective in reducing fever where patients are unable to tolerate oral administration or when rapid reduction of temperature is desirable.

Normothermia after decompressive surgery for space-occupying middle cerebral artery infarction: a protocol-based approach

Background

Moderate hypothermia after decompressive surgery might not be beneficial for stroke patients. However, normothermia may prove to be an effective method of enhancing neurological outcomes. The study aims were to evaluate the application of a pre-specified normothermia protocol in stroke patients after decompressive surgery and its impact on temperature load, and to describe the functional outcome of patients at 12 months after treatment.

Methods

We analysed patients with space-occupying middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction treated with decompressive surgery and a pre-specified temperature management protocol. Patients treated primarily with device-controlled normothermia or hypothermia were excluded. The individual temperature load above 36.5 °C was calculated for the first 96 h after hemicraniectomy as the Area Under the Curve, using °C x hours. The effect of temperature load on functional outcome at 12 months was analysed by logistic regression.

Results

We included 40 stroke patients treated with decompressive surgery (mean [SD] age: 58.9 [10.1] years; mean [SD] time to surgery: 30.5 [16.7] hours). Fever (temperature > 37.5 °C) developed in 26 patients during the first 96 h after surgery and mean (SD) temperature load above 36.5 °C in this time period was 62,3 (+/− 47,6) °C*hours. At one year after stroke onset, a moderate to moderately severe disability (modified Rankin Scale score of 3 or 4) was observed in 32% of patients, and a severe disability (score of 5) in 37% of patients, respectively. The lethality in the cohort at 12 months was 32%. The temperature load during the first 96 h was not an independent predictor for 12 month lethality (OR 0.986 [95%-CI:0.967–1.002]; p < 0.12).

Conclusions

Temperature control in surgically treated patients with space-occupying MCA infarction using a pre-specified protocol excluding temperature management systems resulted in mild hyperthermia between 36.8 °C and 37.2 °C and a low overall temperature load. Future prospective studies on larger cohorts comparing different strategies for normothermia treatment including temperature management devices are needed.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12883-017-0988-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Should we treat pyrexia? And how do we do it?

The concept of pyrexia as a protective physiological response to aid in host defence has been challenged with the awareness of the severe metabolic stress induced by pyrexia. The host response to pyrexia varies, however, according to the disease profile and severity and, as such, the management of pyrexia should differ; for example, temperature control is safe and effective in septic shock but remains controversial in sepsis. From the reported findings discussed in this review, treating pyrexia appears to be beneficial in septic shock, out of hospital cardiac arrest and acute brain injury.Multiple therapeutic options are available for managing pyrexia, with precise targeted temperature management now possible. Notably, the use of pharmacotherapy versus surface cooling has not been shown to be advantageous. The importance of avoiding hypothermia in any treatment strategy is not to be understated.Whilst a great deal of progress has been made regarding optimal temperature management in recent years, further studies will be needed to determine which patients would benefit the most from control of pyrexia and by which means this should be implemented. This narrative review is part of a series on the pathophysiology and management of pyrexia.

Analgesia in Neurocritical Care: An International Survey and Practice Audit

OBJECTIVE

To characterize analgesic administration in neurocritical care.

DESIGN

ICU pharmacy database analgesic delivery audits from five countries. A 31-question analgesic agent survey was constructed, validated, and e-distributed in four countries.

SETTING

International multicenter neuro-ICU database audit and electronic survey.

PATIENTS

Six ICUs provided individual, anonymized analgesic delivery data in primary neurological diagnosis patients. Prescriber surveys were disseminated by neurocritical care societies.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Analgesic delivery data from 173 patients in French, Canadian, American, and Australian and New Zealand ICUs suggest that acetaminophen/paracetamol is the most common first-line analgesic (49.1% of patients); opiates are the "second line" in 31.5% of patients; however, 33% patients received no second agent. In the 2.3% with demyelinating disease, gabapentin was the most likely second analgesic (50.0%). Third-line analgesics were scarce across sites and neuropathologies. Few national or regional differences were found. The analgesic preference rankings noted by the 95 international physicians who completed the survey matched the audits. However, self-reported analgesic prescription rates were much higher than pharmacy records indicate, with self-reported prescribing of both acetaminophen/paracetamol and opiates in 97% of patients and gabapentin in 45% of patients. Third-line analgesic variability appeared to be driven by neuropathology; ibuprofen was preferred for traumatic brain injury, postcraniotomy, and thromboembolic stroke patients, whereas gabapentin/pregabalin were favored in subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage, spine, demyelinating disease, and epileptic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Opiates and acetaminophen are preferred analgesic agents, and gabapentin is a contextual third choice, in neurocritically ill patients. Other agents are rarely prescribed. The discordance in physician self-reports and objective audits suggest that pain management optimization studies are warranted.

Temperature Management in the Neurointensive Care Unit

OPINION STATEMENT

Fever in the neurocritical care unit has a high prevalence and is associated with worse outcomes in patients with severe neurologic illness. While it is well accepted that fever is associated with worse outcomes in this patient population, it is unclear if aggressive temperature management will improve outcomes. Temperature should be monitored routinely in this high-risk population, fever worked up appropriately to identify infectious etiology, and reasonable measures taken to control elevated temperature. While infection is a common source of fever in patients with significant neurologic illness, the fever may also be exacerbated by the underlying brain injury. The clinician must decide at which point to initiate fever control measures, how aggressively to manage the fever, and which temperature to target for normothermia. Several pharmacological agents are available as first-line therapy. Depending on the degree and severity of the febrile response, advanced temperature-control devices should be added to pharmacological measures. Several types of temperature-control devices are available, including invasive (intravascular catheters) and noninvasive (external cooling pads) technologies. The clinician should utilize both pharmacologic and device-based temperature therapies to minimize the amount of time spent in a febrile state and help to mitigate the secondary brain injury brought on by fever.

The Effect of Paracetamol on Core Body Temperature in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomised, Controlled Clinical Trial

Background

Strategies to prevent pyrexia in patients with acute neurological injury may reduce secondary neuronal damage. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of the routine administration of 6 grams/day of intravenous paracetamol in reducing body temperature following severe traumatic brain injury, compared to placebo.

Methods

A multicentre, randomised, blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in adult patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Patients were randomised to receive an intravenous infusion of either 1g of paracetamol or 0.9% sodium chloride (saline) every 4 hours for 72 hours. The primary outcome was the mean difference in core temperature during the study intervention period.

Results

Forty-one patients were included in this study: 21 were allocated to paracetamol and 20 to saline. The median (interquartile range) number of doses of study drug was 18 (17–18) in the paracetamol group and 18 (16–18) in the saline group (P = 0.85). From randomisation until 4 hours after the last dose of study treatment, there were 2798 temperature measurements (median 73 [67–76] per patient). The mean ± standard deviation temperature was 37.4±0.5°C in the paracetamol group and 37.7±0.4°C in the saline group (absolute difference -0.3°C; 95% confidence interval -0.6 to 0.0; P = 0.09). There were no significant differences in the use of physical cooling, or episodes of hypotension or hepatic abnormalities, between the two groups.

Conclusion

The routine administration of 6g/day of intravenous paracetamol did not significantly reduce core body temperature in patients with TBI.

Trial Registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12609000444280

A practical approach to the treatment of low-risk childhood fever

Fever is a common symptom of childhood infections that in itself does not require treatment. The UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) advises home-based antipyretic treatment for low-risk feverish children only if the child appears distressed. The recommended antipyretics are ibuprofen or paracetamol (acetaminophen). They are equally recommended for the distressed, feverish child; therefore, healthcare professionals, parents and caregivers need to decide which of these agents to administer if the child is distressed. This narrative literature review examines recent data on ibuprofen and paracetamol in feverish children to determine any clinically relevant differences between these agents. The data suggest that these agents have similar safety profiles in this setting and in the absence of underlying health issues, ibuprofen seems to be more effective than paracetamol at reducing NICE’s treatment criterion, ‘distress’ (as assessed by discomfort levels, symptom relief, and general behavior).

Randomized controlled study of the antipyretic efficacy of oral paracetamol, intravenous paracetamol, and intramuscular diclofenac in patients presenting with fever to the emergency department

Background

Fever is a common problem in adults visiting the emergency department. Extensive studies have been done in children comparing the efficacy of various antipyretics. However, studies on the efficacy of antipyretic drugs in adults are very scarce. To the best of our knowledge, no controlled trial has been carried out comparing the antipyretic efficacy of paracetamol (oral and intravenous) and intramuscular diclofenac in adults.

Methods

In this parallel-group, open-label trial, participants aged 14–75 years presenting with fever who had a temperature of more than 38.5°C were enrolled and treated. Participants were randomly allocated to receive treatment with 1,000 mg oral paracetamol (n = 145), 1,000 mg intravenous paracetamol (n = 139), or 75 mg intramuscular diclofenac (n = 150). The primary outcome was degree of reduction in mean oral temperature at 90 minutes. The efficacy of diclofenac versus oral and intravenous paracetamol was assessed by superiority comparison. Analysis was done using intention to treat principles.

Results

After 90 minutes, all three groups showed a significant reduction in mean temperature, with intramuscular diclofenac showing the greatest reduction (−1.44 ± 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] −1.4 to −2.5) and oral paracetamol the least (−1.08 ± 0.51, 95% CI −0.99 to −2.2). After 120 minutes, there was a significant difference observed in the mean change from baseline temperature between the three treatment groups (P < 0.0001). Significant changes in temperature were observed in favor of intramuscular diclofenac over oral and intravenous paracetamol at each time point from 60 minutes through 120 minutes inclusive.

Conclusion

Both intramuscular diclofenac and intravenous paracetamol showed superior antipyretic activity than oral paracetamol. However, in view of its ease of administration, intramuscular diclofenac can be used as a first-choice antipyretic in febrile adults in the emergency department.