; Participants in the International Multi-Disciplinary Consensus Conference on the Critical Care Management of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Triggers for aggressive interventions in subarachnoid hemorrhage

Neurovascular disease, diagnosis, and therapy: Subarachnoid hemorrhage and cerebral vasospasm

The worldwide incidence of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage is about 6.1 per 100,000 cases per year (Etminan et al., 2019). Eighty-five percent of cases are due to intracranial aneurysms. The mean age of those affected is 55 years, and two-thirds of the patients are female. The prognosis is related mainly to the neurologic condition after the subarachnoid hemorrhage and the age of the patient. Overall, 15% of patients die before reaching the hospital, another 20% die within 30 days, and overall 75% are dead or remain disabled. Case fatality has declined by 17% over the last 3 decades. Despite the improvement in outcome probably due to improved diagnosis, early aneurysm repair, administration of nimodipine, and advanced intensive care support, the outcome is not very good. Even among survivors, 75% have permanent cognitive deficits, mood disorders, fatigue, inability to return to work, and executive dysfunction and are often unable to return to their premorbid level of functioning. The key diagnostic test is computed tomography, and the treatments that are most strongly supported by scientific evidence are to undertake aneurysm repair in a timely fashion by endovascular coiling rather than neurosurgical clipping when feasible and to administer enteral nimodipine. The most common complications are aneurysm rebleeding, hydrocephalus, delayed cerebral ischemia, and medical complications (fever, anemia, and hyperglycemia). Management also probably is optimized by neurologic intensive care units and multidisciplinary teams.

Bedside cerebral microdialysis monitoring of delayed cerebral hypoperfusion in comatose patients with poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Delayed cerebral ischaemia (DCI) is frequent after poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Owing to the limited accuracy of clinical examination, DCI diagnosis is often based on multimodal monitoring. We examined the value of cerebral microdialysis (CMD) in this setting.

METHODS

20 comatose SAH participants underwent CMD monitoring-for hourly sampling of cerebral extracellular lactate/pyruvate ratio (LPR) and glucose-and brain perfusion CT (PCT). Patients were categorised as DCI when PCT (8±3 days after SAH) showed cerebral hypoperfusion, defined as cerebral blood flow <32.5 mL/100 g/min with a mean transit time >5.7 s. Clinicians were blinded to CMD data; for the purpose of the study, only patients who developed cerebral hypoperfusion in anterior and/or middle cerebral arteries were analysed.

RESULTS

DCI (n=9/20 patients) was associated with higher CMD LPR (51±36 vs 31±10 in patients without DCI, p=0.0007) and lower CMD glucose (0.64±0.34 vs 1.22±1.05, p=0.0005). In patients with DCI, CMD changes over the 18 hours preceding PCT diagnosis revealed a pattern of CMD LPR increase (coefficient +2.96 (95% CI 0.13 to 5.79), p=0.04) with simultaneous CMD glucose decrease (coefficient -0.06 (95% CI -0.08 to -0.01), p=0.03, mixed-effects multilevel regression model). No significant CMD changes were noted in patients without DCI.

CONCLUSIONS

In comatose patients with SAH, delayed cerebral hypoperfusion correlates with a CMD pattern of lactate increase and simultaneous glucose decrease. CMD abnormalities became apparent in the hours preceding PCT, thereby suggesting that CMD monitoring may anticipate targeted therapeutic interventions.

The critical care management of poor-grade subarachnoid haemorrhage

Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage is a neurological syndrome with complex systemic complications. The rupture of an intracranial aneurysm leads to the acute extravasation of arterial blood under high pressure into the subarachnoid space and often into the brain parenchyma and ventricles. The haemorrhage triggers a cascade of complex events, which ultimately can result in early brain injury, delayed cerebral ischaemia, and systemic complications. Although patients with poor-grade subarachnoid haemorrhage (World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies 4 and 5) are at higher risk of early brain injury, delayed cerebral ischaemia, and systemic complications, the early and aggressive treatment of this patient population has decreased overall mortality from more than 50% to 35% in the last four decades. These management strategies include (1) transfer to a high-volume centre, (2) neurological and systemic support in a dedicated neurological intensive care unit, (3) early aneurysm repair, (4) use of multimodal neuromonitoring, (5) control of intracranial pressure and the optimisation of cerebral oxygen delivery, (6) prevention and treatment of medical complications, and (7) prevention, monitoring, and aggressive treatment of delayed cerebral ischaemia. The aim of this article is to provide a summary of critical care management strategies applied to the subarachnoid haemorrhage population, especially for patients in poor neurological condition, on the basis of the modern concepts of early brain injury and delayed cerebral ischaemia.

The role of the microcirculation in delayed cerebral ischemia and chronic degenerative changes after subarachnoid hemorrhage

The mortality after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is 50%, and most survivors suffer severe functional and cognitive deficits. Half of SAH patients deteriorate 5 to 14 days after the initial bleeding, so-called delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Although often attributed to vasospasms, DCI may develop in the absence of angiographic vasospasms, and therapeutic reversal of angiographic vasospasms fails to improve patient outcome. The etiology of chronic neurodegenerative changes after SAH remains poorly understood. Brain oxygenation depends on both cerebral blood flow (CBF) and its microscopic distribution, the so-called capillary transit time heterogeneity (CTH). In theory, increased CTH can therefore lead to tissue hypoxia in the absence of severe CBF reductions, whereas reductions in CBF, paradoxically, improve brain oxygenation if CTH is critically elevated. We review potential sources of elevated CTH after SAH. Pericyte constrictions in relation to the initial ischemic episode and subsequent oxidative stress, nitric oxide depletion during the pericapillary clearance of oxyhemoglobin, vasogenic edema, leukocytosis, and astrocytic endfeet swelling are identified as potential sources of elevated CTH, and hence of metabolic derangement, after SAH. Irreversible changes in capillary morphology and function are predicted to contribute to long-term relative tissue hypoxia, inflammation, and neurodegeneration. We discuss diagnostic and therapeutic implications of these predictions.

Management of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this article is to describe the modern management of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). SAH causes an inflammatory reaction to blood products in the basal cisterns of the brain, which may produce cerebral ischemia and strokes through progressive narrowing of the cerebral artery lumen. This process, known as cerebral vasospasm, is the most common cause of DCI after SAH. Untreated DCI may result in strokes, which account for a significant portion of the death and long-term disability after SAH.

RECENT FINDINGS

A number of publications, including two recent consensus statements, have clarified many best practices for defining, diagnosing, monitoring, preventing, and treating DCI. DCI is best defined as new onset of focal or global neurologic deficits or strokes not attributable to another cause. In addition to the clinical examination, radiographic studies such as transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography, and CT perfusion may have a role in determining which patients are at high risk for developing DCI. The mainstay of prevention and treatment of DCI is maintenance of euvolemia, which can be a difficult therapeutic target to measure. Hemodynamic augmentation with induced hypertension with or without inotropic support has become the first-line treatment of DCI. The ideal method of measuring hemodynamic values and volume status in patients with DCI remains elusive. In patients who do not adequately respond to or cannot tolerate hemodynamic augmentation, endovascular therapy (intraarterial vasodilators and balloon angioplasty) is a complementary strategy. Optimal triggers for escalation and de-escalation of therapies for DCI have not been well defined.

SUMMARY

Recent guidelines and consensus statements have clarified many aspects of prevention, monitoring, and treatment of DCI after SAH. Controversies continue regarding the optimal methods for measurement of volume status, the role of invasive neuromonitoring, and the targets for hemodynamic augmentation therapy.