Aneurysm treatment <24 versus 24-72 h after subarachnoid hemorrhage

Temporal trends and practice variation in early repair of the ruptured aneurysm among patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in the United States, 2012-2019

BACKGROUND

Early repair of the ruptured cerebral aneurysm (RRCA), preferably within 24 h of onset, is endorsed by clinical guideline as the preferred management strategy for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, a comprehensive picture of this guideline-recommended usage in contemporary clinical practice is not available.

AIMS

This study aimed to characterize trends over time and practice variation in the implementation of an early RRCA strategy among patients with aSAH in a large, national representative data.

METHODS

Using data from the 2012-2019 National Inpatient Sample, we measured trends in the proportion of early RRCA, defined as within day 1 of admission, overall, and by demographic and geographical subgroups. In addition, we created multilevel regression models to quantify hospital-level variation in the early RRCA rates.

RESULTS

We identified 82,615 aSAH hospitalizations (mean age = 56.1 years; 68.9% women) undergoing RRCA and, among these, 84.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 83.4-84.7%) receiving early RRCA. The proportion of early RRCA increased steadily from 82.5% in 2012 to 85.8% in 2019 (p for trend <0.001). The proportion of patients receiving early RRCA across geographic regions ranged from 78.7% to 87.9%, with a median (interquartile range (IQR)) of 84.2% (83.0-86.1%). In contrast, the delivery of early RRCA varied widely among hospitals, with a median (IQR) rate of 86.1% (75.0-100.0%) and a range from 0% to 100.0%. The median odds ratio for the early use of RRCA treatment was 1.24 (95% CI = 1.21-1.27) in 2019, indicating 24% increased odds of implementing early RRCA if moving from a lower-use to a higher-use hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients in the United States with aSAH received early RRCA treatment and exhibited an upward trend over the recent 8-year period. However, substantial variation in access to early RRCA was observed across population subgroups, particularly at the hospital level. Future efforts are necessary to identify further sources of this variation and to develop initiatives that could represent an opportunity to optimize guideline-based quality of care in aSAH management.

DATA ACCESS STATEMENT

The data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request following completion of onboarding and verification procedures as specified by the HCUP.

Emergent Management of Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

Spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) carries high morbidity and mortality rates, and the emergent management of this disease can make a large impact on patient outcome. The purpose of this article is to provide a pragmatic overview of the emergent management of SAH.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Recent trials have influenced practice around the use of antifibrinolytics, the timing of aneurysm securement, the recognition of cerebral edema and focus on avoiding a lower limit of perfusion, and the detection and prevention of delayed cerebral ischemia. Much of the acute management of SAH can be protocolized, as demonstrated by two updated guidelines published by the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association and the Neurocritical Care Society in 2023. However, the gaps in evidence lead to clinical equipoise in some aspects of critical care management.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

In acute management, there is an urgency to differentiate the etiology of SAH and take key emergent actions including blood pressure management and coagulopathy reversal. The critical care management of SAH is similar to that of other acute brain injuries, with the addition of detecting and treating delayed cerebral ischemia. Strategies for the detection and treatment of delayed cerebral ischemia are limited by disordered consciousness and may be augmented by monitoring and imaging technology.

Contemporary management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. An update for the intensivist

Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) is a rare yet profoundly debilitating condition associated with high global case fatality and morbidity rates. The key determinants of functional outcome include early brain injury, rebleeding of the ruptured aneurysm and delayed cerebral ischaemia. The only effective way to reduce the risk of rebleeding is to secure the ruptured aneurysm quickly. Prompt diagnosis, transfer to specialized centers, and meticulous management in the intensive care unit (ICU) significantly improved the prognosis of aSAH. Recently, multimodality monitoring with specific interventions to correct pathophysiological imbalances has been proposed. Vigilance extends beyond intracranial concerns to encompass systemic respiratory and haemodynamic monitoring, as derangements in these systems can precipitate secondary brain damage. Challenges persist in treating aSAH patients, exacerbated by a paucity of robust clinical evidence, with many interventions showing no benefit when tested in rigorous clinical trials. Given the growing body of literature in this field and the issuance of contemporary guidelines, our objective is to furnish an updated review of essential principles of ICU management for this patient population. Our review will discuss the epidemiology, initial stabilization, treatment strategies, long-term prognostic factors, the identification and management of post-aSAH complications. We aim to offer practical clinical guidance to intensivists, grounded in current evidence and expert clinical experience, while adhering to a concise format.

Pre-treatment re-bleeding following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review of published prediction models with risk of bias and clinical applicability assessment

BACKGROUND

Pre-treatment rebleeding following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) increases the risk of death and a poor neurological outcome. Current guidelines recommend aneurysm treatment "as early as feasible after presentation, preferably within 24 h of onset" to mitigate this risk, a practice termed ultra-early treatment. However, ongoing debate regarding whether ultra-early treatment is independently associated with reduced re-bleeding risk, together with the recognition that re-bleeding occurs even in centres practicing ultra-early treatment due to the presence of other risk-factors has resulted in a renewed need for patient-specific re-bleed risk prediction. Here, we systematically review models which seek to provide patient specific predictions of pre-treatment rebleeding risk.

METHODS

Following registration on the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) CRD 42023421235; Ovid Medline (Pubmed), Embase and Googlescholar were searched for English language studies between 1st May 2002 and 1st June 2023 describing pre-treatment rebleed prediction models following aSAH in adults ≥18 years. Of 763 unique records, 17 full texts were scrutinised with 5 publications describing 4 models reviewed. We used the semi-automated template of Fernandez-Felix et al. incorporating the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS) checklist and the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST) for data extraction, risk of bias and clinical applicability assessment. To further standardize risk of bias and clinical applicability assessment, we also used the published explanatory notes for the PROBAST tool and compared the aneurysm treatment practices each prediction model's formulation cohort experienced to a prespecified benchmark representative of contemporary aneurysm treatment practices as outlined in recent evidence-based guidelines and published practice pattern reports from four developed countries.

RESULTS

Reported model discriminative performance varied between 0.77 and 0.939, however, no single model demonstrated a consistently low risk of bias and low concern for clinical applicability in all domains. Only the score of Darkwah Oppong et al. was formulated using a patient cohort in which the majority of patients were managed in accordance with contemporary, evidence-based aneurysm treatment practices defined by ultra-early and predominantly endovascular treatment. However, this model did not undergo calibration or clinical utility analysis and when applied to an external cohort, its discriminative performance was substantially lower that reported at formulation.

CONCLUSIONS

No existing prediction model can be recommended for clinical use in centers practicing contemporary, evidence-based aneurysm treatment. There is a pressing need for improved prediction models to estimate and minimize pre-treatment re-bleeding risk.

Aneurysm treatment within 6 h versus 6-24 h after rupture in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

The risk of rebleeding after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is the highest during the initial hours after rupture. Emergency aneurysm treatment may decrease this risk, but is a logistic challenge and economic burden. We aimed to investigate whether aneurysm treatment <6 h after rupture is associated with a decreased risk of poor functional outcome compared to aneurysm treatment 6-24 h after rupture.

METHODS

We used data of patients included in the ULTRA trial (NCT02684812). All patients in ULTRA were admitted within 24 h after aneurysm rupture. For the current study, we excluded patients in whom the aneurysm was not treated <24 h after rupture. We calculated crude and adjusted risk ratios (aRR) with 95% confidence intervals using Poisson regression analyses for poor functional outcome (death or dependency, assessed by the modified Rankin Scale) after aneurysm treatment <6 h versus 6-24 h after rupture. Adjustments were made for age, sex, clinical condition on admission (WFNS scale), amount of extravasated blood (Fisher score), aneurysm location, tranexamic acid treatment, and aneurysm treatment modality.

RESULTS

We included 497 patients. Poor outcome occurred in 63/110 (57%) patients treated within 6 h compared to 145/387 (37%) patients treated 6-24 h after rupture (crude RR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.24-1.88; adjusted RR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.11-1.66).

CONCLUSION

Aneurysm treatment <6 h is not associated with better functional outcome than aneurysm treatment 6-24 h after rupture. Our results do not support a strategy aiming to treat every patient with a ruptured aneurysm <6 h after rupture.

Emergency Medical Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a medical emergency that necessitates direct transfer to a tertiary referral center specialized in the diagnosis and treatment of this condition. The initial hours after aneurysmal rupture are critical for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, both in terms of rebleeding and combating the effect of early brain injury. No good treatment options are available to reduce the risk of rebleeding before aneurysm occlusion. Lowering the blood pressure may reduce the risk of rebleeding but carries a risk of inducing delayed cerebral ischemia or aggravating the consequences of early brain injury. Early brain injury after aneurysmal rupture has an important effect on final clinical outcome. Proper cerebral perfusion is pivotal in these initial hours after aneurysmal rupture but threatened by complications such as neurogenic pulmonary edema and cardiac stunning, or by acute hydrocephalus, which may necessitate early drainage of cerebrospinal fluid.

Appropriate treatment within 13 hours after onset may improve outcome in patients with high-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study evaluated whether earlier timing of appropriate treatment of high-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), defined as management of ruptured intracranial aneurysm (RIA) combined with required additional surgical measures for control of increased intracranial pressure (ICP), is associated with more favorable outcomes.

METHODS

The study cohort comprised 253 patients with high-grade aSAH. Modified Rankin Scale score of 0-3 at 3-month follow-up after the ictus was considered as favorable outcome.

RESULTS

Appropriate treatment of aSAH was completed in 205 patients (81 %), and included clipping or coiling of RIA without (64 cases) and with (141 cases) additional surgical measures for control of increased ICP (evacuation of intracranial hematoma, decompressive craniotomy, and/or cerebrospinal fluid drainage). Favorable outcome was noted significantly more often if appropriate treatment was completed within 13 h after aSAH than between 13 and 72 h (37 % vs. 17 %; adjusted P = 0.0475), which was confirmed by evaluation in the multivariate model along with other prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis revealed that completion of the appropriate treatment within 13 h was associated with more favorable outcome in those patients, who underwent management of RIA in combination with additional surgical measures for control of increased ICP (P = 0.0023), and in those, who felt into poor outcome predicting group (P = 0.0046).

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate treatment of high-grade aSAH with management of RIA in combination with required additional surgical measures for control of increased ICP, may be associated with more favorable outcomes if completed within 13 h after the ictus.

2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

AIM

The "2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage" replaces the 2012 "Guidelines for the Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage." The 2023 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

METHODS

A comprehensive search for literature published since the 2012 guideline, derived from research principally involving human subjects, published in English, and indexed in MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline, was conducted between March 2022 and June 2022. In addition, the guideline writing group reviewed documents on related subject matter previously published by the American Heart Association. Newer studies published between July 2022 and November 2022 that affected recommendation content, Class of Recommendation, or Level of Evidence were included if appropriate. Structure: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a significant global public health threat and a severely morbid and often deadly condition. The 2023 aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage guideline provides recommendations based on current evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to preventing, diagnosing, and managing patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' and their families' and caregivers' interests. Many recommendations from the previous aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

Propensity-adjusted analysis of ultra-early aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage treatment and patient outcomes

BACKGROUND

Optimal definitive treatment timing for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) remains controversial. We compared outcomes for aSAH patients with ultra-early treatment versus later treatment at a single large center.

METHOD

Patients who received definitive open surgical or endovascular treatment for aSAH between January 1, 2014, and July 31, 2019, were included. Ultra-early treatment was defined as occurring within 24 h from aneurysm rupture. The primary outcome was poor neurologic outcome (modified Rankin Scale score > 2). Propensity adjustment was performed for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Hunt and Hess grade, Fisher grade, aneurysm treatment type, aneurysm type, size, and anterior location.

RESULTS

Of the 1013 patients (mean [SD] age, 56 [14] years; 702 [69%] women, 311 [31%] men) included, 94 (9%) had ultra-early treatment. Compared with the non-ultra-early cohort, the ultra-early treatment cohort had a significantly lower percentage of saccular aneurysms (53 of 94 [56%] vs 746 of 919 [81%], P <0 .001), greater frequency of open surgical treatment (72 of 94 [77%] vs 523 of 919 [57%], P <0 .001), and greater percentage of men (38 of 94 [40%] vs 273 of 919 [30%], P = .04). After adjustment, ultra-early treatment was not associated with neurologic outcome in those with at least 180-day follow-up (OR = 0.86), the occurrence of delayed cerebral ischemia (OR = 0.87), or length of stay (exp(β), 0.13) (P ≥ 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large, single-center cohort of aSAH patients, ultra-early treatment was not associated with better neurologic outcome, fewer cases of delayed cerebral ischemia, or shorter length of stay.

Development and Internal Validation of the ARISE Prediction Models for Rebleeding After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Aneurysmal rerupture is one of the most important determents for outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and still occurs frequently because individual risk assessment is challenging given the heterogeneity in patient characteristics and aneurysm morphology.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and internally validate a practical prediction model to estimate the risk of aneurysmal rerupture before aneurysm closure.

METHODS

We designed a multinational cohort study of 2 prospective hospital registries and 3 retrospective observational studies to predict the risk of computed tomography confirmed rebleeding within 24 and 72 hours after ictus. We assessed predictors with Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.

RESULTS

Rerupture occurred in 269 of 2075 patients. The cumulative incidence equaled 7% and 11% at 24 and 72 hours, respectively. Our base model included hypertension, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies scale, Fisher grade, aneurysm size, and cerebrospinal fluid drainage before aneurysm closure and showed good discrimination with an optimism corrected c-statistic of 0.77. When we extend the base model with aneurysm irregularity, the optimism-corrected c-statistic increased to 0.79.

CONCLUSION

Our prediction models reliably estimate the risk of aneurysm rerupture after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage using predictor variables available upon hospital admission. An online prognostic calculator is accessible at https://www.evidencio.com/models/show/2626 .

Early predictors of functional outcome in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) often receive delayed or no aneurysm treatment, although recent studies suggest that functional outcome following early aneurysm treatment has improved. We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze early predictors of functional outcome in poor-grade aSAH patients.  METHODS: We included studies investigating the association of early predictors and functional outcome in adult patients with confirmed poor-grade aSAH, defined as World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) grade or Hunt and Hess (H-H) grade IV-V. Studies had to use multivariable regression analysis to estimate independent predictor effects of favorable functional outcome measured with the Glasgow Outcome Scale or modified Rankin Scale. We calculated pooled adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with random effects models.  RESULTS: We included 27 studies with 3287 patients. The likelihood of favorable outcome increased with WFNS grade or H-H grade IV versus V (aOR 2.9, 95% CI 1.9-4.3), presence of clinical improvement before aneurysm treatment (aOR 3.3, 95% CI 2.0-5.3), and intact pupillary light reflex (aOR 2.9, 95% CI 1.6-5.1), and decreased with older age (aOR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-1.0, per decade), increasing modified Fisher grade (aOR 0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.5, per grade), and presence of intracerebral hematoma on admission imaging (aOR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

We present a summary of early predictors of functional outcome in poor-grade aSAH patients that can help to discriminate between patients with favorable and with unfavorable prognosis and may aid in selecting patients for early aneurysm treatment.

Updates on aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: is there anything really new?

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a severe disease, with systemic involvement and complex diagnosis and treatment. Since the current guidelines were published by the AHA/ASA, Neurocritical Care Society and the European Stroke Organization in 2012-2013,there has been an evolution in the comprehension of SAH-associated brain injury and its multiple underlying mechanisms. As a result, several clinical and translational trials were developed or are underway. Objective: The aim of this article is to review some updates in the diagnosis and treatment of neurological complications of SAH. Methods: A review of PubMed (May, 2010 to February, 2022) was performed. Data was summarized. Results: Content of five meta-analyses, nine review articles and 23 new clinical trials, including pilots, were summarized. Conclusions:Advances in the comprehension of pathophysiology and improvements in critical care have been reflected in the reduction of mortality in SAH. However, despite the number of publications, the only treatments shown to be effective in adequate, well-controlled clinical trials are nimodipine and repair of the ruptured aneurysm. Thus, doubts about the optimal management of SAH still persist.

Association of Onset-to-Treatment Time With Discharge Destination, Mortality, and Complications Among Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

IMPORTANCE

Rapid access to specialized care is recommended to improve outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), but understanding of the optimal onset-to-treatment time for aneurysmal SAH is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the optimal onset-to-treatment time for aneurysmal SAH that maximized patient outcomes after surgery.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study assessed 575 retrospectively identified cases of first-ever aneurysmal SAH occurring within the referral networks of 2 major tertiary Australian hospitals from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2016. Individual factors, prehospital factors, and hospital factors were extracted from the digital medical records of eligible cases. Data analysis was performed from March 1, 2020, to August 31, 2021.

EXPOSURES

Main exposure was onset-to-treatment time (time between symptom onset and aneurysm surgical treatment in hours) derived from medical records.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Clinical characteristics, complications, and discharge destination were extracted from medical records and 12-month survival obtained from data linkage. The associations of onset-to-treatment time (in hours) with (1) discharge destination of survivors (home vs rehabilitation), (2) 12-month survival, and (3) neurologic complications (rebleed, delayed cerebral ischemia, meningitis, seizure, hydrocephalus, and delayed cerebral injury) were investigated using natural cubic splines in multivariable Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Of the 575 patients with aneurysmal SAH, 482 patients (mean [SD] age, 55.0 [14.5] years; 337 [69.9%] female) who received endovascular coiling or neurosurgical clipping were studied. A nonlinear association of treatment delay was found with the odds of being discharged home vs rehabilitation (effective df = 3.83 in the generalized additive model, χ2 test P = .002 for the 4-df cubic spline), with a similar nonlinear association remaining significant after adjustment for sex, treatment modality, severity, Charlson Comorbidity Index, history of hypertension, and hospital transfer (likelihood ratio test: df = 3, deviance = 9.57, χ2 test P = .02). Both unadjusted and adjusted cox regression models showed a nonlinear association between time to treatment and 12-month mortality with the lowest hazard of death with receipt of treatment at 12.5 hours after symptom onset, although the nonlinear term became nonsignificant upon adjustment. The odds of being discharged home were higher with treatment before 20 hours after onset, with the probability of being discharged home compared with rehabilitation or other hospital increased by approximately 10% when treatment was received within the first 12.5 hours after symptom onset and increased by an additional 5% from 12.5 to 20 hours. Time to treatment was not associated with any complications.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cohort study found evidence that more favorable outcomes (discharge home and survival at 12 months) were achieved when surgical treatment occurred at approximately 12.5 hours. These findings provide more clarity around optimal timelines of treatment with people with aneurysmal SAH; however, additional studies are needed to confirm the findings.

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) remains an important cause of mortality and long-term morbidity. This article uses a case-based approach to guide readers through the fundamental epidemiology and pathogenesis of SAH, the approach to diagnosis and management, the results of clinical trials and evidence to date, prognostic considerations, controversies, recent developments, and future directions in SAH.

RECENT FINDINGS

Historically, management of SAH focused on prevention and treatment of subsequent cerebral vasospasm, which was thought to be the primary cause of delayed cerebral ischemia. Clinical and translational studies over the past decade, including several therapeutic phase 3 randomized clinical trials, suggest that the pathophysiology of SAH-associated brain injury is multiphasic and multifactorial beyond large vessel cerebral vasospasm. The quest to reduce SAH-associated brain injury and improve outcomes is shifting away from large vessel cerebral vasospasm to a new paradigm targeting multiple brain injury mechanisms, including early brain injury, delayed cerebral ischemia, microcirculatory dysfunction, spreading cortical depolarization, inflammation, and the brain-body interaction in vascular brain injury with critical illness.Despite multiple negative randomized clinical trials in search of potential therapeutic agents ameliorating the downstream effects after SAH, the overall outcome of SAH has improved over recent decades, likely related to improvements in interventional options for ruptured cerebral aneurysms and in critical care management. Emerging clinical evidence also suggests potential harmful impact of historic empiric treatments for SAH-associated vasospasm, such as prophylactic induction of hypertension, hypervolemia, and hemodilution (triple H therapy).With decreasing mortality, long-term SAH survivorship and efforts to reduce chronic morbidity and to improve quality of life and patient-centered outcome are growing areas of unmet need. Despite existing guidelines, significant variabilities in local and regional practices and in scientific terminologies have historically limited advancement in SAH care and therapeutic development. Large global collaborative efforts developed harmonized SAH common data elements in 2019, and studies are under way to examine how existing variabilities in SAH care impact long-term SAH outcomes.

SUMMARY

Although the overall incidence and mortality of SAH is decreasing with advances in preventive and acute care, SAH remains a major cause of long-term morbidity in survivors. Significant variabilities in care settings and empiric treatment protocols and inconsistent scientific terminologies have limited advancement in patient care and therapeutic clinical studies. Large consensus efforts are under way to introduce clinical guidelines and common data elements to advance therapeutic approaches and improve patient outcome.

Time and predictors of time to treatment for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH): a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) is a serious form of stroke, for which rapid access to specialist neurocritical care is associated with better outcomes. Delays in the treatment of aSAH appear to be common and may contribute to poor outcomes. We have a limited understanding of the extent and causes of these delays, which hinders the development of interventions to reduce delays and improve outcomes. The aim of this systematic review was to quantify and identify factors associated with time to treatment in aSAH.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (Reg. No. CRD42019132748). We searched four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Google Scholar) for manuscripts published from January 1998 using pre-designated search terms and search strategy. Main outcomes were duration of delays of time intervals from onset of aSAH to definitive treatment and/or factors related to time to treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 64 studies with 16 different time intervals in the pathway of aSAH patients were identified. Measures of time to treatment varied between studies (e.g. cut-off timepoints or absolute mean/median duration). Factors associated with time to treatment fell into two categories-individual (n = 9 factors, e.g. age, sex and clinical characteristics) and health system (n = 8 factors, e.g. pre-hospital delay or presentation out-of-hours). Demographic factors were not associated with time to treatment. More severe aSAH reduced treatment delay in most studies. Pre-hospital delays (patients delay, late referral, late arrival of ambulance, being transferred between hospitals or arriving at the hospital outside of office hours) were associated with treatment delay. In-hospital factors (patients with complications, procedure before definitive treatment, slow work-up and type of treatment) were less associated with treatment delay.

CONCLUSIONS

The pathway from onset to definitive treatment of patients with aSAH consists of multiple stages with multiple influencing factors. This review provides the first comprehensive understanding of extent and factors associated with time to treatment of aSAH. There is an opportunity to target modifiable factors to reduce time to treatment, but further research considering more factors are needed.

Timing of treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: are the goals set in international guidelines achievable?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

International guidelines emphasise the importance of securing ruptured cerebral aneurysms within 48-72 h of ictus. We assessed the timing of treatment of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) referred to a national neurosurgical centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analysis of a prospective database of patients with aSAH admitted between 1st of February 2016 and 29th of February 2020 was performed. The timing to treatment was expressed in days and analysed in three ways: ictus to treatment, ictus to referral and referral to treatment. ORs with 95% CI were calculated for aneurysm treatment within 24, 48 and 72 h for good grade (WFSN 1-3) and poor grade (WFNS 4-5) cohorts separately.

RESULTS

Of a total of 538 patients with aSAH, the aneurysm was secured in 312 (58%) within 24 h and in 398 (74%) within 48 h of ictus. Securing the aneurysm within 48 h of ictus was achieved in 89% (395/444) of patients who were referred within 24 h of ictus, but in only 3.2% (3/94) who were referred > 24 h after ictus. Poor grade patients (WFNS 4-5) were more likely than good grade patients (WFNS 1-3) to be referred to neurosurgery within 48 h of ictus (OR 22.87, 95% CI 3.14-166.49, p = 0.0020) and for their aneurysm to be secured within 48 h (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.06-2.98, p = 0.0297) of ictus. Ictus to referral delay was highest in WFNS grade 1 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In centres with 7 day per week provision of interventional neuroradiology and vascular neurosurgery, the majority of patients with aSAH can be treated within the timeframes recommended by international guidelines and this applies to all grades of aSAH. However, delays still occur in a significant proportion of patients and this particularly applies to delays in presentation and diagnosis in good grade patients.

International Practice Variability in Treatment of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Prior research suggests substantial between-center differences in functional outcome following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). One hypothesis is that these differences are due to practice variability. To characterize practice variability, we sent a survey to 230 centers, of which 145 (63%) responded. Survey respondents indicated that an estimated 65% of ruptured aneurysms were treated endovascularly. Sixty-five percent of aneurysms were treated within 24 h of symptom onset, 18% within 24–48 h, and eight percent within 48–72 h. Centers in the United States (US) and Europe (EU) treat aneurysms more often endovascularly (72% and 70% vs. 51%, respectively, US vs. other p < 0.001, and EU vs. other p < 0.01) and more often within 24 h (77% and 64% vs. 46%, respectively, US vs. other p < 0.001, EU vs. other p < 0.01) compared to other centers. Most centers aim for euvolemia (96%) by administrating intravenous fluids to 0 (53%) or +500 mL/day (41%) net fluid balance. Induced hypertension is more often used in US centers (100%) than in EU (87%, p < 0.05) and other centers (81%, p < 0.05), and endovascular therapies for cerebral vasospasm are used more often in US centers than in other centers (91% and 60%, respectively, p < 0.05). We observed significant practice variability in aSAH treatment worldwide. Future comparative effectiveness research studies are needed to investigate how practice variation leads to differences in functional outcome.

Neurovascular disease, diagnosis, and therapy: Subarachnoid hemorrhage and cerebral vasospasm

The worldwide incidence of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage is about 6.1 per 100,000 cases per year (Etminan et al., 2019). Eighty-five percent of cases are due to intracranial aneurysms. The mean age of those affected is 55 years, and two-thirds of the patients are female. The prognosis is related mainly to the neurologic condition after the subarachnoid hemorrhage and the age of the patient. Overall, 15% of patients die before reaching the hospital, another 20% die within 30 days, and overall 75% are dead or remain disabled. Case fatality has declined by 17% over the last 3 decades. Despite the improvement in outcome probably due to improved diagnosis, early aneurysm repair, administration of nimodipine, and advanced intensive care support, the outcome is not very good. Even among survivors, 75% have permanent cognitive deficits, mood disorders, fatigue, inability to return to work, and executive dysfunction and are often unable to return to their premorbid level of functioning. The key diagnostic test is computed tomography, and the treatments that are most strongly supported by scientific evidence are to undertake aneurysm repair in a timely fashion by endovascular coiling rather than neurosurgical clipping when feasible and to administer enteral nimodipine. The most common complications are aneurysm rebleeding, hydrocephalus, delayed cerebral ischemia, and medical complications (fever, anemia, and hyperglycemia). Management also probably is optimized by neurologic intensive care units and multidisciplinary teams.

Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: the Last Decade

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) affects six to nine people per 100,000 per year, has a 35% mortality, and leaves many with lasting disabilities, often related to cognitive dysfunction. Clinical decision rules and more sensitive computed tomography (CT) have made the diagnosis of SAH easier, but physicians must maintain a high index of suspicion. The management of these patients is based on a limited number of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Early repair of the ruptured aneurysm by endovascular coiling or neurosurgical clipping is essential, and coiling is superior to clipping in cases amenable to both treatments. Aneurysm repair prevents rebleeding, leaving the most important prognostic factors for outcome early brain injury from the hemorrhage, which is reflected in the neurologic condition of the patient, and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Observational studies suggest outcomes are better when patients are managed in specialized neurologic intensive care units with inter- or multidisciplinary clinical groups. Medical management aims to minimize early brain injury, cerebral edema, hydrocephalus, increased intracranial pressure (ICP), and medical complications. Management then focuses on preventing, detecting, and treating DCI. Nimodipine is the only pharmacologic treatment that is approved for SAH in most countries, as no other intervention has demonstrated efficacy. In fact, much of SAH management is derived from studies in other patient populations. Therefore, further study of complications, including DCI and other medical complications, is needed to optimize outcomes for this fragile patient population.

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: current concepts and updates

ABSTRACT Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a condition with a considerable incidence variation worldwide. In Brazil, the exact epidemiology of aneurysmal SAH is unknown. The most common presenting symptom is headache, usually described as the worst headache ever felt. Head computed tomography, when performed within six hours of the ictus, has a sensitivity of nearly 100%. It is important to classify the hemorrhage based on clinical and imaging features as a way to standardize communication. Classification also has prognostic value. In order to prevent rebleeding, there still is controversy regarding the ideal blood pressure levels and the use of antifibrinolytic therapy. The importance of definitely securing the aneurysm by endovascular coiling or surgical clipping cannot be overemphasized. Hydrocephalus, seizures, and intracranial pressure should also be managed. Delayed cerebral ischemia is a severe complication that should be prevented and treated aggressively. Systemic complications including cardiac and pulmonary issues, sodium abnormalities, fever, and thromboembolism frequently happen and may have na impact upon prognosis, requiring proper management.

Preventable poor outcome from rebleeding by emergency aneurysm occlusion in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

Introduction

The risk of rebleeding is highest during the initial hours after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH), but the aneurysm is not occluded in all patients immediately after admission.Our aim was to determine the proportion of aSAH patients with poor outcome from early in-hospital rebleeding that can be prevented by three emergency aneurysm occlusion regimes.

Patients and methods

From our prospectively collected database, we retrieved from all aSAH patients admitted between July 2007 and July 2017 data on clinical condition on admission, time of rebleeding, and outcome at 3 months.

Results

Of 1391 consecutive aSAH patients, 923 were in good clinical condition and had an aneurysm on initial imaging that was amenable for treatment. Poor outcome from rebleeding could have been avoided by treatment <4 h during day time shifts in 4 (0.4% [95% CI: 0.2-1.1]) patients (number needed to treat [NNT]: 250), by treatment and <1 h during daytime shift in 9 (1.0% [95% CI: 0.5-1.8]; NNT: 111), and treatment <1 h at 24/7 basis in 16 (1.7% [95% CI: 1.1-2.8%]; NNT: 59).

Discussion

Emergency aneurysm occlusion can reduce poor outcome due to rebleeding, but only in small proportions of patients. Whether such strategies lead to improved outcome for all patients and are cost-effective is highly uncertain.

Conclusion

We do not recommend instalment of a treatment regimen where occlusion of ruptured aneurysm is performed within 1 h on a 24/7 basis.

Aneurysm characteristics and risk of rebleeding after subarachnoid haemorrhage

Introduction

Knowledge of risk factors for rebleeding after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage can help tailoring ultra-early aneurysm treatment. Previous studies have identified aneurysm size and various patient-related risk factors for early (≤24 h) rebleeding, but it remains unknown if aneurysm configuration is also a risk factor. We investigated whether irregular shape, aspect- and bottleneck ratio of the aneurysm are independent risk factors for early rebleeding after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Patients and methods

From a prospectively collected institutional database, we investigated data from consecutive aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage patients who were admitted ≤24 h after onset between December 2009 and January 2015. The admission computed tomographic angiogram was used to assess aneurysm size and configuration. With Cox regression, we calculated stepwise-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for irregular shape, aspect ratio ≥1.6 mm and bottleneck ratio ≥1.6 mm.

Results

Of 409 included patients, 34 (8%) patients had in-hospital rebleeding ≤24 h after ictus. Irregular shape was an independent risk factor for rebleeding (HR: 3.9, 95% CI: 1.3–11.3) after adjustment for age, sex, PAASH score, aneurysm location, aneurysm size and aspect- and bottleneck ratio. Aspect ratio ≥1.6 mm (HR: 2.3, 95% CI: 0.8–6.5) and bottleneck ratio ≥1.6 mm (HR: 1.7, 95% CI: 0.8–3.6) were associated with an increased risk of rebleeding, but were not independent risk factors after multivariable adjustment.

Conclusions

Irregular shape is an independent risk factor for early rebleeding. However, since the majority of subarachnoid haemorrhage patients have an irregular aneurysm, additional risk factors have to be found for aneurysm treatment prioritisation.

Ultra-Early Treatment for Poor-Grade Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

It remains unknown if ultra-early (within 24 hours after onset) treatment can improve the prognosis in patients with poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). We aimed to evaluate the effect of ultra-early treatment on functional outcomes and mortality in patients with poor-grade aSAH via a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We performed a literature search in the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases. Primary outcomes were death and functional outcome assessed at any time period. Secondary outcomes were the rebleeding rate before an aneurysm occlusion procedure and the incidence of intraoperative technique difficulty (ITD). The results are reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 14 articles containing 1111 patients met our inclusion criteria and were included in our analysis. The pooled incidence was 47% (95% CI, 40%-54%) for favorable outcome across 13 studies, 26% (95% CI, 19%-32%) for mortality in 11 studies, 10% (95% CI, 3%-16%) for rebleeding in 5 studies, and 20% (95% CI, 10%-31%) for ITD in 5 studies after ultra-early treatment of poor-grade aSAH. Compared with delayed treatment (>24 hours), the ultra-early treatment failed to improve outcomes (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.75-2.01; P = 0.40) or reduce mortality (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.58-1.22; P = 0.45), but tended to prevent preoperative rebleeding (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.32 to 1.07; P = 0.08) in 6, 4, and 4 case-control studies, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show no significant change both in functional outcome and mortality between ultra-early and delayed treatment although ultra-early treatment may be associated with lower rebleeding rate.

Timing of surgery for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The timing of surgery for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage influences the outcome, but the optimal timing remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review to clarify whether early surgery was better than late surgery for improving outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically searched several databases to screen eligible studies. After synthesizing data, an overall effect was shown using a risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analyses were stratified by multiple variables to control the confounding factors. Sensitivity analyses were applied to check the robustness of the results. Publication bias was measured with Egger's and Begg's tests.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies were included in the analysis. Compared with late surgery, early surgery significantly decreased the incidence of poor outcome, regardless of whether patients were in good condition (RR, 0.65 [95%CI, 0.50 0.84]; p = 0.001) or in poor condition on admission (RR, 0.71 [95%CI, 0.61 0.83]; p < 0.0001). Moreover, when patients were in good condition on admission, early surgery also effectively reduced the death rate (RR, 0.61 [95%CI, 0.46 0.82]; p = 0.001). Additionally, early surgery reduced the death rate compared with late surgery in patients older than 50 years (RR, 0.49 [95%CI, 0.27 0.89]; p < 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Early surgery was superior to late surgery in reducing a poor outcome and death rate when patients were in good condition on admission, and decreased the incidence of poor outcome when patients were in poor condition on admission. Age was a potential confounding factor, influencing the effect of early surgery. Further study is required on this issue.

Functional Outcome After Poor-Grade Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Single-Center Study and Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) (World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grade 4 and 5) is associated with high mortality rates and unfavorable functional outcomes. We report a single-center cohort of poor-grade SAH patients, combined with a systematic review of studies reporting functional outcome in the poor-grade SAH population.

METHODS

Data on a cohort of poor-grade SAH patients treated between 2009 and 2013 were retrospectively collected and combined with a systematic review (from inception to November 2015; PubMed, Embase). Two reviewers assessed the studies independently based on predefined inclusion criteria: consecutive poor-grade SAH, functional outcome measured at least 3 months after hemorrhage, and the report of patients who died before aneurysm treatment.

RESULTS

The search yielded 329 publications, and 23 met our inclusion criteria with 2713 subjects enrolled from 1977 to 2014 in 10 countries (including 179 poor-grade patients from our cohort). Mortality rate was 60 % (1683 patients), of which 806 (29 %) died before and 877 (31 %) died after aneurysm treatment, respectively. Treatment was undertaken in 1775 patients (1775/2826-63 %): 1347 by surgical clipping (1347/1775-76 %) and 428 (428/1775-24 %) by endovascular methods. Outcome was favorable in 794 patients (28 %) and unfavorable in 1867 (66 %). When the studies were grouped into decades, favorable outcome increased from 13 % in the late 1970s to early 1980s to 35 % in the late 1980s to early 1990s, and remained unchanged thereafter.

CONCLUSION

Although mortality remains high in poor-grade SAH patients, a favorable functional outcome can be achieved in approximately one-third of patients. The development of new diagnostic methods and implementation of therapeutic approaches were probably responsible for the decrease in mortality and improvement in the functional outcome from 1970 to the 1990s. The plateau in functional outcome seen thereafter might be explained by the treatment of sicker and older patients and by the lack of new therapeutic interventions specific for SAH.

Meta-analysis of timing of endovascular aneurysm treatment in subarachnoid haemorrhage: inconsistent results of early treatment within 1 day

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To systematically review and meta-analyse the data on impact of timing of endovascular treatment in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) to determine if earlier treatment is associated with improved clinical outcomes and reduced case fatality.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane database, EMBASE and Web of Science to identify studies for inclusion. The measures of effect utilised were unadjusted/adjusted ORs. Effect estimates were combined using random effects models for each outcome (poor outcome, case fatality); heterogeneity was assessed using the I² index. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to account for heterogeneity and risk of bias.

RESULTS

16 studies met the inclusion criteria. Treatment <1 day was associated with a reduced odds of poor outcome compared with treatment >1 day (OR=0.40 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.56; I²=0%)) but not when compared with treatment at 1-3 days (OR=1.16 (95% CI 0.47 to 2.90; I²=81%)). Treatment at <2 days and at <3 days were associated with similar odds of poor outcome compared with later treatment (OR=1.20 (95% CI 0.70 to 2.05; I²=73%; OR=0.71 (95% CI 0.36 to 1.37; I²=71%)). Early treatment was associated with similar odds of case fatality compared with later treatment, regardless of how early/late treatment were defined (OR=1.80 (95% CI 0.88 to 3.67; I²=34%) for treatment <1 day vs days 1-3; OR=1.71 (95% CI 0.72 to 4.03; I²=54%) for treatment <2 days vs later; OR=0.90 (95% CI 0.31 to 2.68; I²=48%) for treatment <3 days vs later).

CONCLUSIONS

In only 1 of the analyses was there a statistically significant result, which favoured treatment <1 day. The inconsistent results and heterogeneity within most analyses highlight the lack of evidence for best timing of endovascular treatment in SAH patients.

The critical care management of poor-grade subarachnoid haemorrhage

Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage is a neurological syndrome with complex systemic complications. The rupture of an intracranial aneurysm leads to the acute extravasation of arterial blood under high pressure into the subarachnoid space and often into the brain parenchyma and ventricles. The haemorrhage triggers a cascade of complex events, which ultimately can result in early brain injury, delayed cerebral ischaemia, and systemic complications. Although patients with poor-grade subarachnoid haemorrhage (World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies 4 and 5) are at higher risk of early brain injury, delayed cerebral ischaemia, and systemic complications, the early and aggressive treatment of this patient population has decreased overall mortality from more than 50% to 35% in the last four decades. These management strategies include (1) transfer to a high-volume centre, (2) neurological and systemic support in a dedicated neurological intensive care unit, (3) early aneurysm repair, (4) use of multimodal neuromonitoring, (5) control of intracranial pressure and the optimisation of cerebral oxygen delivery, (6) prevention and treatment of medical complications, and (7) prevention, monitoring, and aggressive treatment of delayed cerebral ischaemia. The aim of this article is to provide a summary of critical care management strategies applied to the subarachnoid haemorrhage population, especially for patients in poor neurological condition, on the basis of the modern concepts of early brain injury and delayed cerebral ischaemia.

Predictive Factors for Rebleeding After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Rebleeding Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a devastating type of stroke associated with high morbidity and mortality. One of the most feared complications is an early rebleeding before aneurysm repair. Predictors for such an often fatal rebleeding are largely unknown. We therefore aimed to determine predictors for an early rebleeding after aSAH in relation with time after ictus.

METHODS

This observational prospective cohort study included all consecutive patients admitted with aSAH between January 1998 and December 2014 (n=1337) at our University Neurovascular Center. Clinical predictors for rebleeding ≤24 hours were identified using multivariable Cox regression analyses. Kaplan-Meier analyses were applied to evaluate the time of rebleeding ≤72 hours after aSAH.

RESULTS

A modified Fisher grade of 3 to 4 was a predictor for an in-hospital rebleeding ≤24 hours after ictus (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.4; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-10.6; P<0.001). The numbers needed to treat to prevent 1 rebleeding ≤24 hours was calculated 15 (95% confidence interval, 10-25). Also, the initiation of external cerebrospinal fluid-drainage (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-2.5; P<0.001) was independently associated with a rebleeding ≤24 hours. Cumulative in-hospital rebleeding rates were 5.8% ≤24 hours, and 1.2% in the time frame 24-72 hours after ictus.

CONCLUSIONS

In our opinion, timing of treatment of aSAH patients, especially those with an modified Fisher grade of 3 or 4 in a good clinical condition, should be reconsidered. These aSAH patients might be regarded a medical emergency, requiring aneurysm repair as soon as possible. In this respect, our findings should provoke the debate on timing of aneurysm repair, especially in patients considered to be at high risk for rebleeding.

Transfer time to a high-volume center for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage does not affect outcomes

OBJECTIVES

The objective of our study was to examine patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage transferred and directly admitted to our institution in order to determine how transfer time affects outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed of all patients undergoing treatment for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage between 2005 and 2012 at the University of Michigan. Variables, including transfer time, were tested for their independent association with the primary outcomes of symptomatic vasospasm and 12-month outcome as well as secondary outcomes of aneurysm rebleeding and 12-month mortality.

RESULTS

During the study period, 263 (87.4%) patients were transferred to our institution and 38 (12.6%) were directly admitted for treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Transfer time was not associated with the occurrence of symptomatic vasospasm, 12-month outcome, rebleeding, or 12-month mortality. Higher Hunt-Hess grade was associated with the occurrence of symptomatic vasospasm as well as with poorer 12-month outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Transfer time was not associated with the occurrence of symptomatic vasospasm, 12-month outcome, rebleeding, or 12-month mortality. We believe our data argue that protocols should emphasize early resuscitation and stabilization followed by safe transfer rather than a hyperacute transfer paradigm. However, transfer time should be minimized as much as possible so as not to delay time to definitive treatment.