Emergency Neurological Life Support: Traumatic Brain Injury

Cerebral Blood Flow in Polytrauma: Transcranial Doppler Analysis in a Nonhuman Primate Shock Model

BACKGROUND

In combat-related trauma, resuscitation goals are to attenuate tissue hypoxia and maintain circulation. During hemorrhagic shock, compensatory and autoregulatory mechanisms are activated to preserve cerebral blood flow. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography may be an ideal noninvasive modality to monitor cerebral hemodynamics. Using a nonhuman primate (NHP) model, we attempted to characterize cerebral hemodynamics during polytraumatic hemorrhagic shock using TCD ultrasonography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The ophthalmic artery was insonated at multiple time points during varying stages of shock. Hemorrhage was controlled and pressure targeted to 20 mmHg to initiate and maintain the shock period. Mean flow velocity (MFV), peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), pulsatility index (PI), and resistance index (RI) were recorded. Results represent mean ± standard deviation; statistical significance is P < 0.05; n = 12.

RESULTS

Compared to baseline, MFV, PSV, EDV, and RI show significant changes after 60 min of hemorrhagic shock, (9.81 ± 3.60 cm/s; P < 0.01), (21.15 ± 8.59 cm/s; P < 0.01), (5.15 ± 0.21 cm/s; P < 0.01), (0.70 ± 0.11; P < 0.05), respectively. PI did not change during hemorrhagic shock. At end of prehospital care (T30), cerebral flow recovers for MFV, PSV, and RI while EDV remained decreased at T30 (6.15 ± 1.13 cm/s; P < 0.01) and 1 h of simulated transport (T90) (5.87 ± 0.62 cm/s; P < 0.01). Changes in PI at T30 and T90 were not significant. MFV diminished (16.45 ± 3.85 cm/s; P < 0.05) at T90.

CONCLUSIONS

This study establishes baseline and hemorrhagic shock values for NHP cerebral blood flow velocities and cerebrovascular indices. TCD ultrasonography may represent an important area of research for targeted resuscitation investigations using a hemorrhagic shock model in NHPs.

Cerebrospinal Fluid Presepsin As a Marker of Nosocomial Infections of the Central Nervous System: A Prospective Observational Study

Background

Nosocomial CNS infection (NI-CNS) is a common and serious complication in neurocritical care patients. Timely, accurate diagnosis of NI-CNS is crucial, yet current infection markers lack specificity and/or sensitivity. Presepsin (PSP) is a novel biomarker of macrophage activation. Its utility in NI-CNS has not been explored. We first determined the normal range of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) PSP in a control group without brain injury before collecting data on CSF PSP levels in neurocritical care patients. Samples were analyzed in four groups defined by systemic and neurological infection status.

Results

CSF PSP levels in 15 control patients without neurological injury were 50–100 pg/ml. Ninety-seven CSF samples were collected from 21 neurocritical care patients. In patients without NI-CNS or systemic infection, CSF PSP was 340.4 ± 201.1 pg/ml. Isolated NI-CNS was associated with CSF PSP levels of 640.8 ± 235.5 pg/ml, while levels in systemic infection without NI-CNS were 580.1 ± 329.7 pg/ml. Patients with both NI-CNS and systemic infection had CSF PSP levels of 1,047.7 ± 166.2 pg/ml. In neurocritical care patients without systemic infection, a cut-off value of 321 pg/ml gives sensitivity and specificity for NI-CNS of 100 and 58.3%, respectively.

Conclusion

CSF PSP may prove useful in diagnosing NI-CNS, but its current utility is as an additional marker only.

The Neurological Wake-up Test-A Role in Neurocritical Care Monitoring of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients?

The most fundamental clinical monitoring tool in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients is the repeated clinical examination. In the severe TBI patient treated by continuous sedation in a neurocritical care (NCC) unit, sedation interruption is required to enable a clinical evaluation (named the neurological wake-up test; NWT) assessing the level of consciousness, pupillary diameter and reactivity to light, and presence of focal neurological deficits. There is a basic conflict regarding the NWT in the NCC setting; can the clinical information obtained by the NWT justify the risk of inducing a stress response in a severe TBI patient? Furthermore, in the presence of advanced multimodal monitoring and neuroimaging, is the NWT necessary to identify important clinical alterations? In studies of severe TBI patients, the NWT was consistently shown to induce a stress reaction including brief increases in intracranial pressure (ICP) and changes in cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). However, it has not been established whether these short-lived ICP and CPP changes are detrimental to the injured brain. Daily interruption of sedation is associated with a reduced ventilator time, shorter hospital stay and reduced mortality in many studies of general intensive care unit patients, although such clinical benefits have not been firmly established in TBI. To date, there is no consensus on the use of the NWT among NCC units and systematic studies are scarce. Thus, additional studies evaluating the role of the NWT in clinical decision-making are needed. Multimodal NCC monitoring may be an adjunct in assessing in which TBI patients the NWT can be safely performed. At present, the NWT remains the golden standard for clinical monitoring and detection of neurological changes in NCC and could be considered in TBI patients with stable baseline ICP and CPP readings. The focus of the present review is an overview of the existing literature on the role of the NWT as a clinical monitoring tool for severe TBI patients.