Sugammadex Administration to Facilitate Timely Neurologic Examination in the Traumatic Brain Injury Patient

A pharmacovigilance study of FDA adverse events for sugammadex

BACKGROUND

Sugammadex, a selective steroidal neuromuscular blocking agent reversal agent, is increasingly employed for the rapid restoration of neuromuscular function. This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of sugammadex's safety profile.

METHODS

Adverse events (AEs) related to sugammadex reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from January 2009 to September 2023 were extracted. Disproportionality analysis with four measures: reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) were employed to detect significant AEs. We also inspected for unexpected AEs absent from the sugammadex FDA approval documentation and categorized AEs based on the latest version (26.1) of 'Important Medical Event Terms List (IME list)' developed by the EudraVigilance Expert Working Group.

RESULTS

A total of 1452 reports were linked to sugammadex. At the preferred terms (PTs) levels, 98 sugammadex-related AEs were identified, including "anaphylactic reaction", "bradycardia", "bronchospasm" and "cardiac arrest". Among them, 37 representing unexpected events were absent from official FDA labeling, and 50 AEs were recognized as IME warranting observation. Notably, 19 PTs denoted serious AEs were absent from labeling yet needing IME surveillance, including: "Kounis syndrome", "angioedema", "pulseless electrical activity" and "laryngeal edema".

CONCLUSION

The study identified unexpected and potentially life-threatening AEs associated with sugammadex, a valuable agent for rapidly reversing neuromuscular blockade. Clinicians are advised to be mindful of these potential risks, particularly in patients with allergies or existing cardiovascular or respiratory conditions.

Sugammadex Use Outside of the Postoperative Setting

BACKGROUND

Sugammadex rapidly reverses the nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) rocuronium and vecuronium. The role of sugammadex is not well-defined outside of the postoperative setting.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to describe sugammadex use outside the postoperative setting for the reversal of nondepolarizing NMBAs.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study conducted in patients who received sugammadex outside of the postoperative setting at an academic medical center between June 2016 and November 2022. The primary outcome was the effect of sugammadex use for rocuronium reversal, defined as any increase in train-of-four (TOF) after sugammadex administration and/or progress note documentation if TOF was unavailable. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and documentation of contraceptive counseling in patients taking hormonal contraceptives with child-bearing ability.

RESULTS

A total of 14 383 patients received sugammadex during the study period. Of those patients, 39 (0.3%) were outside of the postoperative setting for the reversal of rocuronium and included in the study. Twenty-nine (74%) patients had an increase in TOF after sugammadex administration and/or progress note documentation if TOF was unavailable. Ten (26%) patients lacked documentation regarding the effect of sugammadex. No adverse reactions were reported. Three (8%) patients included in the study were of child-bearing ability, and 1 of the 3 patients was counseled on using an alternative method of contraception following sugammadex administration.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

There is a paucity of literature for the use of sugammadex outside of the postoperative setting. This study found that while the use of sugammadex was rare, overall, it was safe and well-tolerated.

Trauma Anesthesiology Perioperative Management Update

Anesthesia for patients with life-threatening injuries is an essential part of post-accident care. Unfortunately, there is variability in trauma anesthesia care and numerous nonstandardized methods of working with patients remain. Uncertainty exists as to when and how best to intubate trauma patients, the use of vasopressors, and the appropriate management of severe traumatic brain injury. Some physicians recommend prehospital rapid sequence intubation, whereas others use bag-mask ventilation at lower pressures with no cricoid pressure and early transport to a trauma center. Overall, the absence of uniformity in trauma anesthesia care underlines the need for continued study and dialogue to define best practices and optimize patient outcomes.

Neurologic Examination Facilitated by Reversal of Rocuronium with Sugammadex

Background: Patients with neurologic injuries often receive neuromuscular blocking agents to facilitate airway management. The urgent nature of intubation may result in paralytic administration prior to neurologic examination, delaying clinical assessment, prognostication, and surgical interventions. Objective: In October 2018, an institutional guideline was implemented to extend institutional sugammadex use to include patients with uncertain neurologic examinations with recent rocuronium administration. The guideline allowed for a dose range of 2 mg/kg to 16 mg/kg. The objective of this continuous quality improvement project was to describe the use of sugammadex after implementation of an institutional guideline. Methods: Patient records between October 2018 and March 2020 were reviewed for guideline adherence and outcomes. Information assessed included patient weight, injury mechanism, the dosage and timing of rocuronium and sugammadex administration, and neurologic examination findings. Descriptive statistics were used to assess outcomes. Results: During the study period, eleven patients received sugammadex to facilitate neurologic examinations. The most common dose of sugammadex was 4 mg/kg with a mean total dose of 498.4 ± 333.5 mg. The mean time between rocuronium and sugammadex administration was 73.9 ± 41 minutes. Most patients (72.7%) had definitive changes in neurologic examination after sugammadex administration. Five patients had neurosurgical interventions offered and performed, with 1 of the patients surviving. Conclusions: This case series suggests that sugammadex is useful for reversing rocuronium induced paralysis to facilitate neurologic examination needed to determine management strategies for patients with a neurologic injury.

Traumatic brain injury and RSI is rocuronium or succinylcholine preferred?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Traumatic brain injury is widespread and has significant morbidity and mortality. Patients with severe traumatic brain injury often necessitate intubation. The paralytic for rapid sequence induction and intubation for the patient with traumatic brain injury has not been standardized.

RECENT FINDINGS

Rapid sequence induction is the standard of care for patients with traumatic brain injury. Historically, succinylcholine has been the agent of choice due to its fast onset and short duration of action, but it has numerous adverse effects such as increased intracranial pressure and hyperkalemia. Rocuronium, when dosed appropriately, provides neuromuscular blockade as quickly and effectively as succinylcholine but was previously avoided due to its prolonged duration of action which precluded neurologic examination. However, with the widespread availability of sugammadex, rocuronium is able to be reversed in a timely manner.

SUMMARY

In patients with traumatic brain injury necessitating intubation, rocuronium appears to be safer than succinylcholine.

Sugammadex Efficacy and Dosing for Rocuronium Reversal Outside of Perioperative Settings

Background: Sugammadex is approved for postoperative recovery from rocuronium neuromuscular blockade with train-of-four (TOF) guided dosing. Data for non-perioperative sugammadex efficacy and dosing are limited when TOF is not available and reversal is not immediate. Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and dose of sugammadex when administered in the emergency department (ED) or intensive care unit (ICU) for delayed rocuronium reversal when TOF guidance was not consistently available. Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients over a 6-year period who received sugammadex in the ED or ICU at least 30 minutes after rocuronium administration for rapid sequence intubation (RSI). Patients who received sugammadex for intra-operative neuromuscular blockade reversal were excluded. Efficacy was defined as successful reversal documented in progress notes, TOF assessment, or improvement in Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Dose was evaluated in patients with successful reversal by correlating sugammadex and rocuronium dose with reversal time after paralysis. Results: Thirty-four patients were included with 19 (55.9%) patients receiving sugammadex in the ED. Sugammadex indication was acute neurologic assessment in 31 (91.1%) patients. Twenty-nine patients (85.2%) had successful reversal documented. The remaining 5 patients had fatal neurologic injuries with GCS 3 limiting non-TOF efficacy assessment. The median (IQR) sugammadex dose was 3.4 (2.5-4.1) mg/kg administered 89 (56.3-158) minutes after rocuronium. No correlation was identified between sugammadex dose, rocuronium dose, and administration time. No adverse events were noted. Conclusion: This pilot investigation demonstrated safe and effective rocuronium reversal with sugammadex 3 to 4 mg/kg administered in the non-operative setting 1 to 2 hours after RSI. Larger, prospective studies are necessary to determine the safety in patients outside of the operating room when TOF is not available.

Comparison of neostigmine and sugammadex for hemodynamic parameters in neurointerventional anesthesia

Introduction

Hemodynamic stability is important during neurointerventional procedures. However, ICP or blood pressure may increase due to endotracheal extubation. The aim of this study was to compare the hemodynamic effects of sugammadex and neostigmine with atropine in neurointerventional procedures during emergence from anesthesia.

Methods

Patients undergoing neurointerventional procedures were allocated to the sugammadex group (Group S) and the neostigmine group (Group N). Group S was administered IV 2 mg/kg sugammadex when a train-of-four (TOF) count of 2 was present, and Group N was administered neostigmine 50 mcg/kg with atropine 0.2 mg/kg at a TOF count of 2. We recorded heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean blood pressure (MAP), and peripheral arterial oxygen saturation during administration of the reverse agent and at 2, 5, 10, 15, 30, 120 min, and 24 h thereafter. The primary outcome was blood pressure and heart rate change after the reversal agent was given. The secondary outcomes were systolic blood pressure variability standard deviation (a measure of the amount of variation or dispersion of a set of values), systolic blood pressure variability-successive variation (square root of the average squared difference between successive blood pressure measurements), nicardipine use, time-to-TOF ratio ≥0.9 after the administration of reversal agent, and time from the administration of the reversal agent to tracheal extubation.

Results

A total of 31 patients were randomized to sugammadex, and 30 patients were randomized to neostigmine. Except for anesthesia time, there were no significant differences in any of the clinical characteristics between the two groups. The results demonstrated that the increase in MAP from period A to B was significantly greater in Group N than in Group S (regression coefficient = -10, 95% confidence interval = -17.3 to -2.7, P = 0.007). The MAP level was significantly increased from period A to B in the neostigmine group (95.1 vs. 102.4 mm Hg, P = 0.015), but it was not altered in Group S. In contrast, the change in HR from periods A to B was not significantly different between groups.

Conclusion

We suggest that sugammadex is a better option than neostigmine in interventional neuroradiological procedures due to the shorter extubation time and more stable hemodynamic change during emergence.

Rapid sequence intubation and the role of the emergency medicine pharmacist: 2022 update

PURPOSE

The dosing, potential adverse effects, and clinical outcomes of the most commonly utilized pharmacologic agents for rapid sequence intubation (RSI) are reviewed for the practicing emergency medicine pharmacist (EMP).

SUMMARY

RSI is the process of establishing a safe, functional respiratory system in patients unable to effectively breathe on their own. Various medications are chosen to sedate and even paralyze the patient to facilitate an efficient endotracheal intubation. The mechanism of action and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles of these agents were described in a 2011 review. Since then, the role of the EMP as well as the published evidence regarding RSI agents, including dosing, adverse effects, and clinical outcomes, has grown. It is necessary for the practicing EMP to update previous practice patterns in order to continue to provide optimal patient care.

CONCLUSION

While the agents used in RSI have changed little, knowledge regarding optimal dosing, appropriate patient selection, and possible adverse effects continues to be gained. The EMP is a key member of the bedside care team and uniquely positioned to communicate this evolving data.

Utility of neuromuscular blockade reversal in the evaluation of acute neurosurgical patients: A retrospective case-series

OBJECTIVE

Sugammadex reversal of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) is usually performed postoperatively. A scarcity of literature exists exploring sugammadex use for timely neurological examination of neurosurgical patients. NMBAs, like rocuronium, are used in the Emergency Department during intubation and their unpredictable duration of action often impedes timely and accurate assessment of patient neurological status. We aim to explore the role of sugammadex in evaluating patients in need of acute neurosurgical care.

METHODS

Retrospective assessment of patients presenting with traumatic brain injury or intracranial hemorrhage was conducted at our level 1 trauma center. Patients of interest were those for whom sugammadex reversal of rocuronium neuromuscular blockade, from intubating doses, was pursued to ensure timely neurologic assessment. Nine patients were identified for whom GCS pre-/post-sugammadex, rocuronium dosing, elapsed time between rocuronium administration and reversal, and clinical course data were retrieved.

RESULTS

Arrival GCS was 5.2 ± 3.2, with intubation accomplished within 10 ± 2.5 min of presentation. Rocuronium dosing was consistent between patients, average single dose of 1.2 ± 0.3 mg/kg. Lingering neuromuscular blockade ranged from 28 to 132 min (87.3 ± 34.3 min). All patients exhibited a GCS of 3 T upon initial neurosurgical evaluation, prior to reversal. Post-reversal GCS rose to 6.0 T ± 2.2. Sugammadex facilitated more accurate clinical decision making in 8 of 9 patients, including prevention of unnecessary invasive procedures. Two of 9 patients were eventually discharged home or to a rehabilitation facility.

CONCLUSIONS

Rocuronium neuromuscular blockade can linger beyond pharmacokinetic predictions, thus delaying timely and precise neurologic assessment. Our data suggests sugammadex may be a useful addition to the clinician's armamentarium for acute neurologic assessment in the neurosurgical population. Sugammadex may impact clinical decision-making in certain patients and allow for more informed decision-making by families and physicians alike. Prospective studies are needed to definitively assess the impact of sugammadex on outcomes in acute neurosurgical settings.

Rocuronium Reversal in the Emergency Department: Retrospective Evaluation of Hemodynamic Instability Following Administration of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine With Glycopyrrolate

BACKGROUND

Rocuronium is an intermediate-acting non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent frequently used in the emergency department for rapid sequence intubation. The prolonged effects of rocuronium may prevent the ability to conduct a meaningful neurological examination, thereby delaying appropriate diagnosis and treatment. Sugammadex and neostigmine are pharmacologic agents commonly used to reverse rocuronium. The safety of sugammadex versus neostigmine with glycopyrrolate for the reversal of rocuronium in the emergency department has not been well described.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the occurrence of hemodynamic instability post-administration of sugammadex versus neostigmine with glycopyrrolate in the emergency department for the reversal of rocuronium.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study conducted among adult patients that received sugammadex or neostigmine with glycopyrrolate in the emergency department for the reversal of rocuronium. The primary outcome was occurrence of hemodynamic instability that required escalation of treatment. Secondary outcomes included occurrence of hypotensive, bradycardic, or cardiac arrest events.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients met inclusion criteria (n = 10, sugammadex; n = 27, neostigmine). There was no difference between the two groups in regard to hemodynamic instability that required escalation of treatment within 30 minutes after receiving either sugammadex or neostigmine with glycopyrrolate (P = .557).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference between the two groups in regard to occurrence of hemodynamic instability that required escalation of treatment. Given the small sample size, future studies are warranted to further delineate the safety of sugammadex and neostigmine with glycopyrrolate for the reversal of rocuronium in the emergency department.

Emergency Neuropharmacology

Management of acute neurologic disorders in the emergency department is multimodal and may require the use of medications to decrease morbidity and mortality secondary to neurologic injury. Clinicians should form an individualized treatment approach with regard to various patient specific factors. This review article focuses on the pharmacotherapy for common neurologic emergencies that present to the emergency department, including traumatic brain injury, central nervous system infections, status epilepticus, hypertensive emergencies, spinal cord injury, and neurogenic shock.

What is the Role of Sugammadex in the Emergency Department?

BACKGROUND

Sugammadex is a medication newly available to many emergency physicians. It effectively, and within minutes, reverses neuromuscular blockade in patients who have received rocuronium or vecuronium. The role of sugammadex for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade after rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department (ED) is evolving, and limited emergency medicine-specific literature exists.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review evaluates the role of sugammadex for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade in the ED.

DISCUSSION

The basic pharmacology, duration of action, adverse effects, and important medication and disease interactions specific to sugammadex are well described. Case reports suggest sugammadex can reverse neuromuscular blockade to facilitate an urgent, neurologic examination by an emergency physician or consultant. Multiple case reports of failure to improve airway patency with the use of sugammadex, even when neuromuscular blockade is completely reversed, and concern for added difficulty of definitive airway management in a patient with spontaneous movement suggest that sugammadex should largely be omitted from failed or difficult airway management strategies. Instead, it is important to focus on the ability to oxygenate and ventilate, including progression to surgical airway or jet ventilation if needed.

CONCLUSION

Sugammadex is an effective, rapid reversal agent for rocuronium and has the potential use to facilitate an urgent neurologic examination shortly after administration of rocuronium. Its routine inclusion in a failed or difficult emergency airway is not supported by available literature.

High-Risk Airway Management in the Emergency Department: Diseases and Approaches, Part II

BACKGROUND

Successful airway management is critical to the practice of emergency medicine. Thus, emergency physicians must be ready to optimize and prepare for airway management in critically ill patients with a wide range of physiologic challenges. Challenges in airway management commonly encountered in the emergency department are discussed using a pearl and pitfall discussion in this second part of a 2-part series.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review presents an evidence-based approach to airway and patient management during endotracheal intubation in challenging cases commonly encountered in the emergency department.

DISCUSSION

Adverse events during emergent airway management are common with postintubation cardiac arrest, reported in as many as 1 in 25 intubations. Many of these adverse events can be avoided by proper identification and understanding the underlying physiology, preparation, and postintubation management. Those with high-risk features including trauma, elevated intracranial pressure, upper gastrointestinal bleed, cardiac tamponade, aortic stenosis, morbid obesity, and pregnancy must be managed with airway expertise.

CONCLUSIONS

This narrative review discusses the pearls and pitfalls of commonly encountered physiologic high-risk intubations with a focus on the emergency clinician.