Risk Factors Associated with ICU-Specific Care in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

Nationwide trends in intensive care unit utilization in the elective endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

Multiple studies suggest routine post-operative intensive care unit (ICU) stays after endovascular treatment (EVT) of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is unnecessary, though rates of ICU utilization nationwide are unknown. We aim to evaluate rates and characteristics of ICU utilization in patients undergoing elective endovascular repair of UIAs.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing a nationwide private-payer database in the United States to evaluate the ICU utilization in patients undergoing elective endovascular repair of UIAs between 2005 and 2019. Demographics and pre-operative comorbidities as well as post-procedural complications and discharge status were compared. An analysis of charges and costs was also performed.

RESULTS

Among 6218 patients who underwent elective EVT of a UIA, 4890 (78.6%) were admitted to the ICU post-operatively. There were no differences in age, sex, or Charlson comorbidity scores in patients admitted to the ICU post-operatively compared to those admitted elsewhere. ICU utilization was more common in urban locations compared to rural. 12.7% of patients had ICU-specific needs sufficient to be billed by a critical care provider. Total provider costs were significantly higher in patients utilizing the ICU post-operatively, even among uncomplicated patients with routine discharges.

CONCLUSION

Most patients undergoing elective endovascular UIA repair in the United States are admitted to the ICU postoperatively. Only 12.7% have ICU needs, and these patients are predictable from pre-operative characteristics or peri-operative complications. Reducing ICU use in this subgroup of patients may be an important target to improve healthcare value in this patient population.

Clinical Utility of Routine Postprocedural Computed Tomography of the Head Following Elective Neuroendovascular Interventions

BACKGROUND

Little evidence supports acquisition of routine head imaging after uncomplicated elective neurosurgical procedures for patients with unchanged neurological examinations; however, imaging is still performed by some neurointerventionalists. We assessed the clinical utility of routine computed tomography of the head (CTH) following elective neuroendovascular interventions, including aneurysm coiling, aneurysm stent-assisted coiling, aneurysm flow diversion, arteriovenous malformation/fistula embolization, middle meningeal artery embolization for subdural hematoma, extracranial carotid artery stenting, and venous sinus stenting.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review identified patients undergoing neuroendovascular intervention from 2011 to 2021 at our institution. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic variables, including presenting signs and symptoms, antiplatelets and/or anticoagulant medications, intraprocedural complications, postprocedural CTH findings, and postprocedural neurological examinations, were recorded. Association of clinical variables with an abnormal postprocedural CTH was assessed with univariate analysis. Patients with ruptured vascular pathology, preoperative embolizations, and missing postprocedural CTH images and/or reports were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 509 procedures identified, 354 were eligible for analysis; 4.8% of patients (17/354) had abnormal findings on postprocedural CTH. Nine patients had intraprocedural complications or new postprocedural neurological deficits that would have prompted imaging regardless of institutional practice. None of the remaining 8 (2.3%) patients required additional procedures. New postprocedural neurological deficit was the only significant predictor of abnormal postprocedural CTH (odds ratio = 6.79; 95% confidence interval, 2.01-20.32; P = 0.0009).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of patients undergoing elective neuroendovascular intervention, no patients were identified for whom routine postprocedural CTH alone meaningfully altered their clinical care. Routine CTH is not necessary after uncomplicated elective neuroendovascular interventions performed with careful postprocedural neurological assessment.