Stage-Specific Survival Differences Associated with Postoperative Radiotherapy for Gastrointestinal Cancers

Real-world clinical significance of nonbiological factors with staging, prognosis and clinical management in rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The clinical guidance of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system is established only in biological factors and does not include nonbiological factors (NBFs). We assessed the clinical value of incorporating NBFs into the TNM staging system in point of the clinical management and prognostic prediction accuracy of rectal cancer.

METHODS

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and identified 12,515 patients with rectal cancer who were diagnosed between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2015. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to determine the probabilities of cancer-specific survival (CSS) according to different TNM-NBF stages.

RESULTS

Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that county percentage with a bachelor's degree, insurance status, unemployment status, and marital status were all significant prognostic NBFs (p < 0.05). The concordance index of TNM-NBF stages was 0.815 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8072-0.8228). Multivariate Cox analyses showed that, compared with NBF0-stage, NBF1-stage was contacted with a 54.5% increased risk of cancer-specific mortality in rectal cancer, which increased to 68.3% in non-metastatic rectal cancer (all p < 0.001). NBF0-stage showed a CSS benefit as compared with NBF1-stage (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that NBF-stage was an independent prognostic factor for survival in rectal cancer. The influence of NBFs on survival in rectal cancer warrants greater clinical attention. Furthermore, the consolidation of NBF-stage into the TNM staging system is crucial to better prognostic prediction accuracy and individualized risk-adaptive therapies.

The importance of a multidisciplinary team in rectal cancer management

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the interval between surgery and adjuvant treatments regarding the overall survival and recurrence-free survival in patients from a developing country. For stages II and III rectal cancer, international guidelines recommend neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regardless of the tumor location. In the developing countries there is a shortage of radiotherapy centers, specialists, which lead to long waiting lists for radiotherapy. These problems might lead to protocol deviations.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on 161 patients with rectal cancer treated with surgery, postoperative CRT and with or without chemotherapy for a total of 6 months, at The Oncology Institute Cluj-Napoca between 2006-2010. All patients had 5 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 161 patients were enrolled in this study. The majority of patients were locally advanced stages (89.44%). The well known prognostic factors, such as TNM stage, performance status, CEA serum level, perineural, vascular and lymphatic invasion, and node capsular effraction had a statistically significant influence on overall survival. In 21.12% of patients the first adjuvant treatment was started in the first 4 weeks after surgery. Only 13.04% of patients started the concomitant CRT within the limit of 6 weeks after surgery. Concerning the time between surgery and CRT, we did not observe a statistically significantly difference in OS if the radiotherapy started after the first 6 weeks (p=0.701). The OS rate for locally advanced rectal cancer patients was 69.44%.

CONCLUSIONS

In rectal cancer, the importance of the first therapeutic act is crucial. Following international guidelines provides a survival advantage and a better quality of life. In case of adjuvant treatment, it is recommended to start this treatment as soon as the local infrastructure allows it.

Interval between Surgery and Radiation Therapy Is an Important Prognostic Factor in Treatment of Rectal Cancer

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate survival and prognostic factors for rectal cancer, including interval between surgery and radiation therapy after surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of 153 patients with rectal cancer who were treated with surgery, radiotherapy with/without chemotherapy at Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center from January, 1988 to December, 2005. The study included 89 males and 64 females, with a median age of 56 years (range, 23 to 81 years). Tumor, node and metastasis (TNM) was I in 23 patients, II in 39, and III in 91. Radiation therapy was performed on pelvic fields using a median dose of 54 Gy five days per week, 1.8 Gy once per day. Ninety two patients were treated with radiotherapy, 43 with concurrent chemo-radiation therapy and 18 with sequential therapy after surgery. The median follow-up period was 52 months (range, 4 to 272 months). The interval between surgery and radiation was 1-25 weeks (median, 5 weeks).

Results

Two-year and five-year overall survival rate was 64.7% and 46.4%, respectively. Two-year and five-year disease-free-survival (DFS) rate was 58.6% and 43.1%, respectively. Median DFS was 39 months. Loco-regional failure was evident in 10.5% of patients, 8.4% had distant metastasis, and 9.2% had both. In multivariate analysis, TNM stage and interval between surgery and radiation therapy (≤5 weeks vs. >5 weeks; 95% confidence interval, 1.276 to 2.877; hazard ratio, 1.916; p=0.002) were significant prognostic factors of DFS.

Conclusion

Survival rates for rectal cancer after surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy were similar to those reported in previous studies. Starting radiation therapy as soon as possible after surgery, especially within the first five weeks after surgery, is suggested.