A Novel Combination of C-Reactive Protein and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Differential Diagnosis of Ascites

Research progress and treatment status of malignant ascites

Malignant ascites (MA), a common and serious complication of various cancers in the abdominal cavity, originates from the extensive infiltration, metastasis, and growth of cancer cells in or on the abdominal cavity, leading to abnormal accumulation of fluid in the abdominal cavity and the formation of MA. MA seriously reduces the quality of life of cancer patients, shortens their survival period, and generally has a poor prognosis. Modern medicine has developed various strategies for the treatment of MA, including targeted supportive treatment, diuretic treatment, abdominal paracentesis, surgical intervention, and intraperitoneal administration therapy. Among them, chemotherapy, as one of the important treatment methods, includes both systemic chemotherapy and intraperitoneal chemotherapy, especially pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC), hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and foam-based intraperitoneal chemotherapy (FBIC), providing a new choice for the treatment of MA. In addition, innovative treatment methods such as gas-based intra-abdominal hyperthermia (GIH) combined with dehydration therapy have also shown promising application prospects. This article delves into multiple aspects of MA, including its concept, mechanism of occurrence, clinical manifestations, differential diagnostic methods, and current treatment status and research progress. This comprehensive review aims to provide valuable references for effectively controlling MA, improving cancer patients' quality of life, and prolonging the survival cycle of cancer patients in clinical practice. Malignant ascites (MA) is a common complication of cancer, which originates from the extensive infiltration, metastasis, and growth of cancer cells in the abdominal cavity or peritoneum, leading to abnormal accumulation of peritoneal fluid. It is a common clinical manifestation in the late stage of cancer. Its symptoms are stubborn and recurrent, which can lead to abdominal pain, bloating, poor appetite, fatigue, breathing difficulties, and even multiple organ failure. The median survival time for cancer patients with MA is generally 5 to 6 months. The prognosis is poor, and it is imperative to seek more active and effective treatment plans. This article reviews the research and treatment status of MA, aiming to provide certain value for controlling MA and improving the quality of life of patients.

Possible use of 2D shear wave liver elastography in new-onset ascites evaluation

BACKGROUND

No data on the use of 2D shear wave elastography exists regarding the evaluation of the new-onset ascites causality.

AIMS

To determine whether 2D shear wave elastography can help in the non-invasive assessment of the new-onset ascites cause. To assess the applicability of liver stiffness measured by 2D shear wave elastography using Esaote MyLab Nine apparatus in patients with ascites.

METHODS

In 52 consecutive patients with new-onset ascites (January 2020 to October 2021), liver stiffness using 2D shear wave elastography was prospectively measured. The reliable measurements were used for further analysis. Relevant clinical and laboratory data was collected.

RESULTS

The calculated liver stiffness measurement cut-off value of 14.4 kPa held 94% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, and 83% specificity when determining ascites with serum ascites albumin gradient ≥11 g/L. Reliable 2D shear wave elastography success rate was 84%.

CONCLUSIONS

2D shear wave elastography may potentially be used to differentiate transudative from exudative ascites, especially in patients with portal hypertension and peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Progress in the treatment of malignant ascites

Malignant ascites occurs as a symptom of the terminal stage of cancer, affecting the quality of life through abdominal distension, pain, nausea, anorexia, dyspnea and other symptoms. We describe the current main drug treatments in addition to surgery according to the traditional and new strategies. Traditional treatments were based on anti-tumor chemotherapy and traditional Chinese medicine treatments, as well as diuretics to relieve the patient's symptoms. New treatments mainly involve photothermal therapy, intestinal therapy and targeted immunity. This study emphasizes that both traditional and new therapies have certain advantages and disadvantages, and medication should be adjusted according to different periods of use and different patients. In conclusion, this article reviews the literature to systematically describe the primary treatment modalities for malignant ascites.

Clinical risk factors for ascites in metastatic pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Malignant ascites is common in metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) and its management still remains a clinical challenge. Early identification of patients at risk for ascites development may support and guide treatment decisions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of patients treated for mPC at the Medical University of Vienna between 2010 and 2019 were collected by retrospective chart review. Ascites was defined as clinically relevant accumulation of intraperitoneal fluid diagnosed by ultrasound or computer tomography scan of the abdomen. We investigated the association between general risk factors, metastatic sites, liver function, systemic inflammation as well as portal vein obstruction (PVO) and ascites development.

RESULTS

Among 581 patients with mPC included in this study, 122 (21.0%) developed ascites after a median of 8.7 months after diagnosis of metastatic disease. The occurrence of ascites led to an 8.9-fold increased risk of death [confidence interval (CI) 7.2-11, P < 0.001] with a median overall survival of 1 month thereafter. Clinical risk factors for ascites were male sex [hazard ratio (HR) 1.71, CI 1.00-2.90, P = 0.048], peritoneal carcinomatosis (HR 6.79, CI 4.09-11.3, P < 0.001), liver metastases (HR 2.16, CI 1.19-3.91, P = 0.011), an albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score grade 3 (HR 6.79, CI 2.11-21.8, P = 0.001), PVO (HR 2.28, CI 1.15-4.52, P = 0.019), and an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) (HR 4.19, CI 1.58-11.1, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival after diagnosis of ascites is very limited in mPC patients. Male sex, liver and peritoneal metastases, impaired liver function, PVO, as well as systemic inflammation were identified as independent risk factors for ascites development in this uniquely large real-life patient cohort.

Comparative Assessment of Two Strategies for Interpreting Tumor Markers in Ascitic Effusions

BACKGROUND/AIM

There are two strategies for the interpretation of tumor markers (TM) in fluid effusions: i) high cut-off and ii) fluid/serum ratio (F/S) and low cut-off. The objective of this study is to compare these two strategies and to determine whether diagnostic accuracy improves by the identification of possible false positives using Adenosine deaminase (ADA), C reactive protein (CRP) and % of polymorphonuclear cells (%PN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 157 ascitic fluids, 74 of which were malignant. ADA, CRP and %PN were determined in ascitic fluid, and Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Cancer antigen 72-4 (CA72-4), Cancer antigen CA19-9 and Cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3) in both fluid and serum.

RESULTS

The strategy of high cut-off showed 59.5% sensitivity at 100% specificity. The F/S strategy showed 75.7% sensitivity at 95.2% specificity. Subclassifying cases with ADA, CRP and %PN negative showed 67.5% sensitivity at 100% specificity for high cut-off and for the F/S strategy was 81.7% sensitivity at 98.7% specificity.

CONCLUSION

The strategy of F/S with negative ADA, CRP and %PN allow the best interpretation for TM in the ascitic fluid.

Mansoura simple scoring system for prediction of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: lesson learnt

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a common bacterial infection with life-threatening sequelae in cirrhotic ascites. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to recognize the predictors of SBP to build up a noninvasive system to exclude or establish an episode of SBP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of 1194 consecutive patients with cirrhotic ascites, only 966 patients were enrolled in this study. SBP was diagnosed once polymorphonuclear count was at least 250 cells/mm and/or there was a positive ascitic fluid culture result. Biochemical and clinical parameters were evaluated as predictors of SBP. A scoring system was established in the training group of 682 and validated in a second group of 284 participants.

RESULTS

The incidence of SBP was 12.3 and 12% in the training and validation groups, respectively. Age of at least 55 years, mean platelet volume (MPV) of at least 8.5 fl, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of at least 2.5, and C-reactive protein (CRP) of at least 40 mg/l were identified as independent predictors of SBP. A scoring system including these four variables (age, MPV, and NLR with 1 point each, whereas CRP with 2 points) achieves a specificity of 98.2% with a positive predictive value for the diagnosis of SBP of 88.1% (score≥4). At a threshold of 1 point, the negative predictive value is 97.5% with a sensitivity of 92.9%. SBP is not associated with a high Model for End-stage Liver Disease score (P=0.135).

CONCLUSION

The combination of age, MPV, NLR, and CRP in a simple scoring system, Mansoura simple scoring system, supports quick and accurate exclusion or diagnosis of SBP.

Ascites relative enhancement during hepatobiliary phase after Gd-BOPTA administration: a new promising tool for characterising abdominal free fluid of unknown origin

OBJECTIVES

To correlate the degree of ascites enhancement during hepatobiliary phase after gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) administration with ascites aetiology.

METHODS

IRB-approved retrospective study, need for informed consent was waived. We included 74 consecutive ascitic patients who underwent Gd-BOPTA-enhanced liver MRI including hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images between January 2014 and December 2017. Ascites appearance on unenhanced and HBP images was classified as hypo-, iso- or hyperintense in comparison to paraspinal muscles. Ascites signal intensity on unenhanced and HBP images was measured using round ROIs and was normalised to paraspinal muscles (NSI). Normalised relative enhancement (NRE) between native phase and HBP was calculated. The results were related to ascites aetiology using Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests.

RESULTS

On native images, ascites appeared hypointense in 95.9% of the cases and isointense in 4.1%, whereas on HBP images, it appeared hyperintense in 59.4% of the cases, isointense in 36.5% and hypointense in 4.1%. Mean ascites NSI was 0.52 on unenhanced images and 1.50 on HBP ones (p < 0.0001). Mean ascites NRE was 201 ± 133%. Ascites of non-malignant aetiology showed mean NRE of 210 ± 134%, whereas malignant ascites showed mean NRE of 92 ± 20% (p = 0.001). ROC analysis showed that a NRE < 112.5% correlates with malignant aetiology with 100% sensitivity and 83.4% specificity (LR = 5.667). NRE did not show any significant correlation with ascites thickness, eGFR and time interval between contrast administration and HBP acquisition (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Ascites NRE in HBP after Gd-BOPTA administration is significantly lower in patients with ascites secondary to peritoneal carcinomatosis than in patients with non-malignant ascites.

KEY POINTS

• Ascites enhancement in the hepatobiliary phase after Gd-BOPTA administration may determine false positive findings when looking for biliary leaks. • Ascites enhancement in the hepatobiliary phase after Gd-BOPTA administration is lower in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis than in patients with portal hypertension or congestive heart failure. • None of the patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis showed an ascites enhancement of more than 112% as compared with unenhanced images.