Portal Vein Thrombosis and Markers of Inflammation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Predictive model for non-malignant portal vein thrombosis associated with cirrhosis based on inflammatory biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT), a complication of liver cirrhosis, is a major public health concern. PVT prediction is the most effective method for PVT diagnosis and treatment.

AIM

To develop and validate a nomogram and network calculator based on clinical indicators to predict PVT in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Patients with cirrhosis hospitalized between January 2016 and December 2021 at the First Hospital of Lanzhou University were screened and 643 patients with cirrhosis who met the eligibility criteria were retrieved. Following a 1:1 propensity score matching 572 patients with cirrhosis were screened, and relevant clinical data were collected. PVT risk factors were identified using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Variance inflation factors and correlation matrix plots were used to analyze multicollinearity among the variables. A nomogram was constructed to predict the probability of PVT based on independent risk factors for PVT, and its predictive performance was verified using a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Finally, a network calculator was constructed based on the nomograms.

RESULTS

This study enrolled 286 cirrhosis patients with PVT and 286 without PVT. LASSO analysis revealed 13 variables as strongly associated with PVT occurrence. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed nine indicators as independent PVT risk factors, including etiology, ascites, gastroesophageal varices, platelet count, D-dimer, portal vein diameter, portal vein velocity, aspartate transaminase to neutrophil ratio index, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio. LASSO and correlation matrix plot results revealed no significant multicollinearity or correlation among the variables. A nomogram was constructed based on the screened independent risk factors. The nomogram had excellent predictive performance, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.821 and 0.829 in the training and testing groups, respectively. Calibration curves and DCA revealed its good clinical performance. Finally, the optimal cutoff value for the total nomogram score was 0.513. The sensitivity and specificity of the optimal cutoff values were 0.822 and 0.706, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A nomogram for predicting PVT occurrence was successfully developed and validated, and a network calculator was constructed. This can enable clinicians to rapidly and easily identify high PVT risk groups.

Relationship between Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet/Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) and Thrombosis in Patients with Portal Vein Thrombosis (PVT) without Acquired Risk Factor for Thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Inflammation occurring after vascular endothelial damage plays a role in thrombus formation. Changes in various blood parameters that develop after the inflammatory condition can be used as a marker to predict thrombus.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and portal vein thrombosis (PVT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After applying the exclusion and inclusion criteria to the patients diagnosed with PVT and followed up in our center between January 2006 and May 2018, a total of 38 patients without acquired risk factors for the development of PVT and 52 healthy controls were included in the study. Clinical features and NLR and PLR at diagnosis were evaluated.

RESULTS

NLR and PLR values were detected to be significantly higher in patients diagnosed with PVT compared to the control group (P < 0.001 for NLR, P < 0.001 for PLR). Findings were as follows: In acute PVT patients for NLR = 3.645 (area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) 0.886, sensitivity 69.2%, specificity 96.2%, P < 0.001), for PLR = 196.24 (AUROC 0.754, sensitivity 53.2%, specificity 96.2%, P = 0.005), while in chronic PVT patients, for NLR = 3.645 (AUROC 0.744, sensitivity 40%, specificity 96.2%, P = 0.001), and for PLR = 195.93 (AUROC 0.715, sensitivity 44%, specificity 96.2%, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

NLR and PLR were associated with the diagnosis of PVT. In PVT patients, NLR and PLR values were observed to be significantly higher than the control group. In our study, the relationship between NLR and PLR in patients with noncirrhotic, nonmalignant PVT without acquired risk factors for thrombosis was shown for the first time.

Portal vein tumor thrombosis in hepatocellular carcinoma: molecular mechanism and therapy

Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT), a common complication of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), remains the bottleneck of the treatments. Liver cancer cells potentially experienced multi-steps during PVTT process, including cancer cells leave from cancer nest, migrate in extracellular matrix, invade the vascular barrier, and colonize in the portal vein. Accumulated evidences have revealed numerous of molecular mechanisms including genetic and epigenetic regulation, cancer stem cells, immunosuppressive microenvironment, hypoxia, et al. contributed to the PVTT formation. In this review, we discuss state-of-the-art PVTT research on the potential molecular mechanisms and experimental models. In addition, we summarize PVTT-associated clinical trials and current treatments for PVTT and suppose perspectives exploring the molecular mechanisms and improving PVTT-related treatment for the future.

A practical nomogram based on systemic inflammatory markers for predicting portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis

INTRODUCTION

Immunothrombosis has recently been used to describe the responses/mechanisms in thrombosis. Systemic inflammatory markers are prognostic markers for a variety of thrombotic conditions; however, their potential value in predicting portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is unknown. This study aimed to establish an easy-to-use nomogram based on systemic inflammatory markers to predict portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with liver cirrhosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 478 patients with cirrhosis between January 2013 and January 2021. Reputed systemic inflammatory markers (systemic immune-inflammation index [SII], neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR], monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio [MLR], and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)) were measured, and the clinical data were recorded. The independent risk factors for PVT were determined using univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression analyses, and a nomogram to predict the occurrence of PVT was established. The concordance index, receiver operating characteristic curves, and calibration plots were used to evaluate the performance of the model.

RESULTS

A total of 239 patients with PVT and 239 patients without PVT were selected. In the univariate analysis, high SII, NLR, PLR, and MLR were significantly associated with PVT. NLR and PLR were independent risk factors for PVT (P < 0.05) by multivariate analysis. The nomogram had good predictive efficiency for PVT in patients with cirrhosis, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves of 0.891 (95% CI 0.862-0.919) and the calibration curves fit as well, indicating that the nomogram had good clinical application value.

CONCLUSIONS

PVT in patients with cirrhosis is associated with increased levels of systemic inflammatory markers. We successfully developed a practical nomogram based on NLR and PLR to accurately predict PVT, which is a practical method helping clinicians rapidly and conveniently diagnose and guide the treatment of PVT in patients with cirrhosis.Key MessagesThe present study is the first report on a nomogram based on systemic inflammatory markers in patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT).The nomogram had good predictive efficiency and a good clinical application value for predicting PVT in patients with cirrhosis.

HCC or Something Else? Frequency of Various Benign and Malignant Etiologies in Cirrhotic Patients with Newly Detected Focal Liver Lesions in Relation to Different Clinical and Sonographic Parameters

Background and Aims: To investigate the frequency of different benign and malignant focal liver lesions (FLLs) in relation to clinical and sonographic features among patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) and newly detected FLLs. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of 225 cirrhotic patients with newly detected FLLs who underwent hepatic ultrasound (US) examinations at our university hospital from 2011 to 2022. The diagnosis of FLLs was based on histology and/or consensus radiological criteria, in accordance with the current diagnostic guidelines. The FLLs were classified into benign (bFLLs) or malignant (mFLLs) lesions and the latter group was subclassified into HCC and non-HCC mFLLs. The frequency, clinical parameters, and sonographic features of the different groups were examined and compared. Results: Of the 225 FLLs, 154 (68.4%) were mFLLs and 71 (31.6%) bFLLs. HCC was the most frequent subcategory of FLLs (132; 58.7%). There were (22; 9.8%) non-HCC mFLLs with 11 (4.9%) metastases and 11 (4.9%) non-HCC primary liver tumors. Regenerative nodules (RNs) were the most frequent form of bFLLs (25; 11.1%), followed by simple cysts (22; 9.8%) and hemangiomas (14; 6.2%). The other bFLLs (10; 14.1%) were fat deposition/sparing (5), hematomas (2), abscesses (2), and echinococcal cysts (1). The distribution of bFLLs and HCC and non-HCC mFLLs varied significantly according to the clinical scenarios. HCC mFLLs were more frequent in males (p = 0.001), in those with no history of active non-hepatic primary malignant disease (NHPMD) (p < 0.001), in those with a hepatitis B or C etiology of LC (p = 0.002), when located in the right lobe (p = 0.008), and when portal vein thrombosis was present (p = 0.03). Conclusion: In cirrhotic patients with newly detected FLLs, the non-HCC etiology was more frequently diagnosed in lesions that were located in the left lobe, in females, and in patients with a history of active NHPMD. Thus, the lower frequency of HCC in the abovementioned groups demonstrated that a cautious implementation of the current consensus radiological criteria would be required for these groups, particularly in patients with an active NHPMD, given the fact that the consensus criteria were not validated in these populations. A more active diagnostic approach may ultimately be needed for these patients. Large prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Usefulness of Imaging and Biological Tools for the Characterization of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

This study aims to evaluate the performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and biological tests to characterize portal vein thrombosis (PVT). We retrospectively analyzed 101 patients with PVT, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In all patients, demographic, biologic, imaging, and endoscopic data were collected. All patients underwent CEUS and a second line imaging technique (CE-CT/MRI) to characterize PVT. Of the 101 cirrhotic subjects, 77 (76.2%) had HCC. CEUS had 98.6% sensitivity (Se) and 89.3% specificity (Sp) for the characterization of PVT type. A significant correlation was found between alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels and the PVT characterization at CEUS (r = 0.28, p = 0.0098) and CT/MRI (r = 0.3, p = 0.0057). Using the AFP rule-out cutoff values for HCC (AFP < 20 ng/dL), 78% of the subjects were correctly classified as having benign PVT, while 100% of the subjects were correctly classified as tumor-in-vein (TIV) when the rule-in cutoff value was used (AFP ≥ 200 ng/dL). Using multiple regression analysis, we obtained a score for classifying PVT. The PVT score performed better than CEUS (AUC—0.99 vs. AUC—0.93, p = 0.025) or AFP serum levels (AUC—0.99 vs. AUC—0.96, p = 0.047) for characterizing PVT. In conclusion, CEUS is a sensitive method for the characterization of PVT. The PVT score had the highest performance for PVT characterization.

Microscopic Portal Vein Invasion in Relation to Tumor Focality and Dimension in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Microscopic portal vein invasion (microPVI) and tumor multifocality are hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prognosis factors. To investigate whether microPVI and multifocality are directly related to each other.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the relationships between microPVI, multifocality, and maximum tumor diameter (MTD) in prospectively collected transplanted HCC patients.

RESULTS

HCCs with 1, 2, or ≥ 3 foci had more microPVI in larger than in smaller HCCs, with microPVI being present in 52.24% of single large foci. Conversely, microPVI patients had similar percentages of single and multifocal lesions. A linear regression model of MTD, showed microPVI best associated with MTD, with 2.49 as coefficient, whereas multifocality had a 0.83 coefficient. A logistic regression model of microPVI showed significant association with tumor multifocality, especially for small HCCs. Trends for microPVI and multifocality in relation to MTD revealed that both increased with MTD but more significantly for microPVI. Survival was similar in patients with small HCCs, with or without microPVI, but was significantly worse in microPVI patients with larger HCCs. No patient survival differences were found in relation to focality.

CONCLUSIONS

MTD had stronger associations with microPVI than with multifocality. microPVI was associated with worse survival in patients with large HCCs, but survival was not impacted by number of tumor foci. microPVI and multifocality appear weakly related, having different behavior in relation to MTD and survival.

A Combination of Blood Lymphocytes and AST Levels Distinguishes Patients with Small Hepatocellular Carcinomas from Non-cancer Patients

PURPOSE

HCC patients typically present at an advanced tumor stage, in which surgical therapies cannot be used. Screening ultrasound exams can increase the numbers of patients diagnosed with small tumors, but are often not used in patients at risk for HCC. We evaluated clinically available and cheap potential blood tests as biomarkers for screening patients at risk for HCC.

METHODS

A comparison was made of commonly used blood count and liver function parameters in a group of patients (n = 101) with small HCCs (≤ 3 cm) or without HCC (n = 275), who presented for liver transplantation in our institute.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found for blood lymphocytes and AST levels. This 2-parameter combination was found to be significantly different between patients with small HCCs versus no HCC. Using the combination of lymphocytes and AST levels to dichotomize the HCC patients, only blood levels of alpha-fetoprotein among the tumor characteristics were found to be significantly different among the 2 HCC groups, as well as levels of blood total bilirubin, ALKP, and PLR ratio. The results were confirmed using a separate smaller cohort of non-transplanted small size HCC patients.

CONCLUSION

The combination of elevated blood levels of lymphocyte counts and AST levels holds promise for screening of patients with chronic liver disease who are at risk for HCC.

Relationships Between Indices of Tumor Aggressiveness in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) aggressiveness factors include serum levels of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), maximum tumor diameter (MTD), tumor multifocality, and presence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT).

AIMS

The interdependence of these factors has not been closely studied.

METHODS

A large HCC database was examined for the presence of patients with PVT and multifocality and was analyzed retrospectively for the relationship of these 2 parameters to each other and to MTD and survival.

RESULTS

Multifocality was found to increase with increase in MTD in the whole cohort and especially in patients with PVT. PVT also increased with increasing MTD. Neither increases in multifocality nor in PVT depended on elevated serum AFP levels, although they each increased with higher AFP levels. PVT increased in monofocal tumors as MTD increased but increased further in multifocal tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Multifocality and PVT appear to be separate processes, each increasing with increase in MTD and AFP levels. The data support the hypothesis that in hepatocarcinogenesis, various factors cause increase in MTD, that in turn causes increased multifocality and PVT, which are non-co-dependent. However, both multifocality and PVT mechanisms involve both HCC cell growth and invasiveness, multifocality in liver parenchyma, and PVT in the portal vein.

Tumor multifocality and serum albumin levels can identify groups of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein thrombosis having distinct survival outcomes

Background

Macroscopic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a major poor prognosis factor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but constitute a heterogeneous group.

Aims

To examine blood and tumor parameters of 1667 HCC patients who had PVT to identify factors that could differentiate different survival subsets.

Methods

a large HCC database was examined for presence of patients with PVT and analyzed retrospectively for PVT-associated factors and prognosis.

Results

A logistic regression model was calculated for presence of PVT. Highest odds ratios were found for tumor multifocality and serum albumin levels, as well as serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and bilirubin levels. A Kaplan-Meier and Cox model on survival also showed the highest hazard ratios for tumor multifocality and serum albumin. A model was constructed on all 4 possible combinations of tumor focality and serum albumin in PVT patients. The longest survival group had <2 tumor nodules plus serum albumin >3.5 g/dL. Conversely, the shortest survival group had >2 tumor nodules plus serum albumin <3.5 g/dL. These 2 patient groups differed in maximum tumor diameter and levels of serum AFP, AST and bilirubin.

Conclusions

Combination low tumor focality and high serum albumin identifies prognostically better PVT patient subgroups that might benefit from aggressive therapies.

•

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a major poor prognosis factor in HCC patients.

•

We found that the highest odds ratios for PVT included number of tumor foci and serum albumin levels.

•

A model was constructed with all 4 possible combinations of these 2 parameters.

•

The longest survival group had <2 tumor nodules plus normal albumin. Conversely, the shortest survival group had >2 tumor nodules plus low albumin. These 2 PVT groups had a 3-fold difference in survival and had significantly different AFP and bilirubin levels.

•

These findings provide simple patient selection criteria for treating in PVT patients.