Potential clinical significance of ERβ ON promoter methylation in sporadic breast cancer

Estrogen Receptor β4 Regulates Chemotherapy Resistance and Induces Cancer Stem Cells in Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) has the worst prognosis among all breast cancers, and survival in patients with recurrence is rarely beyond 12 months due to acquired resistance to chemotherapy, which is the standard of care for these patients. Our hypothesis is that Estrogen Receptor β1 (ERβ1) increases response to chemotherapy but is opposed by ERβ4, which it preferentially dimerizes with. The role of ERβ1 and ERβ4 in influencing chemotherapy sensitivity has never been studied before. CRISPR/CAS9 was used to truncate ERβ1 Ligand Binding Domain (LBD) and knock down the exon unique to ERβ4. We show that the truncated ERβ1 LBD in a variety of mutant p53 TNBC cell lines, where ERβ1 ligand dependent function was inactivated, had increased resistance to Paclitaxel, whereas the ERβ4 knockdown cell line was sensitized to Paclitaxel. We further show that ERβ1 LBD truncation, as well as treatment with ERβ1 antagonist 2-phenyl-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5,7-bis(trifluoromethyl)-pyrazolo[1,5-a] pyrimidine (PHTPP), leads to increase in the drug efflux transporters. Hypoxia Inducible Factors (HIFs) activate factors involved in pluripotency and regulate the stem cell phenotype, both in normal and cancer cells. Here we show that the ERβ1 and ERβ4 regulate these stem cell markers like SOX2, OCT4, and Nanog in an opposing manner; and we further show that this regulation is mediated by HIFs. We show the increase of cancer cell stemness due to ERβ1 LBD truncation is attenuated when HIF1/2α is knocked down by siRNA. Finally, we show an increase in the breast cancer stem cell population due to ERβ1 antagonist using both ALDEFLUOR^TM and SOX2/OCT4 response element (SORE6) reporters in SUM159 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines. Since most TNBC cancers are ERβ4 positive, while only a small proportion of TNBC patients are ERβ1 positive, we believe that simultaneous activation of ERβ1 with agonists and inactivation of ERβ4, in combination with paclitaxel, can be more efficacious and yield better outcome for chemotherapy resistant TNBC patients.

Estrogen Receptor Beta: The Promising Biomarker and Potential Target in Metastases

The discovery of the Estrogen Receptor Beta (ERβ) in 1996 opened new perspectives in the diagnostics and therapy of different types of cancer. Here, we present a review of the present research knowledge about its role in endocrine-related cancers: breast, prostate, and thyroid, and colorectal cancers. We also discuss the reasons for the controversy of its role in carcinogenesis and why it is still not in use as a biomarker in clinical practice. Given that the diagnostics and therapy would benefit from the introduction of new biomarkers, we suggest ways to overcome the contradictions in elucidating the role of ERβ.

The role of estrogen receptor beta in breast cancer

Breast cancer, a malignant tumor originating from mammary epithelial tissue, is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Challenges facing the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer necessitate the search for new mechanisms and drugs to improve outcomes. Estrogen receptor (ER) is considered to be important for determining the diagnosis and treatment strategy. The discovery of the second estrogen receptor, ERβ, provides an opportunity to understand estrogen action. The emergence of ERβ can be traced back to 1996. Over the past 20 years, an increasing body of evidence has implicated the vital effect of ERβ in breast cancer. Although there is controversy among scholars, ERβ is generally thought to have antiproliferative effects in disease progression. This review summarizes available evidence regarding the involvement of ERβ in the clinical treatment and prognosis of breast cancer and describes signaling pathways associated with ERβ. We hope to highlight the potential of ERβ as a therapeutic target.

Mechanisms for estrogen receptor expression in human cancer

Estrogen is a steroid hormone that has critical roles in reproductive development, bone homeostasis, cardiovascular remodeling and brain functions. However, estrogen also promotes mammary, ovarian and endometrial tumorigenesis. Estrogen antagonists and drugs that reduce estrogen biosynthesis have become highly successful therapeutic agents for breast cancer patients. The effects of estrogen are largely mediated by estrogen receptor (ER) α and ERβ, which are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily of transcription factors. The mechanisms underlying the aberrant expression of ER in breast cancer and other types of human tumors are complex, involving considerable alternative splicing of ERα and ERβ, transcription factors, epigenetic and post-transcriptional regulation of ER expression. Elucidation of mechanisms for ER expression may not only help understand cancer progression and evolution, but also shed light on overcoming endocrine therapy resistance. Herein, we review the complex mechanisms for regulating ER expression in human cancer.

Methylation-specific PCR: four steps in primer design

Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) is still the method of choice for a single gene methylation study. The proper design of the primer pairs is a prerequisite for obtaining reliable PCR results. Despite numerous protocols describing the rules for MSP primer design, none of them provide a comprehensive approach to the problem. Our aim was to depict a workflow for the primer design that is concise and easy to follow. In order to achieve this goal, adequate tools for promoter sequence retrieval, MSP primer design and subsequent in silico analysis are presented and discussed. Furthermore, a few instructive examples regarding a good versus a poor primer design are provided. Finally, primer design is demonstrated according to the proposed workflow. This article aims to provide researchers, interested in a single gene methylation studies, with useful information regarding successful primer design.