1
|
González-Viguera J, Martínez-Pérez E, Pérez-Montero H, Arangüena M, Guedea F, Gutiérrez-Miguélez C. Hype or hope? A review of challenges in balancing tumor control and treatment toxicity in breast cancer from the perspective of the radiation oncologist. Clin Transl Oncol 2024; 26:561-573. [PMID: 37505372 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03287-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this article is to discuss the challenges and new strategies in managing breast cancer patients, with a specific focus on radiation oncology and the importance of balancing oncologic outcomes with quality of life and post-treatment morbidity. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify advances in the management of breast cancer, exploring de-escalation strategies, hypofractionation schemes, predictors and tools for reducing toxicity (radiation-induced lymphocyte apoptosis, deep inspiration breath-hold, adaptive radiotherapy), enhancer treatments (hyperthermia, immunotherapy) and innovative diagnostic modalities (PET-MRI, omics). Balancing oncologic outcomes with quality of life and post-treatment morbidity is crucial in the era of personalized medicine. Radiotherapy plays a critical role in the management of breast cancer patients. Large randomized trials are necessary to generalize some practices and cost remains the main obstacle for many innovations that are already applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier González-Viguera
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Evelyn Martínez-Pérez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Héctor Pérez-Montero
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marina Arangüena
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ferran Guedea
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li X, Zhong X, Xu H, Wang J, Liu X, Wang Y, He L, Ma J, Li G, Liu L. Survival analysis of palliative radiotherapy in patients with HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2024; 14:1305429. [PMID: 38260126 PMCID: PMC10800428 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1305429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Whether radiotherapy can improve the long-term survival of HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer remains unclear. We launched this study to explore the effect of HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer patients through anti-HER-2 targeted therapy + radiotherapy. Methods 488 HER-2 + metastatic breast cancer patients who received anti-HER2 targeted ± local radiotherapy from March 2006 to September 2021 were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into a radiotherapy group (n=207) and a non-radiotherapy group (n=281) based on whether they received radiotherapy or not. 1: 1 propensity matching analysis was used to determine two groups of patients with similar baselines. Results Before matching, the radiotherapy group (n=207) had a median overall survival (mOS) of 51.7 months (48.8-63.8), which was superior to the non-radiotherapy group's (n=281) mOS of 33.9 months (27.9-39.9) (P < 0.0001). Moreover, the radiotherapy group exhibited better 1-year (94.6% vs 83.9%), 3-year (70.8% vs 45.5%), and 5-year (43.3% vs 25.0%) survival rates compared to the control group. Propensity score matching analysis identified 135 pairs of baseline-matched patients. In the matched groups, the mOS was 57.2 (44.5-69.8) months in the radiotherapy group (n=135) and 34.1 (27.5-40.6) months in the non-radiotherapy group (n=135), showing a statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001). Additionally, the radiotherapy group demonstrated 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 93.2%, 71.5%, and 46.9%, respectively, while those in the non-radiotherapy group were 89.4%, 45.8%, and 22.2%, respectively. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that the presence of brain metastasis, liver metastasis, and radiotherapy were identified as independent predictive factors significantly associated with OS. Conclusion In patients with HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer, radiotherapy was associated with better survival benefits compared to those who did not receive radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueting Li
- Division of Head & Neck Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xiaorong Zhong
- Department of Breast Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Hongyu Xu
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Division of Head & Neck Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xianguo Liu
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yang Wang
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Liang He
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jiayu Ma
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Guanghua Li
- Department of Oncology, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Lei Liu
- Division of Head & Neck Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stenmark Tullberg A, Sjöström M, Niméus E, Killander F, Chang SL, Feng FY, Speers CW, Pierce LJ, Kovács A, Lundstedt D, Holmberg E, Karlsson P. Integrating Tumor-Intrinsic and Immunologic Factors to Identify Immunogenic Breast Cancers from a Low-Risk Cohort: Results from the Randomized SweBCG91RT Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:1783-1793. [PMID: 37071498 PMCID: PMC10150244 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-2746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The local immune infiltrate's influence on tumor progression may be closely linked to tumor-intrinsic factors. The study aimed to investigate whether integrating immunologic and tumor-intrinsic factors can identify patients from a low-risk cohort who may be candidates for radiotherapy (RT) de-escalation. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN The SweBCG91RT trial included 1,178 patients with stage I to IIA breast cancer, randomized to breast-conserving surgery with or without adjuvant RT, and followed for a median of 15.2 years. We trained two models designed to capture immunologic activity and immunomodulatory tumor-intrinsic qualities, respectively. We then analyzed if combining these two variables could further stratify tumors, allowing for identifying a subgroup where RT de-escalation is feasible, despite clinical indicators of a high risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). RESULTS The prognostic effect of the immunologic model could be predicted by the tumor-intrinsic model (Pinteraction = 0.01). By integrating measurements of the immunologic- and tumor-intrinsic models, patients who benefited from an active immune infiltrate could be identified. These patients benefited from standard RT (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09-0.85; P = 0.025) and had a 5.4% 10-year incidence of IBTR after irradiation despite high-risk genomic indicators and a low frequency of systemic therapy. In contrast, high-risk tumors without an immune infiltrate had a high 10-year incidence of IBTR despite RT treatment (19.5%; 95% CI, 12.2-30.3). CONCLUSIONS Integrating tumor-intrinsic and immunologic factors may identify immunogenic tumors in early-stage breast cancer populations dominated by ER-positive tumors. Patients who benefit from an activated immune infiltrate may be candidates for RT de-escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel Stenmark Tullberg
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Martin Sjöström
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology/Pathology and Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Emma Niméus
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology/Pathology and Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Fredrika Killander
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology/Pathology and Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Felix Y. Feng
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Lori J. Pierce
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Anikó Kovács
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Dan Lundstedt
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Erik Holmberg
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Per Karlsson
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Comparison of Efficacy and Psychology of Breast-Conserving Surgery and Modified Radical Mastectomy on Patients with Early Breast Cancer under Graded Nursing. COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE 2022; 2022:4491573. [PMID: 36158135 PMCID: PMC9507650 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4491573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Objective To compare the efficacy and psychology of breast-conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy in patients with early breast cancer (BC) under graded nursing. Methods Forty-one early breast-conserving surgery BC patients admitted to our hospital from April 2020 to March 2022 were regarded as group A, and 52 with modified radical surgery were seen as group B. The operating time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, and hospital stay were compared, and the postoperative adverse effects were counted. In addition, patients' psychology and quality of life were assessed using the HAMD, HAMA, and QLSBC rating scales. At the time of discharge, a treatment satisfaction survey was conducted. Results The operative time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, and hospital stay of patients in group A were lower than those in group B (P < 0.05). After treatment, the HAMD and HAMA scores were lower in group A than in group B, while the QLSBC scores and treatment satisfaction were higher (P < 0.05). Conclusion Breast-conserving surgery under graded nursing is less damaging to early BC patients. It can effectively shorten the postoperative recovery process and improve the psychology and quality of life, so it has higher clinical applicability.
Collapse
|
5
|
Hypofractionation and Concomitant Boost in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS): Analysis of a Prospective Case Series with Long-Term Follow-Up. LIFE (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 12:life12060889. [PMID: 35743920 PMCID: PMC9225308 DOI: 10.3390/life12060889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
We previously reported on a cohort of breast cancer patients affected with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) that were treated with breast conservative surgery and hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy with a concomitant boost to the lumpectomy cavity. We now report on the long-term results of the oncological and toxicity outcomes, at a median follow-up of 11.2 years. We also include an analysis of the predictive factors for local recurrence (LR). Eighty-two patients with long-term observation were considered for this report. All received hypofractionated post-operative radiotherapy with a concomitant boost (45 Gy/20 fractions to the whole breast and 50 Gy/20 fractions to the lumpectomy cavity). We report on LC rates at 5 and 10 years, overall survival (OS), and breast-cancer-specific survival (BCSS), employing the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox proportional regression analysis was used to determine the role of selected clinical parameters on the risk of local recurrence, by the univariate and multivariate models. After a median follow-up of 11.2 years (range 5–15 years), 9 pts (11%) developed LR. The LR rates at 5 years and 10 years were 2.4% and 8.2%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 98.8% and 91.6%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year breast-cancer-specific survival rates were 100.0% and 99.0%. Late skin and subcutaneous toxicities were generally mild, and cosmetic results were good–excellent for most patients. For the univariate regression analysis, ER positive status (HR; 95% CI, p = 0.021), PgR positive status (HR; 95% CI, p = 0.012), and the aggregate data of positive hormonal status (HR; 95% CI, p = 0.021) were inversely correlated to LR risk. Conversely, a high tumor grade (G3) was directly correlated with the risk of LR (HR; 95% CI, p = 0.048). For the multivariate regression analysis, a high tumor grade (G3) confirmed its negative impact on LR (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.19–0.75, p = 0.047). Our long-term data demonstrate hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy with a concomitant boost to be feasable, effective, and tolerable. Our experience suggests positive hormonal status to be protective with respect to LR risk. A high tumor grade is a risk factor for LR.
Collapse
|
6
|
Raphael D, Russell N, Winkens B, Immink J, Westhoff P, Stenfert Kroese M, Stam M, Bijker N, van Gestel C, van der Weijden T, Boersma L. A patient decision aid for breast cancer patients deciding on their radiation treatment, no change in decisional conflict but better informed choices. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2021; 20:1-9. [PMID: 34589620 PMCID: PMC8461042 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In selected breast cancer patients, radiation treatment (RT) lowers the recurrence risk, with minor or no improvement of survival. In these patients, the choice to undergo RT is considered a preference-sensitive decision. To facilitate shared decision-making (SDM) for this choice, a patient decision aid was made. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the PtDA on decisional conflict. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a multi-center pre- and post-intervention study (BRASA-trial). The first 214 patients made a choice without support of the PtDA; the subsequent 189 patients received a link to the PtDA. The primary endpoint was decisional conflict; secondary endpoints were perceived SDM and knowledge on treatment options. Patients filled out questionnaires immediately after, and three months after their decision. Data were analyzed with multi-level regression analysis. RESULTS After correcting for the difference in age and educational level, the mean (±SD) decisional conflict for the intervention group (27.3 ± 11.4) was similar to the control group (26.8 ± 11.4; difference = 0.86, 95 %CI 1.67,3.36) three months after their decision. This also applied to perceived SDM. Patients exposed to the PtDA pursued additional treatment less often (45% vs 56%, odds ratio 0.59, 95 %CI 0.37,0.95) and scored significantly higher on the knowledge test (7.4 ± 2.5 vs 6.1 ± 2.7, corrected difference = 1.0, 95 %CI 0.50,1.49). There was no significant increase in consultation time. CONCLUSIONS Handing out the PtDA was not associated with improved scores in decisional conflict or perceived SDM, but it was associated with a choice for less additional treatment and better knowledge about the treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D.B. Raphael
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - N.S. Russell
- Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B. Winkens
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute,Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J.M. Immink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - P.G. Westhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - M.R. Stam
- Radiotherapy Group, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - N. Bijker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands
| | | | - T. van der Weijden
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - L.J. Boersma
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Beato Tortajada I, Ferrer Albiach C, Morillo Macias V. Nomogram for the personalisation of radiotherapy treatments in breast cancer patients. Breast 2021; 60:255-262. [PMID: 34808437 PMCID: PMC8609093 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Numerous prospective studies have shown that the incorporation of genomic assays into clinical practice significantly impacts the choice of adjuvant treatments for patients with early-stage breast cancer. However, the same evidence does not exist for the treatment of locoregional recurrences. Hypothesis and objectives The main objective of this work was to identify the clinicopathological, molecular, and genetic parameters that allow patients to be more precisely categorised into risk groups, in order to create a locoregional recurrence riskclassification tool, the PersonalRT27. Material and methods To create PersonalRT27, we retrospective assessed the variables of patients with early breast cancer (stages I or II) who had undergone the OncotypeDx ® and MammaPrint ® genetic tests. These variables and factors included in the tests were categorised and weighted to obtain scores between 1 and 5 pointsto represent a lower or higher risk of relapse, respectively, based on these factors and as determined by the researchers. Results The mean follow-up time was 60.5 months (range 25–96 months); locoregional progression-free survival at the time of the analysis was 98.4%, and overall survival was 97.5%, of which 0.6% of the deaths had been cancer specific. The area under the curve for the PersonalRT27 was 0.76 (95% CI [0.70, 0.81]), sensitivity was 78%, and the specificity was 58.9%. We used these factors to create an inhospital web-based nomogram. Conclusions The PersonalRT27 is a novel tool that integrates clinical-pathological, molecular, and genetic parameters. External and independent validation will be required to implement its clinical use. Genomic assays impact the choice of adjuvant systemic treatment for patients with early-stage breast cancer. However, the same evidence does not exist for decision making regarding adjuvant locoregional therapy. In other words, can the clinically approved genomic assays predict the risk of locoregional recurrende as a primary event. The main objective of this work was to identify the clinicopathological, molecular, and genetic parameters that allow patients to be more precisely categorised into risk groups, in order to create a locoregional recurrence risk-classification tool, the PersonalRT27.
Collapse
|
8
|
Invernizzi M, de Sire A, Venetis K, Cigna E, Carda S, Borg M, Cisari C, Fusco N. Quality of Life Interventions in Breast Cancer Survivors: State of the Art in Targeted Rehabilitation Strategies. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 2021; 22:801-810. [PMID: 34151769 DOI: 10.2174/1871520621666210609095602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Revised: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor and the most prevalent cause of mortality in women. Advances in early diagnosis and more effective adjuvant therapies have improved the long-term survival of these patients. Pharmacotherapies and intrinsic tumor-related factors may lead to a wide spectrum of treatment-related disabling complications, such as breast cancer-related lymphedema, axillary web syndrome, persistent pain, bone loss, arthralgia, and fatigue. These conditions have a detrimental impact on the health-related quality of life of survivors. Here, we sought to provide a portrait of the role that rehabilitation plays in breast cancer survivors. Particular emphasis has been placed on recovering function, improving independence in activities of daily living, and reducing disability. This complex scenario requires a precision medicine approach to provide more effective decision-making and adequate treatment compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Invernizzi
- Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Alessandro de Sire
- Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | | | - Emanuele Cigna
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Stefano Carda
- Neuropsychology and Neurorehabilitation Service, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne. Switzerland
| | - Margherita Borg
- Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Carlo Cisari
- Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Metovic J, Bragoni A, Osella-Abate S, Borella F, Benedetto C, Gualano MR, Olivero E, Scaioli G, Siliquini R, Ferrando PM, Bertero L, Sapino A, Cassoni P, Castellano I. Clinical Relevance of Tubular Breast Carcinoma: Large Retrospective Study and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:653388. [PMID: 33996576 PMCID: PMC8117349 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.653388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Tubular carcinoma (TC) is a low proliferative grade 1 (G1) breast cancer (BC). Despite its favorable outcome and allegedly lower aggressiveness, patients are treated like other luminal G1 BC, with radiotherapy (RT) and hormonal therapy (HT). We performed: (1) a retrospective study comparing a TC cohort and a control series of luminal G1 BC and (2) a systematic review and meta-analysis focused on TC outcome. Materials and Methods: We selected a series of 572 G1 luminal BC patients [111 TC, 350 not otherwise specified (NOS), and 111 special-type (ST) BC] with follow-up and clinico-pathological data, who underwent local excision followed by RT at Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin. Moreover, 22 and 13 studies were included in qualitative and quantitative meta-analysis, respectively. Results: TCs were generally smaller (≤10 mm) (P < 0.001), with lower lymph node involvement (P < 0.001). TCs showed no local and/or distant recurrences, while 16 NOS and 2 ST relapsed (P = 0.036). Kaplan–Meier curves confirmed more favorable TC outcome (DFI: log-rank test P = 0.03). Meta-analysis data, including the results of our study, showed that the pooled DFI rate was 96.4 and 91.8% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Meta-regression analyses did not show a significant influence of RT nor HT on the DFI at 10 years. Conclusions: Compared to the other G1 BCs, TCs have an excellent outcome. The meta-analysis shows that TC recurrences are infrequent, and HT and RT have limited influence on prognosis. Hence, accurate diagnosis of TC subtype is critical to ensuring a tailored treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasna Metovic
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Bragoni
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Simona Osella-Abate
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Fulvio Borella
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Gynecology and Obstetrics 1, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Chiara Benedetto
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Gynecology and Obstetrics 1, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Maria Rosaria Gualano
- Department of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Elena Olivero
- Department of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giacomo Scaioli
- Department of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberta Siliquini
- Department of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Pietro Maria Ferrando
- Plastic Surgery Unit, Department of General and Specialistic Surgery, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Bertero
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Anna Sapino
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.,Pathology Division, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Paola Cassoni
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Isabella Castellano
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang F, Meszoely I, Pal T, Mayer IA, Bailey CE, Zheng W, Shu XO. Radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for elderly patients with early-stage breast cancer: A national registry-based study. Int J Cancer 2020; 148:857-867. [PMID: 32838477 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Considerable controversies exist regarding whether elderly patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving breast-conserving surgery (BCS) should forgo radiotherapy. We utilized the National Cancer Database to analyze data of 115 516 women aged ≥70 years, treated with BCS for T1-2N0-1M0 breast cancer between 2004 and 2014. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for mortality 3, 5 and 10 years after 90 days of BCS associated with radiotherapy. Patients who received no radiotherapy had a higher mortality rate than those who received radiotherapy (5-year survival rate: 71.2% vs 83.8%), with multivariable-adjusted HRs of 1.65 (95% CI: 1.57-1.72) for 3-year mortality, 1.53 (1.47-1.58) for 5-year mortality and 1.43 (1.39-1.48) for 10-year mortality. The association held even for patients ≥90 years. This association was observed in all strata by reasons for radiotherapy omission, receipt of endocrine therapy or chemotherapy, calendar period and other clinical characteristics, with 40% to 65% increased 5-year mortality for patients without radiotherapy. This positive association persisted when analyses were restricted to patients with T1N0 and estrogen-receptor-positive disease who had received endocrine therapy (5-year mortality: HR 1.47 [1.39-1.57]) and in propensity score weighted analyses. Our study shows, in routine practice, elderly patients who received no post-BCS radiotherapy had higher total mortality than those who received radiotherapy. These findings suggest that the current recommendation of omission of post-BCS radiotherapy for elderly women with early-stage breast cancer may need to be reconsidered, particularly for those without contraindication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Wang
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Ingrid Meszoely
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Tuya Pal
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ingrid A Mayer
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Breast Cancer Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Christina E Bailey
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Xiao-Ou Shu
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Franco P, Kochbati L, Siano M, De Bari B. Suggestions for Radiation Oncologists during the COVID-19 Pandemic. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2020; 2020:4892382. [PMID: 32509860 PMCID: PMC7254074 DOI: 10.1155/2020/4892382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and COVID-19 diffusion have recently become an international public health emergency. Cancer patients, as a frail population, are particularly exposed to the risk related to infections. The clinical decision-making process and the organizational workflow of radiotherapy department should be revised in the light of the critical situation. We herein provide practical suggestions derived from the available literature and discussed during an online session held within the e-learning educational program of the European School of Oncology on March 31st 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lofti Kochbati
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ariana, Tunis El Manar University, Tunisia
| | - Marco Siano
- Interdisciplinary Cancer Service-SIC, Riviera-Chablais Hospital, Rennaz, Switzerland
| | - Berardino De Bari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Réseal Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, La-Chaux-de Fonds, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Older age and comorbidity in breast cancer: is RT alone the new therapeutic frontier? J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2020; 146:1791-1800. [PMID: 32405744 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03243-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
AIM To assess the impact of age, comorbidities and endocrine therapy (ET) in older breast cancer (BC) patients treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy (Hypo-RT). METHODS From June 2009 to December 2017, we enrolled in this study 735 ER-positive BC patients (stage pT1-T2, pNx-1, M0 and age ≥ 65 years) receiving hypo-RT and followed them until September 2019. Baseline comorbidities included in the hypertension-augmented Charlson Comorbidity Index were retrospectively retrieved. Logistic regression model estimated adjusted-odds ratios (ORs) of ET prescription in relation to baseline patient and tumor characteristics. Competing risk analysis estimated 5-year cumulative incidence function (CIF) of ET discontinuation due to side effects (with BC progression or death as competing events), and its effect on locoregional recurrence (LRR) and distant metastasis (DM) (with death as competing event). RESULTS ET has been prescribed in 89% patients. In multivariable analysis, the odds of ET prescription was significantly reduced in older patients (≥ 80 years, OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.03-0.20) and significantly increased in patients with moderate comorbidity. Patients ≥ 80 years discontinued the prescribed therapy earlier and more frequently than younger (65-69 years) patients (p = 0.060). Five-year CIF of LLR, DM and death from causes other that BC were 1.7%, 2.2% and 7.5%, respectively. Patients who discontinued ET had higher chance of LRR (p = 0.004). ET use did not impact on OS in any of the analyzed groups. CONCLUSIONS In older patients, ET did not show a benefit in terms of overall survival. Further studies focusing on tailored treatment approaches are warranted to offer the best care in terms of adjuvant treatment to these patients.
Collapse
|
13
|
Arenas M, Selek U, Kaidar-Person O, Perrucci E, Montero Luis A, Boersma L, Coles C, Offersen B, Meattini I, Bölükbaşı Y, Leonardi MC, Pfeffer R, Cutuli B, Vidali C, Franco P, Kouloulias V, Masiello V, Rivera S, Bourgier C, Ciabattoni A, Lancellotta V, Trigo L, Valentini V, Poortmans P, Aristei C. The 2018 assisi think tank meeting on breast cancer: International expert panel white paper. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 151:102967. [PMID: 32450277 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
We report on the second Assisi Think Tank Meeting (ATTM) on breast cancer which was held under the auspices of the European Society for RadioTherapy & Oncology (ESTRO). In discussing in-depth current evidence and practice it was designed to identify grey areas in diverse forms of the disease. It aimed at addressing uncertainties and proposing future trials to improve patient care. Before the meeting, three key topics were selected: 1) primary systemic therapy, mastectomy, breast reconstruction and post-mastectomy radiation therapy, 2) therapeutic options in ductal carcinoma in situ, and 3) therapy de-escalation in early stage breast cancer. Clinical practice in these areas was investigated by means of an online questionnaire. The time lapse period between the survey and the meeting was used to review the literature and on-going clinical trials. At the ATTM both were discussed in depth and research protocols were proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ugur Selek
- Radiation Oncology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istambul, Turkey
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | | | | | - Liesbeth Boersma
- Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte Coles
- Radiation Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Icro Meattini
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (AOUC), Florence, Italy
| | - Yasemin Bölükbaşı
- Radiation Oncology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istambul, Turkey
| | | | - Raphael Pfeffer
- Radiation Oncology, Assuta Medical Centres, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Bruno Cutuli
- Radiation Oncology, Institut du Cancer Courlancy, Reims, France
| | - Cristiana Vidali
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (ASUITS), Trieste, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Vassilis Kouloulias
- Radiation Oncology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Valeria Masiello
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Sofia Rivera
- Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Céline Bourgier
- Radiation Oncology, ICM-Val d'Aurelle, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Valentina Lancellotta
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Lurdes Trigo
- Radiation Oncology, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Francisco Martins Porto E.P.E, Porto, Portugal
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Radiation Oncology, Iridium Kankernetwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp - University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Forster T, Köhler CVK, Debus J, Hörner-Rieber J. Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation: A New Standard of Care? Breast Care (Basel) 2020; 15:136-147. [PMID: 32398982 DOI: 10.1159/000506254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Breast-conserving therapy including lumpectomy and adjuvant whole breast irradiation (WBI) has become the standard therapy for early-stage breast cancer (EBC). Without WBI, the recurrence rate is significantly increased. However, when selecting patients at a low a priori risk of local recurrence only a small breast-cancer-specific mortality benefit, but no overall survival improvement, was detected for WBI. As most recurrences occur close to the lumpectomy cavity, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) delivered exclusively to a limited volume of tissue around the initial lumpectomy site, has gained increased attention and is now discussed as an alternative to WBI for selected EBC patients. Summary Numerous techniques for APBI (interstitial brachytherapy, external beam-based APBI, intraoperative radiotherapy, MR-guided radiotherapy) allow treatment delivery in a shorter period of time, and radiation oncologists expect to further reduce side effects by using these new techniques, with improvements in cosmetics and quality of life. In this review, we aim to describe the existing evidence for the feasibility and effectiveness of different APBI techniques used in modern radiotherapy. Key Messages APBI has provided outcomes similar to WBI combined with potentially reduced toxicity. While appropriate patient selection persists to be crucial for acceptable recurrence rates, the precise definition of patients suitable for APBI remains a matter of discussion. As long-term data are often still lacking, special attention should be paid to late side effects and long-term outcomes. Decision-making on appropriate treatment techniques should take into account not only local control rates, but also the impact on the patient's quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Franco P, De Rose F, De Santis MC, Pasinetti N, Lancellotta V, Meduri B, Meattini I. Omission of postoperative radiation after breast conserving surgery: A progressive paradigm shift towards precision medicine. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2020; 21:112-119. [PMID: 32090175 PMCID: PMC7025960 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2019] [Revised: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Post-operative radiotherapy is standard after breast conservation in early breast cancer. To de-escalate the treatment burden, indentifying a subset at very low risk of relapse is crucial. Clinical and pathological factors are important, but can be integrated with genomic signatures. Ongoing trials will provide evidence on patients at low risk for radiotherapy omission.
Radiation therapy is a standard therapeutic option in the post-operative setting for early breast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery, providing a substantial benefit in reducing the risk of local relapse with a consequent survival gain. Nevertheless, the reduction in the burden related to treatment is becoming crucial in modern oncology for both local and systemic therapies and investigational efforts are being put forward by radiations oncologists to identify a subset of women at very low risk to be potentially omitted from post-operative irradiation after breast conservation. Clinical factors, classical pathological parameters and new predictive scores derived from gene expression and next generation sequencing techniques are being integrated in the quest toward a reliable low-risk profile for breast cancer patients. We herein provide a comprehensive overview on the topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Italy.,Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, AOU Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Fiorenza De Rose
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | - Nadia Pasinetti
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- Radiation Oncology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Meduri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Adjuvant chemotherapy for node negative, high Recurrence Score TM breast cancer: in defense of de-escalation. NPJ Breast Cancer 2019; 5:24. [PMID: 31428677 PMCID: PMC6690957 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-019-0119-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
17
|
Franco P, Bartoncini S, Martini S, Iorio GC, Ricardi U. Do hypofraction and large breast size reciprocally fit in breast cancer radiotherapy? ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2019; 7:S146. [PMID: 31576353 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.06.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Franco
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Sara Bartoncini
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefania Martini
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carlo Iorio
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dong Y, Zhang WW, Wang J, Sun JY, He ZY, Wu SG. The 21-gene recurrence score and effects of adjuvant radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery in early-stage breast cancer. Future Oncol 2019; 15:1629-1639. [PMID: 30864836 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2018-0967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the associations with the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) and effect of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for early-stage breast cancer after breast conserving surgery. Methods: We included 13,246 patients in the SEER database. Results: Patients with a higher RS were independently related to nonreceipt of RT (p < 0.001). In both the traditional and Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx) RS cut-offs, the receipt of RT was not related to better breast cancer-specific survival in low- and high-risk RS groups, but was independently related to better breast cancer-specific survival in intermediate-risk RS group before (p = 0.029) and after (p = 0.001) propensity score matching. Conclusion: The 21-gene-RS may impact the decision-making of adjuvant RT in early-stage breast cancer after breast conserving surgery. The survival benefit of adjuvant RT may be limited to patients with intermediate-risk RS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Dong
- Department of Oncology, Dongguan Third People's Hospital, Affiliated Dongguan Shilong People's Hospital of Southern Medical University, Dongguan 523326, PR China
| | - Wen-Wen Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, PR China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen 361003, PR China
| | - Jia-Yuan Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, PR China
| | - Zhen-Yu He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, PR China
| | - San-Gang Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen 361003, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cho WK, Park W, Choi DH, Kim YB, Suh CO, Shin KH, Chie EK, Kim JH, Ahn SD, Kim SS, Kim K, Kim JH, Ahn SJ, Lee SY, Lee J, Kim SW, Kwon J, Ahn KJ, Shin HS, Lee HS, Lee NK. Is tumor bed boost necessary in patients who achieved ypCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast conserving therapy? (KROG 12-05 and 16-16). Breast 2019; 45:43-47. [PMID: 30844692 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2018] [Revised: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This multi-institutional study intended to investigate the effect of tumor bed boost in patients who achieved pathologic complete response (ypCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and breast-conserving therapy (BCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified 180 patients who initially had lymph node (LN) metastasis and achieved ypCR (ypT0/isN0) following NAC and BCT from the 13 institutions of the Korean Radiation Oncology Group (KROG) 16-16 and KROG 12-05. The effect of tumor bed boost on loco-regional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates was analyzed. RESULTS In all patients, five-year LRC, DFS and OS rates were 97.5%, 95.4%, and 99.4%, respectively. Tumor bed boost was performed in 158 (87.8%) patients. Advanced N-stage (cN2-3, p = 0.036), close resection margin (p < 0.001), and sentinel lymph node biopsy (p = 0.040) were unfavorable factors for DFS. Tumor bed boost was not a significant factor for LRC, DFS, and OS. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests the benefit of tumor bed boost might be minimal in ypCR patients following NAC and BCT. Larger prospective studies are needed to address this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Won Kyung Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Doo Ho Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Bae Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang-Ok Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea
| | - Eui Kyu Chie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Ho Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Seung Do Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Su Ssan Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Hee Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Ja Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Young Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeongshim Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Won Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiation Oncology, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeanny Kwon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki Jung Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Soo Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bundang CHA Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyung Sik Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Nam Kwon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tang L, Matsushita H, Jingu K. Controversial issues in radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer in older patients: a systematic review. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2018; 59:789-793. [PMID: 30321392 PMCID: PMC6251423 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rry071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Revised: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common malignant disease among older women, and the number of new older patients per year is increasing year by year. Radiotherapy has been confirmed as an important treatment after breast conservation for the reduction of local recurrence and mortality for all patients, including node-positive cases. However, there are fewer clinical trials evaluating the toxicity and benefits of radiotherapy for older patients. Whether radiotherapy can provide substantial benefit for older patients after breast-conserving surgery is controversial. This systematic review will focus on the key aspects of this controversial issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liuwei Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-chou, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Japan
| | - Haruo Matsushita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-chou, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Japan
| | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-chou, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ratosa I, Jenko A, Oblak I. Breast size impact on adjuvant radiotherapy adverse effects and dose parameters in treatment planning. Radiol Oncol 2018; 52:233-244. [PMID: 30210048 PMCID: PMC6137355 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2018-0026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Breast radiotherapy is an established adjuvant treatment after breast conserving surgery. One of the important individual factors affecting the final cosmetic outcome after radiation is breast size. The purpose of this review is to summarise the clinical toxicity profile of adjuvant radiotherapy in women with breasts of various sizes, and to evaluate the treatment planning studies comparing target coverage and dose to thoracic organs at risk in relation to breast size. Conclusions Inhomogeneity and excessive radiation dose (hot spots) in the planning of target volume as well as large volume of the breast per se, all contribute to a higher rate of acute adverse events and suboptimal final cosmetic outcome in adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy, regardless of the fractionation schedule. Improved homogeneity leads to a lower rate of ≥ grade 2 toxicity and can be achieved with three-dimensional conformal or modulated radiotherapy techniques. There may be an association between body habitus (higher body mass index, bigger breast size, pendulous breast, and large chest wall separation) and a higher mean dose to the ipsilateral lung and whole heart. A combination of the technical innovations (i.e. the breath-hold technique, prone position with or without holding breath, lateral decubitus position, and thermoplastic bra), dose prescription (i.e. moderate hypofractionation), and irradiated volume (i.e. partial breast irradiation) should be tailored to every single patient in clinical practice to mitigate the risk of radiation adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivica Ratosa
- Division of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Aljasa Jenko
- Division of Radiotherapy, Department of Medical Physics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Irena Oblak
- Division of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|