Radiotherapy with the anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 immune checkpoint blocker avelumab: acute toxicities in triple-negative breast cancer

Current State of Knowledge on the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treatment: Approaches, Efficacy, and Challenges

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive breast cancer subtype with limited treatment options. Recently, there has been a growing interest in immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in TNBC, leading to extensive preclinical and clinical research. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge on ICIs efficacy and their predictive markers in TNBC and highlights the areas where the data are still limited. Currently, the only approved ICI-based regimen for TNBC is pembrolizumab with chemotherapy. Its advantage over chemotherapy alone was confirmed for non-metastatic TNBC regardless of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (KEYNOTE-522) and for metastatic, PD-L1-positive TNBC (KEYNOTE-355). Pembrolizumab's efficacy was also evaluated in monotherapy, or in combination with niraparib and radiation therapy, showing potential efficacy and acceptable safety profile in phase 2 clinical trials. Atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel increased the overall survival (OS) over placebo + nab-paclitaxel in early TNBC, regardless of PD-L1 status (IMpassion031). In IMpassion130 (untreated, advanced TNBC), the OS improvement was not statistically significant in the intention-to-treat population but clinically meaningful in the PD-L1 positive cohort. The durvalumab-anthracycline combination showed an increased response durability over placebo anthracycline in early TNBC (GeparNuevo). Several phase 1 clinical trials also showed a potential efficacy of atezolizumab and avelumab monotherapy in metastatic TNBC. ICIs appear to be applicable in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, and are both pretreated and previously untreated patients. Further research is necessary to determine the most beneficial drug combinations and optimize patient selection. It is essential to identify the predictive markers for ICIs and factors affecting their expression.

Research Progresses in Immunological Checkpoint Inhibitors for Breast Cancer Immunotherapy

Tumor immune escape refers to the phenomenon in which tumor cells escape the recognition and attack of the body’s immune system through various mechanisms so that they can survive and proliferate in vivo. The imbalance of immune checkpoint protein expression is the primary mechanism for breast cancer to achieve immune escape. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death protein-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are critical immune checkpoints for breast cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors block the checkpoint and relieve its inhibition effect on immune cells, reactivate T-cells and destroy cancer cells and restore the body’s ability to resist tumors. At present, immunological checkpoint inhibitors have made significant progress in breast cancer immunotherapy, and it is expected to become a new treatment for breast cancer.

Radiation therapy and immunotherapy in breast cancer treatment: preliminary data and perspectives

Introduction: The discovery of the major role of the immune system in the tumor process has led to the development of therapeutic strategies with immunotherapy. The potential systemic role of radiotherapy, (RT) used for a long time for its local action, based on its impact on immunity, is now better understood. The combination of immunotherapy and radiation therapy is currently a field of sustained research programs and has shown successful results, in non-small cell lung cancer, for example. Breast cancer (BC) was wrongly considered poorly immunogenic and put aside during accelerating progress in this new area of treatment.Areas covered: This review provides an overview of pre-clinical and clinical rationales to associate immunotherapy with radiation therapy in the management of breast cancer.Expert opinion: Immunotherapy has been used only recently in breast cancer, but clinical trials have yet to determine the place of this treatment. RT may be useful to enhance the response of breast tumors to immunotherapy. This new approach in breast cancer management is currently based on limited data but should be further investigated, especially in triple-negative breast cancer and in the neoadjuvant setting.

[Immunotherapy and radiotherapy for management of breast cancer: Rational and overview on clinical practice]

The discovery of immunotherapy led to understand the major role of immune system during the tumor process. Conventional treatments, such as chemotherapy, are directly tumoricidal. New drugs are developed to target specifically the immune system to make it regain its ability to recognize and eliminate cancer cells. Radiotherapy is used for a long time for its local action, but its systemic role, based on its impact on immunity, is now better known. Breast cancer was wrongly considered poorly immunogenic and put aside the amazing progress in this new area of treatment. In this article, we would like to present the pre-clinical and clinical rationales to associate immunotherapy to radiotherapy in the management of breast cancer.

Predictive biomarkers and mechanisms underlying resistance to PD1/PD-L1 blockade cancer immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint blockade targeting PD-1/PD-L1 has promising therapeutic efficacy in a variety of tumors, but resistance during treatment is a major issue. In this review, we describe the utility of PD-L1 expression levels, mutation burden, immune cell infiltration, and immune cell function for predicting the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy. Furthermore, we explore the mechanisms underlying immunotherapy resistance caused by PD-L1 expression on tumor cells, T cell dysfunction, and T cell exhaustion. Based on these mechanisms, we propose combination therapeutic strategies. We emphasize the importance of patient-specific treatment plans to reduce the economic burden and prolong the life of patients. The predictive indicators, resistance mechanisms, and combination therapies described in this review provide a basis for improved precision medicine.

Efficacy and safety profiles of programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 inhibitors in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer: A comprehensive systematic review

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with worse prognosis, with limited treatment regiments available and higher mortality rate. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) showed great potentials in treating malignancies and may serve as potential therapies for TNBC. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of TNBC. Literature search was performed via PubMed, EBSCOhost, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases, selecting studies which evaluated the use of anti-PD-1/PDL1 for TNBC from inception until February 2019. Risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Overall, 7 studies evaluating outcomes of 1395 patients with TNBC were included in this systematic review. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 showed significant antitumor effect, proven by their promising response (objective response rate (ORR), 18.5-39.4%) and survival rates (median overall survival (OS), 9.2-21.3 months). Moreover, anti- PD-1/PD-L1 yielded better outcomes when given as first-line therapy, and overexpression of PD-L1 in tumors showed better therapeutic effects. On the other hands, safety profiles were similar across agents and generally acceptable, with grade ≥3 treatment- related adverse effects (AEs) ranging from 9.5% to 15.6% and no new AEs were experienced by TNBC patients. Most grade ≥3 AEs are immune-mediated, which are manifested as neutropenia, fatigue, peripheral neuropathy, and anemia. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors showed promising efficacy and tolerable AEs, and thus may benefit TNBC patients. Further studies of randomized controlled trials with larger populations are needed to better confirm the potential of these agents.

Synergetic Functional Nanocomposites Enhance Immunotherapy in Solid Tumors by Remodeling the Immunoenvironment

Checkpoint blockade immunotherapy has demonstrated significant clinical success in various malignant tumors. However, the therapeutic response is limited due to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (ITM). In this study, a functional nanomaterial, layered double hydroxides (LDHs), carrying specific functional miR155 is developed to modulate ITM by synergistically repolarizing tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) to M1 subtype. LDH nanoparticles loaded with miR155 (LDH@155) exhibit superior ability in cellular uptake by murine macrophages, miR escape into the cytoplasm and TAMs specific delivery when introtumoral administration. Meanwhile, upon exposure to LDH@155, TAMs are significantly skewed to M1 subtype, which markedly inhibits myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) formation and stimulates T-lymphocytes to secrete more interferon-γ (IFN-γ) cytokines in vitro. Introtumoral administration of LDH@155 reduces the percentage of TAMs and MDSCs in the tumor and elevates CD4+ and CD8+ T cell infiltration and activation, which can promote therapeutic efficiency of α-PD-1 antibody immunotherapy. Furthermore, it is found that LDH@155 significantly decreases the expression level of phosphorylated STAT3 and ERK1/2 and activates NF-κB expression in TAMs, indicating that the STAT3, ERK1/2, and NF-κB signaling pathways may involve in LDH@155-induced macrophage polarization. Overall, the results suggest that LDH@155 nanoparticles may, in the future, function as a promising agent for cancer combinational immunotherapy.