Biology, geometry and information

2-Site versus 3-site models of ATP hydrolysis by F1-ATPase: definitive mathematical proof using combinatorics and conservation equations

The F1-ATPase enzyme is the smallest-known molecular motor that rotates in 120° steps, driven by the hydrolysis of ATP. It is a multi-subunit enzyme that contains three catalytic sites. A central question is how the elementary chemical reactions that occur in the three sites are coupled to mechanical rotation. Various models and coupling schemes have been formulated in an attempt to answer this question. They can be classified as 2-site (bi-site) models, exemplified by Boyer's binding change mechanism first proposed 50 years ago, and 3-site (tri-site) models such as Nath's torsional mechanism, first postulated 25 years ago and embellished 1 year back. Experimental data collated using diverse approaches have conclusively shown that steady-state ATP hydrolysis by F1-ATPase occurs in tri-site mode. Hence older models have been continually modified to make them conform to the new facts. Here, we have developed a pure mathematical approach based on combinatorics and conservation laws to test if proposed models are 2-site or 3-site. Based on this novel combinatorial approach, we have proved that older and modified models are effectively bi‒site models in that catalysis and rotation in F1-ATPase occurs in these models with only two catalytic sites occupied by bound nucleotide. Hence these models contradict consensus experimental data. The recent 2023 model of ATP hydrolysis by F1-ATPase has been proved to be a true tri-site model based on our novel mathematical approach. Such pure mathematical proofs constitute an important step forward for ATP mechanism. However, in what must be considered an aspect with great scientific potential, the power of such mathematical proofs has not been fully exploited to solve molecular biological problems, in our opinion. We believe that the creative application of pure mathematical proofs (for another example see Nath in Theory Biosci 141:249-260, 2022) can help resolve with finality various longstanding molecular-level issues that arise as a matter of course in the analysis of fundamental biological problems. Such issues have proved extraordinarily difficult to resolve by standard experimental, theoretical, or computational approaches.

Geometric entropy of plant leaves: A measure of morphological complexity

Shape is an objective characteristic of an object. A boundary separates a physical object from its surroundings. It defines the shape and regulates energy flux into and from an object. Visual perception of a definite shape (geometry) of physical objects is an abstraction. While the perceived geometry at an object's sharp interface (macro) creates a Euclidian illusion of actual shape, the notion of diffuse interfaces (micro) allows an understanding of the realistic form of objects. Here, we formulate a dimensionless geometric entropy of plant leaves (SL) by a 2-D description of a phase-field function. We applied this method to 112 tropical plant leaf images. SL was estimated from the leaf perimeter (P) and leaf area (A). It correlates positively with a fractal dimensional measure of leaf complexity, viz., segmental fractal complexity. Leaves with a higher P: A ratio have higher SL and possess complex morphology. The univariate cluster analysis of SL reveals the taxonomic relationship among the leaf shapes at the genus level. An increase in SL of plant leaves could be an evolutionary strategy. The results of morphological complexity presented in this paper will trigger discussion on the causal links between leaf adaptive stability/efficiency and complexity. We present SL as a derived plant trait to describe plant leaf complexity and adaptive stability. Integrating SL into other leaf physiological measures will help to understand the dynamics of energy flow between plants and their environment.

The historical nature of biological complexity and the ineffectiveness of the mathematical approach to it

Contemporary scientific knowledge is built on both methodological and epistemological reductionism. The discovery of the limitations of the reductionist paradigm in the mathematical treatment of certain physical phenomena originated the notion of complexity, both as a pattern and process. After clarifying some very general terms and ideas on biological evolution and biological complexity, the article will tackle to seek to summarize the debate on biological complexity and discuss the difference between complexities of living and inert matter. Some examples of the major successes of mathematics applied to biological problems will follow; the notion of an intrinsic limitation in the application of mathematics to biological complexity as a global, relational, and historical phenomenon at the individual and species level will also be advanced.