Sialendoscopy: introduction, indications and technique

Sialendoscopy-Based Analysis of Submandibular Duct Papillae with a Proposal for Classification

Identifying a submandibular (Wharton's) duct punctum often hinders sialendoscopy; however, there is a paucity of evidence on whether the appearance of Wharton's duct papilla impacts the sialendoscopic procedure. A classification of Wharton's duct papillae based on the macroscopic appearance, size of dilatation probes, and sialendoscopic approach was proposed herein. The classification describing four main types of papillae, A, B, C, and D, was prospectively evaluated on 351 Wharton's duct papillae in 315 patients. For each papillae type, the demographic/clinical data, intraoperative complications, and time required for sialendoscope introduction were analyzed. Estuary-like papilla (type A) was commonly seen after spontaneous stone extrusion, had no intraoperative complications noted, and had the shortest time required for the sialendoscope introduction. Normal papilla (type B) was the most frequently observed papilla (48.1%), reflecting diverse underlying pathology, while difficult papilla (type C) was often associated with unfavorable anatomical variations of the mandible or floor of the mouth. Substantially closed papilla (type D) had the highest rate of intraoperative complications, namely, perforation with a false passage, and required the longest time for the sialendoscope introduction. In seven patients (2.0%), the entrance into the duct was feasible only through the fistula, while the sialendoscope introduction failed in eight patients (2.3%). In conclusion, the appearance of Wharton's duct papillae may be influenced by the underlying pathology. Based on the proposed classification, papilla typology affects the duration of sialendoscope introduction and may influence the frequency of intraoperative complications.

Anatomical Features of the Parotid Duct in Sialography as an Aid to Endoscopy—A Retrospective Study

Sialography is used for diagnosis of obstructive salivary gland diseases and prior to sialendoscopy. Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) sialography allows imaging and measurement of salivary duct structures. Salivary gland endoscopy has a long learning curve. The aim of this retrospective study is to create an anatomical quantitative guide of different distances and angles significant for endoscopy. Twenty-six CBCT sialographies of healthy parotid ducts were included. Outcome parameters included diameters, distances, angles and number of minor tributaries. Results show the average distance from the papilla to the curvature of the gland was 41.5 mm (Q1 36.97 mm–Q3 45.32 mm), with an angle of 126.9° (Q1 107.58°–Q3 135.6°) of the curvature and a distance of 35.25 mm (±7.81 mm) between the curvature and the hilus. The mean width of the duct was 0.8 mm (Q1 0.7 mm–Q3 1.15 mm) at its narrowest and 2 mm (Q1 1.4 mm–Q3 2.2 mm) at its widest. This is the first anatomical quantitative study of the parotid duct in relation to sialendoscopy.

The changing landscape of pediatric salivary gland stones: A half-century systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To assess the evidence for pediatric sialolithiasis, including its demographic characteristics, diagnosis, and demonstrate the shift in its treatment paradigm.

DESIGN

A systematic review of sources from the Medline and Embase databases was conducted from inception to Dec 4, 2020. Two researchers independently extracted data and assessed quality.

PATIENTS

Patients under the age of 18 with sialolithiasis were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Study design, cohort size, age, sex, symptoms, stone characteristics, diagnostic modality and intervention were collected data points.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies with 243 patients were included in the review, of which 40 were case reports or series. Most stones were found in the submandibular gland (n = 210, 85.4%) and were single stones (n = 101, 71.1%). Average stone size was 7.7 mm. The most common diagnostic imaging modality used was ultrasound (n = 73, 47.4%), shifting from plain radiograph which was favoured in earlier years. Similarly, open gland excision was historically preferred, but since 2000, sialoendoscopy comprised 40.5% of all treatment modalities and continues to increase in prevalence, up to 52.1% by 2020. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy was associated with the highest complication rate of 54.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The pediatric sialolithiasis diagnostic and therapeutic landscape has changed with ultrasound replacing plain radiographs, and sialoendoscopy replacing submandibular gland excision. Further high-level quality evidence research is required to refine the indications, effectiveness, and safety of sialoendoscopy in pediatric sialolithiasis.

The sialodynamic test: A preliminary porcine head study

Objectives

To provide a concept of measuring pressure changes under constant fluid infusion for the diagnosis of sialolithiasis, termed the sialodynamic test, in a porcine head model.

Methods

Using a porcine head model, a constant infusion of water into the submandibular gland of the two groups over 30 s was performed and the outlet pressure was measured. Metal beads were inserted into the salivary duct for obstruction simulation after the normal submandibular gland sialodynamic measurements were completed. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the differences between the measured individuals and the experimental group (n = 3).

Results

The results showed no significant difference between individuals in the control group, but intergroup variation was noted in the simulated sialolithiasis group. The volume-dependent linear increase in pressure was exacerbated in the simulated sialolithiasis group compared with the control.

Conclusion

This study indicated that evaluating the relationship between pressure and volume changes can help to determine whether stones are present in the submandibular gland. The sialodynamic test might serve as a potential diagnostic method for salivary diseases.

Nomogram to predict the risk of endoscopic removal failure with forceps/baskets for treating submandibular stones

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic removal with forceps/baskets is favored in treating submandibular stones due to its minimal invasiveness. However, recent studies have found that endoscopic removal failure (ERF) is not unusual, and stones in such cases still need to be removed with other surgical methods. If the risk of ERF can be predicted preoperatively, it could be helpful for surgeons when choosing the appropriate therapy.

AIM

To develop a predictive nomogram for the risk of ERF when treating submandibular stones based on their preoperative clinical features.

METHODS

A total of 180 patients with 211 submandibular stones treated from January 2012 to December 2020 were included in the current study. Based on the preoperative clinical features of the stones, independent risk factors for ERF were identified by logistic regression analysis. The stones were then randomly divided into training and testing sets. A nomogram was constructed to predict the risk of ERF using the training set and then validated using both sets. The predictive performance of the nomogram was assessed by calibration curves and the concordance index (C-index).

RESULTS

Three independent predictors, location (P = 0.040), transverse diameter (P < 0.001) and longitudinal diameter (P < 0.001) measured on the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of the submandibular stones, were identified and included in the predictive nomogram. Calibration curves of the nomogram showed good agreement between the predicted and observed probabilities in both sets. The C-index in the training set was 0.917 (95%CI, 0.875-0.959) and that in the testing set was 0.925 (95%CI, 0.862-0.989).

CONCLUSION

A nomogram based on the location, transverse and longitudinal diameters on CBCT images of submandibular stones showed satisfactory efficacy in predicting the risk of ERF preoperatively when treating submandibular stones.

The Need for Studies on Oral Corticosteroids After Sialendoscopy for Obstructive Salivary Gland Disease: Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

This qualitative systematic review evaluates the evidence in support of the use of oral corticosteroids in patients undergoing sialendoscopy for the treatment of obstructive sialadenitis.

DESIGN

Qualitative systematic review.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted from January 1985 and September 2020. Inclusion criteria embraced peer-reviewed articles in which adult patients undergoing interventional sialendoscopy for obstructive salivary gland disease received oral corticosteroids. The results were initially screened based on title and abstract, and the remaining articles were reviewed for eligibility.

RESULTS

About 218 papers were selected by title and abstract, 96 were selected for full-text review, and 9 met the inclusion criteria. Eight published reports were retrospective observational studies and 1 was a prospective comparative study. Overall, the heterogeneity of clinical data stood out in this systematic review. The pooled success rate in the studies was 873/979 (89%). Only 5 studies described a rationale for oral corticosteroid use as part of the post-operative management. In 4 studies, a prednisone total daily dose of 40 to 50 mg was used. One study clearly showed a lower recurrence rate in patients who received oral steroids for more than 7 days in addition to sialendoscopy for management of ductal stenoses.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review showed that most centers that prescribe oral corticosteroids after sialendoscopy are unaware of the specific results with this treatment. For ductal stenoses, only 1 paper clearly showed the benefits of oral corticosteroids after sialendoscopy but more high-quality evidence is required in the form of a comparative study or randomized controlled trial, with appropriate long-term follow up.

Sialendoscopic Management of Obstructive Salivary Gland Pathology: A Retrospective Analysis of 236 Cases

PURPOSE

To analyze and assess the results of treating obstructive salivary gland pathology by sialendoscopy or sialendoscopic-assisted surgery and analyze the difference in submandibular and parotid gland pathology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between December 2012 and March 2020, 211 patients (236 procedures) underwent sialendoscopy/sialendoscopic-assisted surgery for treatment of obstructive salivary gland pathology. The cases were retrospectively analyzed for type of pathology, symptomatic relief, type of intervention (endoscopy alone or combined with open surgery), recurrence of symptoms, number of gland excisions, and complications encountered. Sialolith cases (n = 117) were treated by sialendoscopic/sialendoscopy-assisted surgical sialolithotomy using basket or graspers. Strictures (n = 69) were treated by serial dilatation or balloon dilatation with or without intraductal steroid. Mucous plugs (n = 26) were managed by sialendoscopic lavage and occasional retrieval using wire baskets.

RESULTS

There were 123 submandibular sialendoscopies in 118 patients and 113 parotid sialendoscopies in 95 patients. Of the 123 submandibular sialendoscopies, 99 were treated for sialolithiasis, 14 for strictures, 3 for mucous plugs, and 2 for foreign bodies. Of the 95 parotid sialendoscopies, 18 were treated for sialolithiasis, 55 for strictures, 23 for mucous plugs, and 1 for foreign body. The success rate was 85.3% for submandibular gland treatment and 92% for parotid gland treatment. About 62.7% of cases were treated by combined method (sialendoscopy with open approach) in submandibular gland and 50% in parotid gland. The number of gland excisions performed was 5 (2.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Sialendoscopy although associated with a gradual learning curve can be used for all cases of obstructive salivary gland pathology with excellent success rate and minimum morbidity. Parotid gland obstructive pathology is distinct from that seen in the submandibular gland, with strictures and mucous plugs contributing to most cases. Diagnosing and treatment planning for strictures and mucous plugs should therefore be as seamless as that for sialoliths.

Developments in Clinical management of Sialadenitis in Africa

Sialendoscopy is a relatively new technique that offers the potential to be both diagnostic and therapeutic. It follows the principle of gland sparing therapy to manage conditions such as ductal stenoses and sialolithiasis. The procedure is relatively easy to learn and more affordable than the traditional methods of intervention. It is well suited to the African continent in that the equipment is relatively portable and may be taken to peripheral and rural areas, while still providing world-class care and minimal disruption to the patients. We hereby present the evolution of sialendoscopy.

Sialendoscopy under conscious sedation versus general anesthesia. A comparative study

OBJECTIVE

Sialendoscopy is a minimally invasive emerging approach, the general surgical technique has been published but many essential questions still need to be addressed with the aim of improving outcomes. For instance, should we systematically perform sialendoscopy under conscious sedation (CS) or general anesthesia (GA)? What are the limitations of CS? The objective of this study is to compare these two modalities.

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective study of 70 patients who had undergone a sialendoscopy between 2014 and 2016 (34 under GA and 36 under CS). Comparisons were made between these two groups in term of operative time, stone size and location, tolerability, operative success and post-operative pain.

RESULT

The patients' mean age was 45.33 years. The operative success rate among the GA group was 79.4% vs. 88.9% in the CS group (P = 0.276), while complications for both groups were comparable. All patients considered the intervention under CS to be tolerable.

CONCLUSION

Sialendoscopy under CS or GA demonstrated the ability to access large and distal stones among the different salivary glands with an excellent tolerability. Anesthesia type should be based on surgeon and patient preference Nevertheless, patient reassurance and surgeon experience are important to producing a good result with CS.

Sialendoscopy for Definitive Management of a Submandibular Abscess following Radiotherapy for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Sialendoscopy has as yet been shown to be ideal for the management of sialolithiasis and chronic inflammatory diseases of the salivary gland. However, its applicability to the management of a broad range of salivary gland disease is continually growing.

METHODS

Here we present a case report where sialendoscopy was used to successfully manage an intraparenchymal submandibular gland abscess in a patient with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma managed with primary chemoradiation.

RESULTS

The use of sialendoscopy enabled visualization of the patency of salivary ducts, drainage of abscess, and irrigation of antibiotic-impregnated fluid. In this particular patient, we were able to avoid a transcervical approach through a previously irradiated field, which would have necessitated concurrent tracheostomy and placed undue risk to surrounding neurovascular structures.

CONCLUSION

Sialendoscopy should thus, in select patients, be considered as an initial intervention for patients with intraparenchymal salivary gland abscesses in which prior therapy creates an increased risk of complication from an open transcervical approach.

Comparison between Sialendoscopy and Conventional Methods in the Treatment of Sialolithiasis

Background

Sialendoscopy is gaining in popularity in treating calculus disease. The delicacy of the instrument and the diameter of the salivary ducts are factors that limit the ability to achieve complete success. There is also continued speculation regarding the utility of the procedure, especially among clinicians who are masters of conventional methods like sialadenectomy and sialodochotomy.

Objective

To assess the efficacy of sialendoscopy over conventional methods in treating sialolithiasis.

Methods

A prospective case control study was conducted in a tertiary care centre; this study involved 50 patients of sialolithiasis, and it extended over a 36-month period. All had undergone treatment, either by conventional methods or interventional sialendoscopy. All patients with nonpalpable calculi smaller than 6 mm underwent interventional sialendoscopy. Failed sialendoscopies and larger nonpalpable calculi were removed through sialadenectomy. The outcome variables studied included calculus removal, postoperative symptoms, and gland preservation.

Results

The success rate in terms of calculus removal by sialendoscopy was 88%, versus 100% by sialadenectomy. The salivary gland was preserved in 88% of the cases in the sialendoscopy group. Only 12% of patients were symptomatic.

Conclusion

Sialendoscopy was effective in removing calculi of various sizes; it was definitely superior to conventional methods. Sialadenectomy should be reserved for cases either not suitable for sialendoscopy or in which there was an intervention failure.

The landmark for removal of sialoliths using sialendoscopy alone in parotid gland sialolithiasis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the general guidelines for removal of sialoliths in parotid gland sialolithiasis using sialendoscopy alone.

METHODS

We analyzed 34 sialoliths treated using sialendoscopy in 26 patients with parotid gland sialolithiasis. We divided the Stensen's duct and parotid gland into for parts using computed tomography findings: (A) front of the masseter, (B) anterior and lateral to the center (anterolateral) of the masseter, (C) posterior and lateral to the center (posterolateral) of the masseter, (D) behind of the masseter. The location and size of each sialolith was assessed.

RESULTS

The removal rates of sialoliths in the different locations by sialendoscopy alone were as follows: front of the masseter, 68.8%; anterolateral of the masseter, 60.0%; posterolateral of the masseter, 0%; and behind of the masseter, 33.3%. The removal rate using sialendoscopy alone was significantly higher in the sections anterior to the center of the masseter than in those posterior to the center of the masseter (66.7% [14/21] vs. 20.0% [2/10]; P=0.019). The size of the sialolith was not correlated to the removal rate by sialendoscopy alone.

CONCLUSION

Sialoliths of the parotid gland located in positions anterior to the center of the masseter are significantly easier to remove by sialendoscopy alone. The center of the masseter is a general landmark for removal of sialoliths from the parotid gland using sialendoscopy alone. The size of the sialolith is not correlated with removal, except rare huge sialoliths.

Sialendoscopy: what is it and what is its awareness?

In expanding the scope of sialendoscopy across the globe and assessing the impact of training activities at the European Sialendoscopy Training Centre, this study was conducted to find out the knowledge and attitude among respondents as well as identify potential obstacles to the initiation of the procedure. Delegates attending the 2011 International Federation of Otorhinolaryngological Societies meeting received a set of five questions. There were a total of 257 responses from 57 countries. Nearly all (238/257) were practising in the academic setting. A significant number of respondents had heard about sialendoscopy (231/257). An equal number found it interesting and were keen to learn more about the procedure (233/257). More than 85 % (219/257) respondents expressed their desire to start sialendoscopy. Hurdles to overcome included financial limitations (110) and "not enough knowledge" (100). Awareness about the existence of the procedure was rather high although the knowledge was limited. Several of the responders seemed keen on starting it, but had not done so due to financial limitations. However, there was a high rate of bias owing to the limited number of responders per country precluding a country-wise inference of awareness. Moreover, meetings of this nature tend to be attended by academics who in general seem to be more aware of new developments than their non-academic peers. Future surveys can address these issues as part of ensuring the universal adoption of sialendoscopy.