Imaging Evaluation of Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Potential Candidates for Cochlear Implantation

Role of Imaging in Evaluating Patients for Cochlear Implantation

Role of Imaging in evaluating patients for Cochlear Implantation. To assess the role of imaging using High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) temporal bone for evaluating candidates for cochlear implantation (CI). It was a prospective study conducted in the department of Otorhinolaryngology at a tertiary care centre, 30 children up to 5 years of age with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss(SNHL) were included in the study, radiological evaluation was done in all children. 20(66.67%) children were in 2-4 years age group with female preponderance. Radiological abnormalities were reported in 13(43.33%) children. Abnormalities of inner ear were seen in 8(26.67%) cases, which included bilateral cochlear nerve aplasia, unilateral cochlear aplasia with bilateral cochlear nerve aplasia, bilateral severe cochlear hypoplasia, mondini's dysplasia. Cochlear nerve deficiency was found in 3(10%) children and narrow Internal auditory canal in 4(13.33%) children. 2(6.67%) patients out of 30 were not the candidates for CI, they had bilateral absent cochlear nerve which is an absolute contraindication for CI. 28(93.33%) patients were evaluated as candidates for CI. Imaging is a fundamental part of the preoperative workup for cochlear implantation, HRCT and MRI temporal bone are complementary to each other in evaluating children for cochlear implantation as HRCT is excellent for demonstrating bony details but, lack in providing details of inner ear neural structures and MRI is better than CT in demonstrating vestibulocochlear nerves.

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of the Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Normal Cochlea: A 2-Year Follow-Up of 70 Children

Cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) is often associated with variable outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI). We assessed previous investigations aiming to identify the main factors that determine CI outcomes, which would enable us to develop predictive models. Seventy patients with CND and normal cochlea who underwent CI surgery were retrospectively examined. First, using a data-driven approach, we collected demographic information, radiographic measurements, audiological findings, and audition and speech assessments. Next, CI outcomes were evaluated based on the scores obtained after 2 years of CI from the Categories of Auditory Performance index, Speech Intelligibility Rating, Infant/Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale or Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale, and Meaningful Use of Speech Scale. Then, we measured and averaged the audiological and radiographic characteristics of the patients to form feature vectors, adopting a multivariate feature selection method, called stability selection, to select the features that were consistent within a certain range of model parameters. Stability selection analysis identified two out of six characteristics, namely the vestibulocochlear nerve (VCN) area and the number of nerve bundles, which played an important role in predicting the hearing and speech rehabilitation results of CND patients. Finally, we used a parameter-optimized support vector machine (SVM) as a classifier to study the postoperative hearing and speech rehabilitation of the patients. For hearing rehabilitation, the accuracy rate was 71% for both the SVM classification and the area under the curve (AUC), whereas for speech rehabilitation, the accuracy rate for SVM classification and AUC was 93% and 94%, respectively. Our results identified that a greater number of nerve bundles and a larger VCN area were associated with better CI outcomes. The number of nerve bundles and VCN area can predict CI outcomes in patients with CND. These findings can help surgeons in selecting the side for CI and provide reasonable expectations for the outcomes of CI surgery.

Change to Hearing Loss-Related Risks and Screening in Preterm Infants

Hearing loss is one of the most common congenital defects in infancy; it increases speech and language delays and adversely affects academic achievement and socialemotional development. The risk of hearing loss in premature infants is higher than that in normal newborns, and because of the fragility of the auditory nervous system, it is more vulnerable to different risk factors. The hearing screening guidelines in current use were proposed by the American Academy of Pediatrics and updated in 2007, but there are no uniform guidelines for hearing screening in preterm infants. This review focuses on the risk factors related to hearing loss in premature infants, hearing screening strategies, and reasons for failure. The aim is to provide a more comprehensive understanding of hearing development in preterm infants to achieve early detection and early intervention. At the same time, attention should be paid to delayed auditory maturation in preterm infants to avoid excessive intervention. KEY POINTS: · Hearing loss is very common in infancy, especially in premature infants.. · Genetic factors, infection, hyperbilirubinemia, drugs, and noise are the main causes.. · We should pay attention to the delayed hearing maturity of premature infants and avoid excessive intervention..

Comprehensive medical evaluation of pediatric bilateral sensorineural hearing loss

Children with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) should undergo a comprehensive medical evaluation to determine the underlying etiology and help guide treatment and counseling. In this article, we review the indications and rationale for medical evaluation of pediatric bilateral SNHL, including history and physical examination, imaging, genetic testing, specialist referrals, cytomegalovirus (CMV) testing, and other laboratory tests. Workup begins with a history and physical examination, which can provide clues to the etiology of SNHL, particularly with syndromic causes. If SNHL is diagnosed within the first 3 weeks of life, CMV testing should be performed to identify patients that may benefit from antiviral treatment. If SNHL is diagnosed after 3 weeks, testing can be done using dried blood spots samples, if testing capability is available. Genetic testing is oftentimes successful in identifying causes of hearing loss as a result of recent technological advances in testing and an ever-increasing number of identified genes and genetic mutations. Therefore, where available, genetic testing should be performed, ideally with next generation sequencing techniques. Ophthalmological evaluation must be done on all children with SNHL. Imaging (high-resolution computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging) should be performed to assess for anatomic causes of hearing loss and to determine candidacy for cochlear implantation when indicated. Laboratory testing is indicated for certain etiologies, but should not be ordered indiscriminately since the yield overall is low.

New-born Hearing Screening Programmes in 2020: CODEPEH Recommendations

Programmes for early detection of congenital hearing loss have been successfully implemented mainly in developed countries, after overcoming some conceptual errors argued against their implementation and some criticism of their efficacy. However, some difficulties and weaknesses are still identified in these programmes: the detection of late-onset hearing loss and the percentage of children who did not pass the screening and did not complete the process of diagnosis and treatment, these being cases that are lost in the process. The purpose of this Document is to analyse these problems to determine areas for improvement and to emphasize one of the basic principles for the success of the programmes: continuous training for the interdisciplinary team. The result of the review process carried out by CODEPEH has been drafted as Recommendations for updating the Programmes with the evidence of the last decade, including advances in screening technology, the impact of the present knowledge on congenital infection by cytomegalovirus, genetic hearing loss research and control systems of lost to follow-up cases, treatment and follow up.

Is CT necessary for imaging paediatric congenital sensorineural hearing loss?

Objectives: To determine if MRI alone is adequate for pre-operative assessment of paediatric congenital sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). While aberrant intratemporal facial nerve anatomy is usually occult on MRI, we postulate that the majority of cases have no adverse bearing on surgical outcomes.Methods: MRI and CT of the temporal bones were analysed in 240 children who underwent both on the same day for SNHL. Only children under the age of 5 years with no reported clinical syndrome or dysmorphic external ear anatomy were included.Results and discussion: 169 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. MRI detected 32/54 cases of cochleovestibular dysplasia, with the majority of the additional CT findings comprising subtle incomplete partition type 2 (IP2) anomalies. Of the 22 cases not evident on MRI, 13 patients also had large vestibular aqueduct syndromoe (LVAS), which would have prompted evaluation with CT due to the near universal co-existence of these entities. Only one patient exhibited aberrant intratemporal facial nerve anatomy that may have conferred surgical risk and was occult on MRI.Conclusion: In a defined paediatric SNHL cohort, the addition of routine temporal bone CT to MRI offers limited additional yield but confers a significant radiation burden on a young population.

Efficacy of a selective imaging paradigm prior to pediatric cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

There is no consensus on the necessary preoperative imaging in children being evaluated for cochlear implantation (CI). Dual-imaging protocols that implement both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) create diagnostic redundancy in the face of potentially unnecessary radiation and anaesthetic exposure. The objectives of the current study were to examine the efficacy of an MRI-predominant with selective HRCT imaging protocol.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

METHODS

The protocol was implemented over a 4-year period, during which HRCT was obtained in addition to MRI only if specific risk factors on clinical assessment were identified or if imaging findings in need of further evaluation were detected on initial MRI evaluation. Retrospective review of operative reports and prospective review of imaging were performed; anesthetic exposure and costing information were also obtained.

RESULTS

Of the 240 patients who underwent assessment, seven (2.9%) had combined HRCT and MRI performed concurrently based on initial clinical assessment, 15 (6.3%) underwent HRCT based on imaging anomalies found on MRI, and MRI alone was ordered for the remaining 218 (90.1%). All patients were implanted without complication. Overall, radiation exposure, general anesthesia (GA), and healthcare costs were reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI alone can be used in the vast majority of cases for preoperative evaluation of pediatric CI candidates resulting in a significant reduction in healthcare costs, radiation, and GA exposure in children. The additional need for HRCT occurs in a small proportion and can be predicted up front on clinical assessment or on initial MRI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 129:2627-2633, 2019.

Pediatric tinnitus: Incidence of imaging anomalies and the impact of hearing loss

OBJECTIVE

Guidelines exist for evaluation and management of tinnitus in adults; however lack of evidence in children limits applicability of these guidelines to pediatric patients. Objective of this study is to determine the incidence of inner ear anomalies detected on imaging studies within the pediatric population with tinnitus and evaluate if presence of hearing loss increases the rate of detection of anomalies in comparison to normal hearing patients.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all children with diagnosis of tinnitus from 2010 to 2015 ;at a tertiary care academic center.

RESULTS

102 pediatric patients with tinnitus were identified. Overall, 53 patients had imaging studies with 6 abnormal findings (11.3%). 51/102 patients had hearing loss of which 33 had imaging studies demonstrating 6 inner ear anomalies detected. This is an incidence of 18.2% for inner ear anomalies identified in patients with hearing loss (95% confidence interval (CI) of 7.0-35.5%). 4 of these 6 inner ear anomalies detected were vestibular aqueduct abnormalities. The other two anomalies were cochlear hypoplasia and bilateral semicircular canal dysmorphism. 51 patients had no hearing loss and of these patients, 20 had imaging studies with no inner ear abnormalities detected. There was no statistical difference in incidence of abnormal imaging findings in patients with and without hearing loss (Fisher's exact test, p ;= ;0.072.) CONCLUSION: There is a high incidence of anomalies detected in imaging studies done in pediatric patients with tinnitus, especially in the presence of hearing loss.