Clarithromycin in the Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Preliminary Results of a Possible Its New Use

Headache alleviation with nasal irrigation following endoscopic endonasal surgery for pituitary adenomas

BACKGROUND

Headache is a common occurrence after endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) for pituitary adenomas and significantly impacts the quality of life of patients. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of nasal irrigation in relieving postoperative headache after EES.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 101 patients (Cohort I) who underwent EES for pituitary adenomas to explore the risk factors associated with postoperative headache. Another cohort of 72 patients (Cohort II) who received adjuvant nasal irrigation following surgery was enrolled for further analysis. The Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) was used to score the severity of headache, and patients with a HIT score > 55 were classified as having headache.

RESULTS

In Cohort I, 21.78% of patients experienced headache one month after EES, which decreased to 5.94% at the three-month follow-up. Multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative nasal sinusitis (OR = 3.88, 95%CI 1.16-13.03, p = 0.028) and Hardy's grade C-D (OR = 10.53, 95%CI 1.02-109.19, p = 0.049) independently predicted the presence of postoperative headache at one month. At the three-month follow-up, patients with sinusitis had higher HIT-6 scores compared to those without sinusitis (44.43 ± 9.78 vs. 39.72 ± 5.25, p = 0.017). In Cohort II, the incidence of sinusitis at three months was significantly lower than that in Cohort I (p = 0.028). Importantly, both the incidence of headache and HIT-6 scores in Cohort II were significantly lower than those in Cohort I at the one- and three-month follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative sinusitis is an independent risk factor for the development of headache following EES for pituitary adenomas. Prophylactic nasal irrigation helps relieve postoperative headache, possibly by preventing the occurrence of sinusitis.

Doxycycline may be more clinically effective in type 2 chronic rhinosinusitis nasal polyp comorbid with asthma

OBJECTIVE

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp (CRSwNP) is one of the major phenotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with a high symptom burden. Doxycycline can be used as add-on therapy in CRSwNP. We aimed to evaluate short-term efficacy of oral doxycycline on visual analog scale (VAS) and SNOT-22 (Sino-nasal outcome test) score for CRSwNP.

METHODS

Visual analog score (VAS) for nasal symptoms and total SNOT-22 scores of 28 patients who applied with the diagnosis of CRSwNP and received 100 mg doxycycline for 21 days were analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. Doxycycline efficacy was also evaluated in subgroups determined according to asthma, presence of atopy, total IgE and eosinophil levels.

RESULTS

After 21-day doxycycline treatment, there was a significant improvement in VAS score for post-nasal drip, nasal discharge, nasal congestion, and sneeze, and total SNOT-22 score (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). No significant improvement was observed in VAS score for the loss of smell (p = 0.18). In the asthmatic subgroup, there were significant improvements in all VAS scores and total SNOT-22 score after doxycycline. In the non-asthmatic subgroup, there was no significant change in any of the VAS scores, but total SNOT-22 score was significantly improved (42 [21-78] vs. 18 [9-33]; p = 0.043). Improvement in VAS score for loss of smell is significant in only some subgroups like asthmatic patients, non-atopic patients, and patients with eosinophil >300 cell/µL.

CONCLUSIONS

Doxycycline can be considered as an add-on treatment for symptom control in patients especially with CRSwNP comorbid with asthma.

What is the evidence for macrolide therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To assess the most recent evidence for macrolide therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

RECENT FINDINGS

Macrolides play a significant role in a select group of patients with CRS. Low-serum and tissue eosinophilia in patients who do not respond to corticosteroid therapy appeared to be an effective predictor of a CRS phenotype suitable for a trial of long-term macrolide therapy. Therapies using half a dose for longer than 12 weeks have noted good outcomes.

SUMMARY

The anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of macrolides have been demonstrated in several studies. Macrolides have shown an important role in patients who are nonresponsive to corticosteroid therapies, therefore patient selection is key. Previous inconsistencies in results may be due to poor patient selection.