Comparative Study of Hearing Improvement of Type 1 Tympanoplasty Using Temporalis Fascia and Conchal Cartilage as Graft Material

The novel retro-conchal approach for middle ear surgeries: Our experience in 196 patients

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to describe a new proposed retro-conchal approach for middle ear surgery and to evaluate its advantages and postoperative impact.

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective case-series study was held at a tertiary university hospital from March 2008 to April 2022. We included 196 adult patients who were candidates for middle ear surgery because of chronic otitis media. The retro-conchal approach entailed a skin incision on the medial conchal surface 1 cm anterior to the auricular sulcus. It allowed the harvesting of the required size of conchal cartilage and temporalis fascia through the same incision with access into the middle ear and complete exposure to the mastoid process. In addition, we evaluated the use of this approach in tympanoplasty, including cholesteatoma surgeries with at least one-year postoperative follow-up.

RESULT

The long-term follow-up (22.9 ± 6.37 months) revealed that most operated cases (89%) did not develop postoperative sequelae related to this approach. On the other hand, 22 patients (11%) developed adverse outcomes, with a statistically significant difference regarding adverse outcomes as the P-value <0.001.

CONCLUSION

According to our experience with a relatively large number of patients, the retro-conchal technique was practical for various middle ear surgeries. It allowed optimal access to different middle ear areas and obtaining large-sized conchal cartilage and temporalis fascia (if needed) through the same incision without needing extra surgical steps. In addition, it was a safe maneuver without significant adverse outcomes in the long-term follow-up.

Comparison of temporalis muscle fascia and cartilage grafts for primary type 1 tympanoplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of temporalis fascia (TF) with cartilage grafts for primary type 1 tympanoplasty in chronic otitis media (COM) patients.

METHODS

Computerized search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL. Eligible for inclusion were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TF and cartilage grafts in individuals with non-cholesteatoma COM and intact ossicles requiring type 1 tympanoplasty. Primary outcomes were graft success and hearing improvement, measured by the air-bone gap (ABG) closure. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of complications. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

RESULTS

Eighteen RCTs that enrolled 1273 participants were found eligible. Data were reported at follow-up periods ranging from 6 weeks to 24 months. The pooled effect estimate revealed a higher and statistically significant graft success favoring cartilage grafts at 12 months (OR = 2.24, 95% CI 1.33-3.78) and 24 months (OR = 2.96, 95% CI 1.18-7.43). There was no significant difference between both grafts in post-operative ABG closure across all follow-up periods (6 weeks to 12 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to TF, primary type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty offers better graft uptake rates and comparable postoperative hearing outcomes for COM patients.

Comparison of cartilage and temporalis fascia grafts in type 1 tympanoplasty: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the results of type 1 tympanoplasties with temporalis fascia (TF) vs cartilage grafts in patients with chronic otitis media.

METHODS

Eligible studies were identified from PubMed, Ovid, and EMBASE databases prior to November 2021. We analyzed the pure tone audiometry (PTA) and air-bone gap (ABG) data as continuous variables, and the success rate was analyzed as a dichotomous variable.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies, including 4582 patients, were eligible. The cartilage graft overall morphologic success rate was higher than that of the TF grafts (P < .001). In the palisade (P < .004) and island grafts (P < .001) subgroups, the analysis was significantly different. However, there was no significant difference in the inlay butterfly grafts subgroup. For hearing outcomes, the analysis revealed that TF grafts had a smaller mean post-operative ABG (P = .009). However, the subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in the mean post-operative ABG. For PTA, there was no significant difference in hearing improvement. However, the palisade cartilage graft subgroup resulted in a better hearing outcome than the TF graft subgroup in terms of the mean post-operative PTA (P = .007). There was no significant difference in the functional success rate or mean ABG gain.

CONCLUSION

Cartilage grafts have a better success rate than TF grafts in tympanoplasty. Both cartilage and TF tympanoplasty provided similar improvements in hearing outcome, while TF grafts generated a better outcome in post-operative ABG and palisade cartilage grafts in post-operative PTA. This may be related to the biological characteristics of the grafts. Further thorough studies need to be conducted.