Auditory Lateralization Training Effects on Binaural Interaction Component of Middle Latency Response in Children Suspected to Central Auditory Processing Disorder

Interventions for School-Aged Children with Auditory Processing Disorder: A Scoping Review

(1) Background: Auditory processing (AP) disorder is associated with learning difficulties and poses challenges to school-aged children in their daily activities. This scoping review identifies interventions and provides audiologists with protocol insights and outcome measures. (2) Methods: A systematic search of both peer-reviewed and grey literature (January 2006 to August 2023) covered ten databases. Studies included had the following characteristics: (i) published in French or English; (ii) participants were school-aged, and had a normal audiogram, AP difficulties or disorder, and no cognitive, developmental, congenital or neurological disorder (with the exception of learning, attention, and language disabilities); (iii) were intervention studies or systematic reviews. (3) Results: Forty-two studies were included, and they predominantly featured auditory training (AT), addressing spatial processing, dichotic listening, temporal processing and listening to speech in noise. Some interventions included cognitive or language training, assistive devices or hearing aids. Outcome measures listed included electrophysiological, AP, cognitive and language measures and questionnaires addressed to parents, teachers or the participants. (4) Conclusions: Most interventions focused on bottom-up approaches, particularly AT. A limited number of top-down approaches were observed. The compiled tools underscore the need for research on metric responsiveness and point to the inadequate consideration given to understanding how children perceive change.

Frequency and Time Domain Analysis of EEG Based Auditory Evoked Potentials to Detect Binaural Hearing in Noise

Hearing loss is a prevalent health issue that affects individuals worldwide. Binaural hearing refers to the ability to integrate information received simultaneously from both ears, allowing individuals to identify, locate, and separate sound sources. Auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) refer to the electrical responses that are generated within any part of the auditory system in response to auditory stimuli presented externally. Electroencephalography (EEG) is a non-invasive technology used for the monitoring of AEPs. This research aims to investigate the use of audiometric EEGs as an objective method to detect specific features of binaural hearing with frequency and time domain analysis techniques. Thirty-five subjects with normal hearing and a mean age of 27.35 participated in the research. The stimuli used in the current study were designed to investigate the impact of binaural phase shifts of the auditory stimuli in the presence of noise. The frequency domain and time domain analyses provided statistically significant and promising novel findings. The study utilized Blackman windowed 18 ms and 48 ms pure tones as stimuli, embedded in noise maskers, of frequencies 125 Hz, 250 Hz, 500 Hz, 750 Hz, 1000 Hz in homophasic (the same phase in both ears) and antiphasic (180-degree phase difference between the two ears) conditions. The study focuses on the effect of phase reversal of auditory stimuli in noise of the middle latency response (MLR) and late latency response (LLR) regions of the AEPs. The frequency domain analysis revealed a significant difference in the frequency bands of 20 to 25 Hz and 25 to 30 Hz when elicited by antiphasic and homophasic stimuli of 500 Hz for MLRs and 500 Hz and 250 Hz for LLRs. The time domain analysis identified the Na peak of the MLR for 500 Hz, the N1 peak of the LLR for 500 Hz stimuli and the P300 peak of the LLR for 250 Hz as significant potential markers in detecting binaural processing in the brain.

The Correlation Analysis Between the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ) and the Psychophysical Measurement of Spatial Hearing

The aim of the present study was examining the relationship between a psychophysical spatial hearing test (spatial word in noise test) and Spatial Hearing Questionnaire. Sixty-six adults (18-40 years old) were divided in three groups: normal subjects, subjects with mild and moderate hearing loss. Spatial word in noise test and Persian version of the spatial hearing questionnaire were evaluated and compared among these groups. According to Pearson's test, there was a significant positive correlation between the scores of spatial word in noise test and Persian version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire in three groups (r = 0.64-0.89). Hearing loss can deteriorate spatial hearing ability. Both objective and subjective spatial hearing tests are shown to be effective in detecting spatial hearing disorder.