Diagnostic Evaluation of Chronic Nasal Obstruction Based on Nasal Endoscopy and CT Scan Paranasal Sinus

Imaging of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in the era of biological therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the sinonasal cavities classified into two major phenotypes: CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). The diagnosis of CRS is based on clinical symptoms associated with imaging and/or nasal endoscopy findings of mucosal inflammation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently, novel biological therapies have emerged as therapeutic options for CRSwNP. Imaging is helpful in deciding whether surgery is likely to be beneficial and in guiding surgery. It can also help demonstrate a clinical response to medical therapy. However, specific guidelines concerning the role of imaging in CRwNP are lacking.

SUMMARY

This article provides a comprehensive and critical multidisciplinary review of the role of conventional radiology, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis and characterization of CRSwNP. Since the complete characterization of nasal polyps on CT or MR images is very challenging, we provide a critical review of the best imaging methods and essential reporting elements used to assess nasal polyps.

Usefulness of nasal cavity evaluation before high-resolution esophageal manometry in high-risk patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

A catheter is inserted through the nasal cavity during high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM), which may cause adverse events such as pain or epistaxis. Despite these possible safety considerations, studies on this subject are very limited. We aimed to investigate the usefulness of nasal cavity evaluation before HRM to reduce the risk of adverse events and test failure.

METHODS

Patients who underwent HRM after consultation with the ear-nose-throat department for nasal evaluation were retrospectively enrolled between December 2021 and May 2022. The included patients had a previous history of sinonasal disease or surgery or had subjective nasal discomfort. All patients answered the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) questionnaire, and subjective nasal discomfort was scored using a visual analog scale. Nasal endoscopy and acoustic rhinometry were performed for disease evaluation and volumetric assessment.

RESULTS

The analysis included 22 patients with a mean age of 58.9 years. The mean SNOT-22 score was 24.2, and 16 patients (72.7%) complained of subjective nasal obstruction. The HRM catheter was successfully inserted in 20 patients (90.9%), without any significant adverse events. The objective measurement outcomes of acoustic rhinometry and sinus endoscopy did not always correspond to subjective symptoms. Narrowed nasal airways unresponsive to decongestants were observed in two patients with failed catheter insertion.

CONCLUSION

To reduce the risk of adverse events and test failure during HRM, a site-specific questionnaire to evaluate nasal obstruction might be helpful. When nasal obstruction is suspected, objective nasal cavity evaluation could be recommended for the safe and successful performance of HRM.

A Comparative Study of CT Scan and Nasal Endoscopic Findings of Lateral Wall of Nose, in Headache of Rhinogenic Origin

Headache disorders are rated among the ten most disabling conditions worldwide. Contact points like septal spur, septal deviation, concha bullosa and bulla ethmoidalis can cause rhinogenic headache (RH). Diagnostic nasal endoscopy (DNE) is an essential part of evaluation of sinonasal disease and is the key to understanding anatomical variations. As compared to CT paranasal sinus (CT PNS), DNE is cheaper and has wider availability, being part of the basic training of present ENT curriculum. We conducted a prospective observational study from September 2018 to June 2020 on 202 patients who were diagnosed to have RH. The aim of this study was to the define the role of DNE as the primary examination for early and accurate diagnosis of rhinogenic headache as compared to CT PNS. RH patients were evaluated with DNE followed by CT PNS. Evaluation of the findings of anatomical variations of lateral wall of nose on DNE and CT PNS was done. In our study the most common anatomic variations in order of frequency in both DNE and CT PNS was deviated nasal septum, impacting spur and unilateral concha bullosa. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of DNE for the various anatomical variations was statistically better than CT PNS findings. We conclude that DNE is a better than CT PNS as a diagnostic technique to detect various anatomical variations, thus initiating early management of RH.

Imaging in chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review of MRI and CT diagnostic accuracy and reliability in severity staging

BACKGROUND

Computerized tomography (CT) severity scores are frequently used as an objective staging tool in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has also been proposed as a valid option in CRS imaging.

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review was to briefly present the recent developments on sinus imaging utilized in clinical practice with regard to diagnostic accuracy of imaging and severity staging in CRS according to evidence-based medicine (EBM) principles.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This review paper has been assembled following PRISMA guidelines. A PubMed and Scopus (EMBASE) search using CRS, "severity staging", "diagnostic accuracy "and "imaging "resulted with 80 results. Of these, only 12 (59%) contained original data, constituting the synthesis of best-quality available evidence.

RESULTS

CT is the most commonly used imaging technique for the severity staging of CRS, but a question of higher cumulative radiation dose should be taken into consideration when repeating CT examinations in evaluating treatment efficacy. MRI may be a complementary diagnostic and staging tool, especially when repeated examinations are required, or when paediatric CRS patients are evaluated. The severity staging system may be improved to better correlate with subjective scores.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI may be utilized as a staging tool with comparable diagnostic accuracy, using the same staging systems as with CT examinations.