Masseteric-Facial Nerve Anastomosis: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes-A Pilot Indian study

Long-term facial nerve outcome in surgically treated petrous bone cholesteatoma patients

INTRODUCTION

The term petrous bone cholesteatoma (PBC) represents a slow-growing epidermal lesion arising from the petrous part of the temporal bone. It is a rare incidence accounting for only 4-9% of all petrous bone lesions. PBC represents a real surgical challenge due to its complex relationship with critical neurovascular structures.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate our experience in using various options of facial nerve (FN) management during surgical treatment of PBC and analyze the long-term facial function outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective medical record review in a quaternary skull-base center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of 298 PBC cases operated between the years 1983 and 2024 were thoroughly evaluated. Sanna's classification scheme was used to classify cases into the appropriate class and the House-Brackmann (HB) grading system of the FN was used to assess the facial function pre- and postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 298 PBC cases were surgically treated at our center. Males constitute 68% (n = 203) of total operated PBC patients while the rest 32% (95) were females, making the male-to-female ratio 2.2:1. The age in this series ranged from 9 to 85. According to updated Sanna's PBC classification, 44% were supralabyrinthine, 33% were massive, 9% were infralabyrinthine-apical, 8% were infralabyrinthine, and 5% were apical. On preoperative FN function examination, 45% (n = 133) of patients had various degrees of paresis and complete paralysis whereas 55% (n = 165) had normal FN function. The commonest degree of paresis observed was HB-III (18.5%) followed by HB-IV (5.7%). A total of 40(13.4%) patients, however, had complete facial paralysis at the initial presentation. The facial function was compromised more frequently in supralabyrinthine and massive PBCs. Among the total patients who had an abnormal facial function at presentation, 52% had paresis/paralysis for less than a year whereas 48% had FN paresis/paralysis for greater than one year. The most commonly used surgical approaches at our center were transotic (TO), modified transcochlear type A (MTCA) with rerouting of the FN, and translabyrinthine (TLAB) with external auditory canal (EAC) closure. Intraoperatively an intact fallopian canal was found only in 33% (n = 99) cases whereas the rest 67% (n = 199) had erosion of the fallopian canal either with intact (n = 24) or infiltrated FN (n = 175). The FN was maintained in the bony fallopian canal in 35% (n = 104) cases. An active form of FN management, however, was required in 65% (n = 194) of cases either intraoperatively or as a second-stage procedure. Factors affecting postoperative FN function include age, preoperative FN function (HB), duration of paralysis, class of PBC, surgical approach, and method of active FN management.

CONCLUSION

PBCs represent diagnostically and surgically challenging lesions of temporal bone which are usually frustrating to the treating surgeon. Preoperative anatomic classification of the lesion enables the physician to choose the appropriate surgical approach. Sanna's classification is the most widely accepted system used to classify PBC. This classification is based on the relation of the lesion to the labyrinthine block. Active FN management, including rerouting, end-to-end anastomosis, cable nerve grafting, and masseteric-to-FN anastomosis routinely come into play in the surgical management of PBCs, and the postoperative FN results after such interventions can be satisfactory in most cases.

Reanimation Techniques of Peripheral Facial Paralysis: A Comprehensive Review Focusing on Surgical and Bioengineering Approaches

Peripheral facial paralysis represents a disabling condition with serious psychological and social impact. Patients with peripheral facial paralysis have a disfigurement of the face with loss of harmony and symmetry and difficulties in everyday facial functions such as speaking, drinking, laughing, and closing their eyes, with impairment of their quality of life. This paralysis leads to impairment of facial expression, which represents one of the first means of communication, an important aspect of human interaction. This review aims to explore the reanimation techniques for managing peripheral facial paralysis. An analysis of static and dynamic techniques for facial reanimation is provided, including muscle flaps, nerve grafting techniques, and bioengineering solutions. Each technique showed its benefits and drawbacks; despite several options for facial reanimation, no technique has been detected as the gold standard. Therefore, each patient must be evaluated on an individual basis, considering their medical history, age, expectations, and treatment goals, to find the best and most fitting treatment.

Facial nerve reconstruction for flaccid facial paralysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

To determine the functional outcome after facial nerve reconstruction surgery in patients with flaccid facial paralysis.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed on studies reporting outcomes after direct facial nerve suture (DFS), facial nerve interpositional graft suture (FIGS), hypoglossal-facial nerve suture (HFS), masseteric-facial nerve suture (MFS), and cross-face nerve suture (CFS). These studies were identified from PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Two independent reviewers performed two-stage screening and data extraction. A favorable result was defined as a final House-Brackmann grade I-III and is presented as a ratio of all patients in percentage. Pooled proportions were calculated using random-effects models.

Results

From 4,932 screened records, 54 studies with 1,358 patients were included. A favorable result was achieved after DFS in 42.67% of the patients [confidence interval (CI): 26.05%-61.12%], after FIGS in 66.43% (CI: 55.99%-75.47%), after HFS in 63.89% (95% CI: 54.83%-72.05%), after MFS in 63.11% (CI: 38.53%-82.37%), and after CFS in 46.67% (CI: 24.09%-70.70%). There was no statistically significant difference between the techniques (Q = 6.56, degrees of freedom = 4, p = 0.1611).

Conclusions

The established facial nerve reconstruction techniques including the single nerve cross-transfer techniques produce satisfactory results in most of the patients with permanent flaccid facial paralysis. An international consensus on standardized outcome measures would improve the comparability of facial reanimation techniques.

Research trends and perspectives on immediate facial reanimation in radical parotidectomy (Review)

For patients diagnosed with advanced malignant parotid tumour, radical parotidectomy with facial nerve sacrifice is part of the treatment. Multiple surgical techniques have been developed to cure facial paralysis in order to restore the function and aesthetics of the face. Despite the large number of publications over time on facial nerve reanimation, a consensus on the timing of the procedure or the donor graft selection has remained to be established. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to conduct a bibliometric analysis to identify and analyse scientific publications on the reconstruction of the facial nerve of patients who underwent radical parotidectomy with facial nerve sacrifice. The analysis on the topic was conducted using the built-in tool of the Scopus database and VOSviewer software. The first 100 most cited articles were separately reviewed to address the aim of the study. No consensus was found regarding the recommended surgical techniques for facial nerve reanimation. The most used donor cranial nerves for transfer included the following: Masseteric branch of the V nerve, contralateral VII nerve with cross-face graft, the XI nerve and the XII nerve. The best timing of surgery is also controversial depending on pre-exiting pathology and degree of nerve degeneration. However, most of the clinical experience suggests facial nerve restoration immediately after the ablative procedure to reduce complications and improve patients' quality of life.

Nerve guide conduits, nerve transfers, and local and free muscle transfer in facial nerve palsy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight the recent literature on reinnervation options in the management of facial nerve paralysis using nerve conduits, and nerve and muscle transfers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Engineering of natural and synthetic nerve conduits has progressed and many of these products are now available on the market. The use of the masseter nerve has become more popular recently as a choice in nerve transfer procedures due to various unique advantages. Various authors have recently described mimetic muscle reinnervation using more than one nerve transfer, as well as dual and triple innervation of free muscle transfer.

SUMMARY

The ideal nerve conduit continues to be elusive, however significant progress has been made with many natural and synthetic materials and designs tested and introduced on the market. Many authors have modified the classic approaches in motor nerve transfer, as well as local and free muscle transfer, and described new ones, that aim to combine their advantages, particularly the simplification to a single stage and use of multiple reinnervation to the mimetic muscles. These advances are valuable to the reconstructive surgeon as powerful tools that can be tailored to the unique challenges of patients with facial nerve palsy looking for dynamic reanimation options.

Donors for nerve transplantation in craniofacial soft tissue injuries

Neural tissue is an important soft tissue; for instance, craniofacial nerves govern several aspects of human behavior, including the expression of speech, emotion transmission, sensation, and motor function. Therefore, nerve repair to promote functional recovery after craniofacial soft tissue injuries is indispensable. However, the repair and regeneration of craniofacial nerves are challenging due to their intricate anatomical and physiological characteristics. Currently, nerve transplantation is an irreplaceable treatment for segmental nerve defects. With the development of emerging technologies, transplantation donors have become more diverse. The present article reviews the traditional and emerging alternative materials aimed at advancing cutting-edge research on craniofacial nerve repair and facilitating the transition from the laboratory to the clinic. It also provides a reference for donor selection for nerve repair after clinical craniofacial soft tissue injuries. We found that autografts are still widely accepted as the first options for segmental nerve defects. However, allogeneic composite functional units have a strong advantage for nerve transplantation for nerve defects accompanied by several tissue damages or loss. As an alternative to autografts, decellularized tissue has attracted increasing attention because of its low immunogenicity. Nerve conduits have been developed from traditional autologous tissue to composite conduits based on various synthetic materials, with developments in tissue engineering technology. Nerve conduits have great potential to replace traditional donors because their structures are more consistent with the physiological microenvironment and show self-regulation performance with improvements in 3D technology. New materials, such as hydrogels and nanomaterials, have attracted increasing attention in the biomedical field. Their biocompatibility and stimuli-responsiveness have been gradually explored by researchers in the regeneration and regulation of neural networks.

Mesenchymal stem cell treatment for peripheral nerve injury: a narrative review

Peripheral nerve injuries occur as the result of sudden trauma and lead to reduced quality of life. The peripheral nervous system has an inherent capability to regenerate axons. However, peripheral nerve regeneration following injury is generally slow and incomplete that results in poor functional outcomes such as muscle atrophy. Although conventional surgical procedures for peripheral nerve injuries present many benefits, there are still several limitations including scarring, difficult accessibility to donor nerve, neuroma formation and a need to sacrifice the autologous nerve. For many years, other therapeutic approaches for peripheral nerve injuries have been explored, the most notable being the replacement of Schwann cells, the glial cells responsible for clearing out debris from the site of injury. Introducing cultured Schwann cells to the injured sites showed great benefits in promoting axonal regeneration and functional recovery. However, there are limited sources of Schwann cells for extraction and difficulties in culturing Schwann cells in vitro. Therefore, novel therapeutic avenues that offer maximum benefits for the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries should be investigated. This review focused on strategies using mesenchymal stem cells to promote peripheral nerve regeneration including exosomes of mesenchymal stem cells, nerve engineering using the nerve guidance conduits containing mesenchymal stem cells, and genetically engineered mesenchymal stem cells. We present the current progress of mesenchymal stem cell treatment of peripheral nerve injuries.