Management of Symptomatic Grade I and II Laryngeal Cleft: Experience of a Tertiary Care Center and Review of Literature

Repair of posterior laryngeal cleft: a 10-year experience in a tertiary referral hospital

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to present experience with surgical treatment of laryngeal cleft cases through both open and endoscopic approaches.

METHOD

A retrospective evaluation of all patients diagnosed as having a laryngeal cleft in a tertiary hospital over 10 years was performed. Pre-operative data, conservative and surgical management of cases, and outcomes were collected, tabulated and analysed.

RESULTS

This study included 43 patients aged from 2 to 44 months with a median of 9.19 months. Concerning management technique, 12 patients had conservative treatment and the remaining 31 underwent a surgical procedure (of them, 20 patients underwent endoscopic intervention and 11 had the open surgical technique). In the open group, we used either tibial periosteum (six cases) or harvested costal cartilage (five cases).

CONCLUSION

Surgical management in the form of endoscopic Coblation-assisted or an open approach is indicated in severe cases or mild cases not responding to conservative management.

Pediatric laryngeal cleft repair with coblation: Functional comparison of a novel technique with traditional methods

OBJECTIVES

The traditional endoscopic techniques for surgical management of laryngeal clefts are carbon dioxide (CO2) laser or microlaryngeal instruments (cold steel). This study compares the functional efficacy and safety of coblation, or "cold" radiofrequency ablation, to traditional approaches for endoscopic laryngeal cleft repair.

METHODS

Patients who underwent endoscopic laryngeal cleft repair with CO2 laser, cold steel, or coblator at two tertiary academic centers from 2015 to 2021 were retrospectively identified. The primary outcome studied was swallowing function: pre- and postoperative swallow studies were scored according to the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative with higher scores indicating worse swallow function. Secondary outcomes included surgical complications and rates of dehiscence.

RESULTS

Of the 53 patients included, 14 underwent repair with CO2 laser, 23 with cold steel, and 16 with the coblator. Mean age at surgery was 2.2 ± 1.1 years for the laser group, 4.3 ± 4.0 years for cold steel, and 1.9 ± 1.4 years for the coblator group. In the laser group, 100% of clefts were type I; for the cold steel group, 82.6% of clefts were type I and 17.4% were type II; for the coblator group, 93.8% of clefts were type I and 6.3% were type II. Pre- and postoperative swallow study scores were 6.3 ± 2.8 and 4.3 ± 3.2, respectively, (p = 0.001) for the laser group, 6.9 ± 2.8 and 5.3 ± 3.1 (p = 0.071) for the cold steel group, and 7.5 ± 1.5 and 4.0 ± 2.9 (p < 0.001) for the coblator group. Mean change in swallow study scores were similar across the three groups (p = 0.212). No patients experienced postoperative dehiscence at the surgical site or complications; no revisions were required.

CONCLUSIONS

Cleft repair with the novel coblation technique showed significant improvements in swallow study scores without any occurrences of postoperative dehiscence or revisions. Coblation is a safe and efficacious approach for laryngeal cleft repair.