Algorithms for managing coagulation disorders in liver disease

GLP-1R agonist therapy and vaccine response: Neglected implications

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), such as semaglutide (Ozempic®), have emerged as effective treatments for diabetes and weight management. However, recent evidence indicates that GLP-1R signalling influences various tissues, including the immune system. Notably, GLP-1 has a short half-life (< 5 minutes) and exists in the picomolar range, while GLP-1RAs like semaglutide have extended half-lives of several days and are administered at supraphysiological doses. This review explores the potential impact of these medications on vaccine efficacy. We examine evidence suggesting that GLP-1RAs may attenuate vaccine responses through direct effects on immune cells and modulation of other tissues. Additionally, we discuss how GLP-1R signalling may create a tolerogenic environment, potentially reducing vaccine immunogenicity. Given the widespread use of GLP-1RAs, it is crucial to understand their impact on immune responses and the translational implications for vaccination outcomes.

Management of Acute Liver Failure: Update 2022

Abbreviated pathogenesis and clinical course of the acute liver failure syndrome. The pathogenesis and clinical course of the syndrome of acute liver failure (ALF) differs depending upon the etiology of the primary liver injury. In turn, the severity of the liver injury and resulting synthetic failure is often the primary determinant of whether a patient is referred for emergency liver transplantation. Injuries by viral etiologies trigger the innate immune system via pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), while toxin-induced (and presumably ischemia-induced) injuries do so via damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). The course of the clinical syndrome further depends upon the relative intensity and composition of cytokine release, resulting in an early proinflammatory phenotype (SIRS) and later compensatory anti-inflammatory response phenotype (CARS). The outcomes of overwhelming immune activation are the systemic (extrahepatic) features of ALF (cardiovascular collapse, cerebral edema, acute kidney injury, respiratory failure, sepsis) which ultimately determine the likelihood of death.Acute liver failure (ALF) continues to carry a high risk of mortality or the need for transplantation despite recent improvements in overall outcomes over the past two decades. Optimal management begins with identifying that liver failure is indeed present and its etiology, since outcomes and the need for transplantation vary widely across the different etiologies. Most causes of ALF can be divided into hyperacute (ischemia and acetaminophen) and subacute types (other etiologies), based on time of evolution of signs and symptoms of liver failure; the former evolve in 3 to 4 days and the latter typically in 2 to 4 weeks. Both involve intense release of cytokines and hepatocellular contents into the circulation with multiorgan effects/consequences.Management involves optimizing fluid balance and cardiovascular support, including the use of continuous renal replacement therapy, vasopressors, and pulmonary ventilation. Early evaluation for liver transplantation is advised particularly for acetaminophen toxicity, which evolves so rapidly that delay is likely to lead to death.Vasopressor support, high-grade hepatic encephalopathy, and unfavorable (subacute) etiologies heighten the need for urgent listing for liver transplantation. Prognostic scores such as Kings Criteria, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, and the Acute Liver Failure Group prognostic index take these features into account and provide reasonable but imperfect predictive accuracy. Future treatments may include liver support devices and/or agents that improve hepatocyte regeneration.

Principles, Interpretation, and Evidence-Based Role of Viscoelastic Point-of-Care Coagulation Assays in Cirrhosis and Liver Failure

Background and Aims

Standard coagulation tests such as prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and international normalized ratio are determined by liver-synthesized coagulation factors. Despite an increased international normalized ratio, patients with cirrhosis are in a "rebalanced" state of hemostasis as the concomitant effect of reduced protein C, protein S, and thrombomodulin is not evaluated in standard coagulation tests. The cell-based model of hemostasis indicates additional mechanisms such as systemic inflammation, sepsis, and organ failures tip the delicate coagulation balance to an anticoagulant type in acute-on-chronic liver failure. In acute liver failure, thrombin generation and platelet function remain intact despite a marked prolongation in prothrombin time. We aimed to explain the principles, application, and utility of viscoelastic tests such as thromboelastography, rotational thromboelastometry, and Sonoclot.

Methods

We reviewed the available literature from MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial with the search terms 'coagulation', 'cirrhosis', 'acute-on-chronic liver failure', 'thromboelastography', 'thromboelastometry' and 'sonoclot' for cross sectional studies, cohort studies and randomized trials.

Results

The point-of-care viscoelastic tests provide actionable targets for correcting the coagulation defect in a patient with bleeding and provide evidence-based algorithms for use in liver disease. A limitation of these tests is the inability to assess vessel injury and endothelial elements.

Conclusion

Global coagulation tests provide a comprehensive estimate of coagulation in vitro; however, their use has only been validated in the setting of liver transplantation. Newer guidelines for hemostatic resuscitation are now accepting these POC tests, but additional data are required to validate their use as standard of care.

Evaluation of Coagulation, Fibrinolysis and Endothelial Biomarkers in Cirrhotic Patients With or Without Portal Venous Thrombosis

To evaluate variations in coagulation, fibrinolysis and endothelial marker expression in cirrhotic patients and to explore their clinical value and predictive performance in cirrhotic patients with or without portal vein thrombosis (PVT), we performed a case-control study with 175 cirrhotic patients and 50 healthy individuals. 99 patients had PVT and another 76 patients did not. All participants were evaluated for plasma levels of conventional hemostatic markers. Thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), plasmin-α2-plasmin inhibitor complex (PIC), thrombomodulin (TM), tissue plasminogen activator inhibitor complex (t-PAIC), von Willebrand factor antigen (vWF: Ag) and coagulation factor Ⅷ (FⅧ: c) were also assessed and the ratio of TAT/t-PAIC was calculated. We analyzed differences in these biomarkers among the three groups and constructed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Patients with PVT exhibited significantly higher TAT and TAT/t-PAIC than cirrhotic patients without PVT (both P < 0.001). Areas under the curve (AUC) of ROC analyses for TAT and TAT/t-PAIC were 0.68 and 0.66, the cut-off levels were 1.55 ng/ml and 0.46, with sensitivities and specificities of 78.79% and 51.32% regarding TAT, 39.8% and 90.79% regarding TAT/t-PAIC. Levels of FⅧ: c and vWF: Ag in patients with PVT were significantly lower than those without PVT (p = 0.026 and p = 0.027, respectively). The AUC^ROC, cut-off level, sensitivity and specificity of FⅧ: c were 0.64, 111.1%, 66.67% and 60%, respectively. For vWF: Ag they were 0.61, 429%, 89.66% and 38.71%, respectively. Cirrhotic patients have disorders of coagulation, fibrinolysis and the endothelial system. TAT, TAT/t-PAIC, FⅧ: c and vWF: Ag can be used as potential biomarkers for predicting PVT in cirrhotic patients.

Evaluation of coagulation parameters in dogs with gallbladder mucoceles

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder mucocele (GBM) is a common biliary disorder in dogs. Limited information is available on the coagulation status of dogs with GBM.

HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES

To determine patterns of coagulation alterations in dogs with GBM and correlate them with clinicopathologic abnormalities and ultrasonographic findings of disease severity.

ANIMALS

Twenty-three dogs with GBM identified on ultrasound examination were prospectively enrolled.

METHODS

At the time of GBM identification, blood and urine were collected for CBC, serum biochemical panel, urinalysis, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), factor VIII, protein C (PC), von Willebrand's factor (vWF), antithrombin activity, fibrinogen, D-dimers, and thromboelastrography (TEG). Gallbladder mucoceles were classified into ultrasound types 1 to 5. Medical records were reviewed for clinical presentation, underlying conditions and to determine if systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) was present.

RESULTS

Based on TEG parameters, maximal amplitude, and G, 19/23 (83%) of dogs with GBM had evaluations consistent with hypercoagulability. On plasma-based coagulation testing, dogs with GBM had increased total PC activity (20/23, 87%), fibrinogen (9/23, 39%), platelet count (9/23, 39%), and D-dimers (6/15, 40%) as well as prolongations in aPTT (9/22, 41%) and low vWF activity (5/21, 24%). No correlation was found between TEG G value and any coagulation or clinical pathology variables, ultrasound stage of GBM or disease severity as assessed by the presence of SIRS.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Dogs with ultrasonographically identified GBM have changes in whole blood kaolin-activated TEG supporting a hypercoagulable state although traditional plasma-based coagulation testing suggests that a complex state of hemostasis exists.

Assessment of hemostatic profile in patients with mild to advanced liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Hemostasis of patients suffering from liver cirrhosis is challenging due to both, pro- and anticoagulatory disorders leading to hemostatic alterations with distinct abnormalities of coagulation. Pathological changes in conventional coagulation analysis and platelet count are common manifestations of decreased liver synthesis of coagulation factors and reduced platelet count in these patients. However, conventional coagulation analysis and platelet count do not reflect in-vivo coagulation status or platelet function. The purpose of this present observational study was therefore to assess the haemostatic profile including plasmatic coagulation using thrombelastometry and impedance aggregometry for platelet function in patients suffering from liver cirrhosis.

AIM

To assess the hemostatic profile of cirrhotic patients according to model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score.

METHODS

Our study included both in- and outpatients suffering from liver cirrhosis attending the out- and inpatient care of the department of hepatology. Demographic and biochemical data as well as medical history including cause of liver cirrhosis, end stage kidney failure and medication with anticoagulants were recorded. To assess the hemostatic profile, platelet function was analyzed by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) using Multiplate^® (ADP-, ASPI- and TRAP-test) and thrombelastometry using ROTEM^® (EXTEM, INTEM, FIBTEM). Data were compared using Mann-Whitney U- or χ²-test. Spearman correlation was performed to analyze the association between MELD Score and results of thrombelastometry and MEA.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients attending the out- and inpatient care suffering from liver cirrhosis were screened. Of these, 50 patients were included and assigned to groups according to MELD score 6 to 11 (n = 25) or ≥ 17 (n = 25). Baseline patient characteristics revealed significant differences for MELD score (8 vs 22, P < 0.0001) and underlying laboratory parameters (international normalized ratio, bilirubine, creatinine) as well as fibrinogen level (275 mg/dL vs 209 mg/dL, P = 0.006) and aPTT (30 s vs 35 s, P = 0.047). MEA showed a moderately impaired platelet function (medians: AUC_ADP = 43U, AUC_ASPI = 71U, AUC_TRAP = 92U) but no significant differences between both groups. Thrombelastometry using ROTEM^® (EXTEM, INTEM, FIBTEM) revealed values within normal range in both groups. No significant correlation was observed between MELD score and results of MEA/thrombelastometry.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate a partially impaired hemostatic profile in liver cirrhosis patients unrelated to MELD score. An individual assessment of a potential coagulopathy should therefore be considered.