Hepatocellular and biliary tract carcinomas: SEOM clinical guidelines

Current and Future Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Updated Comprehensive Review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality. The principal treatment is surgical resection or liver transplantation, depending on whether the patient is a suitable transplant candidate. However, in most patients with HCC the diagnosis is often late, thereby excluding the patients from definitive surgical resection. Medical treatment includes sorafenib, which is the most commonly used systemic therapy; although, it has been shown to only minimally impact patient survival by several months. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy are generally ineffective. Due to the poor prognosis of patients with HCC, newer treatments are needed with several being in development, either in pre-clinical or clinical studies. In this review article, we provide an update on the current and future medical and surgical management of HCC.

Management of lymph nodes during resection of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review

The role of lymph node dissection (LND) in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains controversial. We sought to systematically review all available evidence to determine the role of LND in patients with HCC and ICC. Studies that reported on LND, lymph node metastasis (LNM), and short- and long-term outcomes for patients with HCC or ICC survival were identified from PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Data were extracted, synthesized, and analyzed using standard techniques. A total of 603 and 434 references were identified for HCC and ICC, respectively. Among HCC patients, the overall prevalence of LND was 51.6 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 19.7-83.5) with an associated LNM incidence of 44.5 % (95 % CI 27.4-61.7). LNM was associated with a 3- and 5-year survival of 27.5 and 20.8 %, respectively. Among ICC patients, most patients 78.5 % (95 % CI 76.2-80.7) underwent LND; 45.2 % (95 % CI 39.2-51.2) had LNM. Three and 5-year survival among ICC patients with LNM was 0.2 % (95 % CI 0-0.7) and 0 %, respectively. While there are insufficient data to recommend a routine LND in all patients with HCC or ICC, the potential prognostic value of LND suggests that LND should at least be considered at the time of surgery.

Role of local ablative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Percutaneous local ablation (PLA) techniques are currently considered as the best treatment option for patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are not candidates for surgical resection. They are safe, minimally invasive, efficacious and cost-effective. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is considered as the first line treatment in some centers, though most of the guidelines recommend it for small HCCs, where surgical resection is not feasible. In developing countries percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) and percutaneous acetic acid injection (PAI) may be used instead of RFA. For large HCCs, advances in electrode designs and newer techniques of ablation, including microwave ablation, are increasingly been used. Combination treatment modalities have shown promising results as compared to single modality for large tumors. The selection of the most appropriate modality depends on the size, number of lesions, the liver function status, patient's financial resources, availability of a particular technique and the expertise available.

Safety and efficacy of sorafenib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a single center experience

Sorafenib is the standard treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with demonstrated outcome benefits in randomized clinical trials. We present a single-center experience with sorafenib with the aim to establish its efficacy and safety in daily clinical practice. A total of 62 patients were treated with sorafenib 400 mg/12 h until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response rates, incidence of adverse events, actuarial disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were estimated. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for survival were also performed. Median treatment duration was 92 days. A 43% disease control rate was achieved (partial response, 15% and disease stabilization, 28%). After a median follow-up of 24.1 months, the median progression-free survival and OS for the overall population were 5.8 and 6.7 months, respectively, with survival rates of 27% at 1 year and 17 % at 2 years. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were fatigue (19%), hand-foot syndrome (8%), hypertension (5%), and diarrhea (3%). The univariate analysis showed that patient performance status (PS), use of previous treatments, and albumin >3.5 g/dL were significant prognostic factors for survival. In the multivariate study, only PS, alcoholic etiology and albumin >3.5 g/dL remained as independent predictors of survival. Sorafenib is a safe and moderately effective drug in HCC, although patients must be properly selected before starting therapy. Baseline PS, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging, and liver function should be taken into account as prognostic factors. Results in daily practice are somewhat inferior than observed in clinical trials.