Multidisciplinary approach in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: standard of care and open questions

Consensus minimum data set for lung cancer multidisciplinary teams: Results of a Delphi process

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

While multidisciplinary team (MDT) care in lung cancer is widely practiced, there are few guidelines for MDT on best data collection strategies. MDT meetings need ready access to information for the provision of optimal treatment recommendations (the primary purpose of the meeting), audit of team performance and benchmarking. This study aimed to develop a practical data set designed for these goals through a recognized consensus process with health professionals who participate in formal MDT settings.

METHODS

A modified Delphi process with three iterations (two surveys and one consensus conference) was carried out involving over 100 Australian lung cancer MDT health professionals.

RESULTS

In total, 122 lung cancer MDT health professionals responded to the Round 1 survey from over 350 invitees. Of the 122, 98 were available for invitation to Round 2. Of 98, 52 (53%) invitees responded to the Round 2 survey. After two rounds, 51 data elements across 8 domains (patient demographics, risk factors, biopsy data, staging, timeliness, treatment, follow-up and patient selection) achieved consensus, defined as 80% agreement. For Round 3, 33 MDT lead clinicians were invited to participate in a consensus conference. Of 33, 14 (42%) invitees distilled the 47 data elements into 23 elements across 8 domains to address the study objectives.

CONCLUSION

A practical data set for lung cancer MDT to use for optimal treatment recommendations and to evaluate team performance was developed through recognized consensus methodology. Access to streamlined, relevant and feasible data collection strategies may improve MDT decision-making, audit of team performance and facilitate benchmarking.

Intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging targeting folate receptors identifies lung cancer in a large-animal model

BACKGROUND

Complete tumor resection is the most important predictor of patient survival with non-small cell lung cancer. Methods for intraoperative margin assessment after lung cancer excision are lacking. This study evaluated near-infrared (NIR) intraoperative imaging with a folate-targeted molecular contrast agent (OTL0038) for the localization of primary lung adenocarcinomas, lymph node sampling, and margin assessment.

METHODS

Ten dogs with lung cancer underwent either video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or open thoracotomy and tumor excision after an intravenous injection of OTL0038. Lungs were imaged with an NIR imaging device both in vivo and ex vivo. The wound bed was re-imaged for retained fluorescence suspicious for positive tumor margins. The tumor signal-to-background ratio (SBR) was measured in all cases. Next, 3 human patients were enrolled in a proof-of-principle study. Tumor fluorescence was measured both in situ and ex vivo.

RESULTS

All canine tumors fluoresced in situ (mean Fluoptics SBR, 5.2 [range, 2.7-8.1]; mean Karl Storz SBR 1.9 [range, 1.4-2.6]). In addition, the fluorescence was consistent with tumor margins on pathology. Three positive lymph nodes were discovered with NIR imaging. Also, a positive retained tumor margin was discovered upon NIR imaging of the wound bed. Human pulmonary adenocarcinomas were also fluorescent both in situ and ex vivo (mean SBR, > 2.0).

CONCLUSIONS

NIR imaging can identify lung cancer in a large-animal model. In addition, NIR imaging can discriminate lymph nodes harboring cancer cells and also bring attention to a positive tumor margin. In humans, pulmonary adenocarcinomas fluoresce after the injection of the targeted contrast agent. Cancer 2017;123:1051-60. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Integrated Palliative Care and Oncologic Care in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Palliative care integrated into standard medical oncologic care will transform the way we approach and practice oncologic care. Integration of appropriate components of palliative care into oncologic treatment using a pathway-based approach will be described in this review. Care pathways build on disease status (early, locally advanced, advanced) as well as patient and family needs. This allows for an individualized approach to care and is the best means for proactive screening, assessment, and intervention, to ensure that all palliative care needs are met throughout the continuum of care. Components of palliative care that will be discussed include assessment of physical symptoms, psychosocial distress, and spiritual distress. Specific components of these should be integrated based on disease trajectory, as well as clinical assessment. Palliative care should also include family and caregiver education, training, and support, from diagnosis through survivorship and end of life. Effective integration of palliative care interventions have the potential to impact quality of life and longevity for patients, as well as improve caregiver outcomes.

Incidental receipt of cardiac medications and survival outcomes among patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer after definitive radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Preclinical and epidemiologic studies suggest that receipt of some cardiac medications such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), β-blockers, or aspirin may have antiproliferative effects in several types of cancer. The aim of this study was to estimate survival outcomes in patients receiving incidental cardiac medications during treatment for lung cancer, and to compare outcomes with those patients not receiving these medications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 673 patients who had received definitive radiotherapy for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess associations between receipt of ACEIs, ARBs, β-blockers, or aspirin and locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Multivariate analyses showed that ACEI receipt was associated with poorer LRPFS but had no effect on DMFS, DFS, or OS. Aspirin receipt was associated only with improved DMFS, and β-blocker receipt was associated with improved DMFS, DFS, and OS.

CONCLUSION

Incidental receipt of ACEIs was associated with a higher prevalence of local failure, whereas receipt of either β-blockers or aspirin had protective effects on survival outcomes in this large group of patients with lung cancer. This finding warrants further clinical and preclinical exploration, as it may have important implications for treating patients with lung cancer who are also receiving cardiac medications.