1
|
Abstract
Breast brachytherapy represents a radiation technique that can be utilized as both monotherapy and as a tumor bed boost following breast conserving surgery. As monotherapy, the rationale for brachytherapy is that the majority of residual disease and therefore recurrences occur in close proximity to the lumpectomy cavity; for boost treatment, brachytherapy represents a technique that provided a more conformal approach prior to 3D treatment planning, and more recently can be used in conjunction with oncoplastic surgery. Multiple guidelines are available to assist clinicians with patient selection for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), and recent guidelines support brachytherapy as an appropriate technique to deliver APBI. Modern breast brachytherapy can be performed with interstitial or applicator-based brachytherapy with multilumen and strut devices offering the ability to provide greater skin, chest wall, and normal breast sparing than previous devices. Novel strategies are being evaluated, including high dose rate perioperative/intraoperative radiotherapy, permanent breast seed implants, and noninvasive breast brachytherapy. Additionally, studies are evaluating shorter courses of brachytherapy. Multiple Level I studies are now available supporting interstitial brachytherapy to deliver APBI while prospective data and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-39/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0413 trial are available with applicator brachytherapy and provide standardized prescriptions, target volume definitions, and dosimetric goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chirag Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Alvaro Martinez
- 21st Century Oncology, Michigan Healthcare Professionals, Farmington Hills, MI
| | - Matthew Kolar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Frank Vicini
- 21st Century Oncology, Michigan Healthcare Professionals, Farmington Hills, MI.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guinot JL, Tortajada MI, Santos MA, Moreno A, Fernández J, Peña M, Gozalbo F, Oliver L, Bosó C, Santamaría P, Giménez J, Arribas L. Can invasive breast carcinoma with close or positive margins be managed without a new surgery? Breast J 2018; 24:1024-1027. [PMID: 30240110 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Revised: 01/29/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
We present the long-term outcome (FU 127 months) of a prospective study with 248 breast cancer patients with close or positive surgical margin, treated with 50 Gy whole breast irradiation plus high-dose-rate boost, 3 × 4.4 Gy. Actuarial breast failure at 10/15 years was 6.5%/11.6%; with positive margin (120) 6.8%/14.8%, with margin ≤2 mm (76) 9.8%/9.8%, with margin >2 mm <5 mm (52) 2%/2%. In 90 patients aged ≤50 was 11.9%/17.8%, between 51 and 70, 3.8%/8.2%, >70, 0%. Fibrosis appeared in 26.7%. Cosmetic outcome was excellent/good in 85.8%. This approach avoids a second surgery in women >50 with positive surgical margin, or with close margins in all ages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Luis Guinot
- Foundation Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Araceli Moreno
- Foundation Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | - Jesús Fernández
- Foundation Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | - Marina Peña
- Foundation Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | - Francisco Gozalbo
- Foundation Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | - Laura Oliver
- Foundation Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | - Cristina Bosó
- Foundation Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | - Paula Santamaría
- Foundation Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | - Julia Giménez
- Foundation Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| | - Leoncio Arribas
- Foundation Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Strnad V, Major T, Polgar C, Lotter M, Guinot JL, Gutierrez-Miguelez C, Galalae R, Van Limbergen E, Guix B, Niehoff P, Lössl K, Hannoun-Levi JM. ESTRO-ACROP guideline: Interstitial multi-catheter breast brachytherapy as Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation alone or as boost - GEC-ESTRO Breast Cancer Working Group practical recommendations. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:411-420. [PMID: 29691075 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Revised: 04/06/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This consensus statement from the Breast Cancer Working Group of Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie of European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) aims at generating practical guidelines for multi-catheter image-guided brachytherapy in the conservative management of breast cancer patients used for either Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) or for a breast boost. METHODS Recent advances in techniques of multi-catheter brachytherapy were summarized and all the relevant literature was reviewed by a panel of experts. Panel members of the GEC-ESTRO experts participated in a series of conferences, supplemented their clinical experience, were surveyed to determine their current practices and patterns, performed a literature review, and formulated recommendations for implementing APBI with multi-catheter brachytherapy, focusing on treatment planning issues, catheter insertion, dosimetry and quality assurance. This document was reviewed and approved by the full panel, the GEC-ESTRO executive board and by the ACROP (Advisory Committee on Radiation Oncology Practice). RESULTS Three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning, catheter insertion techniques, dosimetry and methods of quality assurance for APBI and boost with multi-catheter image-guided brachytherapy after breast conserving surgery are described. Detailed recommendations for daily practice including dose constraints are given. CONCLUSIONS Recent standards and guidelines for the use of APBI with different multi-catheter image-guided brachytherapy techniques have been defined. Different techniques are used to insert the catheters. Guidelines are mandatory to assure precise catheter insertion for coverage of the target volume and to guarantee high-quality dosimetry. The same rules apply for brachytherapy based boost irradiation for breast cancer after whole breast irradiation as well as for partial breast re-irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vratislav Strnad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Tibor Major
- Center of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology Budapest, Hungary
| | - Csaba Polgar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Michael Lotter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jose-Luis Guinot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Razvan Galalae
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Evangelische Kliniken, Gelsenkirchen, Germany
| | - Erik Van Limbergen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Benjamin Guix
- IMOR Foundation, Medical Institute for Radiotherapy and Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Peter Niehoff
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sana Hospital Offenbach, Germany
| | - Kristina Lössl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
The American Brachytherapy Society consensus statement for accelerated partial-breast irradiation. Brachytherapy 2018; 17:154-170. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Revised: 09/11/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
5
|
Hypofractionated boost after whole breast irradiation in breast carcinoma: chronic toxicity results and cosmesis. Clin Transl Oncol 2016; 19:464-469. [PMID: 27655367 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-016-1548-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2016] [Accepted: 09/10/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of hypofractionated boost after hypofractionated whole breast irradiation in breast carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients after breast conservative surgery were treated all time with hypofractionation of 2.67 Gy/day. Whole breast dose was 40.05 Gy followed in case of risk of local relapse by a boost of 16.02 Gy or 8.01 Gy. Acute and chronic toxicity results were evaluated including cosmetic software-assisted assessment and objective evaluation of fibrosis parameters (elasticity and hydration) by means of a skin tester. RESULTS A total of 362 patients were evaluated. Acute toxicities comprised grade 1 dermatitis in 48.1 %, grade 2 in 44.5 % and grade 3 in 17 patients 4.7 %, respectively. After a median follow-up of 4.5 years, in 308 cases (86.6 %) there was no chronic skin or subcutaneous changes. In the first consecutive 50 patients, measures with skin tester showed no statistical differences in parameters for skin and subcutaneous fibrosis. Cosmetic results were considered excellent and good in 26 and 62 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Boost to tumour bed with hypofractionated doses is well tolerated and acute and chronic toxicities are mild with good cosmetic results. Objective systems are encouraging methods to assess skin quality and cosmesis.
Collapse
|
6
|
Balgobind BV, Koedooder K, Ordoñez Zúñiga D, Dávila Fajardo R, Rasch CRN, Pieters BR. A review of the clinical experience in pulsed dose rate brachytherapy. Br J Radiol 2015; 88:20150310. [PMID: 26290399 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy is a treatment modality that combines physical advantages of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy with the radiobiological advantages of low dose rate brachytherapy. The aim of this review was to describe the effective clinical use of PDR brachytherapy worldwide in different tumour locations. We found 66 articles reporting on clinical PDR brachytherapy including the treatment procedure and outcome. Moreover, PDR brachytherapy has been applied in almost all tumour sites for which brachytherapy is indicated and with good local control and low toxicity. The main advantage of PDR is, because of the small pulse sizes used, the ability to spare normal tissue. In certain cases, HDR resembles PDR brachytherapy by the use of multifractionated low-fraction dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian V Balgobind
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Kees Koedooder
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Diego Ordoñez Zúñiga
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Coen R N Rasch
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bradley R Pieters
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Guinot JL, Baixauli-Perez C, Soler P, Tortajada MI, Moreno A, Santos MA, Mut A, Gozalbo F, Arribas L. High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost Effect on Local Tumor Control in Young Women With Breast Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 91:165-71. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.09.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2014] [Revised: 09/12/2014] [Accepted: 09/15/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
8
|
Shah C, Vicini F, Wazer DE, Arthur D, Patel RR. The American Brachytherapy Society consensus statement for accelerated partial breast irradiation. Brachytherapy 2013; 12:267-77. [PMID: 23619524 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2013.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2012] [Revised: 01/21/2013] [Accepted: 02/01/2013] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop clinical guidelines for the quality practice of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) as part of breast-conserving therapy for women with early-stage breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Members of the American Brachytherapy Society with expertise in breast cancer and breast brachytherapy in particular devised updated guidelines for appropriate patient evaluation and selection based on an extensive literature search and clinical experience. RESULTS Increasing numbers of randomized and single and multi-institution series have been published documenting the efficacy of various APBI modalities. With more than 10-year followup, multiple series have documented excellent clinical outcomes with interstitial APBI. Patient selection for APBI should be based on a review of clinical and pathologic factors by the clinician with particular attention paid to age (≥50 years old), tumor size (≤3cm), histology (all invasive subtypes and ductal carcinoma in situ), surgical margins (negative), lymphovascular space invasion (not present), and nodal status (negative). Consistent dosimetric guidelines should be used to improve target coverage and limit potential for toxicity following treatment. CONCLUSIONS These guidelines have been created to provide clinicians with appropriate patient selection criteria to allow clinicians to use APBI in a manner that will optimize clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. These guidelines will continue to be evaluated and revised as future publications further stratify optimal patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chirag Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chand MÈ, Rivera S, Hennequin C, Hannoun-Lévi JM, Quero L. [Brachytherapy of breast cancer]. Cancer Radiother 2013; 17:125-9. [PMID: 23453755 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2013.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2013] [Accepted: 01/17/2013] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
For breast cancer, interstitial brachytherapy remains an accurate irradiation technique for delivering a high dose (increasing the local control) in a small volume (decreasing the toxicity). In this article, we present the technical data related to the breast brachytherapy proceeding, from the implantation of the vectors to the treatment itself, including the planning. The different indications of breast brachytherapy include all the breast irradiations focusing on the initial tumour bed (partial irradiation of the breast), such as boost, accelerated and partial breast irradiation (APBI) and second conservative radiosurgical treatment in case of ipsilateral in-breast recurrence. The results in terms of efficacy and toxicity are presented for each indication. Interstitial breast brachytherapy, performed according with the standard rules, remains a major technique for breast cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M-È Chand
- Département de radiothérapie oncologique, centre Antoine-Lacassagne, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rodríguez Pérez A, López Carrizosa MC, Samper Ots PM, Pérez-Regadera Gómez JF, Zapatero Ortuño J, Sáez Garrido JDD, Martín de Miguel MJ. Conservative surgery, external radiotherapy, and HDR brachytherapy in a single fraction of 7 Gy in early breast cancer: long-term toxicity and esthetic assessment. Clin Transl Oncol 2012; 14:953-60. [PMID: 22975899 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-012-0881-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2011] [Accepted: 02/27/2012] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The essential issue in conservative treatment is the quality in breast preservation. When risk factors for local relapse exist, a tumour bed boost is required, but the boost choice remains controversial. Prospectively, we studied long-term toxicity, cosmetic outcome and prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS After conservative treatment, 115 patients received a single dose of 7 Gy HDR-brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost between June 1996 and December 2005. Late toxicity was assessed using the LENT-SOMA scale. For esthetic assessment, a subjective scale was used for patients and a modified Fehlauer scale for physicians. Mean age was 56.6 years. Invasive ductal carcinoma (78 %) and lumpectomy (60 %) were predominantly reported. 48 % received chemotherapy (CT). RESULTS Regarding toxicity, 39 % of patients reported breast pain, 75 % fibrosis, 56 % telangiectasias, 19 % lymphoedema, and 51 % retraction/atrophy. Concerning management, 22 % of patients with pain and 45 % with lymphoedema were treated. The esthetic result was found satisfactory by 96 % of the patients and 85 % of the physicians. Fibrosis was influenced by CT and a larger irradiated volume and telangiectasias by a greater implant volume. CONCLUSIONS HDR-BT boost shows good cosmetic effects with acceptable toxicity. Patients overestimate the esthetic outcome. LENT/SOMA is useful to assess chronic toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurora Rodríguez Pérez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Central de la Defensa Gómez-Ulla, C/Glorieta del Ejército s/n, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|