Is regorafenib providing clinically meaningful benefits to pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer?

Retrospective Correlation between First Drug Treatment Duration and Survival Outcomes in Sequential Treatment with Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Subgroup Analysis

Background: Patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) rarely receive third-line or further treatment. In this context, regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T) are two important novel therapeutic choices with statistically significant increases in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control, with different toxicity profiles. This study is a subgroup analysis of our larger retrospective study, already published, whose objective was to assess the outcomes of patients when R and T were given sequentially. Patients and Methods: The study involved thirteen Italian cancer centers on a 10-year retrospective observation (2012-2022). In this subgroup analysis, we focused our attention on the correlation between the first drug treatment duration (<3 months, 3 to <6 months and ≥6 months) and survival outcomes in patients who had received the sequence regorafenib-to-trifluridine/tipiracil, or vice versa. Results: The initial study included 866 patients with mCRC who received sequential T/R, or R/T, or T or R alone. This analysis is focused on evaluating the impact of the duration of the first treatment in the sequence on clinical outcomes (OS, PFS) and includes 146 and 116 patients of the T/R and R/T sequences, respectively. Based on the duration of the first drug treatment, subgroups for the T/R sequence included 27 patients (18.4%) who received T for <3 months, 86 (58.9%) treated for 3 to <6 months, and 33 (22.6%) treated for ≥6 months; in the reverse sequence (R as the first drug), subgroups included 18 patients (15.5%) who received their first treatment for <3 months, 62 (53.4%) treated for 3 to <6 months, and 35 (31.0%) treated for ≥6 months. In patients who received their first drug treatment for a period of 3 to <6 months, the R/T sequence had a significantly longer median OS (13.7 vs. 10.8 months, p = 0.0069) and a longer median PFS (10.8 vs. 8.5 months, p = 0.0003) than the T/R group. There were no statistically significant differences between groups with first drug treatment durations of <3 months and ≥6 months. Conclusions: Our analysis seems to suggest that the administration of R for a period of 3 to <6 months before that of T can prolong both OS and PFS, as compared to the opposite sequence.

Treatment Settings and Outcomes with Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil at Third-Line Treatment and beyond in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with refractory mCRC rarely undergo third-line or subsequent treatment. This strategy could negatively impact their survival. In this setting, regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T) are two key new treatment options with statistically significant improvements in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control with different tolerance profiles. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of these agents in real-world practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 2012-2022, 866 patients diagnosed with mCRC who received sequential R and T (T/R, n = 146; R/T, n = 116]) or T (n = 325]) or R (n = 279) only were retrospectively recruited from 13 Italian cancer institutes.

RESULTS

The median OS is significantly longer in the R/T group (15.9 months) than in the T/R group (13.9 months) (p = 0.0194). The R/T sequence had a statistically significant advantage in the mPFS, which was 8.8 months with T/R vs. 11.2 months with R/T (p = 0.0005). We did not find significant differences in outcomes between groups receiving T or R only. A total of 582 grade 3/4 toxicities were recorded. The frequency of grade 3/4 hand-foot skin reactions was higher in the R/T sequence compared to the reverse sequence (37.3% vs. 7.4%) (p = 0.01), while grade 3/4 neutropenia was slightly lower in the R/T group than in the T/R group (66.2% vs. 78.2%) (p = 0.13). Toxicities in the non-sequential groups were similar and in line with previous studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The R/T sequence resulted in a significantly longer OS and PFS and improved disease control compared with the reverse sequence. R and T given not sequentially have similar impacts on survival. More data are needed to define the best sequence and to explore the efficacy of sequential (T/R or R/T) treatment combined with molecular-targeted drugs.

Regorafenib-Induced Hypothyroidism as a Predictive Marker for Improved Survival in Metastatic or Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies: A Prospective Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced hypothyroidism is associated with favorable survival in patients with various cancers.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the incidence of regorafenib-induced hypothyroidism and assess its prognostic value in patients with metastatic or unresectable colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving regorafenib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included 68 patients treated at Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Republic of Korea) between 2014 and 2016 with metastatic or unresectable CRC refractory to standard therapies. Regorafenib (160 mg/day on days 1-21 followed by a 7-day break) was administered.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 58 (range 26-72) years; 61.8% of patients were male. Among the 68 patients, 50 (73.5%) showed hypothyroidism; 39 (57.4%) had subclinical and 11 (16.2%) had symptomatic hypothyroidism. Overall, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 7.4% and 70.6%, respectively; both were significantly higher in patients with symptomatic or subclinical hypothyroidism than in euthyroid patients (ORR 27.3% vs. 5.1% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.001; DCR 100% vs. 76.9% vs. 38.9%, P = 0.001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were longer in patients with symptomatic hypothyroidism than in those with subclinical hypothyroidism (median PFS 9.1 vs. 3.8 months, P = 0.018; median OS: 19.2 vs. 9.4 months, P = 0.012) or with euthyroid status (median PFS 9.1 vs. 1.8 months, P < 0.001; median OS 19.2 vs. 4.7 months, P = 0.001). Symptomatic hypothyroidism was a significant protective factor for PFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.37, P = 0.006) and OS (HR = 0.35, P = 0.007); no other adverse events were associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Regorafenib-induced hypothyroidism frequently occurs in patients with metastatic CRC receiving regorafenib and is associated with improved survival. Thyroid function status should be actively monitored in CRC patients receiving regorafenib.

Retrospective study of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil efficacy as a third-line or later chemotherapy regimen for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

Regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) are novel antitumor agents for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. However, it is unclear which patients may derive a survival benefit from these drugs in real-life clinical practice. We evaluated retrospectively the efficacy and safety of regorafenib and TAS-102 at a single institution between June 2013 and November 2015. Cox regression analysis was carried out to obtain predictive scores (the nearest integers of hazard ratio) for survival benefit. Forty-four patients treated with regorafenib or TAS-102 were included in the analysis; among them, 17 received crossover treatment. The median overall survival (OS) was 9.1 months for regorafenib and 9.3 months for TAS-102, and the corresponding values after crossover were 7.1 and 5.3 months, respectively. OS was not correlated to relative dose intensity, but was proportional to the total administered dose of each drug. Adverse events were tolerable even after crossover. We identified three variables as significant for prediction of OS with good discrimination (C-statistic=0.70): Poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, time since diagnosis of metastatic disease ≤18 months, and previous chemotherapy continued ≥2 months beyond progression were all predictors of poor OS. Regorafenib and TAS-102 can be recommended for patients with better performance status and slow progression of metastatic disease. Optimal survival benefit was provided by prompt administration of either drug after failure of previous chemotherapy, with flexible titration to the optimal dose for each individual patient.

A meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of regorafenib for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) often suffer from progressive disease despite previous therapy. It has been a great challenge for those patients. In 2012, regorafenib was approved for mCRC. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to collect and present existing data to explorethe clinical use of regorafenib.

METHODS

The online electronic databases, such as PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library, updated to November 2017 were systematically searched. Trials on the effectiveness of regorafenib in patients who suffer from treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer were included, of which the main outcomes included 3 parameters: overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade 3/4 AE.

RESULTS

Totally, 4 trials were included in this meta-analysis. The OD was significantly better with the use of regorafenib (OR = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.65-0.94, I = 69%, P = .008), and PFS (OR = 0.52, 95%CI = 0.34-0.79, I = 97%, P = .002). However, the most common toxicities occurred more frequently in the regorafenib group than the control group (OR = 3.73, 95%CI = 1.68-8.28, I = 79%, P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Regorafenib demonstrates better efficacy and has manageable adverse-event profile for treatment-refractory mCRC. Considering the safety feature of regorafenib, further studies and clinical trials are warranted to investigate the dosing of regorafenib and alternative approaches are needed to explore predictive biomarker fortherapy selection.

Regorafenib in the Real-Life Clinical Practice: Data from the Czech Registry

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of regorafenib for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in clinical practice in the Czech Republic, and to describe the clinical outcomes of patients in terms of safety and survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data of patients treated with regorafenib were extracted from the national CORECT registry. The CORECT registry is a non-interventional post-marketing database, gathering information about patients with CRC and treated with targeted agents. Twenty oncology centres in the Czech Republic contributed to this registry. Collected data included patients' characteristics, disease history, cancer treatments, response to treatments and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 148 patients treated with regorafenib in clinical practice were analysed. At regorafenib initiation, almost all patients were fully active or slightly restricted in physical activity. Regorafenib was not administered as first-line treatment in any patient. Median progression-free survival was 3.5 months and median overall survival was 9.3 months. One-year survival rate was 44.6 %. Four partial responses were observed and 51 stable diseases. Progression was observed in 66 patients (44.6 %). The main reported adverse events were skin toxicity (5.4 %) and fatigue (2.0 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Regorafenib is a well-established treatment for pretreated patients with mCRC, however real-life data are scarce. Our results demonstrated slightly better efficacy of regorafenib and better safety profile in patients with mCRC compared to the randomised trials.

Non-Coding RNAs as Predictive Biomarkers to Current Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

The onset and selection of resistant clones during cancer treatment with chemotherapy or targeted therapy is a major issue in the clinical management of metastatic colorectal cancer patients. It is possible that a more personalized treatment selection, using reliable response-to-therapy predictive biomarkers, could lead to an improvement in the success rate of the proposed therapies. Although the process of biomarker selection and validation could be a long one, requiring solid statistics, large cohorts and multicentric validations, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) and in particular microRNAs, proved to be extremely promising in this field. Here we summarize some of the main studies correlating specific ncRNAs with sensitivity/resistance to chemotherapy, anti-VEGF therapy, anti-EGFR therapy and immunotherapy in colorectal cancer (CRC).