Efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR-mutant lung cancer women in a real-world setting: the WORLD07 database

Real-World Treatment Patterns, Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Testing and Outcomes in EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Belgium: Results from the REVEAL Study

BACKGROUND

Treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to evolve expeditiously.

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study investigated real-world treatment patterns and EGFR mutation testing in patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC in Belgium.

METHODS

Data were extracted from medical records of adults diagnosed with EGFRm locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2017. Patients were followed retrospectively from diagnosis until 1 September 2018, end of clinical activity or death. Data on demographics, patient outcomes and disease characteristics, treatment patterns and EGFR mutation testing at diagnosis and progression were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients were enrolled. At diagnosis, median age was 69 years, 63.1% were female, 88.7% had metastatic disease, 94.3% had adenocarcinoma histology, 76.6% had ECOG 0/1, 70.9% had common EGFR mutations and 29.1% had only rare mutations. In first line, 73.8% of patients received first/second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (1G/2G EGFR-TKIs), while 21.9% received other systemic treatments. Among 61 patients progressing on and discontinuing a first 1G/2G EGFR-TKI, 45 (73.8%) received subsequent systemic treatment while 16 (26.2%) did not; 20 (32.8%) received osimertinib. Among 65 patients progressing on a first 1G/2G EGFR-TKI, 47 (72.3%) were tested for T790M, of whom 25 (53.2%) were positive.

CONCLUSION

These real-world data from Belgium show that a substantial fraction of patients with EGFRm NSCLC do not receive 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs in first line and do not receive subsequent systemic treatment after progression on 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs. Only a third receive osimertinib upon progression on 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs. These observations should be considered in first-line treatment decisions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03761901-December 3, 2018.

Nationwide Real-world Cohort Study of First-line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-mutated Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Only a few randomized trials directly compared the relative efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and most trials comprised selected series from Asian populations. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the overall survival (OS) of advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC in a large white population and to evaluate variation between different TKIs and identify predictors of survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Information about clinical characteristics, treatment, and survival for 873 patients with stage IV EGFR + NSCLC, diagnosed from 2015 through 2017, was derived from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. OS was evaluated by actuarial analysis and multivariable Cox regression. Prognostic factors are reported as hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 596 (68%) patients received first-line treatment with regular TKIs, providing a median survival of 20.2 months. Forty-five percent of patients were 70 years and older, and 54% of patients had distant metastasis in multiple organs. In the multivariate analysis, survival was significantly worse for men, and patients with higher age, poorer performance, and ≥ 3 organs with metastasis. Compared with erlotinib, OS was worse for gefitinib users (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.64), predominantly in patients with brain metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Dutch patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who received first-line treatment with regular TKIs have a median OS of 20.2 months in a nationwide real-world cohort. In patients with brain metastasis, erlotinib showed superior results compared with gefitinib and was similar to afatinib.

Women With Synchronous or Metachronous Lung and Ovarian Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Report

BACKGROUND/AIM

Double diagnosis of lung cancer (LC) and ovarian cancer (OC) is rare. Here, we describe patients with synchronous/metachronous LC and OC to identify common clinical and pathological patterns.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinical, pathological and molecular data of patients diagnosed and treated at 30 European Institutions from 2008 to 2018 were retrieved and analysed. Whenever tissue was available, centralized pathology revision was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 19 cases were found; one was excluded at pathology revision. Most LCs were adenocarcinomas (15/18) and most OCs were high-grade serous (15/18) carcinomas. Of the 9 patients analysed, 7 carried oncogene-addicted LC (4 EGFR, 1 B-RAF and 2 ALK) and five out of 7 carried BRCA mutations. One patient with a germline-BRCA1 mutation received olaparib, resulting in a durable response of both malignancies. Median overall survival was 33 months.

CONCLUSION

In our series, most synchronous/metachronous LCs and OCs showed genetic alterations. Further analyses with wide NGS panel could shed light on the biological mechanisms driving their occurrence.

Heterogeneous tumor features and treatment outcome between males and females with lung cancer (LC): Do gender and sex matter?

Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, despite a decreasing incidence rate in recent years, especially in men. Most risk factors for LC could be linked to an individual's reproductive system and secondary sex characteristics ('sex-related') and/or to some physical, behavioral and personality traits ('gender-related') peculiar to males rather than females or vice versa. An imbalance of these etiologic factors could explain why some LC features may differ between sexes. For this review, an extended literature data collection was performed, using keywords to identify 'sex/gender' and 'LC'. Differences between genders in LC epidemiology, pathological and molecular characteristics, loco-regional and/or systemic treatments outcome and prognosis were systematically analyzed. The possible predictive role of physio-pathological factors in males and females paves the way for a personalized therapeutic approach, emphasizing the need to include gender as a stratification factor in future clinical trials design.