1
|
Yilmaz MT, Kahvecioglu A, Yazici G, Mohammadipour S, Kertmen N, Cifci GC, Zorlu F. Hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation for progressive glioblastoma: twelve years' experience of a single center. J Neurooncol 2024; 167:295-303. [PMID: 38383875 PMCID: PMC11023988 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04607-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the prognostic factors and the role of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) as a re-irradiation technique in the management of progressive glioblastoma. METHODS The records of 77 previously irradiated glioblastoma patients who progressed and received second course hypofractionated SRT (1-5 fractions) between 2009 and 2022 in our department were evaluated retrospectively. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was utilized for all statistical analyses. RESULTS The median time to progression from the end of initial radiotherapy was 14 months (range, 6-68 months). The most common SRT schedule was 30 Gy (range, 18-50 Gy) in 5 fractions (range, 1-5 fractions). The median follow-up after SRT was 9 months (range, 3-80 months). One-year overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates after SRT were 46% and 35%, respectively. Re-irradiation dose and the presence of pseudoprogression were both significant independent positive prognostic factors for both OS (p = 0.009 and p = 0.04, respectively) and PFS (p = 0.008 and p = 0.04, respectively). For PFS, progression-free interval > 14 months was also a prognostic factor (p = 0.04). The treatment was well tolerated without significant acute toxicity. During follow-up, radiation necrosis was observed in 17 patients (22%), and 14 (82%) of them were asymptomatic. CONCLUSION Hypofractionated SRT is an effective treatment approach for patients with progressive glioblastoma. Younger patients who progressed later than 14 months, received higher SRT doses, and experienced pseudoprogression following SRT had improved survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melek Tugce Yilmaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Alper Kahvecioglu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gozde Yazici
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Sepideh Mohammadipour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Neyran Kertmen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gokcen Coban Cifci
- Radiology Department, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Faruk Zorlu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gregucci F, Di Guglielmo FC, Surgo A, Carbonara R, Laera L, Ciliberti MP, Gentile MA, Calbi R, Caliandro M, Sasso N, Davi' V, Bonaparte I, Fanelli V, Giraldi D, Tortora R, Internò V, Giuliani F, Surico G, Signorelli F, Lombardi G, Fiorentino A. Reirradiation with radiosurgery or stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy in association with regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma. Strahlenther Onkol 2023:10.1007/s00066-023-02172-9. [PMID: 37987802 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02172-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE No standard treatment has yet been established for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). In this context, the aim of the current study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of reirradiation (re-RT) by radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/FSRT) in association with regorafenib. METHODS Patients with a histological or radiological diagnosis of recurrent GBM who received re-RT by SRS/FSRT and regorafenib as second-line systemic therapy were included in the analysis. RESULTS From January 2020 to December 2022, 21 patients were evaluated. The median time between primary/adjuvant RT and disease recurrence was 8 months (range 5-20). Median re-RT dose was 24 Gy (range 18-36 Gy) for a median number of 5 fractions (range 1-6). Median regorafenib treatment duration was 12 weeks (range 3-26). Re-RT was administered before starting regorafenib or in the week off regorafenib during the course of chemotherapy. The median and the 6‑month overall survival (OS) from recurrence were 8.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.9-12.7 months) and 75% (95% CI 50.9-89.1%), respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) from recurrence was 6 months (95% CI 3.7-8.5 months). The most frequent side effects were asthenia that occurred in 10 patients (8 cases of grade 2 and 2 cases of grade 3), and hand-foot skin reaction (2 patients grade 3, 3 patients grade 2). Adverse events led to permanent regorafenib discontinuation in 2 cases, while in 5/21 cases (23.8%), a dose reduction was administered. One patient experienced dehiscence of the surgical wound after reintervention and during regorafenib treatment, while another patient reported intestinal perforation that required hospitalization. CONCLUSION For recurrent GBM, re-RT with SRT/FSRT plus regorafenib is a safe treatment. Prospective trials are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabiana Gregucci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti-Bari, Italy.
| | | | - Alessia Surgo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti-Bari, Italy
| | - Roberta Carbonara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti-Bari, Italy
| | - Letizia Laera
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti-Bari, Italy
| | - Maria Paola Ciliberti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti-Bari, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Calbi
- Department of Radiology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti-Bari, Italy
| | - Morena Caliandro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti-Bari, Italy
| | - Nicola Sasso
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti-Bari, Italy
| | - Valerio Davi'
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti-Bari, Italy
| | - Ilaria Bonaparte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti-Bari, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Fanelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti-Bari, Italy
| | - David Giraldi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti-Bari, Italy
| | - Romina Tortora
- Centro Orientamento Oncologico (COrO), Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti-Bari, Italy
| | - Valeria Internò
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Paolo, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Giammarco Surico
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti-Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Signorelli
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neurosciences (DiBraiN), University "Aldo Moro" of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lombardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Alba Fiorentino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti-Bari, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, LUM University, Casamassima-Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kalita O, Kazda T, Reguli S, Jancalek R, Fadrus P, Slachta M, Pospisil P, Krska L, Vrbkova J, Hrabalek L, Smrcka M, Lipina R. Effects of Reoperation Timing on Survival among Recurrent Glioblastoma Patients: A Retrospective Multicentric Descriptive Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092530. [PMID: 37173996 PMCID: PMC10177480 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma inevitably recurs, but no standard regimen has been established for treating this recurrent disease. Several reports claim that reoperative surgery can improve survival, but the effects of reoperation timing on survival have rarely been investigated. We, therefore, evaluated the relationship between reoperation timing and survival in recurrent GBM. A consecutive cohort of unselected patients (real-world data) from three neuro-oncology cancer centers was analyzed (a total of 109 patients). All patients underwent initial maximal safe resection followed by treatment according to the Stupp protocol. Those meeting the following criteria during progression were indicated for reoperation and were further analyzed in this study: (1) The tumor volume increased by >20-30% or a tumor was rediscovered after radiological disappearance; (2) The patient's clinical status was satisfactory (KS ≥ 70% and PS WHO ≤ gr. 2); (3) The tumor was localized without multifocality; (4) The minimum expected tumor volume reduction was above 80%. A univariate Cox regression analysis of postsurgical survival (PSS) revealed a statistically significant effect of reoperation on PSS from a threshold of 16 months after the first surgery. Cox regression models that stratified the Karnofsky score with age adjustment confirmed a statistically significant improvement in PSS for time-to-progression (TTP) thresholds of 22 and 24 months. The patient groups exhibiting the first recurrence at 22 and 24 months had better survival rates than those exhibiting earlier recurrences. For the 22-month group, the HR was 0.5 with a 95% CI of (0.27, 0.96) and a p-value of 0.036. For the 24-month group, the HR was 0.5 with a 95% CI of (0.25, 0.96) and a p-value of 0.039. Patients with the longest survival were also the best candidates for repeated surgery. Later recurrence of glioblastoma was associated with higher survival rates after reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ondrej Kalita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University in Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Zdravotníků 248/7, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
- Department of Health Care Science, Faculty of Humanities, T. Bata University in Zlin, Stefanikova 5670, 760 01 Zlín, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Kazda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Stefan Reguli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 1790/5, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Radim Jancalek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, Pekarska 664/53, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Fadrus
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavská 20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marek Slachta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University in Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Zdravotníků 248/7, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Pospisil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Lukas Krska
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 1790/5, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Jana Vrbkova
- Institute of Molecular and Translate Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University in Olomouc, Hnevotinska 133/5, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Lumir Hrabalek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University in Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Zdravotníků 248/7, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Smrcka
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavská 20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Radim Lipina
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 1790/5, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Impact of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy on activity of daily living and performance status in progressive/recurrent glioblastoma: a retrospective study. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:201. [PMID: 36474245 PMCID: PMC9727986 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02169-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) is poor, with limited options of palliative localized or systemic treatments. Survival can be improved by a second localized treatment; however, it is not currently possible to identify which patients would benefit from this approach. This study aims to evaluate which factors lead to a lower Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score after fractionated stereotactic RT (fSRT). METHODS We retrospectively collected data from patients treated with fSRT for recurrent GBM at the Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine between October 2010 and November 2017 and analyzed which factors were associated with a lower KPS score. RESULTS 59 patients received a dose of 25 Gy in 5 sessions spread over 5-7 days (80% isodose). The median time from the end of primary radiotherapy to the initiation of fSRT was 10.7 months. The median follow-up after fSRT initiation was 8.8 months. The incidence of KPS and ADL impairment in all patients were 51.9% and 37.8% respectively with an adverse impact of PTV size on KPS (HR = 1.57 [95% CI 1.19-2.08], p = 0.028). Only two patients showed early grade 3 toxicity and none showed grade 4 or late toxicity. The median overall survival time, median overall survival time after fSRT, median progression-free survival and institutionalization-free survival times were 25.8, 8.8, 3.9 and 7.7 months, respectively. Initial surgery was associated with better progression-free survival (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.48 [95% CI 0.27-0.86], p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS A larger PTV should predicts lower KPS in the treatment of recurrent GBM using fSRT.
Collapse
|
5
|
Gregucci F, Surgo A, Carbonara R, Laera L, Ciliberti MP, Gentile MA, Caliandro M, Sasso N, Bonaparte I, Fanelli V, Tortora R, Paulicelli E, Surico G, Lombardi G, Signorelli F, Fiorentino A. Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Brain Radiotherapy with Systemic Therapy in Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas: Is It Feasible? Therapeutic Strategies in Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12081336. [PMID: 36013284 PMCID: PMC9410141 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12081336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose. For recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGG), no standard therapeutic approach has been reported; thus, surgery, chemotherapy, and re-irradiation (re-RT) may all be proposed. The aim of the study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of re-RT by radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/FSRT) in association to chemotherapy in patients with recurrent HGG. Material/Methods: All patients with histological diagnosis of HGG that suffered by recurrent disease diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), according to Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria, after primary/adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy treatment and underwent to re-RT by SRS/FSRT were included in the analysis. Second-line chemotherapy was administered. Outcomes were evaluated by neurological examination and brain MRI performed 1 month after re-RT and then every 2–3 months. Results: From November 2019 to September 2021, 30 patients presenting recurrent HGG underwent re-RT. Median dose was 24 Gy (range 15–36 Gy), and median fractions was 5 (range 1–6). Twenty-one patients (70%) had RPA class ≤ IV. One patient had a histological diagnosis of anaplastic oligodendroglioma, 24 patients (80%) were affected by glioblastoma (GBM) including 3 cases of multifocal form, and 5 patients (17%) by anaplastic astrocytoma. Median time between primary/adjuvant RT and disease recurrence was 8 months. In six cases (20%) re-operation was performed, and in most cases (87%), a second line of systemic therapy was administrated. At a median follow-up time from recurrence of 13 months (range 6–56 months), 10 patients (33%) were alive: 2 patients with partial response disease, 7 patients with stable disease, and 1 patient with out-field progression disease. Of the 20 patients who died (67%), 15 (75%) died for progression disease and 5 (25%) for other causes (3 due to septic event, 1 due to thrombo-embolic event, and 1 due to car accident). Median OS and PFS after recurrence were 12.1 and 11.2 months. Six-month and one-year OS were, respectively, 81% and 51%. No acute or late neurological side effects grade ≥ 2 and no case of radio-necrosis were reported. One patient experienced, after reintervention and during Regorafenib treatment (administered 40 days after surgery), dehiscence of the surgical wound. In three cases, grade 2 distal paresthesia was reported. Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity occurred in seven cases. Three case of grade 5 toxicities during chemotherapy were reported: three septic events and one thrombo-embolic event. Conclusion. Re-RT with SRT/FSRT in association with second-line systemic therapy is a safe and feasible treatment for patients with HGG recurrence. Validation of these results by prospective studies is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabiana Gregucci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti (BA), Italy
| | - Alessia Surgo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti (BA), Italy
| | - Roberta Carbonara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti (BA), Italy
| | - Letizia Laera
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti (BA), Italy
| | - Maria Paola Ciliberti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti (BA), Italy
| | - Maria Annunziata Gentile
- Department of Radiology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti (BA), Italy
| | - Morena Caliandro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti (BA), Italy
| | - Nicola Sasso
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti (BA), Italy
| | - Ilaria Bonaparte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti (BA), Italy
| | - Vincenzo Fanelli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti (BA), Italy
| | - Romina Tortora
- Centro Orientamento Oncologico, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti (BA), Italy
| | - Eleonora Paulicelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti (BA), Italy
| | - Giammarco Surico
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti (BA), Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lombardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Francesco Signorelli
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, Division of Neurosurgery, University “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Alba Fiorentino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti (BA), Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-080-3054608
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leone A, Colamaria A, Fochi NP, Sacco M, Landriscina M, Parbonetti G, de Notaris M, Coppola G, De Santis E, Giordano G, Carbone F. Recurrent Glioblastoma Treatment: State of the Art and Future Perspectives in the Precision Medicine Era. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10081927. [PMID: 36009473 PMCID: PMC9405902 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10081927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Current treatment guidelines for the management of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) are far from definitive, and the prognosis remains dismal. Despite recent advancements in the pharmacological and surgical fields, numerous doubts persist concerning the optimal strategy that clinicians should adopt for patients who fail the first lines of treatment and present signs of progressive disease. With most recurrences being located within the margins of the previously resected lesion, a comprehensive molecular and genetic profiling of rGBM revealed substantial differences compared with newly diagnosed disease. In the present comprehensive review, we sought to examine the current treatment guidelines and the new perspectives that polarize the field of neuro-oncology, strictly focusing on progressive disease. For this purpose, updated PRISMA guidelines were followed to search for pivotal studies and clinical trials published in the last five years. A total of 125 articles discussing locoregional management, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy strategies were included in our analysis, and salient findings were critically summarized. In addition, an in-depth description of the molecular profile of rGBM and its distinctive characteristics is provided. Finally, we integrate the above-mentioned evidence with the current guidelines published by international societies, including AANS/CNS, EANO, AIOM, and NCCN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Augusto Leone
- Department of Neurosurgery, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Nicola Pio Fochi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Matteo Sacco
- Department of Neurosurgery, Riuniti Hospital, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Matteo Landriscina
- Unit of Medical
Oncology and Biomolecular Therapy, Department of Medical and Surgical
Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Matteo de Notaris
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Rummo” Hospital, 82100 Benevento, Italy
| | - Giulia Coppola
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy
| | - Elena De Santis
- Department of Anatomical Histological Forensic Medicine and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy
| | - Guido Giordano
- Unit of Medical
Oncology and Biomolecular Therapy, Department of Medical and Surgical
Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Francesco Carbone
- Department of Neurosurgery, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ziu M, Goyal S, Olson JJ. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of radiation therapy in the management of progressive and recurrent glioblastoma in adults. J Neurooncol 2022; 158:255-264. [PMID: 34748120 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03857-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
TARGET POPULATION These recommendations apply to adult patients (18 years of age and above) with progressive/recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (pGBM) after first line combined multimodality treatment. QUESTION Can re-irradiation (by using conventional radiotherapy, fractionated radiosurgery, or single fraction radiosurgery) be used in patients with pGBM after the first adjuvant combined multimodality treatment with radiation and chemotherapy? RECOMMENDATION Level III: When the target tumor is amenable for additional radiation, re-irradiation is recommended as it provides improved local tumor control, as measured by best imaging response. Such re-irradiation can take the form of conventional fractionation radiotherapy, fractionated radiosurgery, or single fraction radiosurgery. LEVEL III Re-Irradiation is recommended in order to maintain or improve a patient's neurological status and quality of life prior to any further tumor progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mateo Ziu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA, USA.
- Radiation Oncology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inova Neurosciences, 3300 Gallows Rd, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA.
| | - Sharad Goyal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA, USA
- Radiation Oncology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Olson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA, USA
- Radiation Oncology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Germano IM, Johnson DR, Patrick HH, Goodman AL, Ziu M, Ormond DR, Olson JJ. Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Management of Progressive Glioblastoma in Adults: Update of the 2014 Guidelines. Neurosurgery 2022; 90:e112-e115. [PMID: 35426875 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000001903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Institute of Medicine best practice recommendation to review guidelines every 5 years is followed by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons Guidelines Committee. The aim of this work was to provide an updated literature review and evidence-based recommendations on the topic of diagnosis and treatment of patients with progressive glioblastoma (pGBM). OBJECTIVE To review the literature published since the last guidelines on pGBM dated 2014, with literature search ending in June 2012. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for the period July 1, 2012, to March 31, 2019, using search terms and search strategies to identify pertinent abstracts. These were then screened using published exclusion/inclusion criteria to identify full-text review articles. Evidence tables were constructed using data derived from full-text reviews and recommendations made from the evidence derived. RESULTS From the total 8786 abstracts identified by the search, 237 full-text articles met inclusion/exclusion criteria and were included in this update. Two new level II recommendations derived from this work. For the diagnosis of patients with GBM, the use of diffusion-weighted images is recommended to be included in the magnetic resonance images with and without contrast used for surveillance to detect pGBM. For the treatment of patients with pGBM, repeat cytoreductive surgery is recommended to improve overall survival. An additional 21 level III recommendations were provided. CONCLUSION Recent published literature provides new recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of pGBM. The Central Nervous System Guidelines Committee will continue to pursue timely updates to further improve the care of patients with diagnosis.https://www.cns.org/guidelines/browse-guidelines-detail/guidelines-management-of-progressive-glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle M Germano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Derek R Johnson
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Hayes H Patrick
- Department of Neurological Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Abigail L Goodman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mateo Ziu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inova Neuroscience and Spine Institute Fairfax, Virginia, USA
| | - D Ryan Ormond
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Olson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bryukhovetskiy I, Kosianova A, Zaitsev S, Pak O, Sharma A, Sharma HS. Glioblastoma: What can we do for these patients today and what will we be able to do in the future? PROGRESS IN BRAIN RESEARCH 2021; 265:99-118. [PMID: 34560928 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2021.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an extremely aggressive primary human brain tumor. The median survival of GBM patients is 15 months in case of completing the modern complex treatment protocol. Chemotherapy can help to extend the life expectancy of patients. GBM treatment resistance is associated with cancer stem cells (CSCs). The present paper analyses the main reasons for ineffectiveness of the existing GBM treatment methods and suggests treating CSCs as a complex phenomenon, resulting from the coordinated interaction of normal stem cells and cancer cells (CCs) in immunosuppressive microsurroundings. The GBM treatment strategy is suggested not for only suppressing strategically important signaling pathways in CCs, but also for regulating interaction between normal stem cells and cancer cells. The paper considers the issue of controlling penetrability of the blood-brain barrier that is one of the main challenges in neuro-oncology. Also, the paper suggests the ways of extending life expectancy of GBM patients today and prospects for the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Bryukhovetskiy
- School of Life Science & Biomedicine, Medical Center, Far Eastern Federal University (FEFU), Vladivostok, Russia.
| | - Aleksandra Kosianova
- School of Life Science & Biomedicine, Medical Center, Far Eastern Federal University (FEFU), Vladivostok, Russia
| | - Sergeis Zaitsev
- School of Life Science & Biomedicine, Medical Center, Far Eastern Federal University (FEFU), Vladivostok, Russia
| | - Oleg Pak
- School of Life Science & Biomedicine, Medical Center, Far Eastern Federal University (FEFU), Vladivostok, Russia
| | - Aruna Sharma
- International Experimental Central Nervous System Injury & Repair (IECNSIR), Department of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesiology & Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Hari Shanker Sharma
- International Experimental Central Nervous System Injury & Repair (IECNSIR), Department of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesiology & Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kayalı FI, Habiboğlu R. CAN HYPOFRACTIONATED REIRRADIATION PLUS TEMOZOLAMIDE BE A WISE CHOICE FOR RECURRENT HIGH AND LOW GRADE BRAIN TUMORS? JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH AND APPLIED SCIENCES 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/16878507.2021.1935131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|