Intraoperative blood loss does not independently affect the survival outcome of gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection

Risk factors for blood transfusion and its prognostic implications in curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is still a prevalent neoplasm around the world and its main treatment modality is surgical resection. The need for perioperative blood transfusions is frequent, and there is a long-lasting debate regarding its impact on survival.

AIM

To evaluate the factors related to the risk of receiving red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and its influence on surgical and survival outcomes of patients with GC.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative resection for primary gastric adenocarcinoma at our Institute between 2009 and 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Clinicopathological and surgical characteristics data were collected. The patients were divided into transfusion and non-transfusion groups for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 718 patients were included, and 189 (26.3%) patients received perioperative RBC transfusion (23 intraoperatively, 133 postoperatively, and 33 in both periods). Patients in the RBC transfusions group were older (P < 0.001), and had more comorbidities (P = 0.014), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification III/IV (P < 0.001), and lower preoperative hemoglobin (P < 0.001) and albumin levels (P < 0.001). Larger tumors (P < 0.001) and advanced tumor node metastasis stage (P < 0.001) were also associated with the RBC transfusion group. The rates of postoperative complications (POC) and 30-d and 90-d mortality were significantly higher in the RBC transfusion group than in the non-transfusion group. Lower hemoglobin and albumin levels, total gastrectomy, open surgery, and the occurrence of POC were factors associated with the RBC transfusion. Survival analysis demonstrated that the RBC transfusions group had worse disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with patients who did not receive transfusion (P < 0.001 for both). In multivariate analysis, RBC transfusion, major POC, pT3/T4 category, pN+, D1 lymphadenectomy, and total gastrectomy were independent risk factors related to worse DFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative RBC transfusion is associated with worse clinical conditions and more advanced tumors. Further, it is an independent factor related to worse survival in the curative intent gastrectomy setting.

Effects of perioperative blood transfusion in gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The short-term and long-term effects of perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) on patients with gastric cancer are still intriguing. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of blood transfusion on clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and The Cochrane Library on December 31th 2021. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DFS), and postoperative complications. A fixed or random-effects model was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Fifty-one studies with a total of 41,864 patients were included for this review and meta-analysis. Compared with patients who did not receive blood transfusions (NPBT), PBT was associated with worse 5-year OS (HR = 2.39 [95%CI: 2.00, 2.84]; p < 0.001; Multivariate HR = 1.43 [95%CI: 1.24, 1.63]; p < 0. 001), worse 5-year DFS (HR = 2.26 [95%CI: 1.68, 3.05]; p < 0.001; Multivariate HR = 1.45 [95%CI: 1.16, 1.82]; p < 0. 001), and worse 5-year DSS (HR = 2. 23 [95%CI: 1.35, 3.70]; p < 0.001; Multivariate HR = 1.24 [95%CI: 0.96, 1.60]; p < 0.001). Moreover, The PBT group showed a higher incidence of postoperative complications [OR = 2.30 (95%CI:1.78, 2. 97); p < 0.001] than that in the NPBT group, especially grade III-V complications, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. [OR = 2.50 (95%CI:1.71, 3.63); p < 0.001].

Conclusion

In patients who underwent gastrectomy, PBT was associated with negative survival effects (OS, DFS, DSS) and a higher incidence of perioperative complications. However, more research was expected to further explore the impact of PBT. Meanwhile, strict blood transfusion management should be implemented to minimize the use of PBT.

The Impact of Perioperative Events on Cancer Recurrence and Metastasis in Patients after Radical Gastrectomy: A Review

Radical gastrectomy is a mainstay therapy for patients with locally resectable gastric cancer (GC). GC patients who are candidates for radical gastrectomy will experience at least part of the following perioperative events: surgery, anesthesia, pain, intraoperative blood loss, allogeneic blood transfusion, postoperative complications, and their related anxiety, depression and stress response. Considerable clinical studies have shown that these perioperative events can promote recurrence and decrease the long-term survival of GC patients. The mechanisms include activation of neural signaling and the inflammatory response, suppression of antimetastatic immunity, increased release of cancer cells into circulation, and delayed adjuvant therapy, which are involved in every step of the invasion-metastasis cascade. Having appreciated these perioperative events and their influence on the risk of GC recurrence, we can now use this knowledge to find strategies that might substantially prevent the deleterious recurrence-promoting effects of perioperative events, potentially increasing cancer-free survival in GC patients.

Does Intraoperative Blood Loss Affect the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer Patients After Gastrectomy? A Meta-Analysis

Purpose

The purpose of the current meta-analysis was to analyze whether intraoperative blood loss (IBL) influenced the complications and prognosis of gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy.

Methods

We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases on November 29, 2021. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to evaluate the quality of included studies. This meta-analysis uses RevMan 5.3 for data analysis.

Results

A total of nine retrospective studies were included in this meta-analysis, involving 4653 patients. In terms of short-term outcomes, the Larger IBL group has a higher complication rate (OR = 1.94, 95% CI, 1.44 to 2.61, P < 0.0001) and a longer operation time (OR = 77.60, 95% CI, 41.95 to 113.25, P < 0.0001) compared with the smaller IBL group, but the Larger IBL group had higher total retrieved lymph nodes (OR = 3.68, 95% CI, 1.13 to 6.24, P = 0.005). After pooling up all the HRs, the Larger IBL group has worse overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.80, 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.56, P = 0.001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.48, 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.72, P < 0.00001).

Conclusion

Larger IBL increased operation time and postoperative complications, and decreased OS and DFS of gastric cancer patients. Therefore, surgeons should be cautious about IBL during operation.

Negative impact of intraoperative blood loss on long-term outcome after curative gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: exploratory analysis of the JCOG1001 phase III trial

BACKGROUND

Recent retrospective studies have shown that increased intraoperative blood loss (IBL) during curative gastrectomy for patients with advanced gastric cancer is a negative prognostic indicator for recurrence. However, there are no reliable reports assessing this with a large-scale prospective cohort. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of IBL on long-term outcomes using data from the JCOG1001 phase III trial, which was designed to determine if bursectomy led to improved survival vs. nonbursectomy in patients with cT3/4a gastric cancer.

METHODS

This study included 1203 of the 1204 patients enrolled in the JCOG1001. From the tertiles of IBL (196 ml, 400 ml), we divided the patients into three groups: IBL < 200 ml representing small blood loss (SBL, n = 404), 200 ml ≤ IBL < 400 ml representing medium blood loss (MBL, n = 393), and IBL ≥ 400 ml representing large blood loss (LBL, n = 406). The impact of IBL on relapse-free survival (RFS) was evaluated with univariable comparisons and multivariable Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Three-year RFS after SBL, MBL, and LBL was 81.7%, 74.8%, and 70.6%, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified IBL, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, pT, pN, and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy as independent predictors of RFS. Compared with SBL as a reference, the hazard ratios of MBL and LBL were 1.461 (P = 0.012) and 1.520 (P = 0.009), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the analysis of data from a large-scale prospective study, an IBL of ≥ 200 ml after curative surgery for patients with cT3/4a gastric cancer was an independent predictor of reduced RFS.

Different clinicopathologic features and prognostic significance of signet ring cell histology in early and locally advanced gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Although many studies have evaluated the prognostic significance of signet ring cell (SRC) histology for gastric cancer (GC) patients, the results were conflicting. The objective of this study was to compare clinicopathologic characteristics between SRC type and other types, and evaluate its impact on survival outcome.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathologic and survival data of 1891 patients who underwent curative resection for GC. All patients were divided into differentiated, undifferentiated and SRC type according to the histological classification. The prognostic differences between different types were compared and clinicopathologic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

SRC histology type had a poorer disease-free survival (DFS) than differentiated type (5-year DFS, 37.7% vs 52.2%, P<0.001), but there was no prognostic difference between SRC type and undifferentiated type (37.7% vs 41.9%, P>0.05). For early GC patients, SRC type was more frequent in younger, female patients and T1a stage tumors; the 5-year DFS of SRC type was similar to that of any other histology type (P>0.05). SRC type showed more aggressive biological features, including extensive stomach involvement, large tumor size, advanced pTstage and pN stage, than other types for locally advanced GC patients; poorer DFS was observed in SRC type compared with differentiated type. Multivariate analysis indicated that SRC type (HR:1.71, 95%CI:1.10-1.68, P<0.01) and undifferentiated type (HR:1.21, 95%CI:1.04-1.40, P<0.05) were independently associated with poor DFS in locally advanced GC patients.

CONCLUSION

There was a significant difference between early and locally advanced GC patients with regard to clinicopathologic features and prognostic significance of SRC histology. SRC type was an independent prognostic factor for locally advanced GC patients, but not for early GC patients.

Clinicopathological features, risk of lymph node metastasis and survival outcome of synchronous multiple early gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine clinicopathological features, risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and survival outcome in synchronous multiple early gastric cancer (MEGC) patients.

METHODS

A total of 338 solitary early gastric cancer (SEGC) and 26 MEGC patients who underwent surgical resection were retrospectively reviewed. The clinicopathological features and predictive factors for MEGC patients were evaluated. Also, we analyzed risk factors for LNM and compared survival difference between SEGC and MEGC patients.

RESULTS

The frequency of multiple synchronous lesions was 7.1% in early gastric cancer (EGC) patients. The main and minor lesions were mostly confined to the same third of the stomach (84.6%, 22/26), and the most common location was the lower third of the stomach. With regard to the number of coexisting lesions, most of the patients had two lesions and more than three lesions were not common. Tumor size≤2cm (OR:2.684, 95%CI:1.131-6.368, P<0.05) and the presence of atrophic gastritis (OR:2.418, 95%CI:1.052-5.555, P<0.05) were independent risk factors for synchronous MEGC. There was no significant statistical difference between SEGC and MEGC for LNM (17.5% vs 23.1%, P=0.311). The number of coexisting lesions was not associated with the risk of LNM in EGC. In addition, the survival outcome of MEGC patients was similar to that of SEGC (5-year RFS rate, 96.0% vs 93.7%, P=0.329;5-year OS rate, 96.0% vs 88.3%, P=0.479).

CONCLUSION

Meticulous endoscopic examination at the initial diagnosis of MEGC was very important, especially for those with precancerous lesions such as atrophic gastritis. In terms of treatment methods, endoscopic resection may be equally suitable for synchronous MEGC if the lesions fulfilled its indication criteria.

Operative Trauma and Blood Loss - Impact on Tumor Growth and Recurrence

ABSTRACT

In cancer patients, surgical removal of the primary tumor is one of the major steps within a multimodal therapy concept toward eliminating the disease and limiting further progression. In this respect, surgical trauma can have potent effects on the patient's immune system. Intraoperative blood loss associated with major surgical trauma leads to reduced blood flow, regional hypoxia, metabolic, and microenvironmental alterations stimulating an inflammatory response characterized by the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (i.e., TNF-α, IL-6) and acute-phase proteins. The inflammatory state is accompanied by and intertwined with a counter-regulatory anti-inflammatory response reflected in the rise of anti-inflammatory cytokines (i.e., transforming growth factor-β) and prostaglandins (i.e., prostaglandin E2) which can lead to a depression of cell-mediated immunity and systemic immunosuppression. This results in a highly vulnerable state with concurrent expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines alternately predominating. The immunosuppressive state is characterized by a reduced antigen-presentation capacity of macrophages, alterations in lymphocyte proliferation, and activation as well as a shift of the Th1/Th2 (T helper cells 1 and 2) balance toward Th2 and a decrease in natural killer cell activity. The severity of the immunosuppression thereby correlates with the extent and the duration of the surgical procedure. Growing evidence suggests that the immunosuppressive state following hemorrhage and surgical trauma might not only be a risk factor for postoperative complications but also facilitate tumor proliferation, metastatic growth, and recurrence. This article provides an overview of the cascade of events and underlying mechanisms resulting in immunosuppression and describes the impact of hemorrhage and major surgical trauma on tumor growth and recurrence. Attempts to control for perioperative inflammation thereby reducing the adverse effects of postoperative immunosuppression could have positive effects on tumor growth, metastasis formation, and recurrence.

The Impact of Intraoperative Blood Loss on the Survival of Patients With Stage II/III Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is a fatal disease with a poor prognosis. Pancreatic cancer is often unresectable at the time of diagnosis, so the analysis of risk factors in patients with indications for surgery is important. We investigated the impact of intraoperative blood loss (IBL) on survival and recurrence in patients with stage II/III pancreatic cancer after curative surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included 76 patients who underwent curative surgery for stage II/III pancreatic cancer between 2007 and 2012. The risk factors for overall (OS) and recurrence-free (RFS) survival were identified.

RESULTS

IBL of 1,000 ml was considered to be the optimal cut-off value for classification based on a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The OS rates at 5 years after surgery in the groups with low and high IBL were 36.6% and 11.4%, respectively, which was a statistically significant difference (p=0.003). The RFS rates at 1 year after surgery were 49.8% and 24.6%, respectively, which was a significant difference (p=0.045). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that IBL was a significant independent risk factor for OS.

CONCLUSION

IBL is an independent prognostic factor after curative resection of stage II/III pancreatic cancer. The reduction of bleeding during surgery is necessary to improve the results of pancreatic cancer surgery.

Impact of proximal resection margin involvement on survival outcome in patients with proximal gastric cancer

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for proximal resection margin involvement and its impact on survival outcome in patients with proximal gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 488 patients who underwent potentially curative resection for proximal gastric cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival differences between patients with positive and negative resection margins were compared and prognostic factors were determined by Cox multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

In this study, 7.6% (37/488) of patients with proximal gastric cancer had a positive proximal resection margin after postoperative histopathological examination. Positive resection margins were significantly associated with advanced tumour stage and more aggressive biological features including larger tumour size, serosal invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Serosal invasion (OR 4.543, 95% CI 2.201 to 9.380, p<0.001) and lymphovascular invasion (OR 2.279, 95% CI 1.129 to 4.600, p<0.05) were independent risk factors for positive proximal resection margins. In terms of survival outcome, positive resection margins had an adverse impact on the prognosis of patients with proximal gastric cancer (median DFS: 20.7 vs 30.2 months, p<0.001). The multivariate analysis indicated that positive resection margins (HR 1.494, 95% CI 1.042 to 2.142, p=0.029), T stage (T3-T4, HR 2.264, 95% CI 1.484 to 3.454, p<0.001) and N stage (N1-N2 stage, HR 1.696, 95% CI 1.279 to 2.248, p<0.001; N3 stage, HR 2.691, 95% CI 1.967 to 3.681, p<0.001) were independent prognostic factors for patients with proximal gastric cancer.

CONCLUSION

Proximal resection margin involvement was an indicator of more aggressive tumours and an independent prognostic factor for patients with proximal gastric cancer. Aggressive efforts should be made to achieve a negative resection margin if gastric cancer was deemed to be potentially resectable.