Surgical resection of primary tumor in the extremities improves survival for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma patients: a population-based study of the SEER database

Radiation therapy improves survival in elderly patients with localized extremity soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of radiation therapy in enhancing survival outcomes among elderly patients diagnosed with localized extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). Furthermore, it seeks to explore whether the survival benefits conferred by radiation therapy differ according to tumor characteristics and treatment modalities.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify patients aged 80 years and older diagnosed with localized extremity STSs. The study assessed 1498 eligible patients, analyzing cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) through Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Propensity score matching was employed to adjust for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Among the analyzed patients, 773 patients underwent radiation therapy (Radiation group), while 725 patients either did not receive radiation therapy or it was unknown if they had (No-Radiation group). The 5-year OS rate was 40% in the radiation group compared to 38% in the no-radiation group. After propensity score matching, radiation therapy was associated with a significant improvement in OS (P = 0.005, HR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.9). Subgroup analyses indicated that patients undergoing primary tumor resection benefited most from radiation therapy in terms of OS.

CONCLUSION

Radiation therapy is associated with improved overall survival in elderly patients with localized extremity STSs. These findings suggest that radiation therapy should be considered as a key component of the treatment strategy for this patient population, taking into account individual patient characteristics and comorbidities.

Sequential multimodal treatments with chemotherapy and surgery for advanced soft tissue sarcoma may be associated with better survival than chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

In patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS), surgery had been reported to be associated with superior overall survival (OS). Chemotherapy details for such patients were less reported, and whether multimodal treatment with surgery and chemotherapy provides extra survival benefit remains unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with newly diagnosed advanced STS treated at National Taiwan University Hospital from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2017. OS was calculated from the day of diagnosis of advanced STS to the day of death or last follow-up. Baseline patient characteristics and details regarding surgery and chemotherapy were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 545 patients were diagnosed with STS from 2011 to 2017, of which 226 patients had advanced STS. The median age was 54.7 years, and 54% of patients were women. Approximately 38% of patients with advanced STS underwent surgery and exhibited a trend of longer OS compared with who did not (median = 18.6 vs. 11.9 months, p = 0.083). In the chemotherapy subgroup, the benefit of surgery was more prominent (median = 21.9 vs. 16.5 months, p = 0.037). Patients who received chemotherapy prior to surgery exhibited numerically longer OS than those who underwent surgery first (median = 33.9 vs. 18.3 months, p = 0.155). After adjusting other clinical factors, chemotherapy remained an independent factor associated with favourable OS.

CONCLUSION

Surgery may be more beneficial for the patients who receive chemotherapy. Our results support evaluation of sequential multimodal treatments strategy including surgery and chemotherapy in patients with advanced STS.

Amputation surgery associated with shortened survival in patients with localized soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to clarify whether localized extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients who underwent amputation surgery experienced worsened survival and to identify those patients for whom amputation surgery worsened survival.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we identified 8897 patients with localized extremity STS between 1983 and 2016. Of these 6431 patients, 733 patients underwent amputation surgery (Amputation group), and 5698 underwent limb-sparing surgery (Limb-sparing group).

RESULTS

After adjusting for patient background by propensity score matching, a total of 1346 patients were included. Patients in the Amputation group showed worsened survival (cancer-specific survival (CSS): hazard ratio (HR) = 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.75, overall survival (OS): HR = 1.41, 95%CI 1.20-1.65). In subclass analysis, patients with high-grade STS, spindle cell sarcoma and liposarcoma in the Amputation group showed shortened survival (high-grade-CSS: HR = 1.44, 95%CI 1.16-1.77, OS: HR = 1.38, 95%CI 1.18-1.62; spindle cell sarcoma-CSS: HR = 4.75, 95%CI 1.56-14.4, OS: HR = 2.32, 95%CI 1.45-3.70; liposarcoma-CSS: HR = 2.91, 95%CI 1.54-5.50, OS: HR = 2.32, 95%CI 1.45-3.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival was shortened in localized extremity STS patients who received amputation surgery.

New trends in the surgical management of soft tissue sarcoma: The role of preoperative biopsy

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) accounts for 1% of all malignant neoplasms in adults. Their diagnosis and management constitute a challenging target. They originate from the mesenchyme, and 50 subtypes with various cytogenetic profiles concerning soft tissue and bones have been recognized. These tumors mainly affect middle-aged adults but may be present at any age. Half of the patients have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis and require systemic therapy. Tumors above 3-5 cm in size must be suspected of potential malignancy. A thorough history, clinical examination and imaging that must precede biopsy are necessary. Modern imaging techniques include ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography/CT. MRI findings may distinguish low-grade from high-grade STS based on a diagnostic score (tumor heterogeneity, intratumoral and peritumoral enhancement). A score ≥ 2 indicates a high-grade lesion, and a score ≤ 1 indicates a low-grade lesion. For disease staging, abdominal imaging is recommended to detect early abdominal or retroperitoneal metastases. Liquid biopsy by detecting genomic material in serum is a novel diagnostic tool. A preoperative biopsy is necessary for diagnosis, prognosis and optimal planning of surgical intervention. Core needle biopsy is the most indicative and effective. Its correct performance influences surgical management. An unsuccessful biopsy means the dissemination of cancer cells into healthy anatomical structures that ultimately affect resectability and survival. Complete therapeutic excision (R0) with an acceptable resection margin of 1 cm is the method of choice. However, near significant structures, i.e., vessels, nerves, an R2 resection (macroscopic margin involvement) preserving functionality but having a risk of local recurrence can be an acceptable choice, after informing the patient, to prevent an unavoidable amputation. For borderline resectability of the tumor, neoadjuvant chemo/radiotherapy has a place. Likewise, after surgical excision, adjuvant therapy is indicated, but chemotherapy in nonmetastatic disease is still debatable. The five-year survival rate reaches up to 55%. Reresection is considered after positive or uncertain resection margins. Current strategies are based on novel chemotherapeutic agents, improved radiotherapy applications to limit local side effects and targeted biological therapy or immunotherapy, including vaccines. Young age is a risk factor for distant metastasis within 6 mo following primary tumor resection. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy lasting 5-6 wk and surgical resection are indicated for high-grade STS (grade 2 or 3). Wide surgical excision alone may be acceptable for patients older than 70 years. However, locally advanced disease requires a multidisciplinary task of decision-making for amputation or limb salvage.

Comparison of clinical features between patients with bone and soft tissue fibrosarcomas

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Fibrosarcomas predominantly arise in soft tissues, but can also develop in bone. Because of their rarity, whether bone development has an impact on clinical features has not been addressed.

METHODS

We included fibrosarcoma patients diagnosed between 1983 and 2016 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Differences in clinical features between fibrosarcoma of bone (FS-B) and fibrosarcoma of soft tissue (FS-ST) were investigated.

RESULTS

After excluding patients without information regarding cause of death, site of origin, distant tumor or survival, 1443 patients were included. Of those, 98 patients had FS-B. Patients with FS-B were younger, more frequently male, with fibrosarcomas that more often developed in an extremity and were histologically high-grade. In contrast, no difference in potential to metastasize was observed. Survival was almost equal between FS-B and FS-ST (FS-B/FS-ST: cancer-specific survival, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8-1.7; overall survival, HR: 1.3, 95% CI: 0.9-1.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results clearly indicated that patient backgrounds differed, such as younger age and greater tendencies to affect males, develop in an extremity and show high-grade tumor in patients with FS-B. In contrast, no differences were observed in distant metastatic potential or survival.

Score for the Risk and Overall Survival of Lung Metastasis in Patients First Diagnosed With Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Novel Nomogram-Based Risk Assessment System

Background: Metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients have a poor prognosis with a 3-year survival rate of 25%. About 30% of them present lung metastases (LM). This study aimed to construct 2 nomograms to predict the risk of LM and overall survival of STS patients with LM. Materials and Methods: The data of patients were derived from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database during the period of 2010 to 2015. Logistic and Cox analysis was performed to determine the independent risk factors and prognostic factors of STS patients with LM, respectively. Afterward, 2 nomograms were, respectively, established based on these factors. The performance of the developed nomogram was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curves, area under the curve (AUC) calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: A total of 7643 patients with STS were included in this study. The independent predictors of LM in first-diagnosed STS patients were N stage, grade, histologic type, and tumor size. The independent prognostic factors for STS patients with LM were age, N stage, surgery, and chemotherapy. The AUCs of the diagnostic nomogram were 0.806 in the training set and 0.799 in the testing set. For the prognostic nomogram, the time-dependent AUC values of the training and testing set suggested a favorable performance and discrimination of the nomogram. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year AUC values were 0.698, 0.718, and 0.715 in the training set, and 0.669, 0.612, and 0717 in the testing set, respectively. Furthermore, for the 2 nomograms, calibration curves indicated satisfactory agreement between prediction and actual survival, and DCA indicated its clinical usefulness. Conclusion: In this study, grade, histology, N stage, and tumor size were identified as independent risk factors of LM in STS patients, age, chemotherapy surgery, and N stage were identified as independent prognostic factors of STS patients with LM, these developed nomograms may be an effective tool for accurately predicting the risk and prognosis of newly diagnosed patients with LM.

Case Report: Pulmonary Metastases From Epithelioid Sarcoma in Extremity Favourably Responding to Immunotherapy With Camrelizumab

Epithelioid sarcoma (ES) is a rare soft tissue sarcoma (STS), with limited therapies available for metastatic disease. Here, we describe a case of a 30-year-old male with ES of the left knee and underwent surgery and radiation therapy for the primary disease. After 2 years, he had local recurrence and underwent extensive resection surgery; however, adjuvant chemotherapies were delayed due to recurrent wound infection. Nine months after the second surgery, progressive disease was confirmed after detection of metastases to the lungs and inguinal lymph nodes. Amputation was performed for the local recurrence, followed by inguinal lymph nodes dissection. Pazopanib was transiently administered but discontinued as a result of wound dehiscence. The tumour specimens were detected with unexpected high level of PD-L1 expression and tumoural infiltrating lymphocytes. Subsequently, he received camrelizumab 2.0 mg/kg every 21 days for 18 cycles with rapid remission of the pulmonary metastases. This promising response to camrelizumab indicates that immunotherapies may be an alternative choice for patients with metastatic ES in lung based on analysing the tumour immune microenvironment.

Targeted and immuno-based therapies in sarcoma: mechanisms and advances in clinical trials

Sarcomas represent a distinct group of rare malignant tumors with high heterogeneity. Limited options with clinical efficacy for the metastatic or local advanced sarcoma existed despite standard therapy. Recently, targeted therapy according to the molecular and genetic phenotype of individual sarcoma is a promising option. Among these drugs, anti-angiogenesis therapy achieved favorable efficacy in sarcomas. Inhibitors targeting cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6, poly-ADP-ribose polymerase, insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor, mTOR, NTRK, metabolisms, and epigenetic drugs are under clinical evaluation for sarcomas bearing the corresponding signals. Immunotherapy represents a promising and favorable method in advanced solid tumors. However, most sarcomas are immune "cold" tumors, with only alveolar soft part sarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cellular therapies with TCR-engineered T cells, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, and nature killer cells transfer show therapeutic potential. Identifying tumor-specific antigens and exploring immune modulation factors arguing the efficacy of these immunotherapies are the current challenges. This review focuses on the mechanisms, advances, and potential strategies of targeted and immune-based therapies in sarcomas.