SEOM-GEICO clinical guidelines on endometrial cancer (2021)

Endometrial Cancer: 2023 Revised FIGO Staging System and the Role of Imaging

The FIGO endometrial cancer staging system recently released updated guidance based on clinical evidence gathered after the previous version was published in 2009. Different imaging modalities are beneficial across various stages of endometrial cancer (EC) management. Additionally, ongoing research studies are aimed at improving imaging in EC. Gynecological cancer is a crucial element in the practice of a body radiologist. With a new staging system in place, it is important to address the role of radiology in the EC diagnostic pathway. This article is a comprehensive review of the changes made to the FIGO endometrial cancer staging system and the impact of imaging in the staging of this disease.

Assessing the methodological strengths and limitations of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) guidelines: a critical appraisal using AGREE II and AGREE-REX tool

BACKGROUND

The Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) has provided open-access guidelines for cancer since 2014. However, no independent assessment of their quality has been conducted to date. This study aimed to critically evaluate the quality of SEOM guidelines on cancer treatment.

METHODS

Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) and AGREE-REX tool was used to evaluate the qualities of the guidelines.

RESULTS

We assessed 33 guidelines, with 84.8% rated as "high quality". The highest median standardized scores (96.3) were observed in the domain "clarity of presentation", whereas "applicability" was distinctively low (31.4), with only one guideline scoring above 60%. SEOM guidelines did not include the views and preferences of the target population, nor did specify updating methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Although developed with acceptable methodological rigor, SEOM guidelines could be improved in the future, particularly in terms of clinical applicability and patient perspectives.

Are 7.5 Gy×2 fractions more efficient than 6 Gy×3 in exclusive postoperative endometrial cancer brachytherapy? A clinical and dosimetrical analysis

PURPOSE

To compare two vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) schedules in postoperative endometrial carcinoma (PEC) patients considering vaginal-cuff relapses (VCR), late toxicities, dosimetry analysis and vaginal dilator use.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

110 PEC patients were treated with exclusive high-dose-rate VBT using two schedules. Group-1:44-patients received 6 Gy×3fractions (September-2011-April-2014); Group-2:66-patients were treated with 7.5 Gy×2fractions with a dose limit of equivalent total doses in 2-Gy fr (EQD2(α/β=3)) of 68 Gy in the most exposed 2 cm3 of clinical target volume (CTV) (July-2015-November-2021). The dose was prescribed at 5 mm from the applicator surface. Were evaluated the overall radiation dose delivered to 90% of the CTV (D90), the CTV receiving 100% of the prescription dose (V100) and the EQD2(α/β=3) received in the most exposed 2 cm3 to dose in CTV. Late toxicity was prospectively assessed using RTOG scores for bladder and rectum and objective LENT-SOMA criteria for late vaginal toxicity (LVT).

STATISTICS

Descriptive analysis, Chi-square, Student's t-tests and Kaplan and Meier method.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 60 months (15.9-60). There were no VCR or late toxicities in bladder or rectum. LVT ≥ G1 appeared in 26/44 (59.1%) in Group-1 and 25/66 (37.9%) in Group-2. The mean EQD2(α/β=3) received by the most exposed 2 cm3 of CTV was 63.7 Gy ± 10.0 in Group-1 and 60.5 Gy ± 3.8 in Group-2 (p = 0.063). There were no differences in adherence to vaginal dilator use ≥9 months, overall D90 and V100.

CONCLUSION

Considering the lack of vaginal relapses and similar LVT over time, 7.5 Gy×2fractions seem more efficient in terms of patient comfort, workload, and cost. This is the first study using dosimetry parameters to compare effectivity of schedules. Larger series are needed to confirm the present results.

Questionnaire survey regarding current status of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer in Japan: A cross-sectional survey for JSGOE members

AIM

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been introduced as an alternative to more radical surgical procedures. The Japan Society of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Therapy conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire survey to ascertain the status of MIS for endometrial cancer.

METHODS

The survey was conducted between May 10 and June 30, 2022. The questionnaire included information on personal attributes, academic affiliations, qualifications, hysterectomies, and intraoperative procedures performed.

RESULTS

The total number of questionnaire respondents was 436 (9.2% of the membership). The hysterectomy methods and percentage performed were as follows: simple total hysterectomy (equivalent to benign surgery), 3%; simple total hysterectomy with care to avoid shaving the cervix, 31%; extended total hysterectomy, 48%; and modified radical hysterectomy, 15%. An analysis of hysterectomies performed using MIS for endometrial cancer by qualified gynecologists of endoscopy or board-certified gynecologic oncologists showed a tendency not to choose simple total hysterectomy compared to the gynecologists who did not hold certification (p = 0.019, p = 0.045, and p = 0.010, respectively). Additionally, 67% of respondents did not use uterine manipulators, and 59% of the respondents did not perform lymph node dissection following the guidelines for treating endometrial cancer in Japan.

CONCLUSION

This study provided the current status of MIS for endometrial cancer in Japan. The hysterectomy method, use of uterine manipulators, and criteria for omitting lymph node dissection were generally in agreement with the guidelines. Currently, an extra-fascial simple hysterectomy, including at least not shaving the cervix, was a major method for early invasive endometrial cancer using MIS.

Non-endometrioid endometrial cancer: analysis of recurrence pattern and identification of prognostic and treatment factors affecting recurrence and survival

PURPOSE

We investigated the characteristics of recurrence pattern and survival of patients with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer (NEEC) and attempted to identify prognostic and treatment factors affecting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of these patients.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients with histologically confirmed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA-IVA NEEC from February 2003 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The 5‑year DFS and OS rates of the total cohort were 50.6% and 56.1%, respectively. Recurrence occurred in 28 patients (49.1%) during follow-up, and the most common recurrence pattern was distant metastasis (DM; 78.6% of total recurrences). The occurrence of relapse significantly reduced 5‑year OS (recurrence group vs. non-recurrence group: 12.5% vs. 100%; p < 0.001). In univariate analysis, adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) group showed significantly higher 5‑year DFS (56.7% vs. 37.9%; p = 0.04), local recurrence-free survival (91.6% vs. 50.5%; p = 0.01), and regional recurrence-free survival (88.2% vs. 56.5%; p < 0.01) than the non-RT group. In multivariate analysis, advanced FIGO stage was identified as a negative prognostic factor for DFS and OS. Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and adjuvant RT were independent prognostic factors for DFS.

CONCLUSION

The most common recurrence pattern observed in patients with NEEC was DM. FIGO stage and LVSI were identified as prognostic factors for survival, and RT was identified as a therapeutic modality that could increase DFS. To improve the OS of patients with NEEC, the addition of effective chemotherapy that can reduce DM may be important.

Management of Patients Diagnosed with Endometrial Cancer: Comparison of Guidelines

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy in Europe and its management involves a variety of health professionals. In recent years, big discoveries were made concerning the management of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer, particularly in the field of molecular biology and minimally invasive surgery. This requires the continuous updating of guidelines and protocols over the years. In this paper, we aim to summarize and compare common points and disparities among protocols for management of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer by leading international gynecological oncological societies. We therefore systematically report the parallel among the guidelines based on the various steps patients with endometrial cancer usually undergo. The comparison between American and European protocols revealed some relevant disparities, in particular regarding surgical staging, molecular biology application as a prognostic tool and follow up regimens. This could possibly cause differences in interpreting and applying protocols in clinical practice in small centers, leading to a lack of adherence to guidelines or even prompting a confusing mix of them.

Malignant Pleural Effusion Due to Uterine Serous Carcinoma: An Unusual Presentation

Endometrial cancer is the most common cancer of the female genital tract. It can rarely metastasize to the pleura and present as a malignant pleural effusion. Here we present the case of a 61-year-old female with two primary malignancies, breast and endometrium, who presented to us with shortness of breath. Imaging was suggestive of a malignant pleural effusion. Diagnostic and therapeutic thoracentesis were performed that were initially suggestive of a breast source. However, final pleural fluid studies showed endometrial serous carcinoma as the source of the effusion. The patient received pembrolizumab and lenvatinib treatment and continues to be followed up in our clinic.

Survival after laparoscopy versus laparotomy for apparent early-stage uterine clear cell carcinoma: Results of a large multicenter cohort study

Objective

To compare the long-term survival between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in patients with apparent early-stage uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCCC).

Patients and methods

254 patients with apparent early-stage UCCC were reviewed. Comparisons were made between patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery versus those who underwent open surgery. Baseline data, clinicopathological data, and oncological outcomes were analyzed. 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate were estimated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was employed to control the confounding factors.

Results

147 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery, and 107 patients were managed by open surgery. No differences in terms of recurrence rate (laparoscopy versus laparotomy: 10.9% versus 12.9%, P=0.842) and recurrence pattern were observed. For patients who underwent open surgery and patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery, the 5-year DFS rates and 5-year OS rate were 75.8% (95% CI: 65.8%-83.2%) and 69.1% (95% CI: 58.8%-77.4%), 66.0% (95% CI: 57.1%-73.5%) and 60.8% (95% CI: 52.0%-68.5%), respectively. The Cox proportional hazards regression model shown that for apparent early-stage UCCC, the approach of surgical staging was not an independent predictor for survival (laparoscopy versus laparotomy: for DFS, aHR=1.06, 95% CI=0.64-1.75, P=0.826; for OS, aHR=1.10, 95% CI=0.72-1.68, P=0.671).

Conclusion

For apparent early-stage UCCC, in terms of oncological survival, laparoscopic surgery was as safe as open surgery.