Long term outcome of management of antenatally diagnosed pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction

Pyelo-ureteral junction obstruction in poorly functioning kidneys: Does conservative management play a role in pediatric patients?

Background

Management of Pyelo-ureteral Junction Obstruction (PUJO) in poorly functioning kidneys in pediatric patients is still controversial, particularly regarding the role of conservative treatment.

Aim

To evaluate and present the outcomes of internal diversion and follow-up results of a small series of pediatric patients with UPJO in poorly functioning kidneys.

Study design

Retrospective review of 17 consecutive patients with unilateral PUJO in kidneys with Differential Renal Function (DRF) <20% undergoing temporary internal urinary diversion between 2009 and 2021 at a single tertiary center. DRF was reassessed after 1-3 months of diversion and subsequent management was conservative or surgical (pyeloplasty or nephrectomy) based on surgeon's and family's preferences without randomization.

Results

After a trial of internal urinary diversion, 4/17 patients (23%) showed a DRF increase ≥5% (9%-12%), up to a maximum DRF of 28%, 3 underwent pyeloplasty, while 1 was managed conservatively. The remaining 13 patients showed no differential renal function improvement after diversion, and 7 were managed expectantly while 6 surgically (4 pyeloplasty, 2 nephrectomy). Overall, nine patients (53%) were managed surgically and 8 (47%) expectantly After a median (range) follow-up of 3.1 (0.3-7.9) years, no significant difference was observed between groups regarding symptoms (p = 0.205), need for further surgery (p = 1.000), and renal function (p = 1.000).

Discussion

Although fraught with the limitation of a small sample size, this is the first study reporting on the conservative management of this controversial group of patients.

Conclusion

In present pediatric series of pyelo-ureteral Junction obstruction in poorly functioning kidneys with differential renal function <20%, function recovery after a trial of internal urinary diversion was quite exceptional, and no difference was observed in outcome between patients managed surgically and conservatively after stent removal.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Antenatal Hydronephrosis-Infant

Antenatal hydronephrosis is the most frequent urinary tract anomaly detected on prenatal ultrasonography. It occurs approximately twice as often in males as in females. Most antenatal hydronephrosis is transient with little long-term significance, and few children with antenatal hydronephrosis will have significant obstruction, develop symptoms or complications, and require surgery. Some children will be diagnosed with more serious conditions, such as posterior urethral valves. Early detection of obstructive uropathy is necessary to mitigate the potential morbidity from loss of renal function. Imaging is an integral part of screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of children with antenatal hydronephrosis. Optimal timing and appropriate use of imaging can reduce the incidence of late diagnoses and prevent renal scarring and other complications. In general, follow-up neonatal ultrasound is recommended for all cases of antenatal hydronephrosis, while further imaging, including voiding cystourethrography and nuclear scintigraphy, is recommended for moderate or severe cases, or when renal parenchymal or bladder wall abnormalities are suspected. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Primary non-surgical management of unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: a systematic review

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is the most common obstructive uropathy and its optimal management remains controversial. However, there is a current trend towards non-surgical management. We aimed to determine the effects of the non-surgical management in children with unilateral UPJO. For a systematic review, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, clinical trials registries, and selected conference proceedings for eligible studies. Any type of study reporting the outcomes renal function, secondary surgical intervention, drainage pattern or hydronephrosis of non-surgical management in children with unilateral UPJO was included. Data from 20 studies were extracted and evaluated by two independent authors. The pooled prevalence was 21% for split renal function deterioration, 27.9% for secondary surgical intervention, 3.2% for progressive hydronephrosis, and 82.2% for improved drainage pattern. Not all patients with surgical intervention regained split renal function from enrolment. Renal imaging methods did not strongly correlate with each other. Many studies had to be excluded because of a lack of detection of an obstruction or mixed populations with bilateral UPJO or other uropathies. The variable definitions of UPJO, different criteria for surgical intervention, incongruity of management protocols, and the imprecise reporting of outcomes were limiting factors in the comparability of the results, leading to heterogeneity in meta-analyses. Although the available evidence cannot recommend or refute the current non-surgical management, the systematic review clarifies aspects of the ongoing controversy by providing realistic estimates for non-surgical management in children with unilateral UPJO. Additionally, it reveals unclear potential risks, particularly for long-term outcomes, which were rarely reported.