Safety and Immunogenicity of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Preterm Infants: A Meta-Analysis

An update on vaccination in preterm infants

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article is to review the most current literature on vaccines, focusing on their safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy in preterm newborns, aiming to improve vaccine coverage in this population.

DATA SOURCE

Most recent scientific publications addressing the immunization of preterm newborns.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Despite its immunological immaturity, vaccination is well tolerated by preterm infants, and protective immune responses are observed, but some studies have shown that preterm infants undergo unjustified delays in their vaccination schedule.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being widely recommended, the routine immunization of preterm infants is often delayed, putting this vulnerable population at risk for several diseases, many of which are preventable by immunization. Every effort should be made to develop universal guidelines that define the immunization of preterm infants.

Safety and immunogenicity of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in preterm infants

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) in the routine immunization program has resulted in a significant decline in invasive pneumococcal diseases (IPD) around the world. Preterm infants are a special group at a high risk of invasive infection by encapsulated bacteria. However, their slow growth accrual and prolonged hospital stay frequently lead to delays in immunization, which contributes to their risk for severe infections. Areas covered: Authors reviewed the published immunogenicity and safety of the use of PCVs in preterm infants. Expert opinion: PCVs are safe and effective for use in low birth weight and in-hospital preterm infants. Local and systemic reactions are similar for both term and preterm populations. Reports were inconsistent on the risk of apnea, therefore hospitalized extremely premature infants should be kept under observation for at least 48 h after immunization.

Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine rollout in India: Expectations and challenges

India is one among the four Asian countries with the greatest number of deaths due to pneumococcal infection among children under 5 years. pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) has been introduced in a phased manner in five major Indian states. Ambiguity remains in choosing the appropriate type of PCV and optimum schedule with maximum effectiveness specific for each country. Here, we discuss the evidences with respect to serotype coverage, immunogenicity, reactogenicity and dosage schedule for introduction of PCV13 in India. In addition, the expected PCV impact and the challenges are detailed. PCV13 is expected to provide >75% serotype coverage for invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) serotypes in Indian children combined with the replacement by nonvaccine serotypes which is unpredictable due to lack of complete data. Nasopharyngeal (NP) surveillance is easy, feasible and can replace IPD surveillance in resource-poor settings. Continuous IPD as well as NP surveillance in all the regions are necessary to assess the impact of PCV in India.

Preterm Children Have Higher Risk Than Full-term Children of Invasive Pneumococcal Disease During the First 2 Years of Life

BACKGROUND

A few previous studies have reported an increased risk of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in children born preterm, but this has not been investigated in a cohort study. The impact of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) on IPD incidence rates in preterm children is unknown.

METHODS

Data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (2002-2010) were linked to other national registries. In total, 628,138 children were included in our study and followed until 2 years of age. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated with Poisson regression.

RESULTS

We identified 411 cases of IPD. We observed higher rates of IPD in preterm than in full-term children for the intervals 0-23, 0-5 and 6-23 months of age, IRRs = 1.83 (95 % CI: 1.36-2.47), 2.95 (95% CI: 1.44-6.06) and 1.69 (95% CI: 1.22-2.34), respectively. The risk for IPD was reduced in the PCV7-period (2007-2010) compared with that of the pre PCV7-period (2002-2005) for children 6-23 months of age, IRRs = 0.20 (95% CI: 0.08-0.53) for preterm children and 0.28 (95% CI: 0.21-0.38) for full-term children, but not for those 0-5 months of age, IRRs = 1.94 (95% CI: 0.48-7.80) and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.38-1.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Preterm children had an increased risk of IPD. After introduction of PCV7, the rate of IPD was reduced among preterm and full-term children from 6 months of age.