Controversy of Single versus Staged Management of Anorectal Malformations

Factors contributing to emotional distress when caring for children with imperforate anus: a multisite cross-sectional study in China

Background

Imperforate anus (IA) has a life-long impact on patients and their families. The caregivers of children with IA (CoCIA) might experience distress, which could be detrimental to them physically and mentally. However, there are limitations in the related studies. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of IA and the associated factors contributing to the distress experienced by CoCIA.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in three tertiary children's hospitals from November 2018 to February 2019. Distress was assessed using the Chinese version of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, and possible determinants were assessed by the Caregiver Reaction Assessment, the Parent Stigma Scale, the Parent Perception of Uncertainty Scale, and the Social Support Scale. Demographic and clinical information was also collected. Multiple regression analysis was performed to explore the association between variables.

Results

Out of 229 CoCIA, 52.9% reported experiencing a high level of distress or above. The data analysis revealed that health problems associated with caregiving, stigma, uncertainty, social support, and children who underwent anal reconstruction surgery 1 year before or earlier could significantly predicate caregivers' distress, and these factors could explain 50.1% of the variance.

Conclusions

The majority of the caregivers of children with IA experience high levels of distress, particularly when their children undergo anal reconstruction surgery 1 year before or earlier. Additionally, health problems related to caregiving, stigma, uncertainty, and low social support could significantly predicate caregivers' distress. It is important for clinical staff to be aware of the prevalent situation of caregivers' distress and to make targeted interventions focused on addressing modifiable factors that should be carried out in family-based care.

Single-stage procedures for anorectal malformations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to describe all published studies of single-stage procedures for anorectal malformations and to perform a meta-analysis of studies that compared single-stage to staged procedures.

METHODS

Searches were conducted in Pubmed, Medline, Embase and CENTRAL. Meta-analysis was performed in RevMan and expressed as forest plots with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies were included in the narrative synthesis. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, representing 537 patients. The majority (70%) of patients included in this meta-analysis had either perineal or vestibular fistulas. Surgical site infection (SSI) was defined as any reported infection involving the neoanus (both superficial infection and dehiscence) and occurred in 51 of the 291 patients who underwent single-stage procedures, and 26 of the 244 patients who underwent staged procedure. Meta-analysis showed a 2.2 times higher risk of surgical site infection (SSI) amongst patients who undergo single-stage procedures (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.26, 3.92). Six of the 293 patients (2%) who underwent single-stage procedures required a rescue ostomy for wound dehiscence. In LMIC the risk of wound dehiscence was three-fold higher in single-stage (36/202) compared to staged procedures (12/126) (OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.42, 6.63). In HIC there was no evidence of an increased risk of wound dehiscence in patients who underwent a single-stage (15/91) compared to a staged procedure (14/118) (OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.65, 3.51). There is no evidence of a difference between single-stage versus staged procedures with regards to functional outcomes including voluntary bowel movements (79/90 versus 111/128), soiling (24/165 versus 20/203) or constipation (27/90 versus 36/128).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review provides further evidence that single-stage procedures for selected patients with anorectal malformations are safe. Whilst there is evidence of an increased risk of SSI, this did not translate to a significant difference in long-term functional outcomes.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Different Reaction Patterns of Caregivers of Children With Imperforate Anus: A Latent Profile Analysis

AIM

This study aimed to explore how different dimensions of caregivers' reaction shape their caring experience, and the factors associated with different reaction patterns.

DESIGN

A second analysis of a multisite cross-sectional study were conducted. Caregivers of children with imperforate anus (IA) were enrolled in three tertiary children's hospitals in Eastern China between November 2018 and February 2019.

METHODS

The caregiver's experience, stigma feeling, social support level and perception of uncertainty were assessed by Caregiver Reaction Assessment, Parent Stigma Scale, Social Support Scale and Parent's Perception of Uncertainty Scale accordingly. The demographic information of caregivers as well as the children's clinical data were collected. Latent profile analysis was conducted to determine different patterns of caregiver's reaction, and logistics analysis was used to explore the associated factors of the reaction pattern.

FINDINGS

A total number of 229 caregivers (median age = 30, quartiles: 28, 36) were included. Three distinguishable caregiving reaction types were identified (Class 1: low burden and high benefit, 4.8%; Class 2: moderate burden and benefit, 48.9%; Class 3: high burden and low benefit, 46.3%). In logistics analysis, the Class 1 and Class 2 were combined as one group due to the low population in Class 1. The marital status of caregiver (OR = 0.067, 95% CI: 0.006, 0.700, P = 0.024), IA type (OR = 1.745, 95% CI: 1.198, 2.541, P = 0.004), children aged > 2 years (OR = 3.219, 95% CI: 1.364, 7.597, P = 0.008), social support (OR = 0.907, 95% CI: 0.865, 0.951, P < 0.001) and perception of uncertainty (OR = 1.054, 95% CI: 1.026, 1.083, P < 0.001) were associated with different caregiver reaction patterns.

CONCLUSION

Nearly half of the caregivers of children with IA experience reaction of high burden and low benefit, but considerable proportion of caregivers could benefit from the caregiving rather than burden from. Married caregivers may have more negative reaction, especially when children > 2 years and diagnosed with intermediate or high type of IA. However, increasing caregiver's social support and reducing perception of uncertainty may have the potential to modify their reaction pattern.