A Comparative Study of Two Infant Feeding Tools: The Nifty Cup and The Paladai

Breastfeeding and Cleft Lip and Palate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P) and breastfeeding (BF).

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed based on studies published in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, BBO, and Embase databases, and in the gray literature. The search occurred in September 2021 and was updated in March 2022. Observational studies evaluating the association between BF and CL/P were included. Risk of bias was analyzed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Frequency of BF in relation to the presence or absence of CL/P, as well as to the type of CL/P. The association between cleft type and BF challenges was also evaluated.

RESULTS

From a total of 6863 studies identified, 29 were included in the qualitative review. Risk of bias was moderate and high in most studies (n = 26). There was a significant association between the presence of CL/P and absence of BF (OR = 18.08; 95% CI 7.09-46.09). Individuals with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP ± L) had a significantly lower frequency of BF (OR = 5.93; 95% CI 4.30-8.16) and a significantly higher frequency of BF challenges (OR = 13.55; 95% CI 4.91-37.43) compared to individuals with CL. Certainty of the evidence was low or very low in all analyses.

CONCLUSION

The presence of clefts, especially those with palate involvement, is associated with higher chances of absence of BF.

Comparison of Paladai Cup Against Nifty Cup Feeding in Preterm Low-Birth-Weight Infants: An Open-Labeled Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Neonatal Intuitive Feeding Technology (NIFTY) cup feeding has been found to be feasible in preterm low-birth-weight babies. However, literature on direct comparison of the same with paladai feeding is lacking. Methods: In this open-labeled, randomized controlled trial, preterm infants (<34 weeks/<1800 g) on full oral gastric tube feeding for at least 3 consecutive days, eligible to be given a trial of suck and swallow cup feeding, prior to initiation of direct breastfeeding, were randomized to the two feeding intervention groups: paladai cup and Nifty cup. The primary outcome was the time taken from initiation of oral cup feeds to reaching complete gavage-free cup feeds for at least 24 hours. Secondary outcomes were the ease of use of both instruments, the adverse effects during and within 10 minutes after feeding, and anthropometric parameters (head circumference and weight gain). Results: The median (IQR) time taken from initiation to complete transition to full cup feeding for at least 24 hours was not significantly different [4(3,7) days in Nifty cup group versus 3(2,6) days in paladai cup group, p = 0.25]. Mean ± SD weight gain from intervention to discharge was also similar in both the groups (16 ± 6 g/kg/day in Nifty cup group versus 17 ± 5 g/kg/day in paladai cup group, p = 0.18). Adverse events did not differ (32.9% in group A versus 27.1% in group B, p = 0.580). Nurses did not find any difference in ease of teaching caregivers [median (IQR) Nifty cup group 4(4,5) versus paladai cup group 4(4,5), p = 0.13]. Conclusion: The efficacy and adverse event rates were similar between Nifty cup feeding and paladai cup feeding in preterm infants. Both feeding modalities can be used prior to transition to direct breastfeeding in preterm low-birth-weight infants.

Nifty Cup Versus Katori-Spoon Feeding in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Many preterm infants cannot breastfeed directly and depend on other feeding methods. Multiple studies have compared feeding methods for such infants; however, the best method remains unknown. We compared Nifty cup with Katori-spoon feeding in preterm neonates deemed fit for oral feeding. Methods: This open-label randomized controlled trial was performed in a level III neonatal unit. Preterm (<34 weeks) neonates deemed fit to initiate oral feeding were randomly allocated to the Nifty cup and Katori-spoon groups. Patients were followed up until 40 (±2) weeks of postmenstrual age or until death, whichever occurred earlier. The primary outcome was time to achieve full oral feeding. The secondary outcomes included the time spent per feeding session, time to full direct breastfeeding, anthropometry at discharge, duration of hospitalization, and mortality. The opinions of mothers and nurses were recorded using a structured questionnaire. Results: A total of 106 participants (53 in each group) were randomized and analyzed for the primary outcome. The median (1st, 3rd quartile) time to achieve complete oral feeds was 5 (2, 11) versus 6 (4, 11) days in the Nifty cup versus Katori-spoon groups, respectively (p = 0.2). Infants in the Nifty cup group reached full breastfeeds earlier (mean difference = 12.6 days; 95% confidence interval: 4.3 to 20.8, p = 0.003) and had less vomiting (9.4% versus 26.4%, p = 0.023). Mothers and nurses felt that breast milk expression and feeding with a Nifty cup was easier. Conclusions: Compared to the Katori-spoon, feeding with a Nifty cup did not shorten the time to full oral feeds. However, it helps in attaining full breastfeeds earlier than the Katori-spoon. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI/2021/06/034252).

Do Orofacial Clefts Impair Breastfeeding and Increase the Prevalence of Anemia?

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to correlate the prevalence of iron deficiency anemia and breastfeeding with orofacial clefts in children.

DESIGN

Data on the participant profile, presence and type of the cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P), and records on anemia and breastfeeding were collected from patients' charts, and submitted to statistical analysis by χ² test (p < .05; software SPSS 23.0).

RESULTS

Two-hundred and ten files were divided according to: CL/P presence (cleft group;   n = 132) or absence (control group;   n = 78). Group CL/P was subdivided according to the type of cleft: CL/P-I (cleft lip;   n = 35); CL/P-II (cleft lip and palate;   n = 45); CL/P-III (cleft palate;   n = 43); and CL/P-IV (rare orofacial clefts;   n = 9). Group CL/P had significantly more records on anemia (p = .016) and fewer records on breastfeeding (P<.01) than controls. More records on anemia occurred in CL/P-II (p = .004) and CL/P-IV (p = .006) than the control group. The comparison among the orofacial cleft types regarding the anemia records showed no statistically significant differences (p = .123). Group CL/P-I had more records on breastfeeding than the other cleft types (p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, it is suggested that the breastfeeding process is more complex, and the history of anemia is more frequent, in children with cleft lip and palate or rare orofacial clefts than in children without clefts.