Current Perspectives in Management of Edema in Nephrotic Syndrome

Oral Furosemide and Hydrochlorothiazide/Amiloride versus Intravenous Furosemide for the Treatment of Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Data on diuretic treatment in nephrotic syndrome (NS) are scarce. Our goal was to assess the non-inferiority of the combined oral diuretics (furosemide/hydrochlorothiazide/amiloride) compared to intravenous (i.v.) furosemide in patients with NS and resistant edema.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective randomized trial on 22 patients with resistant nephrotic edema (RNE), defined as hypervolemia and a FENa < 0.2%. Based on a computer-generated 1:1 randomization, we assigned patients to receive either intravenous furosemide (40 mg bolus and then continuous administration of 5 mg/h) or oral furosemide (40 mg/day) and hydrochlorothiazide/amiloride (50/5 mg/day) for a period of 5 days. Clinical and laboratory measurements were performed daily. Hydration status was assessed by bioimpedance on day 1 and at the end of day 5 after treatment initiation. The primary endpoint was weight change from baseline to day 5. Secondary endpoints were hydration status change measured by bioimpedance and safety outcomes (low blood pressure, severe electrolyte disturbances, acute kidney injury and worsening hypervolemia).

RESULTS

Primary endpoint analysis showed that after 5 days of treatment, there was a significant difference in weight change from baseline between groups [adjusted mean difference: -3.33 kg (95% CI: -6.34 to -0.31), p = 0.03], with a higher mean weight change in the oral diuretic treatment group [-7.10 kg (95% CI: -18.30 to -4.30) vs. -4.55 kg (95%CI: -6.73 to -2.36)]. Secondary endpoint analysis showed that there was no significant difference between groups regarding hydration status change [adjusted mean difference: -0.05 L (95% CI: -2.6 to 2.6), p = 0.96], with a mean hydration status change in the oral diuretic treatment group of -4.71 L (95% CI: -6.87 to -2.54) and -3.91 L (95% CI: -5.69 to -2.13) in the i.v. diuretic treatment group. We observed a significant decrease in adjusted mean serum sodium of -2.15 mmol/L [(95% CI: -4.25 to -0.05), p = 0.04]), favored by the combined oral diuretic treatment [-2.70 mmol/L (95% CI: -4.89 to -0.50) vs. -0.10 mmol/L (95%CI: -1.30 to 1.10)]. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of oral diuretics based on furosemide, amiloride and hydrochlorothiazide is non-inferior to i.v. furosemide in weight control of patients with RNE and a similar safety profile.

Yue-bi-tang attenuates adriamycin-induced nephropathy edema through decreasing renal microvascular permeability via inhibition of the Cav-1/ eNOS pathway

Edema is one of the most typical symptoms of nephrotic syndrome. Increased vascular permeability makes a significant contribution to the progression of edema. Yue-bi-tang (YBT) is a traditional formula with excellent clinical efficacy in the treatment of edema. This study investigated the effect of YBT on renal microvascular hyperpermeability-induced edema in nephrotic syndrome and its mechanism. In our study, the content of target chemical components of YBT was identified using UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap HRMS analysis. A nephrotic syndrome model was replicated based on male Sprague-Dawley rats with Adriamycin (6.5 mg/kg) by tail vein injection. The rats were randomly divided into control, model, prednisone, and YBT (22.2 g/kg, 11.1 g/kg, and 6.6 g/kg) groups. After 14 d of treatment, the severity of renal microvascular permeability, edema, the degree of renal injury, and changes in the Cav-1/eNOS pathway were assessed. We found that YBT could regulate renal microvascular permeability, alleviate edema, and reduce renal function impairment. In the model group, the protein expression of Cav-1 was upregulated, whereas VE-cadherin was downregulated, accompanied by the suppression of p-eNOS expression and activation of the PI3K pathway. Meanwhile, an increased NO level in both serum and kidney tissues was observed, and the above situations were improved with YBT intervention. It thus indicates YBT exerts therapeutic effects on the edema of nephrotic syndrome, as it improves the hyperpermeability of renal microvasculature, and that YBT is engaged in the regulation of Cav-1/eNOS pathway-mediated endothelial function.

Incidence and risk factors of acute kidney injury among childhood nephrotic syndrome: a prospective cohort study

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a known independent risk factor for morbidity/mortality but there is scarcity of robust data on it among childhood nephrotic syndrome (NS). We assessed the incidence of AKI among hospitalized children with NS as well as looked for any significant risk factors. Prospective observational study conducted across two tertiary pediatric hospitals in Eastern India from September 2020 to August 2021. Children aged 1-18 years admitted with NS and without any nephritic features or pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD) were included. In 200 admissions (n = 176; 63% female, median age 4 years [IQR: 3-7]), AKI occurred in 36 (18%; 95% CI 13 to 36%). Two children required kidney replacement therapy and one death was recorded. In 27/36 (75%), AKI resolved within 48 h, 4 had persistent AKI, 3 acute kidney disease, and two progressed to CKD. On multivariate regression analysis: fractional excretion of sodium ≤ 0.2% (OR 12.77; 95% CI 3.5-46.4), male gender (OR 6.38; 95% CI 2.76-14.74), underlying infection (OR 5.44; 95% CI 2.4-11.86), nephrotoxic drugs (OR 4.83; 95% CI 2.21-10.54), and albumin ≤ 1.4 g/dl (OR 4.35; 95% CI 1.55-12.8) were associated with AKI. A predictive equation using these five variables on admission had high AUC (0.86) in correctly identifying 17 children who subsequently developed AKI.   Conclusion: In a low resource setting, AKI is common among hospitalized children with NS. Larger multi-center prospective studies are needed to refine prediction equations and test its utility in preventing AKI development. What is Known: • Acute Kidney Injury is a known independent risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality. • There are few studies to assess the incidence of Acute kidney injury in hospitalised cases of childhood nephrotic syndrome.. What is New: • This is the largest prospective cohort of children suffering from nephrotic syndrome, in India, proposing a novel algorithm for predicting the risk of AKI among hospitalised cases of childhood nephrotic syndrome.

Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy with Tolvaptan and Furosemide in Children with Nephrotic Syndrome and Refractory Edema: A Prospective Interventional Study

OBJECTIVE

Severe edema in children with nephrotic syndrome is often refractory to conventional diuretics. Tolvaptan has been used satisfactorily for managing edema in patients with heart failure and cirrhosis. The safety and efficacy of combination therapy with oral tolvaptan and intravenous (IV) furosemide was assessed in patients with furosemide refractory edema.

METHODS

Patients, aged 5-18 y with nephrotic syndrome and severe edema, were screened for eligibility. After excluding hypovolemia, patients received IV furosemide (3-4 mg/kg/d) for 48 h. Those refractory to IV furosemide (weight loss < 3%) received tolvaptan (0.5-1 mg/kg once daily) and IV furosemide for the next 48 h. Parameters were compared between 48 h of furosemide alone and combination therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients (18 boys) with mean age of 8.0 ± 3.0 y were enrolled. Urine volume significantly increased with combination therapy as compared to furosemide therapy (mean difference: 1.2 mL/kg/h; 95% CI: 0.8-1.65 mL/kg/h) (p < 0.001). Compared to therapy with furosemide alone, combination therapy resulted in significant reduction in body weight from 26.9 ± 10.3 kg to 24.8 ± 9.7 kg (p < 0.001). Estimated glomerular filtration rate did not change (p = 0.81) but serum sodium increased from 135.7 ± 3.3 mEq/L to 140.4 ± 4.8 mEq/L (p < 0.001) with combination therapy; 2 patients showed asymptomatic hypernatremia.

CONCLUSION

The combination of oral tolvaptan and IV furosemide is effective in augmenting diuresis and reducing weight in patients with furosemide refractory edema but requires monitoring of electrolytes and volume status.

Cardiovascular therapeutics: A new potential for anxiety treatment?

Besides the well‐recognized risk factors, novel conditions increasing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are emerging. Undesirable emotions and behavior such as anxiety and depression, appear to participate in worsening cardiovascular pathologies. On the other hand, deteriorating conditions of the heart and vasculature result in disturbed mental and emotional health. The pathophysiological background of this bidirectional interplay could reside in an inappropriate activation of vegetative neurohormonal and other humoral systems in both cardiovascular and psychological disturbances. This results in circulus vitiosus potentiating mental and circulatory disorders. Thus, it appears to be of utmost importance to examine the alteration of emotions, cognition, and behavior in cardiovascular patients. In terms of this consideration, recognizing the potential of principal cardiovascular drugs to interact with the mental state in patients with heart or vasculature disturbances is unavoidable, to optimize their therapeutic benefit. In general, beta‐blockers, central sympatholytics, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, aldosterone receptor blockers, sacubitril/valsartan, and fibrates are considered to exert anxiolytic effect in animal experiments and clinical settings. Statins and some beta‐blockers appear to have an equivocal impact on mood and anxiety and ivabradine expressed neutral psychological impact. It seems reasonable to suppose that the knowledge of a patient's mood, cognition, and behavior, along with applying careful consideration of the choice of the particular cardiovascular drug and respecting its potential psychological benefit or harm might improve the individualized approach to the treatment of cardiovascular disorders.

Steroid Sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome: Revised Guidelines

Justification

Steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is one of the most common chronic kidney diseases in children. These guidelines update the existing Indian Society of Pediatric Nephrology recommendations on its management.

Objective

To frame revised guidelines on diagnosis, evaluation, management and supportive care of patients with the illness.

Process

The guidelines combine evidence-based recommendations and expert opinion. Formulation of key questions was followed by review of literature and evaluation of evidence by experts in two face-to-face meetings.

Recommendations

The initial statements provide advice for evaluation at onset and follow up and indications for kidney biopsy. Subsequent statements provide recommendations for management of the first episode of illness and of disease relapses. Recommendations on the use of immunosuppressive strategies in patients with frequent relapses and steroid dependence are accompanied by suggestions for step-wise approach and plan of monitoring. Guidance is also provided regarding the management of common complications including edema, hypovolemia and serious infections. Advice on immunization and transition of care is given. The revised guideline is intended to improve the management and outcomes of patients with SSNS, and provide directions for future research.