1
|
Kulkarni RS, Greenwood SN, Weiser BP. Assay design for analysis of human uracil DNA glycosylase. Methods Enzymol 2022; 679:343-362. [PMID: 36682870 DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2022.07.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Human uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG2) is an enzyme whose primary function is to remove uracil bases from genomic DNA. UNG2 activity is critical when uracil bases are elevated in DNA during class switch recombination and somatic hypermutation, and additionally, UNG2 affects the efficacy of thymidylate synthase inhibitors that increase genomic uracil levels. Here, we summarize the enzymatic properties of UNG2 and its mitochondrial analog UNG1. To facilitate studies on the activity of these highly conserved proteins, we discuss three fluorescence-based enzyme assays that have informed much of our understanding on UNG2 function. The assays use synthetic DNA oligonucleotide substrates with uracil bases incorporated in the DNA, and the substrates can be single-stranded, double-stranded, or form other structures such as DNA hairpins or junctions. The fluorescence signal reporting uracil base excision by UNG2 is detected in different ways: (1) Excision of uracil from end-labeled oligonucleotides is measured by visualizing UNG2 reaction products with denaturing PAGE; (2) Uracil excision from dsDNA substrates is detected in solution by base pairing uracil with 2-aminopurine, whose intrinsic fluorescence is enhanced upon uracil excision; or (3) UNG2 excision of uracil from a hairpin molecular beacon substrate changes the structure of the substrate and turns on fluorescence by relieving a fluorescence quench. In addition to their utility in characterizing UNG2 properties, these assays are being adapted to discover inhibitors of the enzyme and to determine how protein-protein interactions affect UNG2 function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rashmi S Kulkarni
- Department of Molecular Biology, Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, United States
| | - Sharon N Greenwood
- Department of Molecular Biology, Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, United States
| | - Brian P Weiser
- Department of Molecular Biology, Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Torgasheva NA, Diatlova EA, Grin IR, Endutkin AV, Mechetin GV, Vokhtantsev IP, Yudkina AV, Zharkov DO. Noncatalytic Domains in DNA Glycosylases. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23137286. [PMID: 35806289 PMCID: PMC9266487 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23137286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Many proteins consist of two or more structural domains: separate parts that have a defined structure and function. For example, in enzymes, the catalytic activity is often localized in a core fragment, while other domains or disordered parts of the same protein participate in a number of regulatory processes. This situation is often observed in many DNA glycosylases, the proteins that remove damaged nucleobases thus initiating base excision DNA repair. This review covers the present knowledge about the functions and evolution of such noncatalytic parts in DNA glycosylases, mostly concerned with the human enzymes but also considering some unique members of this group coming from plants and prokaryotes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia A. Torgasheva
- SB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, 8 Lavrentieva Avenue, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia; (N.A.T.); (E.A.D.); (I.R.G.); (A.V.E.); (G.V.M.); (I.P.V.); (A.V.Y.)
| | - Evgeniia A. Diatlova
- SB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, 8 Lavrentieva Avenue, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia; (N.A.T.); (E.A.D.); (I.R.G.); (A.V.E.); (G.V.M.); (I.P.V.); (A.V.Y.)
- Department of Natural Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, 2 Pirogova Street, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Inga R. Grin
- SB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, 8 Lavrentieva Avenue, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia; (N.A.T.); (E.A.D.); (I.R.G.); (A.V.E.); (G.V.M.); (I.P.V.); (A.V.Y.)
| | - Anton V. Endutkin
- SB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, 8 Lavrentieva Avenue, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia; (N.A.T.); (E.A.D.); (I.R.G.); (A.V.E.); (G.V.M.); (I.P.V.); (A.V.Y.)
| | - Grigory V. Mechetin
- SB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, 8 Lavrentieva Avenue, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia; (N.A.T.); (E.A.D.); (I.R.G.); (A.V.E.); (G.V.M.); (I.P.V.); (A.V.Y.)
| | - Ivan P. Vokhtantsev
- SB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, 8 Lavrentieva Avenue, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia; (N.A.T.); (E.A.D.); (I.R.G.); (A.V.E.); (G.V.M.); (I.P.V.); (A.V.Y.)
- Department of Natural Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, 2 Pirogova Street, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Anna V. Yudkina
- SB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, 8 Lavrentieva Avenue, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia; (N.A.T.); (E.A.D.); (I.R.G.); (A.V.E.); (G.V.M.); (I.P.V.); (A.V.Y.)
| | - Dmitry O. Zharkov
- SB RAS Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, 8 Lavrentieva Avenue, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia; (N.A.T.); (E.A.D.); (I.R.G.); (A.V.E.); (G.V.M.); (I.P.V.); (A.V.Y.)
- Department of Natural Sciences, Novosibirsk State University, 2 Pirogova Street, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Renganathan S, Pramanik S, Ekambaram R, Kutzner A, Kim PS, Heese K. Identification of a Chemotherapeutic Lead Molecule for the Potential Disruption of the FAM72A-UNG2 Interaction to Interfere with Genome Stability, Centromere Formation, and Genome Editing. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5870. [PMID: 34831023 PMCID: PMC8616359 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Family with sequence similarity 72 A (FAM72A) is a pivotal mitosis-promoting factor that is highly expressed in various types of cancer. FAM72A interacts with the uracil-DNA glycosylase UNG2 to prevent mutagenesis by eliminating uracil from DNA molecules through cleaving the N-glycosylic bond and initiating the base excision repair pathway, thus maintaining genome integrity. In the present study, we determined a specific FAM72A-UNG2 heterodimer protein interaction using molecular docking and dynamics. In addition, through in silico screening, we identified withaferin B as a molecule that can specifically prevent the FAM72A-UNG2 interaction by blocking its cell signaling pathways. Our results provide an excellent basis for possible therapeutic approaches in the clinical treatment of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Senthil Renganathan
- Department of Bioinformatics, Marudupandiyar College, Thanjavur 613403, India;
| | - Subrata Pramanik
- Department of Biology, Life Science Centre, School of Science and Technology, Örebro University, 701-82 Örebro, Sweden;
| | | | - Arne Kutzner
- Department of Information Systems, College of Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 133-791, Korea;
| | - Pok-Son Kim
- Department of Information Security, Cryptology, and Mathematics, Kookmin University, Seoul 136-702, Korea;
| | - Klaus Heese
- Graduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 133-791, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kavli B, Iveland TS, Buchinger E, Hagen L, Liabakk NB, Aas PA, Obermann TS, Aachmann FL, Slupphaug G. RPA2 winged-helix domain facilitates UNG-mediated removal of uracil from ssDNA; implications for repair of mutagenic uracil at the replication fork. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:3948-3966. [PMID: 33784377 PMCID: PMC8053108 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Uracil occurs at replication forks via misincorporation of deoxyuridine monophosphate (dUMP) or via deamination of existing cytosines, which occurs 2-3 orders of magnitude faster in ssDNA than in dsDNA and is 100% miscoding. Tethering of UNG2 to proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) allows rapid post-replicative removal of misincorporated uracil, but potential 'pre-replicative' removal of deaminated cytosines in ssDNA has been questioned since this could mediate mutagenic translesion synthesis and induction of double-strand breaks. Here, we demonstrate that uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG), but not SMUG1 efficiently excises uracil from replication protein A (RPA)-coated ssDNA and that this depends on functional interaction between the flexible winged-helix (WH) domain of RPA2 and the N-terminal RPA-binding helix in UNG. This functional interaction is promoted by mono-ubiquitination and diminished by cell-cycle regulated phosphorylations on UNG. Six other human proteins bind the RPA2-WH domain, all of which are involved in DNA repair and replication fork remodelling. Based on this and the recent discovery of the AP site crosslinking protein HMCES, we propose an integrated model in which templated repair of uracil and potentially other mutagenic base lesions in ssDNA at the replication fork, is orchestrated by RPA. The UNG:RPA2-WH interaction may also play a role in adaptive immunity by promoting efficient excision of AID-induced uracils in transcribed immunoglobulin loci.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bodil Kavli
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.,Clinic of Laboratory Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, NO-7006 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Tobias S Iveland
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.,Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, NO-7006 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Edith Buchinger
- NOBIPOL, Department of Biotechnology and Food Science, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Lars Hagen
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.,Clinic of Laboratory Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, NO-7006 Trondheim, Norway.,PROMEC Proteomics and Modomics Experimental Core at NTNU and the Central Norway Regional Health Authority, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Nina B Liabakk
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.,Clinic of Laboratory Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, NO-7006 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Per A Aas
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.,Clinic of Laboratory Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, NO-7006 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Tobias S Obermann
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.,Clinic of Laboratory Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, NO-7006 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Finn L Aachmann
- NOBIPOL, Department of Biotechnology and Food Science, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Geir Slupphaug
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.,Clinic of Laboratory Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, NO-7006 Trondheim, Norway.,PROMEC Proteomics and Modomics Experimental Core at NTNU and the Central Norway Regional Health Authority, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Perkins JL, Zhao L. The N-terminal domain of uracil-DNA glycosylase: Roles for disordered regions. DNA Repair (Amst) 2021; 101:103077. [PMID: 33640758 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The presence of uracil in DNA calls for rapid removal facilitated by the uracil-DNA glycosylase superfamily of enzymes, which initiates the base excision repair (BER) pathway. In humans, uracil excision is accomplished primarily by the human uracil-DNA glycosylase (hUNG) enzymes. In addition to BER, hUNG enzymes play a key role in somatic hypermutation to generate antibody diversity. hUNG has several isoforms, with hUNG1 and hUNG2 being the two major isoforms. Both isoforms contain disordered N-terminal domains, which are responsible for a wide range of functions, with minimal direct impact on catalytic efficiency. Subcellular localization of hUNG enzymes is directed by differing N-terminal sequences, with hUNG1 dedicated to mitochondria and hUNG2 dedicated to the nucleus. An alternative isoform of hUNG1 has also been identified to localize to the nucleus in mouse and human cell models. Furthermore, hUNG2 has been observed at replication forks performing both pre- and post-replicative uracil excision to maintain genomic integrity. Replication protein A (RPA) and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) are responsible for recruitment to replication forks via protein-protein interactions with the N-terminus of hUNG2. These interactions, along with protein degradation, are regulated by various post-translational modifications within the N-terminal tail, which are primarily cell-cycle dependent. Finally, translocation on DNA is also mediated by interactions between the N-terminus and DNA, which is enhanced under molecular crowding conditions by preventing diffusion events and compacting tail residues. This review summarizes recent research supporting the emerging roles of the N-terminal domain of hUNG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob L Perkins
- Department of Chemistry and Environmental Toxicology Graduate Program, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, United States
| | - Linlin Zhao
- Department of Chemistry and Environmental Toxicology Graduate Program, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kara H, Chazal N, Bouaziz S. Is Uracil-DNA Glycosylase UNG2 a New Cellular Weapon Against HIV-1? Curr HIV Res 2020; 17:148-160. [PMID: 31433761 DOI: 10.2174/1570162x17666190821154331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Uracil-DNA glycosylase-2 (UNG2) is a DNA repair protein that removes uracil from single and double-stranded DNA through a basic excision repair process. UNG2 is packaged into new virions by interaction with integrase (IN) and is needed during the early stages of the replication cycle. UNG2 appears to play both a positive and negative role during HIV-1 replication; UNG2 improves the fidelity of reverse transcription but the nuclear isoform of UNG2 participates in the degradation of cDNA and the persistence of the cellular genome by repairing its uracil mismatches. In addition, UNG2 is neutralized by Vpr, which redirects it to the proteasome for degradation, suggesting that UNG2 may be a new cellular restriction factor. So far, we have not understood why HIV-1 imports UNG2 via its IN and why it causes degradation of endogenous UNG2 by redirecting it to the proteasome via Vpr. In this review, we propose to discuss the ambiguous role of UNG2 during the HIV-1 replication cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hesna Kara
- Cibles Therapeutiques et Conception de Medicaments (CiTCoM), CNRS UMR8038, Faculte des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Nathalie Chazal
- Institut de Recherche en Infectiologie de Montpellier (IRIM), CNRS UMR9004, Universite de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Serge Bouaziz
- Cibles Therapeutiques et Conception de Medicaments (CiTCoM), CNRS UMR8038, Faculte des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Iveland TS, Hagen L, Sharma A, Sousa MML, Sarno A, Wollen KL, Liabakk NB, Slupphaug G. HDACi mediate UNG2 depletion, dysregulated genomic uracil and altered expression of oncoproteins and tumor suppressors in B- and T-cell lines. J Transl Med 2020; 18:159. [PMID: 32264925 PMCID: PMC7137348 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-020-02318-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) belong to a new group of chemotherapeutics that are increasingly used in the treatment of lymphocyte-derived malignancies, but their mechanisms of action remain poorly understood. Here we aimed to identify novel protein targets of HDACi in B- and T-lymphoma cell lines and to verify selected candidates across several mammalian cell lines. METHODS Jurkat T- and SUDHL5 B-lymphocytes were treated with the HDACi SAHA (vorinostat) prior to SILAC-based quantitative proteome analysis. Selected differentially expressed proteins were verified by targeted mass spectrometry, RT-PCR and western analysis in multiple mammalian cell lines. Genomic uracil was quantified by LC-MS/MS, cell cycle distribution analyzed by flow cytometry and class switch recombination monitored by FACS in murine CH12F3 cells. RESULTS SAHA treatment resulted in differential expression of 125 and 89 proteins in Jurkat and SUDHL5, respectively, of which 19 were commonly affected. Among these were several oncoproteins and tumor suppressors previously not reported to be affected by HDACi. Several key enzymes determining the cellular dUTP/dTTP ratio were downregulated and in both cell lines we found robust depletion of UNG2, the major glycosylase in genomic uracil sanitation. UNG2 depletion was accompanied by hyperacetylation and mediated by increased proteasomal degradation independent of cell cycle stage. UNG2 degradation appeared to be ubiquitous and was observed across several mammalian cell lines of different origin and with several HDACis. Loss of UNG2 was accompanied by 30-40% increase in genomic uracil in freely cycling HEK cells and reduced immunoglobulin class-switch recombination in murine CH12F3 cells. CONCLUSION We describe several oncoproteins and tumor suppressors previously not reported to be affected by HDACi in previous transcriptome analyses, underscoring the importance of proteome analysis to identify cellular effectors of HDACi treatment. The apparently ubiquitous depletion of UNG2 and PCLAF establishes DNA base excision repair and translesion synthesis as novel pathways affected by HDACi treatment. Dysregulated genomic uracil homeostasis may aid interpretation of HDACi effects in cancer cells and further advance studies on this class of inhibitors in the treatment of APOBEC-expressing tumors, autoimmune disease and HIV-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias S Iveland
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.,Cancer Clinic, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Lars Hagen
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.,Clinic of Laboratory Medicine, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.,Proteomics and Modomics Experimental Core, PROMEC, at NTNU and the Central Norway Regional Health Authority, Stjørdal, Norway
| | - Animesh Sharma
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.,Clinic of Laboratory Medicine, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.,Proteomics and Modomics Experimental Core, PROMEC, at NTNU and the Central Norway Regional Health Authority, Stjørdal, Norway
| | - Mirta M L Sousa
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.,Clinic of Laboratory Medicine, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Antonio Sarno
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.,Clinic of Laboratory Medicine, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Kristian Lied Wollen
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Nina Beate Liabakk
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.,Clinic of Laboratory Medicine, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Geir Slupphaug
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway. .,Clinic of Laboratory Medicine, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. .,Proteomics and Modomics Experimental Core, PROMEC, at NTNU and the Central Norway Regional Health Authority, Stjørdal, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rodriguez G, Orris B, Majumdar A, Bhat S, Stivers JT. Macromolecular crowding induces compaction and DNA binding in the disordered N-terminal domain of hUNG2. DNA Repair (Amst) 2019; 86:102764. [PMID: 31855846 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.102764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Revised: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Many human DNA repair proteins have disordered domains at their N- or C-termini with poorly defined biological functions. We recently reported that the partially structured N-terminal domain (NTD) of human uracil DNA glycosylase 2 (hUNG2), functions to enhance DNA translocation in crowded environments and also targets the enzyme to single-stranded/double-stranded DNA junctions. To understand the structural basis for these effects we now report high-resolution heteronuclear NMR studies of the isolated NTD in the presence and absence of an inert macromolecular crowding agent (PEG8K). Compared to dilute buffer, we find that crowding reduces the degrees of freedom for the structural ensemble, increases the order of a PCNA binding motif and dramatically promotes binding of the NTD for DNA through a conformational selection mechanism. These findings shed new light on the function of this disordered domain in the context of the crowded nuclear environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaddiel Rodriguez
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| | - Benjamin Orris
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| | - Ananya Majumdar
- Biomolecular NMR Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States
| | - Shridhar Bhat
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| | - James T Stivers
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Weiser BP, Rodriguez G, Cole PA, Stivers JT. N-terminal domain of human uracil DNA glycosylase (hUNG2) promotes targeting to uracil sites adjacent to ssDNA-dsDNA junctions. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 46:7169-7178. [PMID: 29917162 PMCID: PMC6101581 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The N-terminal domain (NTD) of nuclear human uracil DNA glycosylase (hUNG2) assists in targeting hUNG2 to replication forks through specific interactions with replication protein A (RPA). Here, we explored hUNG2 activity in the presence and absence of RPA using substrates with ssDNA–dsDNA junctions that mimic structural features of the replication fork and transcriptional R-loops. We find that when RPA is tightly bound to the ssDNA overhang of junction DNA substrates, base excision by hUNG2 is strongly biased toward uracils located 21 bp or less from the ssDNA–dsDNA junction. In the absence of RPA, hUNG2 still showed an 8-fold excision bias for uracil located <10 bp from the junction, but only when the overhang had a 5′ end. Biased targeting required the NTD and was not observed with the hUNG2 catalytic domain alone. Consistent with this requirement, the isolated NTD was found to bind weakly to ssDNA. These findings indicate that the NTD of hUNG2 targets the enzyme to ssDNA–dsDNA junctions using RPA-dependent and RPA-independent mechanisms. This structure-based specificity may promote efficient removal of uracils that arise from dUTP incorporation during DNA replication, or additionally, uracils that arise from DNA cytidine deamination at transcriptional R-loops during immunoglobulin class-switch recombination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian P Weiser
- Department of Molecular Biology, Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ 08084, USA
| | - Gaddiel Rodriguez
- Department of Pharmacology & Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Philip A Cole
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine and Department of Biological Chemistry & Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - James T Stivers
- Department of Pharmacology & Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Esadze A, Stivers JT. Facilitated Diffusion Mechanisms in DNA Base Excision Repair and Transcriptional Activation. Chem Rev 2018; 118:11298-11323. [PMID: 30379068 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Preservation of the coding potential of the genome and highly regulated gene expression over the life span of a human are two fundamental requirements of life. These processes require the action of repair enzymes or transcription factors that efficiently recognize specific sites of DNA damage or transcriptional regulation within a restricted time frame of the cell cycle or metabolism. A failure of these systems to act results in accumulated mutations, metabolic dysfunction, and disease. Despite the multifactorial complexity of cellular DNA repair and transcriptional regulation, both processes share a fundamental physical requirement that the proteins must rapidly diffuse to their specific DNA-binding sites that are embedded within the context of a vastly greater number of nonspecific DNA-binding sites. Superimposed on the needle-in-the-haystack problem is the complex nature of the cellular environment, which contains such high concentrations of macromolecules that the time frame for diffusion is expected to be severely extended as compared to dilute solution. Here we critically review the mechanisms for how these proteins solve the needle-in-the-haystack problem and how the effects of cellular macromolecular crowding can enhance facilitated diffusion processes. We restrict the review to human proteins that use stochastic, thermally driven site-recognition mechanisms, and we specifically exclude systems involving energy cofactors or circular DNA clamps. Our scope includes ensemble and single-molecule studies of the past decade or so, with an emphasis on connecting experimental observations to biological function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Esadze
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences , Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , 725 North Wolfe Street , WBSB 314, Baltimore , Maryland 21205 , United States
| | - James T Stivers
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences , Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , 725 North Wolfe Street , WBSB 314, Baltimore , Maryland 21205 , United States
| |
Collapse
|