Tumour Cell Anaplasia and Multinucleation as Prognosticators in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

The Impact of Four Smoking Metrics on Survival After Diagnosis with HPV+ Oropharyngeal Cancer

OBJECTIVE

While tobacco use is understood to negatively impact HPV+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) outcomes, debate remains as to how this impact differs between cohorts. Multiple smoking metrics have been identified as having the greatest prognostic significance, and some recent works have found smoking to have no significant impact. Herein, we show through an analysis of four common smoking metrics that while smoking impacts overall survival (OS), it has a limited impact on recurrence-free survival (RFS) in our cohort.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated for HPV+ OPSCC in our health system from 2012 to 2019. Patients with metastatic disease or concurrent second primaries were excluded. Four metrics of tobacco use were assessed: current/former/never smokers, ever/never smokers, and smokers with >10 or >20 pack-year (PY) smoking histories. Our main outcomes were 3-year RFS and OS.

RESULTS

Three hundred and sixty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. 37.3% of patients (137/367) were never-smokers; 13.8% of patients (51/367) were currently smoking at diagnosis and 48.8% of patients (179/367) were former smokers. No tobacco-use metric significantly impacted 3-year RFS. On univariate analysis, all smoking metrics yielded inferior OS. On multivariate analysis, current and ever smoking status significantly impacted 3-year OS.

CONCLUSION

The impact of tobacco use on HPV+ OPSCC outcomes is not universal, but may instead be modulated by other cohort-specific factors. The impact of smoking may decrease as rates of tobacco use decline.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 (Cohort and case-control studies) Laryngoscope, 134:3158-3164, 2024.

Clinical, morphologic and molecular heterogeneity of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer

The incidence of human papillomavirus-positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is rising rapidly and has exceeded cervical cancer to become the most common HPV-induced cancer in developed countries. Since patients with HPV + OPSCC respond very favorably to standard aggressive treatment, the emphasis has changed to reducing treatment intensity. However, recent multi-center clinical trials failed to show non-inferiority of de-escalation strategies on a population basis, highlighting the need to select low-risk patients likely to respond to de-intensified treatments. In contrast, there is a substantial proportion of patients who develop recurrent disease despite aggressive therapy. This supports that HPV + OPSCC is not a homogeneous disease, but comprises distinct subtypes with clinical and biological variations. The overall goal for this review is to identify biomarkers for HPV + OPSCC that may be relevant for patient stratification for personalized treatment. We discuss HPV + OPSCC as a heterogeneous disease from multifaceted perspectives including clinical behavior, tumor morphology, and molecular phenotype. Molecular profiling from bulk tumors as well as single-cell sequencing data are discussed as potential driving factors of heterogeneity between tumor subgroups. Finally, we evaluate key challenges that may impede in-depth investigations of HPV + OPSCC heterogeneity and outline potential future directions, including a section on racial and ethnic differences.

Image analysis reveals differences in tumor multinucleations in Black and White patients with human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Understanding biological differences between different racial groups of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients, who have differences in terms of incidence, survival, and tumor morphology, can facilitate accurate prognostic biomarkers, which can help develop personalized treatment strategies.

METHODS

This study evaluated whether there were morphologic differences between HPV-associated tumors from Black and White patients in terms of multinucleation index (MuNI), an image analysis-derived metric that measures density of multinucleated tumor cells within epithelial regions on hematoxylin-eosin images and previously has been prognostic in HPV-associated OPSCC patients. In this study, the authors specifically evaluated whether the same MuNI cutoff that was prognostic of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival in their previous study, T_TR , is valid for Black and White patients, separately. We also evaluated population-specific cutoffs, T_B for Blacks and T_W for Whites, for risk stratification.

RESULTS

MuNI was statistically significantly different between Black (mean, 3.88e-4; median, 3.67e-04) and White patients (mean, 3.36e-04; median, 2.99e-04), with p = .0078. Using T_TR , MuNI was prognostic of OS in the entire population with hazard ratio (HR) of 1.71 (p = .002; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-2.43) and in White patients with HR of 1.72 (p = .005; 95% CI, 1.18-2.51). Population-specific cutoff, T_W , yielded improved HR of 1.77 (p = .003; 95% CI, 1.21-2.58) for White patients, whereas T_B did not improve risk-stratification in Black patients with HR of 0.6 (p = .3; HR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2-1.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Histological difference between White and Black patient tumors in terms of multinucleated tumor cells suggests the need for considering population-specific prognostic biomarkers for personalized risk stratification strategies for HPV-associated OPSCC patients.

Anaplasia and multinucleation in metastases of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma is associated with poorer outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The presence of tumor cell anaplasia and multinucleation (A/M) in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has recently been found to be associated with increased disease recurrence and poorer disease-specific survival, regardless of human papillomavirus status. We studied the detection of A/M in cytology specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a comprehensive data search for all patients with OPSCC diagnosed and treated at Northwestern Memorial Hospital between January 2013 and April 2020. All cytology and histopathologic slides were reviewed for the presence of A/M in patients with both surgical resection or biopsy specimens and fine needle aspiration cytology of a metastatic site.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients were identified with both surgical and cytology specimens available for review. A/M was identified in 21 cytology specimens and 14 surgical specimens. Cytologic A/M was seen in 11 of the 14 patients (78.5%) with corresponding histologic A/M and in 10 of the 73 patients (13.7%) without histologic A/M. Disease-specific survival was significantly worse for the patients with cytologic A/M regardless of the presence of histologic A/M (P = 0.0064) and for the patients with cytologic A/M only (P = 0.0271). In patients with p16-positive/human papillomavirus-associated carcinoma, disease-specific survival was significantly worse for the patients with both histologic and cytologic A/M (P = 0.0305).

CONCLUSIONS

A/M can be reliably identified in cytology specimens among all the various stains and preparations, irrespective of the primary tumor histologic type. Identification of A/M on cytology specimens could indicate more aggressive clinical behavior and help guide patient management.

Cytokeratin 7 and 19 expression in oropharyngeal and oral squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

The precise etiopathogenesis of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), and reasons for predilection for crypt epithelium, remain uncertain. The purpose of this study is to investigate the interaction between HPV and specific cytokeratins 7 (CK7) and 19 (CK19) in crypt epithelium.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting between 1999 and 2015 at a tertiary referral center. CK7 and CK19 positivity and H Scores were determined by immunohistochemistry. Disease-specific and overall survival rates were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 253 patients presenting with OPSCC (134), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of unknown primary site (22), and oral tongue SCC (97). Primary tumor CK7 and CK19 positivity and H Scores were significantly higher in HPV-positive OPSCC than HPV-negative OPSCC and oral tongue SCC. Higher CK19 Scores, but not CK7 Scores, were also seen in regional metastases from HPV-positive OPSCC than other sites. No impact on disease-specific or overall survival was identified on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

The increased expression of CK7 and CK19 in HPV-positive OPSCC compared to HPV-negative disease supports the theory for a role for these cytokeratins in the etiopathogenesis of HPV-related OPSCC.

The role of tumour morphology in assigning HPV status in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

There is no consensus on the optimal approach to human papilloma virus (HPV) testing in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Our objective was to classify OPSCC as HPV positive or negative based on (1) morphology alone, (2) p16 status alone, (3) combined morphology and p16 status with additional HPV testing in discordant cases in keeping with 2012 College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines (combined approach), and to evaluate and compare survival outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of 168 patients, 146 with OPSCC and 22 with cervical SCC of unknown primary site (SCCUP). Morphology was classified as keratinizing or non-keratinizing, p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) performed and additional HPV DNA PCR testing undertaken in cases in which morphology and p16 status were discordant. Survival statistics were evaluated and compared for the 3 different approaches to classification.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis all 3 classification methods significantly predicted for overall survival (OS). Both p16 status and the combined approach also predicted for disease specific survival (DSS), whereas morphology fell just outside significance (p = 0.06). On multivariate analysis only the combined approach retained significance for both OS and DSS, whilst morphology was also significant for DSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings confirm that tumour morphology significantly predicts for survival in OPSCC. However, we found combined tumour morphology and p16 IHC, with additional testing for discordant cases to be superior to either morphology or p16 IHC alone. Further study is required to establish the optimal testing method for HPV in OPSCC particularly in low prevalence populations.