Comparison of left ventricular functional parameters obtained from three different commercial automated software cardiac quantification program packages and their intraobserver reproducibility

Analysis of Differences in Assessment of Left Ventricular Function on Echocardiography and Nuclear Perfusion Imaging

Two widely used methods for left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) determination, echocardiography (echo) and gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), often have wide limits of agreement. Factors influencing discrepancies between core laboratory echo and MPI LVEF determinations were examined in a large series of heart failure (HF) subjects and normal controls. 879 HF and 101 control subjects had core lab analyses of echo and MPI (mean time between procedures 7-8 days). LVEF differences were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Bland-Altman plots. Relationships between LVEF differences and patient characteristics and outcome endpoints (mortality and arrhythmias) were explored with logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. There was a systematic difference between the 2 modalities; echo LVEF was higher with more severe LV dysfunction, MPI LVEF higher when systolic function was normal. LVEF results were within ±5% in only 37% of HF and 23% of control subjects. Considering discordance around the LVEF threshold 35%, there was disagreement between the 2 methods in 305 HF subjects (35%). Male gender (odds ratio (OR) = 0.200), atrial fibrillation (OR = 2.314), higher body mass index (OR = 1.051) and lower LV end-diastolic volume (OR = 0.985) were the strongest predictors of methodologic discordance. Cardiac event rates were highest if both LVEF values were ≤35% and lowest when both LVEF values were >35%. In conclusion, substantial disagreements between LVEF results by echo and MPI are common. HF patients with LVEF ≤35% by both techniques have the highest 2-year event risk.

Myocardial perfusion and left ventricular quantitative parameters obtained using gated myocardial SPECT: Comparison of three software packages

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to compare Emory Cardiac Toolbox, Myovation, and Quantitative Gated SPECT software regarding the automatic measurements of perfusion and functional left ventricular (LV) quantitative parameters, summed stress score (SSS), perfusion defect score, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume, and end-systolic volume (ESV).

METHODS AND RESULTS

99mTc-tetrofosmin gated SPECT studies were performed in 634 consecutive patients based on the one-day stress/rest protocol. Participants were divided into subgroups according to heart size (ESV cut-off value: 25 mL), perfusion (SSS >/≤3), and other patient/protocol-related factors. LVEF was categorized as normal (≥50%), mildly moderately impaired (35-49%), and severely abnormal (<35%). The concordance between the packages was good to excellent, in overall population, ESV ≤25 mL, ESV >25 mL, and SSS >3 subgroups (intraclass correlation coefficients, ICCs 0.73-0.93). In SSS ≤3 subgroup, the correlation was excellent for LV functional parameters, but suboptimal for perfusion variables (ICCs 0.30-0.83). LVEF categorization revealed similar variability (discordance 18.1 and 11.1% for stress/rest LVEF values, respectively). Pair comparisons demonstrated considerable differences concerning all parameters for all patient subgroups. The statistical significance of our findings by ESV and SSS classifications was evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the significant concordance between software packages, considerable differences in mean values of myocardial perfusion and LV functional parameters were demonstrated.

Comparison of software programs for the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using 99mTc-tetrofosmin-gated SPECT/CT: correlation with equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography in the Indian population

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to compare Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECTb), quantitative gated SPECT (QGS), four-dimensional single photon emission computed tomography (4D-MSPECT) and Myometrix cardiac software programs for the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using 99mTc-tetrofosmin-gated SPECT/CT [myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS)] and correlate them with the LVEF values derived from equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography (ERNV) in patients with known/suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 109 patients (80 men, 29 women) were recruited into the study. Fifty-five patients had known CAD and 54 were referred with suspicion of CAD. All the patients underwent ERNV and MPS as per the standard protocol. ERNV was processed using the vendor-provided 'EF analysis' and gated MPS was processed using individual software programs.

RESULTS

The mean LVEF on ERNV was 47.9 ± 15.5%. The mean LVEF values for ECTb, QGS, 4D-MSPECT and Myometrix were 51.5 ± 19.6, 51.0 ± 18.6, 57.1 ± 19.3 and 49.7 ± 19%, respectively. On correlation analysis, a very strong positive correlation was observed between LVEF values derived by ERNV and those derived by the MPS software programs: ECTb (r=0.842, P<0.0001), QGS (r=0.835, P<0.0001), 4D-MSPECT (r=0.830, P<0.0001) and Myometrix (r=0.875, P<0.0001). Significant correlation was also seen for LVEFs among the four software programs. Normal cutoff values for ejection fraction on ECTb, QGS, 4D-MSPECT and Myometrix were 56, 52, 54 and 51%, respectively, using a 50% or more cutoff value on ERNV.

CONCLUSION

A strong correlation was observed among ECTb, QGS, 4D-MSPECT and Myometrix software programs when compared with ERNV and also between them for assessment of LVEF. However, there are subtle differences in the objective values of ejection fraction generated by individual software, which must be taken into account for clinical studies.

Quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using freeware package (cardioBull)

OBJECTIVE

We have developed freeware package for automatically quantifying myocardial perfusion and (123)I-labeled radiopharmaceutical single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), which is called "cardioBull". We aim to evaluate diagnostic performance of the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) on the developed software in comparison with commercially available software package [Quantitative Perfusion SPECT (QPS)].

METHODS

Stress-rest (99m)Tc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT was performed in 36 patients with CAD and 35 control patients. A ≥ 75% stenosis in the coronary artery was identified by coronary angiography in the CAD group. Segmental perfusion defect score was automatically calculated by both cardioBull and QPS software. Summed stress score (SSS) was obtained to detect CAD by the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. Areas under the ROC curves (AUC) were calculated in patient-based and coronary-based analyses.

RESULTS

Mean SSSs showed no significant difference between cardioBull and QPS (6.0 ± 7.1 vs. 5.6 ± 7.0). The AUC for cardioBull was equivalent to that for QPS (0.91 ± 0.04 vs. 0.87 ± 0.04, p = n.s.). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for cardioBull were 89, 74, and 82%, respectively. For the regional detection of CAD, the AUC showed largest value in left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) territory (0.86 ± 0.06 for cardioBull, 0.87 ± 0.06 for QPS, p = n.s.). Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of cardioBull were 70, 88, and 83% for the LAD; 91, 62, and 66% for the left circumflex coronary artery (LCx); and 78, 69, and 70% for the right coronary artery (RCA), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The AUC, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the detection of CAD showed high diagnostic performance on the developed software. In addition, the developed software provided comparable diagnostic performance to the commercially available software package.