Role of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in preoperative management of solid-type small-sized lung cancer

Surgery and invasive diagnostic procedures for benign disease are rare in a large low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening program

OBJECTIVE

Lung cancer screening with low-dose chest computed tomography improves survival. However, concerns about overdiagnosis and unnecessary interventions persist. We reviewed our lung cancer screening program to determine the rate of surgery and invasive procedures for nonmalignant disease.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients undergoing lung cancer screening from January 2012 to June 2017 with follow-up through January 2019. Patients with suspicious findings (Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System 4) were referred for further evaluation.

RESULTS

Of 3280 patients screened, 345 (10.5%) had Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System 4 findings. A total of 311 patients had complete follow-up, of whom 93 (29.9%) were diagnosed with lung cancer. Eighty-three patients underwent lung surgery (2.5% of screened patients). Forty patients underwent lobectomy (48.2%), 3 patients (3.6%) underwent bilobectomy, and 40 patients (48.2%) underwent sublobar resection. Fourteen patients underwent surgery for benign disease (0.43% of screened patients). Fifty-four patients, 5 with benign disease, had at least 1 invasive diagnostic procedure but never underwent surgery. The incidence of any invasive intervention for nonmalignant disease was 0.95% (31/3280 patients). There were no postprocedural deaths within 60 days. Twenty-five patients (0.76%) underwent stereotactic body radiation therapy; 19 patients (76%) had presumed lung cancer without pretreatment pathologic confirmation.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection for benign disease occurred in 0.43% of patients undergoing lung cancer screening. The combined incidence of any invasive diagnostic or therapeutic intervention, including surgical resection, for benign disease was only 0.95%. Periprocedural complications were rare. These results indicate that concern over unnecessary interventions is overstated and should not hinder adoption of lung cancer screening. A multidisciplinary team approach, including thoracic surgeons, is critical to maintain an appropriate rate of interventions in lung cancer screening.

[Accuracy of Resolution Recovery in PSF-based Fully-3D PET Image Reconstruction: Simulation and Phantom Study in Multicenter Trial]

PURPOSE

Recently, the quality of positron emission tomography (PET) images has rapidly improved using resolution recovery algorithm with point spread function (PSF). The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of the resolution recovery algorithm using three different PET systems.

METHODS

Three PET scanner models, the GE Discovery 600 M (D600M), SIEMENS Biograph mCT (mCT), and SHIMADZU SET-3000GCT/X (3000GCT) were used in this study. The radial dependences of spatial resolution (full width at half maximum: FWHM) were obtained by point source measurements (0.9 mmφ). All PET data were acquired in three-dimensional (3D) mode and reconstructed using the filtered back projection (FBP) , 3D-ordered subsets expectation maximization (3D-OSEM or dynamic row-action maximum likelihood algorithm) , and 3D-OSEM+PSF (PSF) algorithms. Two indicators, aspect ratio (ASR) and resolution recovery ratio (RRR), were calculated from measured FWHMs and compared among the three PET scanners.

RESULTS

In D600 and 3000GCT, distortions of the radial direction were slightly increased at circumference of field of view (FOV). On the other hand, random distortions were occurred in both radial and tangential direction in mCT. ASRs calculated from 3D-OSEM images at circumference of FOV were 2.06, 1.22, and 2.04 on D600M, mCT, and 3000GCT, respectively. ASR improved with PSF in all PET scanners. On the other hand, RRR with PSF were calculated 57.6%, 61.4%, and 31.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the spatial resolutions of PET images could be improved with PSF algorithm in all PET systems; however, effect of PSF was different depending on PET systems. Furthermore, PSF algorithm could not completely improve spatial resolutions in circumference of FOV.