1
|
Advanced approaches to imaging primary breast cancer: an update. Clin Transl Imaging 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-019-00346-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
2
|
Johnbeck CB, Knigge U, Langer SW, Loft A, Berthelsen AK, Federspiel B, Binderup T, Kjaer A. Prognostic Value of 18F-FLT PET in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison with 18F-FDG PET and Ki-67 in 100 Patients. J Nucl Med 2016; 57:1851-1857. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.174714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2016] [Accepted: 06/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
|
3
|
van Es SC, Venema CM, Glaudemans AWJM, Lub-de Hooge MN, Elias SG, Boellaard R, Hospers GAP, Schröder CP, de Vries EGE. Translation of New Molecular Imaging Approaches to the Clinical Setting: Bridging the Gap to Implementation. J Nucl Med 2016; 57 Suppl 1:96S-104S. [PMID: 26834109 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.157974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Molecular imaging with PET is a rapidly emerging technique. In breast cancer patients, more than 45 different PET tracers have been or are presently being tested. With a good rationale, after development of the tracer and proven feasibility, it is of interest to evaluate whether there is a potential meaningful role for the tracer in the clinical setting-such as in staging, in the (early) prediction of a treatment response, or in supporting drug choices. So far, only (18)F-FDG PET has been incorporated into breast cancer guidelines. For proof of the clinical relevance of tracers, especially for analysis in a multicenter setting, standardization of the technology and access to the novel PET tracer are required. However, resources for PET implementation research are limited. Therefore, next to randomized studies, novel approaches are required for proving the clinical value of PET tracers with the smallest possible number of patients. The aim of this review is to describe the process of the development of PET tracers and the level of evidence needed for the use of these tracers in breast cancer. Several breast cancer trials have been performed with the PET tracers (18)F-FDG, 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT), and (18)F-fluoroestradiol ((18)F-FES). We studied them to learn lessons for the implementation of novel tracers. After defining the gap between a good rationale for a tracer and implementation in the clinical setting, we propose solutions to fill the gap to try to bring more PET tracers to daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne C van Es
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Clasina M Venema
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Andor W J M Glaudemans
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn N Lub-de Hooge
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; and
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Geke A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Carolina P Schröder
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth G E de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cieslak JA, Sibenaller ZA, Walsh SA, Boles Ponto LL, Du J, Sunderland JJ, Cullen JJ. Fluorine-18-Labeled Thymidine Positron Emission Tomography (FLT-PET) as an Index of Cell Proliferation after Pharmacological Ascorbate-Based Therapy. Radiat Res 2016; 185:31-8. [PMID: 26720803 PMCID: PMC4720529 DOI: 10.1667/rr14203.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Pharmacological ascorbate (AscH(-)) induces cytotoxicity and oxidative stress selectively in pancreatic cancer cells compared with normal cells. Positron emission tomography (PET) with the thymidine analog 3'-deoxy-3'-((18)F) fluorothymidine (FLT) enables noninvasive imaging and quantification of the proliferation fraction of tumors. We hypothesized that the rate of tumor proliferation determined by FLT-PET imaging, would be inversely proportional to tumor susceptibility to pharmacological AscH(-)-based treatments. Indeed, there was decreased FLT uptake in human pancreatic cancer cells treated with AscH(-) in vitro, and this effect was abrogated by co-treatment with catalase. In separate experiments, cells were treated with AscH(-), ionizing radiation or a combination of both. These studies demonstrated that combined AscH(-) and radiation treatment resulted in a significant decrease in FLT uptake that directly correlated with decreased clonogenic survival. MicroPET (18)F-FLT scans of mice with pre-established tumors demonstrated that AscH(-) treatment induced radiosensitization compared to radiation treatment alone. These data support testing of pharmacological ascorbate as a radiosensitizer in pancreatic cancer as well as the use of FLT-PET to monitor response to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A. Cieslak
- Free Radical and Radiation Biology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Zita A. Sibenaller
- Free Radical and Radiation Biology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - Susan A. Walsh
- Free Radical and Radiation Biology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology
- Department of Small Animal Imaging Core, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Laura L. Boles Ponto
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
- Department of Small Animal Imaging Core, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Juan Du
- Free Radical and Radiation Biology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology
| | - John J. Sunderland
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Joseph J. Cullen
- Free Radical and Radiation Biology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
- Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, Iowa
- Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|