Optimization of attenuation and scatter corrections in sentinel lymph node scintigraphy using SPECT/CT systems

99mTc-labeled colloid SPECT/CT versus planar lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel lymph node detection in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT) and planar lymphoscintigraphy (PL) in patients with primary breast cancer, undergoing lymphoscintigraphy at initial staging. Specifically, we assessed the detection rate (DR) for sentinel lymph node (SLN), the absolute number of detected SLNs by each technique, and the proportion of patients with additional SLNs detected by one technique compared to the other one. Finally, we aimed to evaluate the impact of SPECT/CT on the surgical approach.

Methods

Original articles, providing a head-to-head comparison between SPECT/CT and PL, including patients with primary breast cancer at first presentation, were searched in PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases through March 31st, 2022. The DR of the imaging techniques was calculated on a per-patient analysis; studies were pooled on their odds ratios (ORs) with a random-effects model to assess the presence of a significant difference between the DRs of SPECT/CT and PL. The number of additional SLNs, calculated as relative risk (RR), and the pooled proportion of patients with additional SLNs using one imaging technique rather than the other one were investigated. The pooled ratio of surgical procedures (SLN harvesting) influenced by the use of SPECT/CT, according to the surgeons, was calculated.

Results

Sixteen studies with 2693 patients were eligible for the calculation of the DR of SPECT/CT and PL. The DR was 92.11% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 89.32–94.50%] for SPECT/CT, and 85.12% (95% CI 80.58–89.15%) for PL, with an OR of 1.96 (95% CI 1.51–2.55) in favor of SPECT/CT. There was a relative risk of detection of larger number of SLNs (RR: 1.22, 95% CI 1.14–1.32; 12 studies; 979 patients) for SPECT/CT (n = 3983) compared to PL (n = 3321) and a significant proportion of patients with additional SLNs detected by SPECT/CT, which were missed by PL (18.88%, 95% CI: 11.72%-27.27%; 13 studies). Four articles, with a total number of 1427 patients, revealed that 23.98% of the surgical procedures benefited from the use of SPECT/CT.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis favors SPECT/CT over PL for the identification of SLN in patients with primary breast cancer at staging due to higher DR, more SLNs depicted, and a significant proportion of subjects with additional detected SLNs by SPECT/CT compared to PL. Furthermore, SPECT/CT positively influences the surgical procedure. However, PL remains a satisfactory imaging option for imaging departments not equipped with SPECT/CT due to its good patient-based DR.

Comparison between planar, SPECT and SPECT/computed tomography systems in 99mTc- nanocolloid sentinel lymph node imaging: phantom design and clinical investigations

PURPOSE

It was aimed to examine the performance of planar, SPECT and SPECT/CT in lymph nodes detection of breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In-house made phantom was immersed in water-filled container. Disparate activities were injected into spheres emulating breast tumour (1.5 cm), and adjacent lymph nodes (1, 0.5 and 0.25 cm). Planar, SPECT and SPECT/CT scans were made at depths of 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 cm. Rose Criteria was employed to investigate the detectability in planar imaging, and contrast to noise ratios (CNRs) were used in SPECT and SPECT/CT images. SPECT and SPECT/CT of 20 patients were randomly incorporated in the current study.

RESULTS

CNR values from planar images at 1 cm depth for the simulated nodes of 1, 0.5and 0.25 cm were 36, 18 and 17, respectively. Whereas, those from SPECT/CT were 94.5, 63.3 and 20.9, repectively. CNRs from SPECT were lower than SPECT/CT in order of 60.1, 41.8 and 17.1 at the same depth. At 9 cm, CNR values of 1, 0.5 and 0.25 cm from the planar images were 14, 6 and 5, respectively. While CNR values from SPECT were higher as 53.6, 38.0, and 14.9, respectively, and the greatest CNRs were in SPECT/CT as 85.7, 55.8, and 19.1, repectively.

CONCLUSION

The CNR values in SPECT/CT were 1.5- and 3.5-folds higher than SPECT and planar imaging at depth range 1-9 cm. The patients study exhibited larger SPECT/CT CNRs over SPECT as great as 1.6-fold.

Sentinel-node mapping in endometrial cancer patients: comparing SPECT/CT, gamma-probe and dye

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare preoperative SPECT/CT with gamma-probe and methylene blue-dye (MBD) in the identification of sentinel lymph node (SLN) in early stage endometrial cancer.

METHODS

40 stage-I EC patients (66.7 ± 9.7 years) underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. After about 3 h from Tc-99m-albumin nanocolloid cervical injection, all patients underwent SPECT/CT study. MBD was injected into the cervix just before surgery under general anesthesia. All patients underwent SLN biopsy, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and radical regional lymphadenectomy. SPECT/CT findings were compared to those of gamma-probe and MBD techniques.

RESULTS

In 2 patients no nodal migration was observed, neither with MBD nor radiotracer. Detection rate of at least one SLN was 90% (36/40 patients) with SPECT/CT, 88% (35/40) intra-operatively with gamma-probe and 80% (32/40) with MBD. Only in 7/40 patients a bilateral migration was obtained with all considered modalities. In particular, bilateral detection was achieved in 26 patients with SPECT/CT, in 24 with gamma-probe and in 10 patients with MBD. The concordance site between SPECT/CT and intraoperative gamma-probe was 73% (29/40 patients: 2 without migration, 21 bilateral and 6 monolateral SLNs); while concordance site with MBD was found in 40% (16/40: 8 bilateral, 6 monolateral SLNs, 2 without SLNs). Overall, 628 LNs were dissected (mean 18 LNs per patient). The median number of SLNs removed was 2 (mean 2.5 per patient). Out of 91 SLNs: 43 were "hot and blue (HB)", 10 were blue only and 38 were hot only. LN metastases rate was 16%: 9/90 SLNs (7 HB, 2 hot only) were positive for metastases in 6 patients. Four non-SLNs were found positive in 3 patients, and all presented concomitant positive SLNs. False negative rate was 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

SPECT/CT had the highest detection rate and achieved the highest rate of bilateral mapping, compared to gamma-probe and MDB. SPECT/CT had moderate concordance with gamma-probe, and it can help the intraoperative detection of SLNs providing important information about their anatomic location.

The hidden sentinel node in breast cancer: Reevaluating the role of SPECT/CT and tracer reinjection

INTRODUCTION

Lymphoscintigraphy with planar imaging is considered a helpful tool to depict lymph node drainage in patients with invasive breast cancer. Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography with integrated CT (SPECT/CT) is usually performed to detect sentinel nodes (SN)s in breast cancer patients showing non-visualisation on lymphoscintigraphy. Incorporation of new SN indications (recurrent surgery, previous radiotherapy, or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy) has led to an increase of non-visualisation rates. The present study evaluates the contribution of SPECT/CT and tracer reinjection for SN-visualisation in breast cancer patients without drainage on lymphoscintigraphy.

METHODS

Between 1st of July 2008 and 6th of November 2014 in total 1968 patients underwent a SN breast procedure, using intra-tumoural tracer administration. SPECT/CT was performed in 284 breast cancer patients with non-visualisation of SNs on lymphoscintigraphy. If SN non-visualisation persisted, a second radiotracer injection with repeated imaging was performed when logistics allowed this. Univariate analysis was applied to evaluate SPECT/CT visualisation rates in specific subgroups.

RESULTS

The SPECT/CT visualisation rate was 23.2% (66/284). Univariate analysis revealed no significant subgroups influencing SPECT/CT visualisation. In patients receiving reinjection after persistent SPECT/CT non-visualisation the SN-visualisation rate reached 62.1% (36/58). Intraoperatively, the SN-identification rate using a gamma probe and blue dye was 87.9% (175/199) and 32.9% (28/85) for, respectively, primary and recurrent surgery after non-visualisation on lymphoscintigraphy.

CONCLUSION

In this evaluation including new breast cancer SN indications, SPECT/CT scored lower than reinjection to visualise SNs in patients with non-visualisation on lymphoscintigraphy. Consequently, our institutional protocol has been readjusted.