Diagnostic value of metabolic heterogeneity as a reliable parameter for differentiating malignant parotid gland tumors

Diagnostic imaging of salivary gland cancers: REFCOR recommendations by the formal consensus method

OBJECTIVE

To define the indications for each imaging modality in the screening, characterization, extension and follow-up of salivary gland tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The French Network of Rare Head and Neck Tumors (REFCOR) formed a steering group who drafted a narrative review of the literature published on Medline and proposed recommendations. The level of adherence to the recommendations was then assessed by a rating group, according to the formal consensus method.

RESULTS

If a swelling of a salivary gland is palpable for 3 weeks, an ultrasound scan is recommended to confirm a tumoral lesion and rule out differential diagnoses. For a salivary gland tumor, MRI is recommended with diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced techniques. In the case of histologically proven malignancy or a highly suspicious lesion, a CT scan of the neck and chest is recommended to assess the tumor, lymph nodes and metastases. FDG-PET is not currently recommended in routine clinical practice for initial diagnosis, assessment of extension, evaluation of response to treatment, staging of recurrence, or follow-up of salivary gland tumors.

CONCLUSION

Assessing salivary tumors is based on MRI. Extension assessment is based on neck and chest CT.

Management of Salivary Gland Malignancy: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations for practicing physicians and other healthcare providers on the management of salivary gland malignancy.

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, neuroradiology, pathology, and patient advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 2000 through 2020. Outcomes of interest included survival, diagnostic accuracy, disease recurrence, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 293 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Six main clinical questions were addressed, which included subquestions on preoperative evaluations, surgical diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, appropriate radiotherapy techniques, the role of systemic therapy, and follow-up evaluations.

RECOMMENDATIONS

When possible, evidence-based recommendations were developed to address the diagnosis and appropriate preoperative evaluations for patients with a salivary gland malignancy, therapeutic procedures, and appropriate treatment options in various salivary gland histologies.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines.

Diagnostic Value of Conventional PET Parameters and Radiomic Features Extracted from 18F-FDG-PET/CT for Histologic Subtype Classification and Characterization of Lung Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Aim: To evaluate if conventional Positron emission tomography (PET) parameters and radiomic features (RFs) extracted by 18F-FDG-PET/CT can differentiate among different histological subtypes of lung neuroendocrine neoplasms (Lu-NENs). Methods: Forty-four naïve-treatment patients on whom 18F-FDG-PET/CT was performed for histologically confirmed Lu-NEN (n = 46) were retrospectively included. Manual segmentation was performed by two operators allowing for extraction of four conventional PET parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)) and 41 RFs. Lu-NENs were classified into two groups: lung neuroendocrine tumors (Lu-NETs) vs. lung neuroendocrine carcinomas (Lu-NECs). Lu-NETs were classified according to histological subtypes (typical (TC)/atypical carcinoid (AC)), Ki67-level, and TNM staging. The least absolute shrink age and selection operator (LASSO) method was used to select the most predictive RFs for classification and Pearson correlation analysis was performed between conventional PET parameters and selected RFs. Results: PET parameters, in particular, SUVmax (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.91; cut-off = 5.16) were higher in Lu-NECs vs. Lu-NETs (p < 0.001). Among RFs, HISTO_Entropy_log10 was the most predictive (AUC = 0.90), but correlated with SUVmax/SUVmean (r = 0.95/r = 0.94, respectively). No statistical differences were found between conventional PET parameters and RFs (p > 0.05) and TC vs. AC classification. Conventional PET parameters were correlated with N+ status in Lu-NETs. Conclusion: In our study, conventional PET parameters were able to distinguish Lu-NECs from Lu-NETs, but not TC from AC. RFs did not provide additional information.

Diagnostic value of positron-emission tomography textural indices for malignancy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-avid adrenal lesions

BACKGROUND

PET Textural indices could have an add-on diagnostic value for diagnosis of malignancy in patients with FDG-avid adrenal lesions.

METHODS

Consecutive patients referred for a FDG-PET/CT to our nuclear medicine department from June 2012 to June 2017 were retrospectively screened. Inclusion criteria were: patients with a FDG-avid adrenal lesion (uptake≥liver background); malignant/benign lesion confirmed histologically or with follow-up imaging examination. Pheochromocytomas were not included in the analysis. For each adrenal lesion, 5 quantitative PET parameters (SUV<inf>max</inf>, MTV, TLG, TLR<inf>max</inf> and TLRmean<inf>)</inf> were calculated. Thirty-seven textural indices were extracted using LIFEx software^®. Diagnostic performance to determine malignancy was assessed with a ROC analysis. Parameters with a significantly AUC>0.5 were selected and groups of highly correlated (r>0.8) parameters were created. A scoring system combining PET and textural indices was examined.

RESULTS

PET textural indices were calculated for 53 lesions (37 malignant, 16 benign). Three PET metabolic parameters (SUV<inf>max</inf>, TLR<inf>max</inf>, TLRmean) and 13 textural indices had an AUC>0.5. Seven groups of highly correlated parameters (r>0.8) were extracted. For PET parameters, SUV<inf>max</inf> had the best AUC (0.89 95% CI [0.79-0.98]; cut-off=7.0). For textural indices, ZLNU had the best AUC (0.87 95% CI [0.78-0.96]; cut-off=34.7) and specificity of 100%. Three scores combining the best four textural indices alone (Contrast<inf>GLCM</inf>, LRHGE, SZE and ZLNU) or with one PET parameters (SUV<inf>max</inf>, TLR<inf>max</inf>) were developed but did not increase the diagnostic performance (AUC≤0.89). ZLNU was the best parameter to distinguish primary adrenal cancer from adrenal metastases in malignant lesions (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlighted excellent diagnostic performance of several PET textural indices comparable to that of PET metabolic parameters. However, our results did not find any additional diagnostic value of textural indices when combined with metabolic parameters.

Radiomics in Oncological PET/CT: Clinical Applications

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is widely used for staging, evaluating treatment response, and predicting prognosis in malignant diseases. FDG uptake and volumetric PET parameters such as metabolic tumor volume have been used and are still used as conventional PET parameters to assess biological characteristics of tumors. However, in recent years, additional features derived from PET images by computational processing have been found to reflect intratumoral heterogeneity, which is related to biological tumor features, and to provide additional predictive and prognostic information, which leads to the concept of radiomics. In this review, we focus on recent clinical studies of malignant diseases that investigated intratumoral heterogeneity on PET/CT, and we discuss its clinical role in various cancers.