Up-front F18-FDG PET/CT in suspected salivary gland carcinoma

Indications for Submandibulectomy Within a 20-Year Period

Purpose: Different pathologies of the submandibular gland are an indication of submandibular gland excision-ranging from inflammatory causes and sialolithiasis to malignant tumors. The purpose of this study was to get an overview of the different indications for submandibular gland excision. Methods: The main goal of this study was to evaluate the different indications for submandibular gland excision during a 20-year period. In addition, epidemiological information and therapy concepts were investigated with a special focus on Tumor Lymph nodes Metastasis (TNM) classification and recurrence rate. Procedures during which the submandibular gland was removed while not being the primary cause for surgery (eg, neck dissection in Level Ib) were not included. Results: During the period of observation, 359 submandibular gland excisions were performed. The most common cause for submandibular gland excision was sialolithiasis (n = 129) with intraparenchymal stone localization. Up next were inflammatory causes (n = 115) in particular chronic submandibular sialadenitis followed by only a few cases of Sjögren's syndrome, sarcoidosis, and tuberculosis. In 115 cases, surgery was performed for tumors of the submandibular gland, with 88 of them being benign and 27 malignant. Malignancies were then divided into lymphomas (n = 9) and primary salivary gland malignancies (n = 18). Conclusion: This retrospective study of a large cohort of patients displays a representative overview of the indications for submandibular gland excision. Sialolithiasis was the most common underlying cause of gland excision. The malignancy rate in our cohort was lower than described in the literature.

Lymph node surgery for salivary gland cancer: REFCOR recommendations by the formal consensus method

OBJECTIVE

To determine the indications for neck dissection in the management of parotid, submandibular or minor salivary gland cancers depending on the clinical situation: i.e., clinical lymph node involvement (cN+) or not (cN0); low or high risk of occult nodal metastasis; diagnosis of malignancy before, during or after surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The French Network of Rare Head and Neck Tumors (REFCOR) formed a steering group which drafted a narrative review of the literature published on Medline and proposed recommendations. The level of adherence to the recommendations was then assessed by a rating group according to the formal consensus method.

RESULTS

In cN+ salivary gland cancer, ipsilateral neck dissection is recommended. In cN0 salivary gland cancer, ipsilateral neck dissection is recommended, except for tumors at low risk of occult nodal metastasis. If definitive pathology reveals a high risk of occult nodal involvement, additional neck treatment is recommended: ipsilateral neck dissection or elective nodal irradiation.

CONCLUSION

The rate of occult lymph node involvement, and therefore the indication for elective neck dissection, depends primarily on the pathologic grade of the salivary gland cancer.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging and Post-Therapy Assessment of Head and Neck Cancer

Imaging of head and neck cancer at initial staging and as part of post-treatment surveillance is a key component of patient care as it guides treatment strategy and aids determination of prognosis. Head and neck cancer includes a heterogenous group of malignancies encompassing several anatomic sites and histologies, with squamous cell carcinoma the most common. Together this comprises the seventh most common cancer worldwide. At initial staging comprehensive imaging delineating the anatomic extent of the primary site, while also assessing the nodal involvement of the neck is necessary. The treatment of head and neck cancer often includes a combination of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Post-treatment imaging is tailored for the evaluation of treatment response and early detection of local, locoregional, and distant recurrent tumor. Cross-sectional imaging with CT or MRI is recommended for the detailed anatomic delineation of the primary site. PET/CT provides complementary metabolic information and can map systemic involvement. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Salivary gland carcinoma in children and adolescents: The EXPeRT/PARTNER diagnosis and treatment recommendations

Salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) are rare during childhood and adolescence. Consequently, no standardized recommendations for the diagnosis and therapeutic management of pediatric SGC are available, and pediatric oncologists and surgeons generally follow adult guidelines. Complete surgical resection with adequate margins constitutes the cornerstone of treatment. However, the indications and modalities of adjuvant therapy remain controversial and may be challenging in view of the potential long-term toxicities in the pediatric population. This paper presents the consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of children and adolescents with SGCs, established by the European Cooperative Study Group for Pediatric Rare Tumors (EXPeRT) within the EU-funded PARTNER project (Paediatric Rare Tumours Network - European Registry).

Effective combination of 3 imaging modalities in differentiating between malignant and benign palatal lesions

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can effectively differentiate between malignant and benign palatal lesions.

STUDY DESIGN

In total, 59 patients with palatal lesions (32 malignant and 27 benign), who underwent CT, MRI, and/or PET/CT imaging examinations and had histopathological diagnoses, were divided into an analysis group (n = 46) and a validation group (n = 13). Bone changes adjacent to the lesion, MRI signal intensity, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), time to peak enhancement (T_peak), and maximum standardized uptake values (SUV_max) were evaluated in the analysis group. Diagnostic performance was individually assessed for each parameter for differentiating between malignant and benign lesions. A diagnostic decision tree was constructed by using useful parameters and its accuracy tested in the validation group.

RESULTS

The frequency distribution of bone change types and T_peak differed significantly between malignant and benign lesions. The ADC of malignant lymphoma was significantly lower than that of other lesions. The other parameters did not distinguish between lesion types. The accuracy of the decision tree, constructed by using bone change types, ADC, and T_peak, was 87.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone change types, ADC values, and T_peak are useful for differentiating between malignant and benign palatal lesions.