1
|
Cho H, Byun SS, Son NH, Chung JI, Seo WI, Lee CH, Morgan TM, Han KH, Chung JS. Impact of Circulating Tumor Cell-Expressed Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen and Prostate-Specific Antigen Transcripts in Different Stages of Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:1788-1800. [PMID: 38587547 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-3083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based images, which visually quantify PSMA expression, are used to determine prostate cancer micrometastases. This study evaluated whether a circulating tumor cell (CTC)-based transcript platform, including PSMA mRNA, could help identify potential prognostic markers in prostate cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We prospectively enrolled 21 healthy individuals and 247 patients with prostate cancer [localized prostate cancer (LPCa), n = 94; metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), n = 44; and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), n = 109]. The mRNA expression of six transcripts [PSMA, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), AR, AR-V7, EpCAM, and KRT 19] from CTCs was measured, and their relationship with biochemical recurrence (BCR) in LPCa and mCRPC progression-free survival (PFS) rate in mHSPC was assessed. PSA-PFS and radiological-PFS were also calculated to identify potential biomarkers for predicting androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) and taxane-based chemotherapy resistance in mCRPC. RESULTS CTC detection rates were 75.5%, 95.3%, and 98.0% for LPCa, mHSPC, and mCRPC, respectively. In LPCa, PSMA [hazard ratio (HR), 3.35; P = 0.028) and PSA mRNA (HR, 1.42; P = 0.047] expressions were associated with BCR. Patients with mHSPC with high PSMA (HR, 4.26; P = 0.020) and PSA mRNA (HR, 3.52; P = 0.042) expressions showed significantly worse mCRPC-PFS rates than those with low expression. Increased PSA and PSMA mRNA expressions were significantly associated with shorter PSA-PFS and radiological PFS in mCPRC, indicating an association with drug resistance. CONCLUSIONS PSMA and PSA mRNA expressions are associated with BCR in LPCa. In advanced prostate cancer, PSMA and PSA mRNA can also predict rapid progression from mHSPC to mCRPC and ARSI or taxane-based chemotherapy resistance.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Male
- Neoplastic Cells, Circulating/metabolism
- Neoplastic Cells, Circulating/pathology
- Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood
- Aged
- Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II/genetics
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Biomarkers, Tumor/blood
- Antigens, Surface/genetics
- Antigens, Surface/metabolism
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Staging
- Prognosis
- RNA, Messenger/genetics
- Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology
- Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics
- Prostatic Neoplasms/blood
- Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality
- Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/genetics
- Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology
- Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/blood
- Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy
- Aged, 80 and over
- Prospective Studies
- Kallikreins/blood
- Kallikreins/genetics
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyungseok Cho
- Department of Nanoscience and Engineering Center for Nano Manufacturing, Inje University, Gimhae, South Korea
| | - Seok-Soo Byun
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Nak-Hoon Son
- Department of Statistics, Keimyung University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Jae Il Chung
- Department of Urology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Busan, South Korea
| | - Won Ik Seo
- Department of Urology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Busan, South Korea
| | - Chan Ho Lee
- Department of Urology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Busan, South Korea
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Ki-Ho Han
- Department of Nanoscience and Engineering Center for Nano Manufacturing, Inje University, Gimhae, South Korea
| | - Jae-Seung Chung
- Department of Urology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University, Busan, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tsuchiya N, Kimura K, Tateishi U, Watabe T, Hatano K, Uemura M, Nonomura N, Shimizu A. Detection support of lesions in patients with prostate cancer using [Formula: see text]-PSMA 1007 PET/CT. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2024:10.1007/s11548-024-03067-5. [PMID: 38329565 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-024-03067-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study proposes a detection support system for primary and metastatic lesions of prostate cancer using [Formula: see text]-PSMA 1007 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images with non-image information, including patient metadata and location information of an input slice image. METHODS A convolutional neural network with condition generators and feature-wise linear modulation (FiLM) layers was employed to allow input of not only PET/CT images but also non-image information, namely, Gleason score, flag of pre- or post-prostatectomy, and normalized z-coordinate of an input slice. We explored the insertion position of the FiLM layers to optimize the conditioning of the network using non-image information. RESULTS [Formula: see text]-PSMA 1007 PET/CT images were collected from 163 patients with prostate cancer and applied to the proposed system in a threefold cross-validation manner to evaluate the performance. The proposed system achieved a Dice score of 0.5732 (per case) and sensitivity of 0.8200 (per lesion), which are 3.87 and 4.16 points higher than the network without non-image information. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated the effectiveness of the use of non-image information, including metadata of the patient and location information of the input slice image, in the detection of prostate cancer from [Formula: see text]-PSMA 1007 PET/CT images. Improvement in the sensitivity of inactive and small lesions remains a future challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoki Tsuchiya
- Institute of Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Koganei, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Koichiro Kimura
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo City, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ukihide Tateishi
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo City, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tadashi Watabe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Tracer Kinetics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Hatano
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Motohide Uemura
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Norio Nonomura
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akinobu Shimizu
- Institute of Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Koganei, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grawe F, Blom F, Winkelmann M, Burgard C, Schmid-Tannwald C, Unterrainer LM, Sheikh GT, Pfitzinger PL, Kazmierczak P, Cyran CC, Ricke J, Stief CG, Bartenstein P, Ruebenthaler J, Fabritius MP, Geyer T. Reliability and practicability of PSMA-RADS 1.0 for structured reporting of PSMA-PET/CT scans in prostate cancer patients. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:1157-1166. [PMID: 37624414 PMCID: PMC10853294 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10083-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES As structured reporting is increasingly used in the evaluation of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) for prostate cancer, there is a need to assess the reliability of these frameworks. This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and interreader agreement among readers with varying levels of experience using PSMA-RADS 1.0 for interpreting PSMA-PET/CT scans, even when blinded to clinical data, and therefore to determine the feasibility of implementing this reporting system in clinical practice. METHODS PSMA-PET/CT scans of 103 patients were independently evaluated by 4 readers with different levels of experience according to the reporting and data system (RADS) for PSMA-PET/CT imaging PSMA-RADS 1.0 at 2 time points within 6 weeks. For each scan, a maximum of five target lesions were freely chosen and stratified according to PSMA-RADS 1.0. Overall scan score and compartment-based scores were assessed. Intra- and interreader agreement was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS PSMA-RADS 1.0 demonstrated excellent interreader agreement for both overall scan scores (ICC ≥ 0.91) and compartment-based scores (ICC ≥ 0.93) across all four readers. The framework showed excellent intrareader agreement for overall scan scores (ICC ≥ 0.86) and compartment-based scores (ICC ≥ 0.95), even among readers with varying levels of experience. CONCLUSIONS PSMA-RADS 1.0 is a reliable method for assessing PSMA-PET/CT with strong consistency and agreement among readers. It shows great potential for establishing a standard approach to diagnosing and planning treatment for prostate cancer patients, and can be used confidently even by readers with less experience. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT This study underlines that PSMA-RADS 1.0 is a valuable and highly reliable scoring system for PSMA-PET/CT scans of prostate cancer patients and can be used confidently by radiologists with different levels of experience in routine clinical practice. KEY POINTS PSMA-RADS version 1.0 is a scoring system for PSMA-PET/CT scans. Its reproducibility needs to be analyzed in order to make it applicable to clinical practice. Excellent interreader and intrareader agreement for overall scan scores and compartment-based scores using PSMA-RADS 1.0 were seen in readers with varying levels of experience. PSMA-RADS 1.0 is a reliable tool for accurately diagnosing and planning treatment for prostate cancer patients, and can be used confidently in clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freba Grawe
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Franziska Blom
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Winkelmann
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Caroline Burgard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Kirrberger Str., Geb. 50, 66421, Homburg, Germany
| | - Christine Schmid-Tannwald
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Gabriel T Sheikh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Paulo L Pfitzinger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Kirrberger Str., Geb. 50, 66421, Homburg, Germany
| | - Philipp Kazmierczak
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Clemens C Cyran
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian G Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Ruebenthaler
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias P Fabritius
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Geyer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ouvrard E, Kaseb A, Poterszman N, Porot C, Somme F, Imperiale A. Nuclear medicine imaging for bone metastases assessment: what else besides bone scintigraphy in the era of personalized medicine? Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 10:1320574. [PMID: 38288299 PMCID: PMC10823373 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1320574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Accurate detection and reliable assessment of therapeutic responses in bone metastases are imperative for guiding treatment decisions, preserving quality of life, and ultimately enhancing overall survival. Nuclear imaging has historically played a pivotal role in this realm, offering a diverse range of radiotracers and imaging modalities. While the conventional bone scan using 99mTc marked bisphosphonates has remained widely utilized, its diagnostic performance is hindered by certain limitations. Positron emission tomography, particularly when coupled with computed tomography, provides improved spatial resolution and diagnostic performance with various pathology-specific radiotracers. This review aims to evaluate the performance of different nuclear imaging modalities in clinical practice for detecting and monitoring the therapeutic responses in bone metastases of diverse origins, addressing their limitations and implications for image interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Ouvrard
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Ashjan Kaseb
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nathan Poterszman
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Clémence Porot
- Radiopharmacy, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
| | - Francois Somme
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Alessio Imperiale
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), University Hospitals of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- IPHC, UMR 7178, CNRS/Unistra, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Seifert R, Gafita A, Telli T, Voter A, Herrmann K, Pomper M, Hadaschik B, Rowe SP, Fendler WP. Standardized PSMA-PET Imaging of Advanced Prostate Cancer. Semin Nucl Med 2024; 54:60-68. [PMID: 37573199 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
Imaging of advanced prostate cancer is a challenging task, as it requires longitudinal characterization of disease extent in a standardized way to enable appropriate treatment selection and evaluation of treatment efficacy. In the last years, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT has become the reference standard examination for patients with advanced prostate cancer. Together with the rise of PSMA-PET, standardized frameworks for the reporting of image findings have been proposed, eg, the Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE) and the structured reporting system for PSMA targeted PET imaging (PSMA-RADS) framework. Therefore, recent evidence on PSMA-PET derived tumor volume as useful a biomarker for outcome prognostication and related frameworks will be discussed in the article. The PROMISE framework recommends quantifying the tumor volume per-organ system, which accounts for the fact that the location of the metastases greatly influence its biological aggressiveness. In addition, changes in PSMA-PET derived tumor volume have been shown to be promising biomarkers for response assessment. Limitations of PSMA-PET will also be discussed because the tumor volume might not always be suited for response assessment. As a pitfall of PSMA-based systems, decreasing PSMA-expression might erroneously be interpreted as response to therapy. Also, especially for patients with limited disease, the tumor volume might not be ideal for response assessment. Therefore, various frameworks have been introduced to objectively measure response to therapy with PSMA-PET. Amongst these, the PSMA-PET progression (PPP) criteria and the response evaluation criteria in PSMA (RECIP) are optimized for earlier and later phenotypes of advanced prostate cancer, respectively. Variables needed to determine PPP or RECIP outcome on PSMA-PET are recorded under the umbrella of PROMISE recommendations. In this article, various reporting and response assessment frameworks are explained and discussed. Also, recent evidence for the relevance of PSMA-PET biomarkers for clinical management and outcome prognostication are shown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Seifert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - A Gafita
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - T Telli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Andrew Voter
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - K Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Pomper
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - B Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Steven P Rowe
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - W P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eveslage M, Rassek P, Riegel A, Maksoud Z, Bauer J, Görlich D, Noto B. Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Treatment Response Assessment in Osteoblastic Metastases-A Repeatability Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3757. [PMID: 37568573 PMCID: PMC10417276 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is a candidate marker of treatment response in osteoblastic metastases that are not evaluable by morphologic imaging. However, it is unclear whether the ADC meets the basic requirement for reliable treatment response evaluation, namely a low variance of repeated measurements in relation to the differences found between viable and nonviable metastases. The present study addresses this question by analyzing repeated in vivo ADCmedian measurements of 65 osteoblastic metastases in nine patients, as well as phantom measurements. PSMA-PET served as a surrogate for bone metastasis viability. Measures quantifying repeatability were calculated and differences in mean ADC values according to PSMA-PET status were examined. The relative repeatability coefficient %RC of ADCmedian measurements was 5.8% and 12.9% for phantom and in vivo measurements, respectively. ADCmedian values of bone metastases ranged from 595×10-6mm2/s to 2090×10-6mm2/s with an average of 63% higher values in nonviable metastases compared with viable metastases (p < 0.001). ADC shows a small repeatability coefficient in relation to the difference in ADC values between viable and nonviable metastases. Therefore, ADC measurements fulfill the technical prerequisite for reliable treatment response evaluation in osteoblastic metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Eveslage
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Philipp Rassek
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Arne Riegel
- Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Ziad Maksoud
- Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Jochen Bauer
- Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Dennis Görlich
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Benjamin Noto
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
- Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim M, Seifert R, Fragemann J, Kersting D, Murray J, Jonske F, Pomykala KL, Egger J, Fendler WP, Herrmann K, Kleesiek J. Evaluation of thresholding methods for the quantification of [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET molecular tumor volume and their effect on survival prediction in patients with advanced prostate cancer undergoing [ 177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:2196-2209. [PMID: 36859618 PMCID: PMC10199857 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06163-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the effect of thresholding algorithms used in computer vision for the quantification of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PET) derived tumor volume (PSMA-TV) in patients with advanced prostate cancer. The results were validated with respect to the prognostication of overall survival in patients with advanced-stage prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 78 patients who underwent [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radionuclide therapy from January 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively included in this study. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET images, acquired prior to radionuclide therapy, were used for the analysis of thresholding algorithms. All PET images were first analyzed semi-automatically using a pre-evaluated, proprietary software solution as the baseline method. Subsequently, five histogram-based thresholding methods and two local adaptive thresholding methods that are well established in computer vision were applied to quantify molecular tumor volume. The resulting whole-body molecular tumor volumes were validated with respect to the prognostication of overall patient survival as well as their statistical correlation to the baseline methods and their performance on standardized phantom scans. RESULTS The whole-body PSMA-TVs, quantified using different thresholding methods, demonstrate a high positive correlation with the baseline methods. We observed the highest correlation with generalized histogram thresholding (GHT) (Pearson r (r), p value (p): r = 0.977, p < 0.001) and Sauvola thresholding (r = 0.974, p < 0.001) and the lowest correlation with Multiotsu (r = 0.877, p < 0.001) and Yen thresholding methods (r = 0.878, p < 0.001). The median survival time of all patients was 9.87 months (95% CI [9.3 to 10.13]). Stratification by median whole-body PSMA-TV resulted in a median survival time from 11.8 to 13.5 months for the patient group with lower tumor burden and 6.5 to 6.6 months for the patient group with higher tumor burden. The patient group with lower tumor burden had significantly higher probability of survival (p < 0.00625) in eight out of nine thresholding methods (Fig. 2); those methods were SUVmax50 (p = 0.0038), SUV ≥3 (p = 0.0034), Multiotsu (p = 0.0015), Yen (p = 0.0015), Niblack (p = 0.001), Sauvola (p = 0.0001), Otsu (p = 0.0053), and Li thresholding (p = 0.0053). CONCLUSION Thresholding methods commonly used in computer vision are promising tools for the semiautomatic quantification of whole-body PSMA-TV in [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-PET. The proposed algorithm-driven thresholding strategy is less arbitrary and less prone to biases than thresholding with predefined values, potentially improving the application of whole-body PSMA-TV as an imaging biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moon Kim
- Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Robert Seifert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jana Fragemann
- Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - David Kersting
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jacob Murray
- Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Frederic Jonske
- Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Cancer Research Center Cologne Essen (CCCE), Essen, Germany
| | - Kelsey L Pomykala
- Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jan Egger
- Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jens Kleesiek
- Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Cancer Research Center Cologne Essen (CCCE), Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Duncan I, Ingold N, Martinez-Marroquin E, Paterson C. An Australian experience using Tc-PSMA SPECT/CT in the primary diagnosis of prostate cancer and for staging at biochemical recurrence after local therapy. Prostate 2023; 83:970-979. [PMID: 37051636 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technetium 99 prostate-specific membrane antigen (Tc-PSMA) single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) has the potential to provide greater accessibility globally than gallium 68 (Ga)-PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/CT but has not been studied as extensively in primary diagnosis, staging, or relapse of prostate cancer (PC). We instituted a novel SPECT/CT reconstruction algorithm using Tc-PSMA and established a database to prospectively accumulate data on all patients referred with PC. This study extracts data on all patients referred over a 3.5-year period with the primary aim of comparing the diagnostic accuracy of Tc-PSMA and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the primary diagnosis of PC. The secondary aim was to assess the sensitivity of Tc-PSMA in detecting disease with relapse after either radical prostatectomy or primary radiotherapy. METHODS A total of 425 men referred for primary staging (PS) of PC and 172 men referred with biochemical relapse (BCR) were evaluated. We evaluated diagnostic accuracy and correlations between Tc-PSMA SPECT/CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), prostate biopsy, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and age in the PS group and positivity rates at different PSA levels in the BCR group. RESULTS Taking the biopsy's grade according to the International Society of Urological Pathology protocol as a reference, the sensitivity (true positive rate), specificity (true negative rate), accuracy (positive and negative predictive value), and precision (positive predictive value) for Tc-PSMA in the PS group were 99.7%, 83.3%, 99.4%, and 99.7%, respectively. Comparison rates for MRI in this group were 96.4%, 71.4%, 95.7%, and 99.1%. We found moderate correlations between Tc-PSMA uptake in the prostate and biopsy grade, the presence of metastases, and PSA. In BCR, the Tc-PSMA positive rates were 38.9%, 53.2%, 62.5%, and 84.6% at PSA levels of <0.2, 0.2 to <0.5, 0.5 to <1.0, and > 1.0 ng/mL respectively. CONCLUSIONS We have shown that Tc-PSMA SPECT/CT using an enhanced reconstruction algorithm has a diagnostic performance similar to Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI in an everyday clinical setting. It may have some advantages in cost, sensitivity for primary lesion detection, and the ability for intraoperative localization of lymph nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iain Duncan
- Garran Medical Imaging, Garran, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Nicholas Ingold
- Garran Medical Imaging, Garran, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | | | - Catherine Paterson
- University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fendler WP, Eiber M, Beheshti M, Bomanji J, Calais J, Ceci F, Cho SY, Fanti S, Giesel FL, Goffin K, Haberkorn U, Jacene H, Koo PJ, Kopka K, Krause BJ, Lindenberg L, Marcus C, Mottaghy FM, Oprea-Lager DE, Osborne JR, Piert M, Rowe SP, Schöder H, Wan S, Wester HJ, Hope TA, Herrmann K. PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM procedure guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for prostate cancer imaging 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:1466-1486. [PMID: 36604326 PMCID: PMC10027805 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-06089-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 95.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Here we aim to provide updated guidance and standards for the indication, acquisition, and interpretation of PSMA PET/CT for prostate cancer imaging. Procedures and characteristics are reported for a variety of available PSMA small radioligands. Different scenarios for the clinical use of PSMA-ligand PET/CT are discussed. This document provides clinicians and technicians with the best available evidence, to support the implementation of PSMA PET/CT imaging in research and routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Marburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mohsen Beheshti
- Division of Molecular Imaging & Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Jamshed Bomanji
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostics, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Steve Y Cho
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | - Frederik L Giesel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karolien Goffin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Leuven, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Uwe Haberkorn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heather Jacene
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA
| | | | - Klaus Kopka
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- School of Science, Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Bernd J Krause
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Liza Lindenberg
- Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Charles Marcus
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Felix M Mottaghy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph R Osborne
- Department of Radiology, Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Morand Piert
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Steven P Rowe
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Simon Wan
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hans-Jürgen Wester
- Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Walther-Meißner-Str. 3, 85748, Garching, Germany
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ke ZB, Chen SM, Chen JY, Chen SH, You Q, Sun JB, Xue YT, Sun XL, Wu XH, Zheng QS, Wei Y, Xue XY, Xu N. Head-to-head comparisons of [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, multiparametric MRI, and prostate-specific antigen for the evaluation of therapeutic responses to neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy in high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer patients: a prospective study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:1240-1251. [PMID: 36416906 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-06047-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The optimal tool to evaluate the tumour therapeutic responses to neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) in patients with high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) remains uncertain. We compared the role of [68Ga]-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 positron emission tomography/computerized tomography ([68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT), multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and assessed the practical value of the recent European Association of Urology and European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EAU/EANM) recommended criteria of PSMA PET/CT to evaluate the therapeutic responses to NCHT in patients with high-risk non-metastatic PCa. METHODS This prospective study included 72 high-risk non-metastatic PCa patients receiving NCHT followed by radical prostatectomy from June 2021 to March 2022. PSA testing, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, and mpMRI scanning were conducted in all patients before and after NCHT. Therapeutic responses to NCHT were evaluated with PSA, RECIST 1.1, PERCIST 1.0, and EAU/EANM recommended criteria. Postoperative pathological results were considered the reference standard. A favourable pathological response was defined as pathologic complete remission (pCR) or minimal residual disease (MRD). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and Cohen's kappa index. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent predictive value of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-derived parameters. RESULTS All cases experienced a marked decrease in PSA levels after NCHT. Twenty-four (33.33%) cases experienced a favourable pathological response, including five (6.94%) cases of pCR and 19 (26.39%) cases of MRD. According to the results of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, EAU/EANM recommended criteria indicated that 20 (27.78%) cases had a CR, whereas PERCIST 1.0 criteria indicated that 23 (31.94%) cases had a CR. There was a strong association between EAU/EANM recommended criteria and PERCIST 1.0 criteria (Pearson's R=0.857). The sensitivity (75.00%, 79.17% vs. 58.33%, 58.33%), specificity (95.83%, 91.67% vs. 83.33%, 68.75%), PLR (18.00, 9.50 vs. 3.50, 1.87), NLR (0.26, 0.23 vs. 0.50, 0.61), PPV (90.0%, 82.6% vs. 63.6%, 48.3%), and NPV (88.5%, 89.8% vs. 80.0%, 76.7%) of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (including EAU/EANM recommended criteria and PERCIST 1.0 criteria) to predict favourable pathological responses were all superior to those of mpMRI and nadir PSA. The kappa index to predict a favourable pathological response was 0.257 for PSA, 0.426 for RECIST 1.1, 0.716 for PERCIST 1.0, and 0.739 for EAU/EANM recommended criteria. Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that the post-NCHT maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) before radical prostatectomy was an independent predictor of a favourable pathological response to NCHT. CONCLUSIONS [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT had a better concordance with a favourable pathological response to NCHT compared with nadir PSA and mpMRI. EAU/EANM recommended criteria and PERCIST 1.0 criteria performed equally to identify pathological responders when [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was used as a therapeutic response assessment tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Bin Ke
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Institute, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China
| | - Shao-Ming Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China
| | - Jia-Yin Chen
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Institute, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China
| | - Shao-Hao Chen
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Institute, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China
| | - Qi You
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Institute, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China
| | - Jiang-Bo Sun
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Institute, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China
| | - Yu-Ting Xue
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Institute, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China
| | - Xiong-Lin Sun
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Institute, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China
| | - Xiao-Hui Wu
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Institute, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China
| | - Qing-Shui Zheng
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Institute, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China
| | - Yong Wei
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Institute, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China
| | - Xue-Yi Xue
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Institute, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China. .,Fujian Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Cancer, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China.
| | - Ning Xu
- Department of Urology, Urology Research Institute, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China. .,Fujian Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Cancer, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Roberts MJ, Maurer T, Perera M, Eiber M, Hope TA, Ost P, Siva S, Hofman MS, Murphy DG, Emmett L, Fendler WP. Using PSMA imaging for prognostication in localized and advanced prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2023; 20:23-47. [PMID: 36473945 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00670-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed applications in modern prostate cancer management has evolved rapidly over the past few years, helping to establish new treatment pathways and provide further insights into prostate cancer biology. However, the prognostic implications of PSMA-PET have not been studied systematically, owing to rapid clinical implementation without long follow-up periods to determine intermediate-term and long-term oncological outcomes. Currently available data suggest that traditional prognostic factors and survival outcomes are associated with high PSMA expression (both according to immunohistochemistry and PET uptake) in men with localized and biochemically recurrent disease. Treatment with curative intent (primary and/or salvage) often fails when PSMA-positive metastases are present; however, the sensitivity of PSMA-PET in detecting all metastases is poor. Low PSMA-PET uptake in recurrent disease is a favourable prognostic factor; however, it can be associated with poor prognosis in conjunction with high 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clinical trials embedding PSMA-PET for guiding management with reliable oncological outcomes are needed to support ongoing clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Roberts
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marlon Perera
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, GZA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Goettingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Li B, Duan L, Shi J, Han Y, Wei W, Cheng X, Cao Y, Kader A, Ding D, Wu X, Gao Y. Diagnostic performance of 99mTc-HYNIC-PSMA SPECT/CT for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1072437. [PMID: 36568205 PMCID: PMC9768541 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1072437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives 99mTc-HYNIC-PSMA is a novel technetium-99m-labeled small-molecule inhibitor of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) for detection of prostate cancer. The present study investigated the diagnostic yield of 99mTc-HYNIC-PSMA Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT in 147 patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Methods 147 patients with biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy were finally eligible for this retrospective analysis. The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 8.26 ng/mL (range, 0.22-187.40 ng/mL). Of the 147 patients, 72 patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) at least 6 months before the 99mTc-HYNIC-PSMA SPECT/CT. All patients underwent planar whole-body scans and subsequent SPECT/CT of the thoracic and abdominal regions after intravenous injection of 705 ± 70 MBq of 99mTc-HYNIC-PSMA. Images were evaluated for the presence and location of PSMA-positive lesions, in which SUVmax were also measured. Detection rates were stratified according to PSA levels, ADT and Gleason scores. The relationships between SUVmax and clinical characteristics were analyzed using univariate and multivariable linear regression models for patients with positive findings. Results Of the 147 patients, 99mTc-HYNIC-PSMA SPECT/CT revealed at least one positive lesion in 118 patients with a high detection rate (80.3%). The detection rates were 48.6% (17/35), 85.1% (40/47), 92.1% (35/38), and 96.3% (26/27) at PSA levels of greater than 0.2 to 2, greater than 2 to 5, greater than 5 to 10, and greater than 10 ng/mL, respectively. PSMA SPECT/CT indicated local recurrence, lymph node metastases, bone metastases, and visceral metastases in 14 (9.5%), 73 (49.7%), 48 (32.7%) and 3 (2.0%) patients. The detection rates of local recurrence and metastasis increased with increasing PSA levels. The detection rate was higher in patients treated with ADT than those without (90.3% vs. 70.7%; P =0.0029). In patients with Gleason scores ≥8, detection rate was slightly higher than those with ≤7 (81.7% vs. 78.5%), but not statistically significant (P = 0.6265). Multivariable linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation of PSA levels and ADT with SUVmax (P=0.0005 and P=0.0397). Conclusions 99mTc-HYNIC-PSMA SPECT/CT offers high detection rates for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. The detection rate and SUVmax were positively correlated with PSA levels and ADT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Li
- Henan Key Laboratory for Molecular Nuclear Medicine and Translational Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital & Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China,Department of Medical Imaging, Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps 13 division Red Star Hospital, Hami, China
| | - Lili Duan
- Henan Key Laboratory for Molecular Nuclear Medicine and Translational Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital & Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jingqi Shi
- Henan Key Laboratory for Molecular Nuclear Medicine and Translational Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital & Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yunyun Han
- Henan Key Laboratory for Molecular Nuclear Medicine and Translational Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital & Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Urology Surgery, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital & Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xiaoliang Cheng
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong Universityl, Xi’an, China
| | - Yong Cao
- Department of Medical Imaging, Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps 13 division Red Star Hospital, Hami, China
| | - Akeban Kader
- Department of Medical Imaging, Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps 13 division Red Star Hospital, Hami, China,*Correspondence: Yongju Gao, ; Xinyu Wu, ; Degang Ding, ; Akeban Kader,
| | - Degang Ding
- Department of Urology Surgery, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital & Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China,*Correspondence: Yongju Gao, ; Xinyu Wu, ; Degang Ding, ; Akeban Kader,
| | - Xinyu Wu
- Henan Key Laboratory for Molecular Nuclear Medicine and Translational Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital & Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China,*Correspondence: Yongju Gao, ; Xinyu Wu, ; Degang Ding, ; Akeban Kader,
| | - Yongju Gao
- Henan Key Laboratory for Molecular Nuclear Medicine and Translational Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital & Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China,*Correspondence: Yongju Gao, ; Xinyu Wu, ; Degang Ding, ; Akeban Kader,
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dong S, Li Y, Chen J, Li Y, Yang P, Li J. 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT-derived semi-quantitative parameters for risk stratification of newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1025930. [PMID: 36568229 PMCID: PMC9768475 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1025930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to assess the value of 18F-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)-derived semi-quantitative parameters of primary tumor for risk stratification of newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Methods Sixty patients referred for 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT imaging for primary PCa were retrospectively analyzed and classified into the low-intermediate-risk (LIR) or high-risk (HR) group. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of primary tumor, prostate total lesion PSMA (TL-PSMAp), and prostate PSMA-tumor volume (PSMA-TVp) were measured, and group differences were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. Spearman's correlation was performed to assess the correlation between the above parameters with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and Gleason score (GS). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine optimal cut-off values for SUVmax, TL-PSMAp, and PSMA-TVp to identify high-risk PCa and compare diagnostic efficacy. Results Among 60 patients, 46 were assigned to the HR group and 16 to the LIR group. In all patients, SUVmax, TL-PSMAp, and PSMA-TVp were moderately correlated with pre-treatment PSA values (r = 0.411, p = 0.001; r = 0.663, p < 0.001; and r = 0.549, p < 0.001, respectively). SUVmax and TL-PSMAp were moderately correlated with GS (r = 0.457 and r = 0.448, respectively; p < 0.001), while PSMA-TVp was weakly correlated with GS (r = 0.285, p = 0.027). In the ROC curve analysis, the optimal cut-off values of SUVmax, TL-PSMAp, and PSMA-TVp for identifying high-risk PCa were 9.61, 59.62, and 10.27, respectively, and the areas under the operating curve were 0.828, 0.901, and 0.809, respectively. The sensitivities of SUVmax, TL-PSMAp, and PSMA-TVp were 91.03%, 71.74%, and 63.04%, respectively, and the specificities were 71.43%, 100.00%, and 92.86%, respectively. Conclusions TL-PSMAp had a superior ability to identify high-risk PCa. The semi-quantitative parameters of primary tumor on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT imaging can be an objective imaging reference index to determine PCa risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siying Dong
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China,College of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
| | - Yanmei Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China,*Correspondence: Juan Li, ; Yanmei Li,
| | - Jian Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China,College of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
| | - Yongliang Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China,College of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
| | - Pengfei Yang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
| | - Juan Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China,*Correspondence: Juan Li, ; Yanmei Li,
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Low TLR and PSMA-TV predict biochemical response to abiraterone acetate in metastatic prostate cancer patients developing castration resistance after chemohormonal therapy at hormone-sensitive stage. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022:10.1007/s00432-022-04438-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04438-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
15
|
Kubilay E, Akpinar Ç, Oǧuz ES, Araz MS, Soydal Ç, Baltacı S, Ürün Y, Süer E. Significance of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion uptake measured using Ga-68 labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT in primary staging of prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:408.e19-408.e25. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
|
16
|
Telli TA, Ozguven S, Alan O, Filizoglu N, Ozturk MA, Sariyar N, Isik S, Arikan R, Demircan NC, Basoglu T, Cetin IA, Ones T, Ercelep O, Dane F, Yumuk PF. Role of baseline 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-derived whole-body volumetric parameters in predicting survival outcomes of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients receiving first-line treatment. Ann Nucl Med 2022; 36:964-975. [PMID: 35997890 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-022-01785-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate whether baseline 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-derived whole-body volumetric parameters could be used as predictive biomarkers for survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receiving first-line treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included 54 mCRPC patients, who underwent baseline 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging within 1 month before starting first-line treatment. Pre-treatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and treatments were recorded. SUVmax, SUVmean, whole-body PSMA-derived tumor volume (wbPSMA-TV), and whole-body total lesion PSMA (wbTL-PSMA) were calculated for all patients. PSA response was defined as a decline of ≥ 50% from pre-treatment value at 12 weeks. Overall survival (OS) was measured from the start of the first-line treatment for mCRPC. RESULTS Docetaxel and abiraterone/enzalutamide were administered to 32 and 22 patients in the first-line setting, respectively. wbPSMA-TV (rho = 0.582, p = 0.004) and wbTL-PSMA (rho = 0.564, p = 0.007) showed moderate positive correlations with PSA levels. Older age (p = 0.02), higher wbPSMA-TV (p = 0.007), higher PSA (p = 0.01), higher number of bone metastases (p = 0.02), and lack of PSA response (p = 0.03) were significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality. Multivariate analysis determined wbPSMA-TV (HR: 1.003, 95% CI 1.001-1.004, p = 0.001) and PSA response (HR: 2.241, 95% CI 1.189-4.222, p = 0.01) as independent predictors of OS. CONCLUSION The wbPSMA-TV may be a useful tool to reflect tumor burden and predict survival outcomes in patients with mCRPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tugba Akin Telli
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, 34899, Turkey.
| | - Salih Ozguven
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, 34899, Turkey
| | - Ozkan Alan
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, 34899, Turkey.,Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nuh Filizoglu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, 34899, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Akif Ozturk
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, 34899, Turkey
| | - Nisanur Sariyar
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, 34899, Turkey
| | - Selver Isik
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, 34899, Turkey
| | - Rukiye Arikan
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, 34899, Turkey
| | - Nazim Can Demircan
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, 34899, Turkey
| | - Tugba Basoglu
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, 34899, Turkey
| | - Ilknur Alsan Cetin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, 34899, Turkey
| | - Tunc Ones
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, 34899, Turkey
| | - Ozlem Ercelep
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, 34899, Turkey
| | - Faysal Dane
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, 34899, Turkey
| | - Perran Fulden Yumuk
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, 34899, Turkey.,Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Super Early Scan of PSMA PET/CT in Evaluating Primary and Metastatic Lesions of Prostate Cancer. Molecules 2022; 27:molecules27144661. [PMID: 35889531 PMCID: PMC9318552 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27144661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 PET/CT has been widely used in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa); however, the urine lead shielding resulting from the urinary metabolism of tracers may obstruct the detection of surrounding metastasis. In this research, the additive value of super early scanning in diagnosing primary lesions and metastasis in the pelvic cavity was evaluated. Firstly, the differentiation efficiency of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET scanned at 3 min post-injection (min P.I.) was measured in PSMA-positive (22rv1 cells) and PSMA-negative (PC3 cells) model mice. Secondly, 106 patients were scanned at 3 min P.I. for the pelvic cavity and then scanned as a standard protocol at 45 min P.I. In the results, the differential diagnosis of PSMA expression was completely reflected as early as 3 min P.I. for mice models. For patients, when correlated with the Gleason score, the quantitative results of the super early scan displayed a comparable correlation coefficient with the routine scan. The target to bladder ratios increased from 1.44 ± 2.40 at 45 min to 10.10 ± 19.10 at 3 min (p < 0.001) for the primary lesions, and it increased from 0.99 ± 1.88 to 9.27 ± 23.03 for metastasis. Meanwhile, the target to background ratios increased from 2.21 ± 2.44 at 3 min to 19.13 ± 23.93 at 45 min (p < 0.001) for the primary lesions, and it increased from 1.68 ± 2.71 to 12.04 ± 18.73 (p < 0.001) for metastasis. In conclusion, super early scanning of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT added referable information for metastasis detection in order to avoid disturbing tracer activity in the urinary system.
Collapse
|
18
|
Galvis JC. Manejo del cáncer de próstata oligometastásico: Una perspectiva del radioterapeuta. UROLOGÍA COLOMBIANA 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
19
|
Reduced Segmentation of Lesions Is Comparable to Whole-Body Segmentation for Response Assessment by PSMA PET/CT: Initial Experience with the Keyhole Approach. BIOLOGY 2022; 11:biology11050660. [PMID: 35625388 PMCID: PMC9137844 DOI: 10.3390/biology11050660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
(1) Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)-derived parameters, such as the commonly used standardized uptake value (SUV) and PSMA-positive tumor volume (PSMA-TV), have been proposed for response assessment in metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, the calculation of whole-body PSMA-TV remains a time-consuming procedure. We hypothesized that it may be possible to quantify changes in PSMA-TV by considering only a limited number of representative lesions. (2) Methods: Sixty-five patients classified into different disease stages were assessed by PSMA PET/CT for staging and restaging after therapy. Whole-body PSMA-TV and whole-body SUVmax were calculated. We then repeated this calculation only including the five or ten hottest or largest lesions. The corresponding serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were also determined. The derived delta between baseline and follow-up values provided the following parameters: ΔSUVmaxall, ΔSUVmax10, ΔSUVmax5, ΔPSMA-TVall, ΔPSMA-TV10, ΔPSMA-TV5, ΔPSA. Finally, we compared the findings from our whole-body segmentation with the results from our keyhole approach (focusing on a limited number of lesions) and correlated all values with the biochemical response (ΔPSA). (3) Results: Among patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa (mHSPC), none showed a relevant deviation for ΔSUVmax10/ΔSUVmax5 or ΔPSMA-TV10/ΔPSMA-TV5 compared to ΔSUVmaxall and ΔPSMA-TVall. For patients treated with taxanes, up to 6/21 (28.6%) showed clinically relevant deviations between ΔSUVmaxall and ΔSUVmax10 or ΔSUVmax5, but only up to 2/21 (9.5%) patients showed clinically relevant deviations between ΔPSMA-TVall and ΔPSMA-TV10 or ΔPSMA-TV5. For patients treated with radioligand therapy (RLT), up to 5/28 (17.9%) showed clinically relevant deviations between ΔSUVmaxall and ΔSUVmax10 or ΔSUVmax5, but only 1/28 (3.6%) patients showed clinically relevant deviations between ΔPSMA-TVall and ΔPSMA-TV10 or ΔPSMA-TV5. The highest correlations with ΔPSA were found for ΔPSMA-TVall (r ≥ 0.59, p ≤ 0.01), followed by ΔPSMA-TV10 (r ≥ 0.57, p ≤ 0.01) and ΔPSMA-TV5 (r ≥ 0.53, p ≤ 0.02) in all cohorts. ΔPSA only correlated with ΔSUVmaxall (r = 0.60, p = 0.02) and with ΔSUVmax10 (r = 0.53, p = 0.03) in the mHSPC cohort, as well as with ΔSUVmaxall (r = 0.51, p = 0.01) in the RLT cohort. (4) Conclusion: Response assessment using PSMA-TV with a reduced number of lesions is feasible, and may allow for a simplified evaluation process for PSMA PET/CT.
Collapse
|
20
|
Zschaeck S, Andela SB, Amthauer H, Furth C, Rogasch JM, Beck M, Hofheinz F, Huang K. Correlation Between Quantitative PSMA PET Parameters and Clinical Risk Factors in Non-Metastatic Primary Prostate Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2022; 12:879089. [PMID: 35530334 PMCID: PMC9074726 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.879089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background PSMA PET is frequently used for staging of prostate cancer patients. Furthermore, there is increasing interest to use PET information for personalized local treatment approaches in surgery and radiotherapy, especially for focal treatment strategies. However, it is not well established which quantitative imaging parameters show highest correlation with clinical and histological tumor aggressiveness. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of 135 consecutive patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer and PSMA PET before any treatment. Clinical risk parameters (PSA values, Gleason score and D'Amico risk group) were correlated with quantitative PET parameters maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean SUV (SUVmean), tumor asphericity (ASP) and PSMA tumor volume (PSMA-TV). Results Most of the investigated imaging parameters were highly correlated with each other (correlation coefficients between 0.20 and 0.95). A low to moderate, however significant, correlation of imaging parameters with PSA values (0.19 to 0.45) and with Gleason scores (0.17 to 0.31) was observed for all parameters except ASP which did not show a significant correlation with Gleason score. Receiver operating characteristics for the detection of D'Amico high-risk patients showed poor to fair sensitivity and specificity for all investigated quantitative PSMA PET parameters (Areas under the curve (AUC) between 0.63 and 0.73). Comparison of AUC between quantitative PET parameters by DeLong test showed significant superiority of SUVmax compared to SUVmean for the detection of high-risk patients. None of the investigated imaging parameters significantly outperformed SUVmax. Conclusion Our data confirm prior publications with lower number of patients that reported moderate correlations of PSMA PET parameters with clinical risk factors. With the important limitation that Gleason scores were only biopsy-derived in this study, there is no indication that the investigated additional parameters deliver superior information compared to SUVmax.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephanie Bela Andela
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julian M. Rogasch
- BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Kai Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chen Z, Chen X, Wang R. Application of SPECT and PET / CT with computer-aided diagnosis in bone metastasis of prostate cancer: a review. Cancer Imaging 2022; 22:18. [PMID: 35428360 PMCID: PMC9013072 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-022-00456-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
AbstractBone metastasis has a significant influence on the prognosis of prostate cancer(PCa) patients. In this review, we discussed the current application of PCa bone metastasis diagnosis with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) computer-aided diagnosis(CAD) systems. A literature search identified articles concentrated on PCa bone metastasis and PET/CT or SPECT CAD systems using the PubMed database. We summarized the previous studies focused on CAD systems and manual quantitative markers calculation, and the coincidence rate was acceptable. We also analyzed the quantification methods, advantages, and disadvantages of CAD systems. CAD systems can detect abnormal lesions of PCa patients’ 99mTc-MDP-SPECT, 18F-FDG-PET/CT, 18F-NaF-PET/CT, and 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT images automated or semi-automated. CAD systems can also calculate the quantitative markers, which can quantify PCa patients’ whole-body bone metastasis tumor burden accurately and quickly and give a standardized and objective result. SPECT and PET/CT CAD systems are potential tools to monitor and quantify bone metastasis lesions of PCa patients simply and accurately, the future clinical application of CAD systems in diagnosing PCa bone metastasis lesions is necessary and feasible.
Collapse
|
22
|
Erdogan M, Sengul SS, Cetin B, Avcı M, Yagci S, Ozkoç I, Barikan DE, Yildiz M. The role of Ga 68 PSMA PET/CT imaging in Lu 177 PSMA treatment planning in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Ann Nucl Med 2022; 36:562-569. [PMID: 35397091 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-022-01739-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Lutetium-177 (Lu177) prostate-specific membrane antigen (Lu177 PSMA) is a novel targeted treatment for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The purpose of the study was to determine the molecular volumetric Gallium-68 (Ga68) PSMA PET/CT parameters that can predict patients who will respond to treatment. METHODS These single-center retrospective data were obtained from metastatic CRPC patients receiving intravenous 6.0-8.5 GBq Lu177 PSMA treatment every 6-8 weeks for a maximum of 3-8 cycles, with baseline Ga68 PSMA PET/CT scan, clinical data, and information on treatment responses. All lesions were divided into two groups according to the increase and decrease in PSMA expression levels of 600 bone lesions and 85 lymph nodes that were compatible with metastasis of 23 patients after the treatment. The primary endpoint of our study was the evaluation of the relation between the baseline SUVmax, PSMA TV, TL PSMA values, and the treatment response of the two groups. The threshold values were determined for the parameters that had significant relations. In the present study, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and treatment-induced toxicities were also evaluated as the secondary endpoint. RESULTS It was found that SUVmax, PSMA TV, and TL PSMA values in bone metastases showed significant differences between the groups with decreased and increased PSMA expression levels after the treatment. The AUC value for SUVmax was significant (AUC = 0.677; p < 0.001). The cutoff value was > 10.50 (sensitivity = 91.8%, Specificity = 41.5%) for SUVmax, > 1.50 cm3 (sensitivity = 49.1%, specificity = 70%) for PSMA TV and > 8.50 g (sensitivity = %60.9, specificity = %72.2) for TL PSMA. The median SUVmax value before the treatment in all metastatic lymph nodes was found to be 7.1 (5.4-12.4), and the median SUVmax after the treatment was 2.5 (1.6-12.1) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION It was shown in the present study that Lu177 PSMA treatment response may be higher in CRPC patients with metastatic bone lesion with high baseline PSMA expression level, and better treatment response may be achieved in patients with lymph node metastases than in bone metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Erdogan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine, Isparta, 32260, Turkey.
| | - Sevim S Sengul
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine, Isparta, 32260, Turkey
| | - Bulent Cetin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine, Isparta, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Avcı
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine, Isparta, 32260, Turkey
| | - Samet Yagci
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine, Isparta, 32260, Turkey
| | - Ismail Ozkoç
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine, Isparta, 32260, Turkey
| | - Damla Ezgi Barikan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine, Isparta, 32260, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Yildiz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine, Isparta, 32260, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cardoza-Ochoa DR, Cristancho-Rojas C, Pérez DJ, Moreno-Izaguirre P, Guzman M, Gutiérrez-Rivera MC, Gaxiola-Mascareño AP, Avila-Rodríguez MA, Rivera-Bravo B. Semiautomatic assessment of whole-body tumor burden with 18F-PSMA-1007 in biochemical recurrent prostate cancer. Nucl Med Commun 2022; 43:332-339. [PMID: 34954764 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to evaluate the 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/computed tomography (CT) semiautomatic volumetric parameters to assess the whole-body tumor burden and its correlation with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 110 patients referred for 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT due to biochemical recurrence were retrospectively analyzed. Whole-body total lesion prostate-specific membrane antigen (wbTl-PSMA) and whole-body PSMA-derived tumor volume (wbPSMA-TV) metrics on 18F-PSMA-1007 were obtained semiautomatically in dedicated software. A Spearman test was performed to explore the correlation of volumetric imaging parameters with PSA levels and Gleason score. To analyze the association between volumetric measures and PSA subgroups, we used a Kruskal-Wallis test and a Dunn's test to identify each group causing an observed difference. RESULTS A total of 492 metastatic lesions were analyzed, and a significant correlation was found between wbTL-PSMA (R = 0.63, P < 0.0001) and wbPSMA-TV (R = 0.49, P < 0.0001) with serum PSA. A statistically significant difference with wbTL-PSMA was found in patients with a PSA less than or equal 0.5 ng/ml and PSA in the range of 0.51-1.0 ng/ml. CONCLUSION 18F-PSMA-1007 PSMA volumetric parameters can provide a quantitative imaging biomarker for whole-body tumor burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R Cardoza-Ochoa
- Unidad PET-CT, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City
| | - Cesar Cristancho-Rojas
- Unidad PET-CT, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City
| | - David J Pérez
- Unidad Radiofarmacia-Ciclotrón, División de Investigación, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Paola Moreno-Izaguirre
- Unidad PET-CT, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City
| | - Melissa Guzman
- Unidad PET-CT, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City
| | | | | | - Miguel A Avila-Rodríguez
- Unidad Radiofarmacia-Ciclotrón, División de Investigación, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Belén Rivera-Bravo
- Unidad PET-CT, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Yoon JG, Mohamed I, Smith DA, Tirumani SH, Paspulati RM, Mendiratta P, Ramaiya NH. The modern therapeutic & imaging landscape of metastatic prostate cancer: a primer for radiologists. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:781-800. [PMID: 34783876 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03348-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Revised: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer represents one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in the United States and the most common cancer among men. Treatment paradigms for the management of advanced stages of prostate cancer have continued to evolve in recent years. These advancements in the therapeutic landscape of metastatic prostate cancer and diagnostic imaging modalities have fundamentally changed the treatment of patients with prostate cancer. In this review article we provide a primer for radiologists highlighting the most recent developments in treatment options and imaging techniques utilized in the modern oncologic management of metastatic prostate cancer. We will examine current therapy options and associated toxicities with an emphasis on relevant imaging findings commonly encountered by radiologists. We also summarize the role of modalities including CT, MRI, PET, bone scintigraphy, and PET in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin G Yoon
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 2109 Adelbert Road, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Inas Mohamed
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Daniel A Smith
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
| | - Sree H Tirumani
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Raj M Paspulati
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Prateek Mendiratta
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Nikhil H Ramaiya
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 2109 Adelbert Road, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fournier L, de Geus-Oei LF, Regge D, Oprea-Lager DE, D’Anastasi M, Bidaut L, Bäuerle T, Lopci E, Cappello G, Lecouvet F, Mayerhoefer M, Kunz WG, Verhoeff JJC, Caruso D, Smits M, Hoffmann RT, Gourtsoyianni S, Beets-Tan R, Neri E, deSouza NM, Deroose CM, Caramella C. Twenty Years On: RECIST as a Biomarker of Response in Solid Tumours an EORTC Imaging Group - ESOI Joint Paper. Front Oncol 2022; 11:800547. [PMID: 35083155 PMCID: PMC8784734 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.800547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) v1.1 are currently the reference standard for evaluating efficacy of therapies in patients with solid tumours who are included in clinical trials, and they are widely used and accepted by regulatory agencies. This expert statement discusses the principles underlying RECIST, as well as their reproducibility and limitations. While the RECIST framework may not be perfect, the scientific bases for the anticancer drugs that have been approved using a RECIST-based surrogate endpoint remain valid. Importantly, changes in measurement have to meet thresholds defined by RECIST for response classification within thus partly circumventing the problems of measurement variability. The RECIST framework also applies to clinical patients in individual settings even though the relationship between tumour size changes and outcome from cohort studies is not necessarily translatable to individual cases. As reproducibility of RECIST measurements is impacted by reader experience, choice of target lesions and detection/interpretation of new lesions, it can result in patients changing response categories when measurements are near threshold values or if new lesions are missed or incorrectly interpreted. There are several situations where RECIST will fail to evaluate treatment-induced changes correctly; knowledge and understanding of these is crucial for correct interpretation. Also, some patterns of response/progression cannot be correctly documented by RECIST, particularly in relation to organ-site (e.g. bone without associated soft-tissue lesion) and treatment type (e.g. focal therapies). These require specialist reader experience and communication with oncologists to determine the actual impact of the therapy and best evaluation strategy. In such situations, alternative imaging markers for tumour response may be used but the sources of variability of individual imaging techniques need to be known and accounted for. Communication between imaging experts and oncologists regarding the level of confidence in a biomarker is essential for the correct interpretation of a biomarker and its application to clinical decision-making. Though measurement automation is desirable and potentially reduces the variability of results, associated technical difficulties must be overcome, and human adjudications may be required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laure Fournier
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Université de Paris, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hopital europeen Georges Pompidou, Department of Radiology, Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (PARCC) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMRS) 970, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), Paris, France
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Daniele Regge
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Radiology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione del Piemonte per l’Oncologia-Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (FPO-IRCCS), Turin, Italy
| | - Daniela-Elena Oprea-Lager
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers [Vrije Universiteit (VU) University], Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Melvin D’Anastasi
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Medical Imaging Department, Mater Dei Hospital, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| | - Luc Bidaut
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- College of Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom
| | - Tobias Bäuerle
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Egesta Lopci
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) – Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Cappello
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Radiology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione del Piemonte per l’Oncologia-Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (FPO-IRCCS), Turin, Italy
| | - Frederic Lecouvet
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marius Mayerhoefer
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Wolfgang G. Kunz
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Joost J. C. Verhoeff
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Damiano Caruso
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marion Smits
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Brain Tumour Centre, Erasmus Medical Centre (MC) Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital, Carl-Gustav-Carus Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sofia Gourtsoyianni
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Areteion Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Regina Beets-Tan
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- School For Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW) School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Emanuele Neri
- European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Department of Translational Research and of New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Nandita M. deSouza
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (EIBALL), European Society of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
- Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance, Radiological Society of North America, Oak Brook, IL, United States
| | - Christophe M. Deroose
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Caroline Caramella
- Imaging Group, European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Radiology Department, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph Centre International des Cancers Thoraciques, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Plessis-Robinson, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Review of imaging techniques for evaluating morphological and functional responses to the treatment of bone metastases in prostate and breast cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2022; 24:1290-1310. [PMID: 35152355 PMCID: PMC9192443 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-02784-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Bone metastases are very common complications associated with certain types of cancers that frequently negatively impact the quality of life and functional status of patients; thus, early detection is necessary for the implementation of immediate therapeutic measures to reduce the risk of skeletal complications and improve survival and quality of life. There is no consensus or universal standard approach for the detection of bone metastases in cancer patients based on imaging. Endorsed by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), the Spanish Society of Medical Radiology (SERAM), and the Spanish Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SEMNIM) a group of experts met to discuss and provide an up-to-date review of our current understanding of the biological mechanisms through which tumors spread to the bone and describe the imaging methods available to diagnose bone metastasis and monitor their response to oncological treatment, focusing on patients with breast and prostate cancer. According to current available data, the use of next-generation imaging techniques, including whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI, PET/CT, and PET/MRI with novel radiopharmaceuticals, is recommended instead of the classical combination of CT and bone scan in detection, staging and response assessment of bone metastases from prostate and breast cancer.Clinical trial registration: Not applicable.
Collapse
|
27
|
Has Simsek D, Kuyumcu S, Karadogan S, Oflas M, Isik EG, Ozkan ZG, Paksoy N, Ekmekcioglu O, Ekenel M, Sanli Y. Can PSMA-based tumor burden predict response to docetaxel treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer? Ann Nucl Med 2021; 35:680-690. [PMID: 33783752 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-021-01610-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigated the role of PSMA-derived tumor burden in predicting docetaxel (DTX) therapy response in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). METHODS Fifty-two mCRPC patients who received at least six cycles of DTX as the first-line treatment following 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT were enrolled in this retrospective study. Total PSMA-derived tumor volume (TV-PSMA) and total lesion PSMA activity (TL-PSMA) were derived from metastatic lesions. A ≥ 50% decline in PSA was defined as a response; a ≥ 25% increase in PSA was defined as progression. Univariate/multivariate logistic and cox regression analyses were performed to predict PSA response, OS, and TTP. RESULTS Twelve (23%) patients had PSA progression after chemotherapy, while 40 patients (77%) achieved a PSA response. On univariate analysis, a significant association was found between TV-PSMA (p = 0.001), TL-PSMA (p = 0.001), pre-PSA (p = 0.012), LDH (p = 0.003), Hg (p = 0.035), and PSA response to DTX. High TV-PSMA (> 107 cm3) (p = 0.04) and high LDH (> 234 U/L) (p = 0.017) were 8.2 times and 12.2 times more likely for DTX failure in multivariate regression analyses. The median TTP was 16 months, and the median OS was not reached. Patients with high TV-PSMA (p = 0.017), high TL-PSMA (> 1013 cm3) (p = 0.042), high age (> 70 years) (p = 0.016), and high LDH (p ≤ 0.001) had significantly shorter OS, while only high TV-PSMA (p = 0.038) and high age (p = 0.006) were significantly related with shorter TTP. High TV-PSMA (p = 0.017) and high age (p = 0.01) were significant predictors for shorter OS, while only high age (p = 0.006) was a significant predictor for shorter TTP in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Patients with high TV-PSMA had a significantly higher risk for DTX failure. PSMA-based tumor burden prior to DTX therapy seems to be a reliable predictive tool for survival in mCRPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duygu Has Simsek
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Fatih, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Serkan Kuyumcu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Fatih, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Seyfullah Karadogan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Fatih, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Melis Oflas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Fatih, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Emine Goknur Isik
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Fatih, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Zeynep Gozde Ozkan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Fatih, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nail Paksoy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ozgul Ekmekcioglu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Meltem Ekenel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yasemin Sanli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Fatih, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Michalski K, Klein C, Brüggemann T, Meyer PT, Jilg CA, Ruf J. Assessing Response to [ 177Lu]PSMA Radioligand Therapy using modified PSMA PET Progression Criteria. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:jnumed.120.260836. [PMID: 33789932 PMCID: PMC8612188 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.260836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PET/CT) targeting the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) plays a key role in staging of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Moreover, it is not only used for the assessment of adequate PSMA expression of PCa cells before PSMA-targeting radioligand therapy (PSMA RLT) but also for re-staging during the course of therapy to evaluate response to treatment. Whereas no established criteria exist for systematic response evaluation so far, recently proposed PSMA PET Progression (PPP) criteria might fill this gap. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of PPP criteria in patients undergoing PSMA RLT and their prognostic implications. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, PSMA PET/CT scans of 46 patients acquired before and after completion of PSMA RLT were analyzed separately by two readers using modified PPP criteria. After interobserver agreement assessment, consensus results (progressive vs. non-progressive disease) were compared in a multivariate cox regression model (endpoint overall survival, OS). Results: Interobserver agreement on modified PPP criteria was substantial (Cohens κ = 0.73) with a concordance in 87% of patients. Median OS of all patients after PSMA RLT (n = 46) was 9.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.8 - 10.2] months. Progression according to modified PPP criteria was found in 32 patients and was a significant (p ≤0.001) prognostic marker for OS with a hazard ratio of 15.5 [95% CI 3.4 - 70.2]. Conclusion: Response assessment in patients undergoing PSMA RLT using modified PPP criteria are reproducible and highly prognostic for OS. Modified PPP criteria should be validated in future prospective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin Michalski
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; and
| | - Claudius Klein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; and
| | - Tonio Brüggemann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; and
| | - Philipp T. Meyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; and
| | - Cordula A. Jilg
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Juri Ruf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; and
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
99mTc-MIP-1404 SPECT/CT for Assessment of Whole-Body Tumor Burden and Treatment Response in Patients With Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer. Clin Nucl Med 2020; 45:e349-e357. [PMID: 32558706 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000003102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to investigate the value of Tc-MIP-1404 SPECT/CT for assessment of whole-body tumor burden and treatment response in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer who undergo androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). METHODS A total of 125 patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer underwent Tc-MIP-1404 SPECT/CT. All 364 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive lesions in the field of view were assessed quantitatively to calculate PSMA-derived metabolic tumor parameters, including whole-body PSMA tumor volume and whole-body total lesion PSMA. These metrics were correlated with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and Gleason scores. In a subset of 50 patients who underwent Tc-MIP-1404 SPECT/CT before the initiation of ADT or EBRT, TL-PSMA and SUVmax were compared with radiographic response assessment by CT based on RECIST 1.1 and to biochemical response (BR) determined by changes in serum PSA levels. RESULTS Serum PSA levels correlated with SUVmax, whole-body PSMA tumor volume, and whole-body total lesion PSMA in patients with 1 and in those with more than 1 PSMA-positive lesion (P < 0.05). The correlations were significant for both well-differentiated (Gleason score ≤7) and poorly differentiated tumors (Gleason score ≥8) (P < 0.05). The agreement between TL-PSMA derived from SPECT and BR in patients who underwent Tc-MIP-1404 SPECT/CT before and after initiation of ADT was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.91; Cohen κ = 0.68; P < 0.05); in these patients, the agreement between TL-PSMA and CT was 60% (95% CI, 0.20-0.72; Cohen κ = 0.46; P < 0.05) and the agreement between BR and CT was 52% (0.07-0.61; Cohen κ = 0.34; P < 0.05). Comparable results were found for patients who underwent SPECT/CT before and after initiation of EBRT, with the strongest agreement between TL-PSMA and BR (80%; 95% CI, 0.38-0.93; Cohen κ = 0.66; P < 0.05) compared with the agreement between TL-PSMA and CT (60%; 95% CI, 0.13-0.69; Cohen κ = 0.69; P < 0.05) and between BR and CT (48%; 95% CI, 0-0.54; Cohen κ = 0.26; P = 0.11). Discordant findings between SPECT and CT were most likely due to limitations in the assessment of small lymph node metastases and bone involvement, which were detectable on SPECT but not on CT. CONCLUSIONS The results of our study show that Tc-MIP-1404 SPECT/CT is a promising method for the evaluation of treatment response in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer who undergo either ADT or EBRT. TL-PSMA for assessment of treatment response has the strongest correlation with serum PSA levels, superior to SUVmax-based evaluation and response assessment based on CT data and RECIST 1.1.
Collapse
|
30
|
Detection of metastases in newly diagnosed prostate cancer by using 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and its relationship with modified D’Amico risk classification. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 48:1639-1649. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04995-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
31
|
Simsek DH, Sanli Y, Civan C, Engin MN, Isik EG, Ozkan ZG, Kuyumcu S. Does bone scintigraphy still have a role in the era of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer? Ann Nucl Med 2020; 34:476-485. [PMID: 32394269 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-020-01474-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTION We aimed to evaluate the role of bone scintigraphy (BS) which has long been the imaging modality of choice in prostate cancer (PCa) and performed a head-to-head comparison between BS, BS + SPECT/CT and 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT, for the detection of bone metastasis of PCa. METHODS We evaluated 138 PCa patients who underwent BS and 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and SPECT/CT of 102 of 138 patients. Images were interpreted retrospectively and areas of abnormally increased tracer uptake related to PCa were documented as benign, metastatic or equivocal. Equivocal uptakes were finally diagnosed based on a consensus review of correlative imaging. Patient- and lesion-based analysis was performed. Patients with superscan images were excluded from lesion-based analysis. RESULTS At least one metastatic or equivocal uptake in skeleton was defined in 76 of 138 (55%) BS, in 33 of 102 (32.3%) SPECT/CT, and in 49 of 138 (35.5%) 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT. 23 (16.7%) patients had also superscan findings on BS and 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT. For patient-based analysis, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV were calculated as 91.1%, 64.5%, 73.1%, 55.4% and 93.7% for BS; 95.5%, 82.7%, 86.9%, 72.8% and 96.2% for BS + SPECT/CT; 97.7%, 95.7%, 95.6%, 91.6% and 98.8% for 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT. For lesion-based analysis, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV were 53%, 63.9%, 60.1%, 42.8% and 71.8% for BS; 59.2%, 87.6%, 77.7%, 62.6% and 80% for BS + SPECT/CT; 96.4%, 98.1%, 97.5%, 96.4% and 98.1% for 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT. CONCLUSION This study has shown that 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT overcomes the limitations of BS and proves superiority in detecting bone metastases, even in patients with SPECT/CT. Our findings present important implications that 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT can replace BS in future practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duygu Has Simsek
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, 34093, Fatih, İstanbul, Turkey.
| | - Yasemin Sanli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, 34093, Fatih, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Caner Civan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, 34093, Fatih, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Muge Nur Engin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, 34093, Fatih, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Emine Goknur Isik
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, 34093, Fatih, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Zeynep Gozde Ozkan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, 34093, Fatih, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Serkan Kuyumcu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, 34093, Fatih, İstanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Özülker T, Özülker F. Assessment of the role of Ga-68 PSMA I&T PET/CT in response evaluation to docetaxel therapy in castration resistant prostate cancer patients. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2020; 39:292-298. [PMID: 32595026 DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2020.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2019] [Revised: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There have been only few studies investigating the role of PSMA ligands in the therapy response assessment of metastasized castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) cases. In this study we aimed at evaluating the capability of 68Ga- prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) I&T positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) in the assessment of therapeutic response in patients under docetaxel therapy for prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIAL AND METHODS The clinical records of all mCRPC patients treated with docetaxel and referred to our department for 68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT imaging were retrospectively analysed. Sixteen patients (mean age 69 years, range 52-82 years) with castration-resistant prostate cancer patients receiving palliative docetaxel therapy and had undergone 68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT scan were included in the study. 68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT imaging was done and prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels were measured at baseline before administration of docetaxel (PET1) and after at least 3 cycles (range 4-12) of chemotherapy (PET2). Patient-based as well as lesion-based comparison of PET2 findings with PET1 findings were done. RESULTS The change (decrease) observed in lymph node and prostate gland/prostatic bed SUVmax values after treatment compared to pretreatment was found to be statistically significant (P=.033). 3/16 patients (19%) were classified as progressive disease (PD), 4/16 (25%) as stable disease (SD), 9/16 (56%) as partial remission (PR) radiologically. An increasing PSA trend (IT) was observed in 4 patients (25%) and a decreasing PSA trend (DT) in 3 patients (18%). Nine patients showed a PSA response of ≥ 50% (56%). Of the 4 patients showing SD, 3 had IT, 3 had BR. Of the 9 patients who showed PR on PET studies, 8 patients showed BR and 1 patient showed DT. CONCLUSION Imaging with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT showed great concordance with biochemical response evaluation in terms of PSA levels, especially in patients showing good response to therapy. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was also successful in identifying progressive disease in patients showing paradoxical decline in PSA levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Özülker
- Health Sciences University, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, İstanbul, Turquía.
| | - F Özülker
- Health Sciences University, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, İstanbul, Turquía
| |
Collapse
|