Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in patients with advanced oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

PET/MR Imaging in Head and Neck Cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) can either be examined with hybrid PET/MR imaging systems or sequentially, using PET/CT and MR imaging. Regardless of the acquisition technique, the superiority of MR imaging compared to CT lies in its potential to interrogate tumor and surrounding tissues with different sequences, including perfusion and diffusion. For this reason, PET/MR imaging is preferable for the detection and assessment of locoregional residual/recurrent HNSCC after therapy. In addition, MR imaging interpretation is facilitated when combined with PET. Nevertheless, distant metastases and distant second primary tumors are detected equally well with PET/MR imaging and PET/CT.

Contemporary Imaging and Reporting Strategies for Head and Neck Cancer: MRI, FDG PET/MRI, NI-RADS, and Carcinoma of Unknown Primary-AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

CT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT play major roles in the diagnosis, staging, treatment planning, and surveillance of head and neck cancers. Nonetheless, an evolving understanding of head and neck cancer pathogenesis, advances in imaging techniques, changing treatment regimens, and a lack of standardized guidelines have led to areas of uncertainty in the imaging of head and neck cancer. This narrative review aims to address four issues in the contemporary imaging of head and neck cancer. The first issue relates to the standard and advanced sequences that should be included in MRI protocols for head and neck cancer imaging. The second issue relates to approaches to surveillance imaging after treatment of head and neck cancer, including the choice of imaging modality, the frequency of surveillance imaging, and the role of standardized reporting through the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System. The third issue relates to the role of imaging in the setting of neck carcinoma of unknown primary. The fourth issue relates to the role of simultaneous PET/MRI in head and neck cancer evaluation. The authors of this review provide consensus opinions for each issue.

Prospective Investigation of 18FDG-PET/MRI with Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Assess Survival in Patients with Oropharyngeal or Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma

To prospectively investigate the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in patients with oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OHSCC) treated by chemoradiotherapy. The study cohort consisted of patients with OHSCC who had undergone integrated PET/MRI prior to chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy. Imaging parameters derived from intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), and 18F-FDG PET were analyzed in relation to overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). In multivariable analysis, T classification (p < 0.001), metabolic tumor volume (p = 0.013), and pseudo-diffusion coefficient (p = 0.008) were identified as independent risk factors for OS. The volume transfer rate constant (p = 0.015), initial area under the curve (p = 0.043), T classification (p = 0.018), and N classification (p = 0.018) were significant predictors for RFS. The Harrell’s c-indices of OS and RFS obtained from prognostic models incorporating clinical and PET/MRI predictors were significantly higher than those derived from the traditional TNM staging system (p = 0.001). The combination of clinical risk factors with functional parameters derived from IVIM and DCE-MRI plus metabolic PET parameters derived from 18F-FDG PET in integrated PET/MRI outperformed the information provided by traditional TNM staging in predicting the survival of patients with OHSCC.

PET/MR versus PET/CT for locoregional staging of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer

Background

The value of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for TN staging in head and neck cancer (HNC) has been proven in numerous studies. A few studies have investigated the value of FDG-PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the staging of HNC; the combined results indicate potential for FDG-PET/MRI, but the scientific evidence remains weak.

Purpose

To compare performance of FDG-PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI for locoregional staging in patients with oropharyngeal carcinomas.

Material and Methods

Two radiologists independently of each other retrospectively reviewed primary pre-therapeutic FDG-PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI examinations from 40 individuals with oropharyngeal carcinomas. TN stage and primary tumor size were noted. The results were compared between observers and modalities and against TN stage set at a multidisciplinary conference.

Results

For nodal staging, PET/MRI had slightly higher specificity and accuracy than PET/CT for the most experienced observer. Both methods demonstrated excellent sensitivity (≥ 0.97 and 1.00, respectively), as well as high negative predictive values (≥ 0.95 and 1.00, respectively). No significant differences were found for tumor staging or measurement of maximum tumor diameter. There was a weak agreement (κ = 0.35–0.49) between PET/CT and PET/MRI for T and N stages for both observers. Inter-observer agreement was higher for PET/MRI than for PET/CT, both for tumor staging (κ = 0.57 vs. 0.35) and nodal staging (κ = 0.69 vs. 0.55). The agreement between observers was comparable to the agreement between methods.

Conclusion

PET/MRI may be a viable alternative to PET/CT for locoregional staging (TN staging) and assessment of maximal tumor diameter in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer.

Quantitative parameters derived from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging can accurately estimate the histologic grade of hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma preoperatively

PURPOSE

Among head and neck cancers, hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HSCC) shows the highest malignancy, which is associated with histologic grading. This study was designed to investigate whether quantitative parameters derived from ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI) can preoperatively estimate the histologic grade of HSCC.

METHODS

¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI of neck was successfully performed in 21 patients with histologically proven HSCC including poorly differentiated group (ten patients) and well-moderately differentiated group (eleven patients). Quantitative parameters derived from FDG-PET, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) were calculated based on volume of interest drawn on the tumor and compared between two groups. The efficacy of quantitative parameters for the estimation of histologic grades of HSCC was evaluated.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in mean value of standard uptake value (SUV), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and K^trans derived from ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI of HSCC between two groups (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in other quantitative parameters derived from ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI of HSCC between two groups. The area under the curve (AUC) of the combination of SUV_mean, ADC_mean, and K^trans in the estimation of histologic grade of HSCC was 0.936 with sensitivity of 90.0% and specificity of 81.8%.

CONCLUSION

The combination of SUV_mean, ADC_mean, and K^trans derived from ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI can accurately predict the histologic grade of HSCC preoperatively.