Peroneal tendoscopy

Minimally Invasive Peroneal Tenodesis Assisted by Peroneal Tendoscopy: Technique and Preliminary Results

Introduction: Peroneal disorders are a common cause of ankle pain and lateral instability and have been described in as much as 77% of patients with lateral ankle instability. Clicking, swelling, pain, and tenderness in the peroneal tendons track are frequent symptoms, but they can be confused with other causes of lateral ankle pain. The management of peroneal disorders can be conservative or surgical. When the conservative treatment fails, surgery is indicated, and open or tendoscopic synovectomy, tubularization, tenodesis or tendon transfers can be performed. The authors present a surgical technique of tendoscopy associated to minimally invasive tenodesis for the treatment of peroneal tendon tears, as well as the preliminary results of patients submitted to this procedure. Methods: Four patients with chronic lateral ankle pain who were diagnosed with peroneal brevis pathology were treated between 2020 and 2022 with tendoscopic-assisted minimally invasive synovectomy and tenodesis. Using a 2.7 mm 30° arthroscope and a 3.0 mm shaver blade, the entire length of the peroneus brevis tendon and most parts of the peroneus longus tendon can be assessed within Sammarco's zones 1 and 2. After the inspection and synovectomy, a minimally invasive tenodesis is performed. Results: All patients were evaluated at least six months after surgery. All of them reported improvement in daily activities and in the Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire (pre-surgery mean FFI = 23.86%; post-surgery mean FFI = 6.15%), with no soft tissue complications or sural nerve complaints. Conclusion: The tendoscopy of the peroneal tendons allows the surgeon to assess their integrity, confirm the extent of the lesion, perform synovectomy, prepare the tendon for tenodesis, and perform it in a safe and minimally invasive way, reducing the risks inherent to the open procedure.

Pathologies of the Peroneals: A Review

Peroneal tendon disorders remain an often overlooked source of lateral hindfoot pain and tenderness. Medical professionals who specialize in foot and ankle care are still far more likely to diagnose a peroneal tendon disorder as an ankle injury. In fact, acute peroneal dislocations are misdiagnosed in up to 40% of cases. The major subsets of peroneal disorders include peroneal tendonitis and tenosynovitis, painful os peroneum syndrome, subluxation, and tearing of the peroneal tendons. Proper history and physical exam maneuvers must be performed to help identify the source of the injury and differentiate these categories. Detailed imaging through X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging must also be used to diagnose the etiology of the patient's condition in order to direct management. Currently, there is very limited knowledge on peroneal pathologies, and treatment protocol is highly variable and limited to expert opinion. Despite the individual preferences and nuances held by each surgeon when it comes to operating, the overarching principles that guide appropriate management of tendonitis, subluxation, and tendon tear should maintain a higher level of consistency. Therefore, the authors of this review aim to elucidate the most current methods to diagnose these disorders as well as evidence-based practices for optimal management.Levels of Evidence: Level V.

Peroneal Tendinosis and Subluxation

Peroneal tendinosis and subluxation are lifestyle-limiting conditions that can worsen if not properly diagnosed and treated. Adequate knowledge of ankle anatomy and detailed history and comprehensive physical examination is essential for diagnosis. Peroneal tendinopathy is likely to result from overuse, whereas subluxation often precipitates from forceful contraction of peroneals during sudden dorsiflexion while landing or abruptly stopping. In athletes, conservative measures remain first-line treatment of tendinopathy, but surgery is often immediately indicated in cases of recurrent symptomatic subluxation or dislocation. Surgical technique varies on the type, mechanism, and severity of injury, but most procedures have a high success rate.

2-Mm Diameter Operative Tendoscopy of the Tibialis Posterior, Peroneal, and Achilles Tendons: A Cadaveric Study

BACKGROUND

Technical innovation now offers the possibility of 2-mm-diameter operative tendoscopy with disposable arthroscopes and tablet-like control units. The promises of new technology should be critically scrutinized. Therefore, this study assessed whether 2-mm-diameter operative tendoscopy of the tibialis posterior, peroneal, and Achilles tendons was safe and effective in a cadaveric model.

METHODS

A 2-mm-diameter arthroscopic system was used to perform a tendoscopic procedure in 10 nonpaired, fresh-frozen, human ankles. Standard tendoscopic portals were utilized. Visual examination and operative reach with tailored tendoscopic instruments within the tendon sheaths were recorded and documented. Adhesiolysis and vincula resections were performed. After dissection, distances between portal tracts and neurovascular structures were measured and the tendons were inspected for signs of iatrogenic damage.

RESULTS

The entire tendon sheath and tendon of the tibialis posterior, peroneus brevis, and Achilles tendons were visualized and reached with tailored operative instruments. The proximal part of the peroneus longus tendon was visible and reachable from proximally up to the cuboid bone distally. Adhesiolysis and vincula resections were successfully performed in all specimens. The mean distances between portal tracts and local neurovascular structures ranged between 9.4 and 19.2 mm and there were no cases of contact. None of the tendons showed signs of iatrogenic damage.

CONCLUSION

Two-millimeter-diameter operative tendoscopy provided safe and effective visualization and operative reach of the tibialis posterior, peroneal, and Achilles tendons.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Compared with current practice, 2-mm-diameter operative tendoscopy has the potential to make tendoscopy around the ankle less invasive and more accessible. Diagnostic, interventional, and second-look procedures might be performed at substantially reduced risk, time, and costs.

Operative Approaches to Ankle and Hindfoot Arthroscopy

The role of arthroscopy in the management of ankle and hindfoot pathology management has increased greatly in recent years with the potential for lower complication rates, faster recovery, improved access, and improved outcomes when compared to open techniques. Procedural variations exist as techniques aim to optimize lesion access, decrease operative time, and improve patient safety. Our goal is to summarize the described approaches and patient positionings common in minimally invasive arthroscopic surgery for anterior, lateral, and posterior ankle pathologies. A survey of pathology organized by arthroscopic approach and a review of recent advances in concomitant lesion management may be useful when planning arthroscopic foot and ankle surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, expert opinion.

The distance from the peroneal tendons sheath to the sural nerve at the posterior tip of the fibula decreases from proximal to distal

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare the distance from the peroneal tendons sheath to the sural nerve in different points proximally and distally to the tip of the fibula.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen lower extremities were dissected to expose the nerves and tendons. Having the posterior tip of the fibula as a reference, the distance between the tendons sheath and the sural nerve was measured in each point with a tachometer with three independent different observers. Two measures were taken distally at 1.5 and 2 cm from fibula tip and 3 measures were performed proximally at 2, 3, and 5 cm from fibula tip. Data were described using means, standard deviations, medians, and minimum and maximum values.

RESULTS

The average distance between distance between the fibula tip and sural nerve is 16.6 ± 4.4 mm. The average distance between peroneal tendons sheath and the sural nerve at 5 cm, 3 cm, and 2 cm from the proximal fibular tip was 29.6 ± 3.2 mm, 24.2 ± 3.6 mm, and 19.7 ± 2.7 mm, respectively. The average distance between the peroneal tendons sheath and the sural nerve at 2 cm and 1.5 cm distal to fibular tip was 9.1 ± 3.5 mm and 7.8 ± 3.3 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The distance from the peroneal tendons sheath to the sural nerve decreases from proximal to distal. As the distance between the peroneal tendons sheath and the sural nerve decreases from proximal to distal, performing the tendoscopy portal more distally would increase the risk of nerve iatrogenic injury.

The distance from the peroneal tendons sheath to the sural nerve at the posterior tip of the fibula decreases from proximal to distal

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare the distance from the peroneal tendons sheath to the sural nerve in different points proximally and distally to the tip of the fibula.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen lower extremities were dissected to expose the nerves and tendons. Having the posterior tip of the fibula as a reference, the distance between the tendons sheath and the sural nerve was measured in each point with a tachometer with three independent different observers. Two measures were taken distally at 1.5 and 2 cm from fibula tip and 3 measures were performed proximally at 2, 3, and 5 cm from fibula tip. Data were described using means, standard deviations, medians, and minimum and maximum values.

RESULTS

The average distance between distance between the fibula tip and sural nerve is 16.6 ± 4.4 mm. The average distance between peroneal tendons sheath and the sural nerve at 5 cm, 3 cm, and 2 cm from the proximal fibular tip was 29.6 ± 3.2 mm, 24.2 ± 3.6 mm, and 19.7 ± 2.7 mm, respectively. The average distance between the peroneal tendons sheath and the sural nerve at 2 cm and 1.5 cm distal to fibular tip was 9.1 ± 3.5 mm and 7.8 ± 3.3 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The distance from the peroneal tendons sheath to the sural nerve decreases from proximal to distal. As the distance between the peroneal tendons sheath and the sural nerve decreases from proximal to distal, performing the tendoscopy portal more distally would increase the risk of nerve iatrogenic injury.

Results of Peroneal Tendoscopy With a Technical Modification

BACKGROUND:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of tendoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of peroneal tendon (PT) pathologies, and to evaluate the results of our technical modification.

METHODS:

Twenty ankles of 18 patients with retrofibular pain, operated on between 2006 and 2012, were included in this study. Peroneal tendoscopy was performed diagnostically for the patients who were diagnosed as having "peroneal tendinopathy" with physical examination, x-ray, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). After being diagnosed by peroneal tendoscopy, patients were definitively treated with either tendoscopy or open surgery.

RESULTS:

Thirteen of 20 ankles had accompanying ankle pathology with PT pathology, and the other 7 ankles had no concomitant pathology. We detected peroneal tenosynovitis (PTS) in 13 patients, PT tear in 7 patients, and vincula thickening in 1 patient. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 76 preoperatively, and after 2 years' follow-up the AOFAS score was 96.

CONCLUSION:

Tendoscopy is a useful method for the diagnosis and treatment of PT pathologies. The patients with clinical suspicion of PT pathology were treated or diagnosed by peroneal tendoscopy with our technical modification.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Tendoscopy of Achilles, peroneal and tibialis posterior tendons: An evidence-based update

BACKGROUND

Tendoscopy has been proposed in treating several conditions affecting tendons around the ankle. We reviewed literature to investigate the efficacy of Achilles, peroneal and tibialis posterior tendoscopy.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA checklist, the Medline, Scopus and EMBASE databases were searched, including studies reporting patients affected by disorders of Achilles, peroneal and tibialis posterior tendons and treated by tendoscopy (or tendoscopic-assisted procedures). The tendoscopic technique, rehabilitation protocol, clinical scores, patient satisfaction, success and failure rates and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies (319 procedures) dealt with Achilles tendoscopy, nine (108) and six (78) about peroneal and tibialis posterior, respectively. Wound healing, cosmetic results, complication rate, work and sport resumption delay were satisfactory. Clinical scores, classification methods and rehabilitation protocols adopted were heterogeneous.

CONCLUSIONS

The recent scientific evidence suggests that tendoscopy and endoscopic-assisted percutaneous procedures are a safe and effective treatment in chronic and acute disorders of tendons around the ankle.

Measuring Visualized Tendon Length in Peroneal Tendoscopy

BACKGROUND

Despite multiple studies outlining peroneal tendoscopy, no study exists to evaluate how effective tendoscopy is at visualizing the peroneal tendons without missing a lesion. We sought to measure the length of the peroneal tendons that could be visualized using tendoscopy.

METHODS

Ten fresh cadaveric specimens were evaluated using standard peroneal tendoscopy techniques. Peroneus longus and brevis tendons were pierced percutaneously with Kirschner wires at the edge of what could be seen through the camera. The tendon sheaths were then dissected and the distances from anatomic landmarks were directly measured. During zone 3 peroneus longus tendoscopy, a more distal portal site was created for the final 5 specimens.

RESULTS

The peroneus brevis could be visualized through the entirety of zone 1 and up to an average of 19.5 mm (95% confidence interval, 16.5-22.5) from its insertion onto the base of the fifth metatarsal in zone 2. Peroneus longus could be visualized through the entirety of zones 1 and 2 and up to an average of 9.7 mm from its insertion onto the base of the first metatarsal in zone 3. This distance was decreased significantly with a more distal portal. The muscle belly of peroneus brevis terminated an average of 1.8 mm (-3.7 to 7.3) above the tip of the lateral malleolus.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite limitations, these results suggest that the vast majority of the length of the peroneal tendons can be seen during routine peroneal tendoscopy. A more distal skin portal site may improve visualization of zone 3 of peroneus longus.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study confirms the ability of peroneal tendoscopy to see the entire tendon length with appropriate portal placement.

Foot and ankle tendoscopies: current concepts review

Tendoscopy is an apparently safe and reliable procedure to manage some foot and ankle disorders.The most common foot and ankle tendoscopies are: Achilles; peroneal; and posterior tibial tendon.Tendoscopy may be used as an adjacent procedure to other techniques.Caution is recommended to avoid neurovascular injuries.Predominantly level IV and V studies are found in the literature, with no level I studies still available.There are many promising and evolving endoscopic techniques for tendinopathies around the foot and ankle, but studies of higher levels of evidence are needed to strongly recommend these procedures. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:440-447. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.160028.

Peroneal tendoscopy--more than just a solitary procedure: case-series

This study presents a series of 13 patients who underwent peroneal tendoscopy as a solitary or accessory procedure at our department in 2013. Patients were clinically diagnosed with peroneal tendons disorders and underwent an additional radiological assessment. Peroneal tendoscopy was carried out in a standard manner before any other arthroscopic or open procedure. Postoperative management depended on the type of pathology. We found 3 peroneus brevis tendon partial tears, 4 cases of a low-lying peroneus brevis muscle belly, 5 cases of tenosynovitis, and 1 case of an intrasheath peroneal tendon subluxation. In 5 patients peroneal tendoscopy was performed as a solitary procedure and in 8 patients as an accessory procedure – together with anterior or posterior ankle arthroscopy, combined posterior and anterior ankle arthroscopy, or open surgery. Both as a solitary and accessory procedure, peroneal tendoscopy was safe and successful, ie, all patients were without any symptoms at one-year follow-up. Our series of patients showed that peroneal tendoscopy can be used both as an independent procedure as well as a valuable accessory procedure.

Peroneal tendoscopy

Peroneal tendoscopy is indicated for peroneal tenosynovitis, subluxation or dislocation, snapping, partial tears requiring debridement, and postoperative adhesions and scarring. Peroneal tendoscopy was also found to be valuable as a diagnostic tool in some instances. It is generally reported to have good to excellent outcomes in most patients with a relatively low occurrence of complications.

Foot and ankle tendoscopy: evidence-based recommendations

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of the current literature on tendoscopy of the foot and ankle and assign an evidence-based grade of recommendation for or against intervention.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was performed on May 26, 2013, using the PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Studies focusing on the use of foot and ankle tendoscopy were isolated, and these articles were then reviewed and assigned a Level of Evidence (I through V). The literature was then analyzed, and a grade of recommendation was assigned for tendoscopy of the tendons of the foot and ankle on which the procedure is generally performed.

RESULTS

There is weak evidence (grade Cf) to support the use of tendoscopy on the Achilles, flexor hallucis longus, and peroneal tendons. Insufficient evidence (grade I) exists to assign a grade of recommendation for tendoscopy of the tibialis posterior, tibialis anterior, flexor digitorum longus, extensor hallucis longus, and extensor digitorum longus.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive review of the literature on foot and ankle tendoscopy has shown predominantly Level IV and V studies, with just 1 Level II study. On the basis of the current literature available, there is poor evidence (grade Cf) in support of Achilles, flexor hallucis longus, and peroneal tendoscopy for the common indications. There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation (grade I) for or against tendoscopy of the tibialis posterior, tibialis anterior, flexor digitorum longus, extensor hallucis longus, and extensor digitorum longus. Although current literature suggests that tendoscopy is a safe and effective procedure, original scientific articles of higher levels of evidence are needed before a stronger recommendation can be assigned.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level II, IV, and V studies.