The patella in total knee arthroplasty: to resurface or not is the question. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014;7:117-124. [PMID: 24706154 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-014-9212-4]

What are the Outcomes of Secondary Patella Resurfacing for Dissatisfaction Following Primary Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 604 Knees

BACKGROUND

Secondary patella resurfacing is often performed for dissatisfaction following primary knee arthroplasty where the native patella was retained. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate outcomes of secondary patella resurfacing.

METHODS

The systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies reporting on patients who underwent secondary patella resurfacing after previous primary knee arthroplasty with retention of the native patella were considered eligible. The risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized studies tool. A random-effects model and the inverse-variance weighting method was used for meta-analysis. There were sixteen retrospective studies including 604 knees (594 patients) with a mean follow up of 42 months (range, 2 to 197).

RESULTS

An overall improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) was achieved in 53% of cases from pooled data available for 293 knees [95% Confidence Interval (CI) (0.44, 0.62), I2=68% - moderate heterogeneity]. The pooled proportion of patients satisfied with the procedure was 59% [95% CI (48, 68), I2 = 70% - moderate heterogeneity] in a sample size of 415. There was a minimal rate (2%) of complication incidence when performing secondary patella resurfacing and a pooled rate of revision surgery of 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

An improvement in pain, satisfaction, and PROMs was achieved in slightly more than half of the patients following secondary patella resurfacing. However, studies lacked standardized objective selection criteria for the procedure and the available data was predominantly retrospective, with high heterogeneity and variation in outcome reporting.

Patellar resurfacing might not be mandatory in contralateral second total knee replacement even if performed during replacement of the first knee

INTRODUCTION

The appropriateness or necessity of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is not clearly established. The objective of the present study was to compare the clinical and functional results of patients with bilateral involvement, operated on in one knee by TKA with patellar resurfacing and in the other knee by TKA without resurfacing. The hypothesis was that there was no difference in results between the two sides.

METHOD

This was a retrospective cohort of patients operated on by TKA without patellar resurfacing in a second osteoarthritic knee after contralateral TKA with patellar resurfacing. Twenty consecutive patients who underwent second primary TKA constituted their own control group (40 knees). Iwano scores were comparable. Mean age was 75.9±6.2years. Mean time between the two procedures was 20.6±11.9months.

RESULTS

There were no differences in SF-36, KOOS or Lille patellofemoral scores between the right and left knees. Sixty-five percent of patients were unable to differentiate the performance of their knees in activities of daily living.

CONCLUSION

The present study did not differentiate results according to patellar resurfacing, showing the limitations of resurfacing for early functional gain after primary TKA. Resurfacing might thus not be essential, even if it was performed in replacement of the first knee.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective cohort study.

The Fate of Unresurfaced Patellae in Contemporary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Early to Midterm Results

BACKGROUND

Leaving the patella unresurfaced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has increased significantly over the past decade in the United States, likely due to modern patella-friendly implants, complications with resurfacing, and the knowledge that historical studies were scientifically confounded. This study evaluated revision-free survivorship out to 8.5 years in a cohort of contemporary primary TKAs with patella-friendly femoral components and unresurfaced patellae.

METHODS

A total of 1,053 consecutive primary TKAs with unresurfaced patellae were retrospectively reviewed. A selective patellar nonresurfacing protocol was used for all cases. Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimates were calculated based on patellar revision and the latest follow-up. An aggressive lateral patellar facetectomy was performed in 78% (823 of 1,053) of cases. The cohort was 62% women and 43% American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification I or II with a mean age and body mass index of 65 years (range, 35 to 94) and 35 kg/m2 (range, 18 to 65), respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 4 (0.4%, 4 of 1,053) unresurfaced patellae were revised. Three were resurfaced as part of other procedures: 2 for global instability and one for aseptic loosening at a mean of 1.6 years; and one patella was resurfaced by an outside surgeon for unexplained pain. The all-cause revision-free survivorship estimate specifically related to the patella was 98.9% (95% confidence interval, 98 to 100) out to 8.5 years. No significant difference in survivorship was related to patellae with or without a lateral patellar facetectomy (99.5 versus 98.1%, P ≥ .191); however, 3 of 4 patellar revisions occurred in TKAs without a lateral patellar facetectomy (P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate excellent revision-free survivorship related to unresurfaced patellae, particularly when a lateral facetectomy was performed. These early to midterm results using modern patella-friendly femoral components are promising and comparable to resurfaced patellae in the literature.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

A Crossed Screw Patellar Reconstruction Technique for the Treatment of the Severely Deficient Scaphoid Shaped Patella in Total Knee Arthroplasty

One of the contraindications to patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty is a thin and severely eroded 'deficient' patella. However, such patients often present with severe patellofemoral joint arthritis, patellar lateral subluxation, and patella maltracking, which can only be treated effectively with resurfacing. While various treatments have been proposed, options remain limited. Here we introduce a method of patella reconstruction using four 2.7-mm titanium cortical screws crossing each other into the inner shell of the patella. This provides a scaffold onto which bone cement and any standard polyethylene patellar component can be fixed. Postoperatively, the patient had no anterior knee pain, no patella maltracking, and no component loosening. Advantages of this technique include minimization of extensor disruption, low costs, easy accessibility, reproducibility, and improved mechanical strength.

Outcomes and Survivorships of Total Knee Arthroplasty Comparing Resurfaced and Unresurfaced Patellae

BACKGROUND

The decision to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. While there is some consensus that leaving the patella unresurfaced increases risk of reoperation, there is conflicting evidence about patient reported outcomes or indications for resurfacing. This study sought to determine recent rates of patellar resurfacing, examine factors affecting rates of resurfacing, and analyze the associations between patellar resurfacing and both revision rates and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

The American Joint Replacement Registry was used to identify primary TKAs performed for osteoarthritis between 2012 and 2021. Cases were classified as resurfaced patella and unresurfaced patella (URP). Outcomes analyzed included trends in patellar resurfacing, factors influencing rate of resurfacing, revision rates, operative time, and 2 PROMs.

RESULTS

Rates of patellar resurfacing decreased and rates of URP increased significantly faster in ambulatory surgery centers and among high volume surgeons. Operative time was significantly lower in URP versus resurfaced patella (88.15 versus 89.90 minutes). The URP were significantly more likely to require revision surgery (odds ratio = 1.206 (1.078, 1.35), P = .0011). There was no significant difference in the likelihood of achieving the minimal clinically important difference in PROMs between resurfaced and nonresurfaced TKAs at 1 year (odds ratio = 1.060 (0.710, 1.581), P = .7755).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in minimal clinically important difference between resurfaced and URPs and no clinically relevant difference in operative time. However, URPs were more likely to require revision surgery. Therefore, the decision not to resurface should be made carefully considering the known risk of revision and the uncertain benefit.

Patellar resurfacing and kneeling ability after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Difficulty kneeling following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains highly prevalent, and has cultural, social, and occupational implications. With no clear evidence of superiority, whether or not to resurface the patella remains debatable. This systematic review examined whether resurfacing the patella (PR) or not (NPR) influences kneeling ability following TKA.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted by following PRISMA guidelines. Three electronic databases were searched utilizing a search strategy developed with the aid of a department librarian. Study quality was assessed using MINROS criteria. Article screening, methodological quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two independent authors, and a third senior author was consulted if consensus was not reached.

RESULTS

A total of 459 records were identified, with eight studies included in the final analysis, and all deemed to be level III evidence. The average MINORS score was 16.5 for comparative studies and 10.5 for non-comparative studies. The total number of patients was 24,342, with a mean age of 67.6 years. Kneeling ability was predominantly measured as a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), with two studies also including an objective assessment. Two studies demonstrated a statistically significant link between PR and kneeling, with one demonstrating improved kneeling ability with PR and the other reporting the opposite. Other potential factors associated with kneeling included gender, postoperative flexion, and body mass index (BMI). Re-operation rates were significantly higher in the NPR cohort whereas PR cohorts had higher Feller scores, patient-reported limp and patellar apprehension.

CONCLUSION

Despite its importance to patients, kneeling remains not only under-reported but also ill-defined in the literature, with no clear consensus regarding the optimum outcome assessment tool. Conflicting evidence remains as to whether PR influences kneeling ability, and to clarify the situation, large prospective randomized studies are required.

Patella non-resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty provides good functional results-a retrospective review of nine thousand three hundred forty six knees

PURPOSE

Patellar resurfacing has long been a contentious subject in TKA with no consensus and the literature yielding disparate results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term functional outcomes and complications of patients undergoing primary TKA without patellar resurfacing (non-resurfacing).

METHODS

This study retrospectively analysed 9346 patients who underwent primary manual jig-based TKA without patellar resurfacing at a single high-volume arthroplasty centre between 2010 and 2018. Patients with a minimum three year follow-up irrespective of disease etiology and implant manufacturer were included in the study. Primary outcome was measured using Oxford knee score and patellofemoral Feller score. Secondary outcomes included determining the incidence of patellofemoral complications and re-operation rates following TKA.

RESULTS

A total of 8695 knees were eligible for final evaluation having a mean follow-up of 6.6 years. Mean age of the patients was 62.6 (SD-7.5) years with female predominance of (N-6619, 70.8%). The majority of the patients had primary OA (N-8792, 94.1%) with varus deformity (N-8642, 92.46%). Depuy was the most used manufacturer (n = 2592, 26.4%) with the posterior stabilised (N-4127, 44.2%) design being the most predominant. The mean Feller score of the study population was 24.5 (SD = 3) with a majority of patients having good to excellent outcomes (86.95%, N-8424) and mean Oxford knee score was 36.9 (SD-6.9) with a majority of the patients having an OKS greater than 30 (87.1%, N-8133) with anterior knee pain (AKP) reported in only 4.8% patients (N-418). Most common complications included patellar clunk (N-56, 0.7%), traumatic patellar fractures (N-62, 0.8%), quadriceps tendon tear (N-54, 0.7%) and patellar dislocation (N-4, 0.05%) CONCLUSION: Patellar non-resurfacing has no detrimental impact on functional outcomes and incidence of AKP. We conclude that it is a safe, cost-effective and satisfactory approach in primary TKA with no significant complications.

Selective Patella Resurfacing in Contemporary Cruciate Retaining and Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

Leaving the patella unresurfaced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing due to modern patella-friendly implants, awareness that complications are not uncommon with resurfacing, and knowledge that historical studies were scientifically confounded. This study examined the effect of selective patellar resurfacing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using modern implants and techniques in cohorts rigorously matched for demographics and osteoarthritis severity.

METHODS

A total of 166 TKAs performed without patellar resurfacing were case-control matched to 166 TKAs with patella resurfacing. Case-control matching was based on demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status, comorbidities, and osteoarthritis severity. No significant differences were observed between cohorts for demographics (P ≥ .347), comorbidities (P ≥ .443), or radiographic osteoarthritis severity (P ≥ .078). Radiographic alignment and prospectively collected PROMs were evaluated preoperatively and at latest clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, patellar tilt was less for the unresurfaced patella group (3 versus 4°, P = .003); however, postoperative patellar tilt was not different (3 versus 3°, P = .225). At a mean of 2.1 years follow-up (range, 1 to 7), University of California Los Angeles Activity Level was significantly higher for the unresurfaced patella group (6.3 versus 5.5, P = .002), but the mean group difference did not reach a minimal clinically important difference. There were no other significant differences in PROMs or reoperation rates between cohorts (P ≥ .135).

CONCLUSION

In contemporary cruciate retaining and substituting TKA designs, not resurfacing the patella in select patients may achieve comparable PROMs and re-operation rates; and potentially greater activity level compared to patella resurfacing at early follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The AAHKS Clinical Research Award: Resurfacing the Thin Native Patella: Is It Safe?

BACKGROUND

Whether to resurface the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains debated. One often cited reason for not resurfacing is inadequate patellar thickness. The aim of this study was to describe the implant survivorships, reoperations, complications and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent patellar resurfacing of a thin native patella.

METHODS

From 2000 to 2010, 7,477 patients underwent primary TKA with patellar resurfacing and had an intraoperatively, caliper-measured patella thickness at our institution. Of these, 200 (2.7%) had a preresection patellar thickness of ≤19 millimeters (mm). Mean preresection thickness was 18 mm (range, 12-19). Mean age was 69 years, mean body mass index was 31 kg/m², and 93% of the patients were women. Median follow-up was 10 years (range, 2-20).

RESULTS

At 10 years, survivorships free of any patella revision, patella-related reoperation, and periprosthetic patella fracture were 98%, 98%, and 99%, respectively. There were 3 patella revisions (1 aseptic loosening, 2 periprosthetic joint infections). There were 2 additional patella-related reoperations for patellar clunk. There were 3 nonoperatively managed periprosthetic patella fractures. Radiographically, all nonrevised knees had well-fixed patellae. Knee society scores improved from mean 36 points (interquartile range [IQR] 24-49) preoperatively to mean 81 points (IQR 77-81) at 10-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Resurfacing the thin native patella was associated with high survivorship free of patellar revision at 10-year follow-up. Nevertheless, there was 1 case of patellar loosening and 3 periprosthetic patella fractures. These risks must be weighed against the known higher incidence of revision when the thin native patella is left unresurfaced.

Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty, a Never-Ending Controversy; Case Report and Literature Review

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a lifesaving procedure for advanced gonarthrosis. However, patella resurfacing (PR) in TKA remains a controversial procedure, leading to extensive discussions amongst orthopedic surgeons, regarding its indications and results. Based on these premises, we present a clinical case of a 70-year-old Caucasian woman admitted for pain, swelling and limitation of left knee joint mobility. Her medical history records an Ahlback stage IV gonarthrosis with simultaneous bilateral TKA surgery performed in different hospital, when two NexGen cemented total prostheses were implanted with patellar resurfacing being performed only on the right side. Our clinical (American Knee Society Score, Lonner and Feller scales) and radiological evaluations (CT scan and Xray) revealed left patellar arthrosis and a slight lateral subluxation of the patella. The chosen treatment plan was revision surgery for PR and patellar prosthesis with a cemented patellar component, cross-linked polyethylene, no 32 NexGen model with 8.5 mm thickness. The immediate and distant postoperative evolution was favorable. Extensive literature review shows that, at present, PR remains at surgeon's discretion mainly based on his previous results. Therefore, we believe there is an imperative need to develop high quality studies based on accurate scientific evidence to universally establish valid guidelines for PR in TKA.

Does Choice of Patellar Implant in Total Knee Arthroplasty Matter?: A Randomized Comparative Trial of 3 Commonly Used Designs

BACKGROUND

There is currently a lack of evidence to identify the optimal patellar implant design in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to assess clinical, intraoperative, radiographic, and scintigraphic differences between inlay (IN), onlay round (OR), and onlay oval (OO) patellar implants.

METHODS

A parallel-group, double-blinded, randomized trial compared IN, OR, and OO patellar implants using the same posterior-stabilized TKA prosthesis for each. Patient outcomes were prospectively followed for a minimum of 2 years, with survivorship outcomes followed for a mean of 5 years. The primary outcome was the between-group differences in the mean Kujala score change from preoperatively to 2 years postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included differences in other knee-specific and general health outcomes, intraoperative characteristics, radiographic parameters, patellar vascularity, and implant survivorship.

RESULTS

A total of 121 participants (40 in the IN group, 41 in OR group, 40 in the OO group) were allocated to 1 of 3 implant designs. At 2 years postoperatively, there were no significant differences in Kujala score changes between groups (p = 0.7; Kruskal-Wallis test). Compared with the IN group, the OR group showed greater improvements in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Activities of Daily Living and in KOOS Quality of Life compared with the OO group. However, the OO design exhibited better bone coverage and lower lateral facetectomy rates compared with the IN and OR designs. The IN group had more lateral contact compared with the OO group (p = 0.02; Fisher exact test), but the overall value for lateral contact was not significant (p = 0.09; chi-square test). There were no differences in postoperative scintigraphic vascularity (p = 0.8; chi-square test). There was 1 revision for infection at 3 years postoperatively in the OO group, and no revision in the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patellar design did not influence patellofemoral outcomes or survivorship. However, OR implants showed improvements in some secondary patient-reported outcome measures, and OO implants exhibited superior bone coverage and improvements in several intraoperative, radiographic, and scintigraphic outcomes. These findings, combined with superior long-term implant survivorship from previous studies, add support for the use of onlay designs in TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Is the patient aware of the difference between resurfaced and nonresurfaced patella after bilateral total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of simultaneous bilateral randomized trials

Purpose

The optimal practice of patellar management in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. This systematic review was conducted to compare patella-related (1) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), (2) clinical outcomes, and (3) reoperation rates after TKA with patellar resurfacing (PR) and nonresurfacing (NPR) in single patients undergoing bilateral patellar procedures during simultaneous bilateral TKA.

Methods

This review included prospective bilateral randomized trials investigating patella-related PROMs, clinical outcomes, and reoperation (secondary resurfacing and patellar component revision) and other patella-related complications in single patients undergoing randomly assigned PR and NPR during bilateral TKA.

Results

Six studies were included. There was no difference in PROMs between PR and NPR in five studies, whereas PR was found to be superior to NPR in one study. Five studies reported similar functional outcomes and complication rates between PR and NPR, while one study found better clinical outcomes and a lower complication rate in PR. Between-group secondary resurfacing and patellar revision rates were similar in all studies.

Conclusions

The majority of patients who underwent bilateral patellar procedures could not tell the difference between PR and NPR following bilateral TKA. There were no differences in clinical outcomes or reoperation and complication rates between PR and NPR. No evidence was found to support routine PR.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level 1

Clinical Outcomes After Stage-One Antibiotic Coated Molded Hip Spacer

BACKGROUND

Two-stage exchange remains the gold standard for managing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We evaluated the outcomes of patients treated with a specific molded articulating antibiotic hip spacer for PJI at a tertiary referral center.

METHODS

An institutional database was retrospectively queried for patients who underwent implantation of spacer between 2009-2019. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

We identified 88 patients at an average age of 60.4 years who received a spacer implant, with an average of 4.2 years follow-up (standard deviation [SD] 2.5 years). A total of 34 patients (38.6%) had a "clean" two-stage course with successful reimplantation and no evidence of infection at 1-year follow-up. The remaining patients (61.4%) required 3.67 (±0.52) additional surgeries. Overall reimplantation rate was 72%. Causative bacterial agents included MSSA (n = 22), MRSA (n = 16), coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (n = 14), and polymicrobial (n = 12). Regarding complications, there were 13 (15%) dislocations, 16 (18%) periprosthetic fractures, 8 (9%) bent/fractured stems, and 16 (18%) patients had clinically significant subsidence. Patients with previous extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) experienced higher rates of bent/broken spacer stems (25% vs 3.1%; P = .006) periprosthetic fractures (37.5% vs 10.9%; P = .010), and dislocations (37.5% vs 6.2%; P = .001). The rate of infection clearance was lower in the prior ETO cohort (26.6% vs 54.2%; P = .029).

CONCLUSION

We report outcomes in patients who underwent implantation of a specific molded articulating hip spacer at our institution. Infection eradication was roughly in line with published series of hip PJI treatment. There was a high rate of mechanical complications, especially in those patients who required an ETO.

Osteoarthritic Severity in Unresurfaced Patellae Does Not Adversely Affect Patient-reported Outcomes in Contemporary Primary TKA

Introduction:

The degree of osteoarthritis (OA) acceptable to leave in a native patella during unresurfaced total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unknown. This study's purpose was to examine the effect of patellofemoral OA severity on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in primary TKAs performed without patellar resurfacing.

Methods:

One hundred ninety-three primary TKAs performed without patellar resurfacing were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative patellofemoral OA severity was graded on severity, marginal osteophytes, joint space narrowing, and chondral damage using accepted grading systems. Patellar tilt and tibiofemoral alignment were measured radiographically. PROMs were evaluated at a minimum of 1-year follow-up.

Results:

In multivariate regression, preoperative lateral patella Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥2 was associated with superior change in Knee Society Score pain with level walking, higher absolute change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (P ≤ 0.029), and knees ‟always feeling normal” (odds ratio [OR] 3.12; P = 0.005). Osteoarthritis Research Society International atlas grades and Outerbridge classification scores did not significantly influence PROMs.

Discussion:

Worse preoperative OA severity in the lateral patellar facet, graded with the Kellgren-Lawrence system, predicted superior knee-specific PROMs in patients with unresurfaced patellae after contemporary TKA. This observation supports the clinical finding that patients with more severe OA have optimized patient outcomes and highlights the minimal contribution of patella OA to knee function after primary TKA.

Patella Strength Characteristics in Cemented vs Press-fit Implants: A Biomechanical Analysis of Initial Stability

Background

Patellar resurfacing is routinely performed during total knee arthroplasty to reduce pain associated with patellofemoral osteoarthritis. With 3-dimensional ingrowth materials readily available, the present study aimed to evaluate if cemented polyethylene (CP) patellar buttons conferred higher ultimate load to failure than press-fit metal-backed (PF) buttons in axial compression.

Material and methods

Ten matched cadaveric and 20 composite patellae were resurfaced and implanted with either a PF or CP button. Biomechanical testing using an MTS machine was performed to measure the force required to generate a periprosthetic patella fracture. Mean load to failure and load to failure per 1-mm patellar thickness were compared with a paired and independent samples Students’ t-test for the cadaveric and composite patellae, respectively.

Results

The average load to failure for the matched cadaveric patellae with PF implants was significantly lower than that for patellae with CP buttons (4082.05 N vs 5898.37 N, P = .045). The average load to failure for composite patella with PF implants was significantly higher than that for composite patellae with CP implants (6004.09 N vs 4551.40 N, P = .001). The mean load to failure per 1-mm patellar thickness was also significantly higher for composite patellae with PF implants (263.80 N/mm vs 200.37 N/mm, P = .001).

Conclusion

Cadaveric patellae with cemented implants had a significantly higher ultimate load to failure in axial compression than press-fit patella. However, this result was reversed in the composite model. Exploration of biological and composite model properties could provide further insight into patellar implant selection during total knee arthroplasty.

Artificial Intelligence Based Patient-Specific Preoperative Planning Algorithm for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Previous studies have shown that the manufacturer’s default preoperative plans for total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific guides require frequent, time-consuming changes by the surgeon. Currently, no research has been done on predicting preoperative plans for orthopedic surgery using machine learning. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate whether artificial intelligence (AI) driven planning tools can create surgeon and patient-specific preoperative plans that require fewer changes by the surgeon. A dataset of 5409 preoperative plans, including the manufacturer’s default and the plans corrected by 39 surgeons, was collected. Features were extracted from the preoperative plans that describe the implant sizes, position, and orientation in a surgeon- and patient-specific manner. Based on these features, non-linear regression models were employed to predict the surgeon’s corrected preoperative plan. The average number of corrections a surgeon has to make to the preoperative plan generated using AI was reduced by 39.7% compared to the manufacturer’s default plan. The femoral and tibial implant size in the manufacturer’s plan was correct in 68.4% and 73.1% of the cases, respectively, while the AI-based plan was correct in 82.2% and 85.0% of the cases, respectively, compared to the surgeon approved plan. Our method successfully demonstrated the use of machine learning to create preoperative plans in a surgeon- and patient-specific manner for total knee arthroplasty.

Factors Affecting the Risk of Aseptic Patellar Complications in Primary TKA Performed with Cemented All-Polyethylene Patellar Resurfacing

BACKGROUND

Patellar complications are a consequential cause of failure of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of demographic and patient factors with the long-term risk of patellar complications as a function of time in a very large cohort of primary TKAs performed with patellar resurfacing.

METHODS

We identified 27,192 primary TKAs utilizing cemented all-polyethylene patellar components that were performed at a single institution from 1977 through 2015. We evaluated the risk of any aseptic patellar complication and any aseptic patellar reoperation or revision, subanalyzed risks of reoperation or revision for loosening, maltracking/instability, and wear, and evaluated the risk of clinical diagnosis of patellar fracture and clunk/crepitus. The mean age at TKA was 68 years (range, 18 to 99 years); 57% of the patients were female. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 32 kg/m2. The primary diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 83%, and 70% of the TKAs were posterior-stabilized. Median follow-up was 7 years (range, 2 to 40 years). Risk factors for each outcome were evaluated with Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and seventy-seven knees with all-polyethylene patellae developed patellar complications. Survivorship free from any aseptic patellar complication was 93.3% at 20 years. Twenty-year survivorship free from any aseptic patellar reoperation was 97.3% and free from any aseptic patellar revision was 97.4%. Fifteen-year survivorship for the same end points for procedures performed from 2000 to 2015 was 95.7%, 99.2% and 99.3% respectively, representing substantial improvements compared with implants placed before 2000. Univariate analysis demonstrated that male sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.4), an age of <65 years (HR, 1.3), and a BMI of ≥30 kg/m2 (HR, 1.2) were associated with increased risk of patellar complications (all p ≤0.01). Posterior-stabilized designs were associated with fewer patellar reoperations and revisions overall (HR, 0.4 and 0.4; p < 0.001) but higher risk of patellar clunk/crepitus (HR, 14.1; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The 20-year survivorship free from any aseptic patellar complication in this series of cemented all-polyethylene patellae was 93%. Important risk factors for any aseptic patellar complication were male sex, an age of <65 years, a BMI of ≥30 kg/m2, and a patella implanted before 2000.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fracture Risk With Patella Resurfacing During Total Knee Arthroplasty After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone-Patella-Bone Autograft: A Biomechanical Analysis

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are common injuries. Ipsilateral bone patellar tendon bone (BPTB) autograft has been frequently used for ACL reconstructions. A large percentage of patients who sustain ACL ruptures develop early osteoarthritis and require total knee arthroplasty (TKA). When patients with previous BPTB autograft for an ACL tear undergo TKA, there may be an increased risk of fracture after patellar resurfacing.

Methods

There were 20 artificial Sawbones and 10 cadaveric patellae resurfaced. To simulate the presence of a previous BPTB autograft, a bone plug was removed from the anterior surface of the patellae and was resurfaced with a cemented patellar button. Biomechanical testing was performed to determine the compressive load to fracture of patellae with and without previous BPTB autograft.

Results

The average maximum load to failure for the artificial Sawbones patellae without a previous BPTB autograft was 4551.40 N ± 753.12 compared with 2855.39 N ± 531.46 with a previous BPTB autograft (P < .001). The average maximum load to failure for the cadaveric patellae without a previous BPTB autograft was 7256.37 N ± 1473.97 compared with 5232.22 N ± 475.04 with a previous BPTB autograft (P = .021).

Conclusions

The results demonstrate a significantly lower maximum load to failure of a resurfaced patella in the presence of a previous BPTB autograft. This can be used to aid in the decision of whether to resurface the patellae in these patients and to educate patients that the presence of a previous BPTB autograft may be an increased risk factor for patella fracture after TKA.

Patellar tilt does not affect patient reported outcomes after modern total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The focus of patella maltracking after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has traditionally been on patella polyethylene damage and failure mechanisms rather than functional outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of patellar tilt on patient reported outcomes (PROMS) after primary TKA performed with patellar resurfacing.

METHODS

A retrospective review using a single implant design was performed. Patella tilt was radiographically measured according to a standardized protocol. PROMS related to pain, function, and satisfaction were evaluated preoperatively and at minimum 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 468 TKAs were included for analysis. Mean age and BMI were 64 years and 35 kg/m²; respectively while 63% of patients were female. The median follow-up period was 12.7 months. Overall, patellar tilt was corrected from a median of 5.0 degrees preoperatively to a median of 3.0 degrees postoperatively. Preoperative, postoperative, and the change in patellar tilt had no significant effects on PROMS at minimum 1-year follow-up (p ≥ 0.092). Satisfaction in knee function while getting out of bed was higher for patients with approximately the same patellar tilt before and after TKA compared to patients with an increase in lateral patellar tilt (95% vs 80%, p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

The range of patellar tilt studied in this cohort had little to no effect on PROMS. However, suboptimal patellar tracking may potentiate edge loading of the polyethylene and contribute to implant damage in the long-term. These results are helpful to focus efforts on the tibiofemoral articulation as the predominant determinant of patient outcomes.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes after Total Knee Arthroplasty with and without Patellar Resurfacing in the Same Patients

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Patellar management during total knee arthroplasty: a review

The optimal management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial and surgeons tend to approach the patella with one of three general mindsets: always resurface the patella, never resurface the patella, or selectively resurface the patella based on specific patient or patellar criteria.

Studies comparing resurfacing and non-resurfacing of the patella during TKA have reported inconsistent and contradictory findings.

When resurfacing the patella is chosen, there are a number of available patellar component designs, materials, and techniques for cutting and fixation.

When patellar non-resurfacing is chosen, several alternatives are available, including patellar denervation, lateral retinacular release, and patelloplasty. Surgeons may choose to perform any of these alone, or together in some combination.

Prospective randomized studies are needed to better understand which patellar management techniques contribute to superior postoperative outcomes. Until then, this remains a controversial topic, and options for patellar management will need to be weighed on an individual basis per patient.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:861-871. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200156

Benefits of CT Scanning for the Management of Knee Arthritis and Arthroplasty

This review investigated the potential value of computed tomography (CT) scans for the evaluation and management of knee arthritis and arthroplasty. Specifically, we evaluated the following: (1) assessment of arthritis within knee compartments, (2) patellofemoral joint assessment, (3) implant sizing prediction, (4) component alignment, (5) soft-tissue protection, and (6) potential concerns with radiation exposure. To compare if CT or X-ray imaging is more accurate and clinically relevant, a search was performed using Boolean search operators and terms: "CT," "radiograph," "joint alignment," "knee," and "arthroplasty," which yielded 661 results. Studies were evaluated based on (1) assessment of arthritis within knee compartments, (2) patellofemoral joint assessment, (3) implant sizing prediction, (4) component alignment, (5) soft-tissue protection, and (6) potential concerns with radiation exposure. Correlative and comparative analyses of imaging modalities to pre-, intra-, and postoperative clinical and patient-related factors were performed for the 63 included studies. CT scans were found to better detect medial and lateral arthritic changes, bony deformities, subchondral cysts, and cartilage losses. CT scans were shown to 99% accurately predict prosthetic sizes preoperatively. CT scans can also help better visualize surrounding anatomy, such as the posterior cruciate ligament, and have therefore been linked to better soft tissue protection during total knee arthroplasty. Although radiation is a potential concern, newer imaging protocols have comparable exposure to plain radiographs. Compared with plain radiographs, CT scans were found to be more accurate and provide more clinically relevant data. Therefore, the authors recommend the use of CT for the evaluation of certain patients with arthritis and for preoperative planning for knee arthroplasty.

Management of the Patella During Total Knee Arthroplasty

»

The optimal management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a controversial topic with no consensus.

»

Patellar management techniques during TKA include patellar retention or resurfacing with or without patellaplasty, as well as circumferential denervation and partial lateral facetectomy (PLF).

»

Special considerations such as patient age, etiology of disease, implant design, and surgeon preference should be accounted for when determining optimal management.

»

We recommend that most patellae be circumferentially denervated, regardless of whether they are resurfaced, as the potential benefits outweigh the small associated risks.

»

Evidence demonstrates improved functional outcomes with the addition of PLF to nonresurfaced patellae. There is currently a paucity of evidence of this technique with respect to resurfaced patellae.

»

Patellar resurfacing adds additional costs and health-care resources that should be considered in the decision-making process.

Midterm functional recovery of Total knee arthroplasty patients compared between the ATTUNE knee system and the press fit condylar (PFC) SIGMA knee system

BACKGROUND

The ATTUNE Knee System is a new prosthetic design that has theoretical advantages over the Press Fit Condylar (PFC) Sigma Knee System specific to improved knee kinematics and patellofemoral joint tracking. This study aimed to evaluate functional outcomes compared between the ATTUNE and PFC Sigma designs at a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients who received either the ATTUNE or PFC Sigma system during November 2013 to February 2015 at Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand). Functional outcomes were evaluated using Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, 2-min walk test (2MWT), modified knee score, numerical rating scale-pain, range of motion (ROM), and rate of anterior knee pain and crepitation at preoperation, 3-months, 1-year, and 5-years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Of 113 patients, 59 and 54 received the PFC Sigma and ATTUNE systems, respectively. At a minimum of 5-years follow-up, all functional outcomes improved significantly from the preoperative period although TUG test and 2MWT declined significantly from 1- to 5-years postoperatively only in the PFC Sigma group. The mean ROM at 5-years postoperatively was significantly higher in ATTUNE than in PFC Sigma; however, the difference was small (116° vs. 110°, respectively; p = 0.041). There were no significant differences in any of the other outcome measurements, including anterior knee pain, clunking, and crepitation, between groups at any study time point.

CONCLUSIONS

​Our results revealed no major differences in functional outcomes between the PFC Sigma and ATTUNE TKA designs at an intermediate-term follow-up of at least 5 years. Longer-term follow-up study is needed to evaluate the benefits of the ATTUNE design relative to polyethylene wear and the rate of aseptic loosening.

Secondary Patellar Resurfacing in TKA: A Combined Analysis of Registry Data and Biomechanical Testing

The German Arthroplasty registry (EPRD) has shown that different prosthesis systems have different rates of secondary patellar resurfacing: four years after implantation, the posterior-stabilized (PS) Vega prosthesis has a 3.2% risk of secondary patellar resurfacing compared to the cruciate-retaining (CR) Columbus prosthesis at 1.0% (both Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany). We hypothesized that PS implants have increased retropatellar pressure and a decreased retropatellar contact area compared to a CR design, which may lead to an increased likelihood of secondary patellar resurfacing. Eight fresh frozen specimens (cohort 1) were tested with an established knee rig. In addition, a possible influence of the registry-based patient collective (cohort 2) was investigated. No significant differences were found in patient data–cohort 2-(sex, age). A generally lower number of PS system cases is noteworthy. No significant increased patella pressure could be detected with the PS design, but a lower contact area was observed (cohort 1). Lower quadriceps force (100°–130° flexion), increased anterior movement of the tibia (rollback), greater external tilt of the patella, and increasing facet pressure in the Vega PS design indicate a multifactorial cause for a higher rate of secondary resurfacing which was found in the EPRD patient cohort and might be related to the PS’ principle function.

Controversy: supporting patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty - do it

Patellar resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty remains a controversial topic.Some surgeons routinely resurface the patella to avoid the increased rates of postoperative anterior knee pain and reoperation for secondary resurfacing, whilst others selectively resurface based on the presence of preoperative anterior knee pain, damaged articular cartilage, inflammatory arthritis, isolated patellofemoral arthritis, and patellar subluxation and/or maltracking. A third group of surgeons never resurface the patella.The anatomy and biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint as well as the advances in surgical techniques and prosthetic design must be taken into account when making a decision about whether to resurface the patella. Accurate component implantation if the patella is resurfaced becomes crucial to avoid complications.In our institution before 2008 we were performing a selective resurfacing of the patella, but in the last decade we have decided to always resurface it, with good outcomes and low complication rate. A reproducible surgical technique may be helpful in reducing the risk of postoperative anterior knee pain and complications related to implants.In this article we analyse the current trend and controversial topics in dealing with the patella in total knee arthroplasty, and discuss the available literature in order to sustain our choice. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:785-792. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190075.

New treatment of patellar instability after total knee arthroplasty: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Patellar instability is an uncommon complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Partial lateral patella facetectomy (LPF) with lateral retinaculum release treatment of patellar instability is rarely reported.

CASE SUMMARY

We present a case of patellar instability 8 mo after primary TKA. Treatment of this complication was adapted to address the cause of the dislocation. To eliminate patellar instability, we restored the vastus medialis and performed LPF with lateral retinaculum release. We achieved normal patellar tracking. Clinical and radiographic evaluations at the 1-year postoperative follow-up were satisfactory.

CONCLUSION

LPF with lateral retinaculum release represents a promising option to restore central patellar tracking in patients with patellar instability after TKA in cases without component malposition.

Does Circumferential Patellar Denervation Result in Decreased Knee Pain and Improved Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Nonresurfaced, Simultaneous Bilateral TKA?

BACKGROUND

Anterior knee pain, which has a prevalence of 4% to 49% after TKA, may be a cause of patient dissatisfaction after TKA. To limit the occurrence of anterior knee pain, patellar denervation with electrocautery has been proposed. However, studies have disagreed as to the efficacy of this procedure.Questions/purposes We evaluated patients undergoing bilateral, simultaneous TKA procedures without patellar resurfacing to ask: (1) Does circumferential patellar cauterization decrease anterior knee pain (Kujala score) postoperatively compared with non-cauterization of the patella? (2) Does circumferential patellar cauterization result in better functional outcomes based on patient report (VAS score, Oxford knee score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) than non-cauterization of the patella? (3) Is there any difference in the complication rate (infection, patellar maltracking, fracture, venous thromboembolism, or reoperation rate) between cauterized patellae and non-cauterized patellae?

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients (156 knees) were included in this prospective, quasi-randomized study, with each patient serving as his or her own control. Patellar cauterization was always performed on the right knee during simultaneous, bilateral TKA. Five patients (6%) were lost to follow-up before the 2-year minimum follow-up interval. A single surgeon performed all TKAs using the same type of implant, and osteophyte excision was performed in all patellae, which were left unresurfaced. Patellar cauterization was performed at 2 mm to 3 mm deep and approximately 5 mm circumferentially away from the patellar rim. The preoperative femorotibial angle and degree of osteoarthritis (according to the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system) were measured. Restoration of the patellofemoral joint was assessed using the anterior condylar ratio. Clinical outcomes, consisting of clinician-reported outcomes (ROM and Kujala score) and patient-reported outcomes (VAS pain score, Oxford knee score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 month and 2 years postoperatively. Preoperatively, the radiologic severity of osteoarthritis, based on the Kellgren-Lawrence classification, was not different between the two groups, nor were the baseline pain and knee scores. The mean femorotibial angle of the two groups was also comparable: 189° ± 4.9° and 191° ± 6.3° preoperatively (p = 0.051) and 177° ± 2.9° and 178° ± 2.1° postoperatively (p = 0.751) for cauterized and non-cauterized knees, respectively. The preoperative (0.3 ± 0.06 versus 0.3 ± 0.07; p = 0.744) and postoperative (0.3 ± 0.06 versus 0.2 ± 0.07; p = 0.192) anterior condylar ratios were also not different between the cauterized and non-cauterized groups.

RESULTS

At the 2-year follow-up interval, no difference was observed in the mean Kujala score (82 ± 2.9 and 83 ± 2.6 for cauterized and non-cauterized knees, respectively; mean difference 0.3; 95% confidence interval, -0.599 to 1.202; p = 0.509). The mean VAS pain score was 3 ± 0.9 in the cauterized knee and 3 ± 0.7 in the non-cauterized knee (p = 0.920). The mean ROM was 123° ± 10.8° in the cauterized knee and 123° ± 10.2° in the non-cauterized knee (p = 0.783). There was no difference between cauterized and non-cauterized patellae in the mean Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for symptoms (86 ± 4.5 versus 86 ± 3.9; p = 0.884), pain (86 ± 3.8 versus 86 ± 3.6; p = 0.905), activities (83 ± 3.2 versus 83 ± 2.8; p = 0.967), sports (42 ± 11.3 versus 43 ± 11.4; p = 0.942), and quality of life (83 ± 4.9 versus 83 ± 4.7; p = 0.916), as well as in the Oxford knee score (40 ± 2.1 versus 41 ± 1.9; p = 0.771). Complications were uncommon and there were no differences between the groups (one deep venous thromboembolism in the cauterized group and two in the control group; odds ratio 0.49, 95% CI, 0.04-5.56; p = 0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

Patellar cauterization results in no difference in anterior knee pain, functional outcomes, and complication rates compared with non-cauterization of the patella in patients who undergo non-resurfaced, simultaneous, bilateral, primary TKA with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. We do not recommend circumferential patellar cauterization in non-resurfaced patellae in patients who undergo TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study.

Influence of patellar implantation on the patellofemoral joint of an anatomic customised total knee replacement implant: A case study

Few studies have been conducted to investigate kinematics and kinetics of the patellofemoral joint under physiological muscle forces and ankle joint loads. In this study, a preliminary design of a customised total knee implant was proposed and created. To compare the influences of different patella treatment scenarios, a dynamic knee simulation model was created with patient-specific muscle forces and ankle joint loads that are calculated from an OpenSim musculoskeletal model. The goal is to improve patellar implant-bone connection and restore patellofemoral joint mobility. Identical dynamic boundary conditions were applied on an unresurfaced patella and three different dome-shaped patellar implants. It was found that the unresurfaced patella and patellar implants resulted in different motions of patellar internal rotation and medial tilt. The size of the dome-shaped patellar implant affected the motion and loading of the patellofemoral joint. When the exposed patella bone was not fully covered by the patellar implant, the patella bone then contacted the femoral component during knee flexion. This would most likely lead to anterior knee pain and subsequent revision.

[Total knee replacement without patellar resurfacing: about 60 cases]

Lors de la mise en place d’une prothèse totale du genou (PTG), une des principales problématiques de la technique chirurgicale est le choix à faire entre la conservation de la patella ou son resurfaçage avec remplacement du cartilage patellaire par une prothèse. Cette problématique continue à faire l’objet d’une controverse au sein de la communauté orthopédique. Il n'y a pas de consensus clair sur la gestion optimale de la rotule pendant arthroplastie totale du genou (PTG). Ce travail est une étude rétrospective concernant 60 arthroplasties totales du genou sans resurfaçage de la rotule, implantées au Service de Chirurgie Traumatologique et Orthopédique (B) du CHU Hassan II de Fès, depuis janvier 2009 à décembre 2015. L’âge moyen de nos patients était de 58 ans avec des extrêmes allant de 20 ans à 80 ans. La prédominance féminine est nette avec 41 femmes soit (72%) et 16 hommes soit (28%). Cliniquement, nos malades se plaignaient de douleurs de type mécanique dans la majorité des cas et tous nos patients ont bénéficié d’un examen clinique et radiologique. Le score IKS a été utilisé pour évaluer l’état du genou avant et après l’intervention. L’acte opératoire a consisté en une arthroplastie totale du genou par prothèse totale du genou sans resurfaçage de la rotule. Les complications post-opératoires étaient marquées par 7 cas de douleur antérieur de genou, 2 cas d’infections cutanées superficielles traitées par une antibiothérapie adéquate et 3 cas de raideur. Aucun cas d’hématome ou de phlébite ou de sepsis n’a été signalé. Les résultats cliniques après un recul de 18 mois ont été satisfaisants. À la lumière de ces résultats, la conservation de la patella a permis d’obtenir des résultats très satisfaisants à moyen terme concernant la douleur et la fonction. De plus, les complications potentielles des prothèses patellaires ont été évitées. Une seule contrainte demeure concernant l’avenir de ces prothèses implantées sans resurfaçage est l’apparition ou parfois la persistance de la douleur antérieur du genou d’où la nécessité d’un resurfaçage secondaire.

Age and Prosthetic Design as Risk Factors for Secondary Patella Resurfacing

BACKGROUND

Selectively resurfacing the patella based on a patient's risk of secondary patella resurfacing (SPR) may be the optimal strategy for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, exactly which factors increase the risk of SPR is unknown. Utilizing New Zealand Joint Registry data, we investigated the following: (1) What patient and surgical factors are more prevalent among TKA patients who received SPR compared to those who did not? and (2) What is the difference in Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) between those who receive SPR and those who do not?

METHODS

Prevalence of various patient and surgical factors was compared between 197 non-resurfaced TKAs that proceeded to SPR and 31,399 that did not. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the odds ratio for each factor that differed between groups. Six-month postoperative OKS for each group was utilized for comparison.

RESULTS

Posterior-stabilized designs had an odds ratio of 1.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-2.66; P = .001) when compared to cruciate-retaining designs. When compared to age less than 55, age >75 and age 65-74 had odds ratios of 0.27 (95% CI 0.16-0.46; P < .001) and 0.44 (95% CI 0.28-0.69; P < .001) respectively. Six-month OKS was lower among those who received SPR (37.27 vs 27.26; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Younger age, posterior-stabilized design, and a low 6-month OKS were associated with SPR.

Femoropatellar Osteoarthritis and Trochlear Femoral Bone Defect due to Giant Cell Tumor of the Knee: A Selected Patellofemoral Joint Arthroplasty and Reconstructive Technique: A Case Report

CASE

A 35-year-old man with a giant cell tumor involving the lateral condyle and trochlea of the right distal femur underwent curettage of the lesion and cement grafting, which resulted in symptomatic patellofemoral osteoarthritis after more than 4 years. A standard follow-up excluded recurrence, whereas infection was ruled out while investigating the symptoms. Finally, a patellofemoral resurfacing prosthesis was implanted while filling the bone defects with tantalum cones.

CONCLUSION

A "tailored" surgical technique with a selected patellofemoral joint arthroplasty could be used in oncologic setting to save further bone stock for possible revisions while permitting full and quick clinical recovery.

Effect of Patellar Resurfacing on Clinical Outcomes, Range of Knee Motion and Anterior Knee Pain in Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty

Objectives: In this study, we retrospectively compare the clinical results, range of knee motion and anterior knee pain in patients on whom we performed knee arthroplasty with and without patellar resurfacing.

Thirty-eight patients were evaluated in the study. Knee Society scores, knee range of motion and anterior knee pain before and 12 months after surgery were detected. Patients were divided into two groups: resurfaced patellas and nonresurfaced patellas. There were 18 patients in the resurfaced group and 20 patients in the nonresurfaced group.

Mean Knee Society score was 40.72±13.09 in the resur-faced group and 38.55±5.88 in the nonresurfaced group before surgery. Mean Knee Society score was 80.38±7.78 in the resur-faced group and 80.10±3.22 in the nonresurfaced group in the last control. Mean knee range of motion was 92.83±12.12 degrees in the resurfaced group and 91.05±10.10 degrees in the nonresurfaced group before surgery. Mean range of motion was 106.22±9.13 degrees in the resurfaced group and 97.25±8.50 degrees in the nonresurfaced group after surgery. There were twelve patients with anterior pain before surgery in the resur-faced group and 13 patients with anterior knee pain before surgery in the nonresurfaced group. After surgery, there was one patient with anterior pain in the resurfaced group and 9 patients with anterior knee pain in the nonresurfaced group.

Anterior knee pain ratio was smaller in the resurfaced group than in the nonresurfaced group, and there was a significant difference in range of knee motion as a result of our study. We offered to resurface the patella.

The effect of patellar thickness on gait biomechanics following total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patella resurfacing is commonly performed during total knee arthroplasty; however, determining the appropriate patellar thickness remains a challenge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of post-TKA patellar thickness on knee extensor strength and biomechanical joint loading forces during walking and stair negotiation.

METHODS

Fifteen patients (21 knees) underwent gait analysis prior to TKA and post-TKA at six weeks, three months, six months, and one year. Knee extensor strength and biomechanics were collected during level walking and stair negotiation and analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Knee extensor strength was positively correlated to patellar thickness at three months and one year post-TKA (p ≤ .05). During walking, no significant correlations were present. During stair ascent, there was a positive correlation between patellar thickness and peak knee flexion angle one year post-TKA (p ≤ .05). During stair descent, there was a positive correlation between patellar thickness and maximum vertical ground reaction forces at one year post-TKA (p ≤ .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The loss of patellar thickness when compared to measured pre-resurfacing thickness was correlated with a decrease in knee extensor strength; however, changes in patellar thickness were not significantly correlated to biomechanical loading forces during walking. Increases in demand of activity increase the torque to the knee joint, which elicit increases in compensatory motions, likely reducing the extent to which differences in joint loading during stair negotiation may be attributable to changes in patellar thickness. Therefore, the effect of post-patellar thickness on patient function in primary TKA is limited.

Patellar osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty with patellar resurfacing: a potentially underappreciated problem

Osteolysis of the patella following total knee arthroplasty is both uncommon and poorly described in the literature. We describe 3 cases of total knee arthroplasty with patella resurfacing that later presented with anterior knee pain with patellar osteolysis without evidence of patellar implant failure: 2 males and 1 female patient, all with bilateral knee osteoarthritis. Osteolysis of the patella was identified radiographically between 2 and 16 years from the index procedure. We theorize that high pressures across the patella-femoral joint, in obese or muscular patients, may play a role in the formation of these patellar osteolytic lesions. We suspect that the prevalence of this phenomenon is under-recognized in the literature and may increase with longer term follow-up and awareness.

Long-Term Results of Patellar Bone-Grafting for Severe Patellar Bone Loss During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on managing severe patellar bone loss after total knee arthroplasty. We previously described an initial series involving a novel technique of patellar bone-grafting with a short follow-up. The purpose of this study was to determine long-term survivorship and the radiographic and clinical results of patellar bone-grafting during revision total knee arthroplasty in a larger series with an extended follow-up.

METHODS

We identified 90 patients from a single institution who underwent 93 patellar bone-grafting procedures for severe patellar bone loss from 1997 to 2014. The mean age of the patients was 70 years, and 46% of patients were female. Forty-five knees (48%) underwent first-time revisions, and 19 knees (20%) had undergone a failed attempt at patellar resurfacings. Intraoperative patellar caliper thickness increased from a mean of 7 to 25 mm after patellar bone-grafting (p < 0.01). Radiographic review determined changes in patellar height, tracking, and remodeling. Knee Society scores (KSSs) were calculated. The mean follow-up was 8 years (range, 2 to 18 years). Kaplan-Meier methods determined survivorship free of any revision and any reoperation. Cox proportional hazards analysis determined predictive factors for failure.

RESULTS

Survivorship free of patellar revision was 96% at 10 years. Survivorship free of any revision was 84% at 10 years. Survivorship free of any reoperation was 78% at 10 years. Increasing patient age was the only protective factor against further patellar revision (hazard ratio, 0.95; p < 0.01). When comparing initial radiographs with final radiographs, patellar height decreased from 22 to 19 mm (p < 0.01), 80% compared with 59% of patellae articulated centrally in the trochlea (p = 0.01), and 32% compared with 77% had remodeling over the lateral femoral condyle (p < 0.01). Anterior knee pain decreased from 51% to 27% postoperatively (p = 0.01). The mean knee flexion improved from 101° to 108° (p = 0.03). The mean KSS improved from 50 to 85 points (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Reliable long-term clinical results can be expected with patellar bone-grafting for severe patellar bone loss during revision total knee arthroplasty. Pain, range of motion, and other reported outcomes improve despite radiographic changes to patellar height, tracking, and remodeling. This technique is a durable and reliable option when standard patellar resurfacing is not possible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The evolution of patellofemoral prosthetic design in total knee arthroplasty: how far have we come?

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has evolved into a successful, cost-effective treatment for end-stage knee arthrosis.The patellofemoral articulation in TKA has largely been ignored during its development despite being an important determinant of outcome.New technologies still need further development to incorporate the patella in TKA surgical planning and operative technique.Alternative approaches to alignment in TKA will have a secondary impact on patellofemoral mechanics and possibly future implant designs.Technologies that assist with precise implant positioning may alter our understanding and overall practice of TKA. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:503-512. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180094.

The Effect of Surgeon Preference for Selective Patellar Resurfacing on Revision Risk in Total Knee Replacement: An Instrumental Variable Analysis of 136,116 Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

BACKGROUND

The optimum strategy regarding resurfacing the patella in total knee replacement (TKR) remains debated, with wide national and international variability. To minimize the confounders of a direct comparison of cases with or without resurfacing, we performed an instrumental variable analysis examining revision risk on the basis of surgeon preference for patellar resurfacing in TKR, specifically examining the subsequent patellar revision risk and all-cause revision risk among cases of surgeons preferring to perform resurfacing on a selective basis compared with those whose preference is to routinely resurface or who infrequently perform resurfacing.

METHODS

Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry from 1999 to 2016 were obtained to assess the cumulative percent revision, hazard ratio, and revision diagnoses for 3 cohorts, grouped according the surgeons' patellar-resurfacing preferences: infrequently (<10% of the time), selectively (10% to <90% of the time), or routinely (≥90% of the time). To avoid confounding from implant design or surgeon performance, only minimally stabilized TKRs using hybrid or cemented fixation and performed by surgeons performing ≥50 TKR procedures per year were included.

RESULTS

A total of 136,116 procedures were included, with patients in all 3 cohorts having similar demographics. The selectively resurfaced cohort had a higher patellar revision risk compared with the routinely resurfaced cohort, with this risk being greatest in the first 4.5 years following the primary procedure, including 306% higher in the first 1.5 years, and remaining 50% higher after 4.5 years. In a subgroup analysis, increased revision risk was observed among males, females, those <65 years of age, and those ≥65 years of age. The infrequently resurfaced cohort had the highest risk of subsequent patellar revision, up to 482% higher, as seen in the first 1.5 years after the primary procedure, compared with the routinely resurfaced cohort. Additionally, the risk of all-cause revision was 20% higher for the selectively resurfaced cohort compared with routinely resurfaced.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons who preferred selective resurfacing of the patella had a higher risk of patellar revision than those who had preference for routine resurfacing of the patella. Overall, a greater preference for resurfacing resulted in a lower risk of patellar revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A 90-day episode-of-care cost analysis of robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty

Aim: To evaluate 90-day episode-of-care (EOC) costs associated with robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) versus manual TKA (mTKA). Patients & methods: TKA procedures were identified in Medicare 100% data. Accounting for baseline differences, propensity score matching was performed 1:5. 90-day EOC and index costs, lengths-of-stay, discharge disposition and readmission rates were assessed. Results: A total of 519 rTKA and 2595 mTKA were included. Overall 90-day EOC costs were US$2391 less for rTKA (p < 0.0001). Over 90% of patients in both cohorts utilized post-acute services, with rTKA accruing fewer costs than mTKA. Post-acute savings can be attributed to discharge destination. Conclusion: rTKA incurred an overall lower 90-day EOC cost versus mTKA. Savings were driven by fewer readmissions and an economically beneficial discharge destinations.

Usually, Selectively, or Rarely Resurfacing the Patella During Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Determining the Best Strategy

BACKGROUND

Surgeons may "usually" resurface the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), "rarely" resurface, or "selectively" resurface on the basis of certain criteria. It is unknown which of these 3 strategies yields superior outcomes. Utilizing New Zealand Joint Registry data, we investigated (1) what proportion of surgeons employs each of the 3 patellar resurfacing strategies, (2) which strategy is associated with the lowest overall revision rate, and (3) which strategy is associated with the highest 6-month and 5-year Oxford Knee Score (OKS).

METHODS

Two hundred and three surgeons who performed a total of 57,766 primary TKAs from 1999 to 2015 were categorized into the 3 surgeon strategies on the basis of how often they resurfaced the patella during primary total knee arthroplasty; with "rarely" defined as <10% of the time, "selectively" as ≥10% to ≤90%, and "usually" as >90%. For each strategy, the cumulative incidence of all-cause revision was calculated and utilized to construct Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The mean 6-month and 5-year postoperative OKS for each group were utilized for comparison.

RESULTS

Overall, 57% of surgeons selectively resurfaced, 37% rarely resurfaced, and 7% usually resurfaced. The usually resurfacing group was associated with the highest mean OKS at both 6 months (38.57; p < 0.001) and 5 years postoperatively (41.34; p = 0.029), followed by the selectively resurfacing group (6-month OKS, 37.79; 5-year OKS, 40.87) and the rarely resurfacing group (6-month OKS, 36.92; 5-year OKS, 40.02). Overall, there was no difference in the revision rate per 100 component years among the rarely (0.46), selectively (0.52), or usually (0.46) resurfacing groups (p = 0.587). Posterior-stabilized TKAs that were performed by surgeons who selectively resurfaced had a lower revision rate (0.54) than those by surgeons who usually resurfaced (0.64) or rarely resurfaced (0.74; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Usually resurfacing the patella was associated with improved patient-reported outcomes, but there was no difference in overall revision rates among the 3 strategies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Evaluation of the Effect of the Sulcus Angle and Lateral to Medial Facet Ratio of the Patellar Groove on Patella Tracking in Aging Subjects with Stable Knee Joint

Purpose

To determine whether the sulcus angle and the lateral to medial facet ratio correlate with patella lateral displacement and tilt in patients without patella instability.

Methods

Computed tomography images of the lower limb of 64 patients without known arthropathy were collected. Three-dimensional models of the lower limb with a unified coordinate system were rebuilt by using Mimics software. The sulcus angle, lateral to medial facet ratio, lateral trochlear inclination of the patellar groove, tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, bisect offset index, and lateral tilt of the patella were measured. Pearson's correlation test was used to determine the relationship between the aforementioned parameters.

Results

Data from 51 patients were analyzed. The sulcus angle was negatively correlated with lateral tilt inclination (p < 0.001, r = 0.8406) and positively correlated with the bisect offset index (p = 0.003, r = 0.634) and patellar tilt (p = 0.03, r = 0.551); the lateral to medial facet ratio was positively correlated with TT-TG distance (p = 0.003, r = 0.643) and bisect offset index (p = 0.026, r = 0.559).

Conclusion

The sulcus angle and lateral to medial facet ratio of the patellar groove can influence patella tracking in patients with stable knee joints.

Trends and Economic Impact of Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Central Europe: Findings from the Austrian National Database

Arthroplasty registers were originally established in Scandinavia to receive clinically relevant information from pooled data, to improve quality and reduce revision surgeries, with socioeconomic benefit. In Austria, where the highest rate of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) per inhabitant of all OECD countries was reached in 2014, arthroplasties are centrally reported since 2009. Study purpose was to perform the first analysis of the Austrian database, aiming to obtain data on trends in arthroplasty in Austria over time in relation to demographic development. Between 2009 and 2015 an almost continuous increase of total hip arthroplasties (THA; 18.052) by 14% and TKA (17.324) by 13% were observed, representing 210 THA and 202 TKA per 100k inhabitants in 2015. A similar increase was found for revision surgeries, with 1.290 re-implanted THA (7.1% of all THA) and 919 re-implanted TKA (5.3% of all TKA) in 2015. Implantation of mega or tumor prosthesis for the knee and hip joint remained constant and was mainly performed in two university hospitals. Patellar resurfacing decreased by 31.6%. Demographic development will further increase the number of primary and revision surgeries. Inclusion of more detailed information on used and revised components was established and will improve efficacy in quality control.

A Meta-Analysis of Patellar Replacement in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis (MA) aims at comparing the clinical outcomes of resurfacing and nonresurfacing the patella in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials were included by retrieving data from electronic English databases. Both fixed and random-effects models were employed, and standardized mean difference and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Stata13.1 software was used for statistical analysis for all the studies included to compare the differences in improving Knee Society Clinical Score and Knee Society Function Score as well as the reduction in rates of infection, reoperation, and anterior knee pain.

RESULTS

A total of 394 studies were initially included in this MA. About 20 randomized controlled trials which met the inclusion criteria were finally enrolled in this MA. The results of our MA showed that the reoperation rate of the patellar resurfacing group was lower than that of the nonresurfacing group. The subgroup analysis was performed according to the follow-up time and revealed that the increase in the Knee Society Clinical Score was higher in the patellar resurfacing group than that in the nonresurfacing group in the follow-up period of 1 to 2 years. The risk of reoperation rate was lower in the patellar resurfacing group than that in the nonresurfacing group, while there were no statistical differences in the follow-up time over 2 years.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that during the follow-up of 1 to 2 years, patellar resurfacing can significantly increase the Knee Society Clinical Score and reduce the reoperative rates in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: How Does Residual Patellar Thickness Affect Patient-Oriented Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Maintenance of the native patellar thickness has been deemed important for proper clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our objective was to study the effects of the change in patellar thickness on patient-perceived outcomes (PPOs) after TKA. We hypothesized that reestablishing native patellar thickness after TKA results in better PPOs.

METHODS

819 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA were studied. Patients were classified according to their postoperative patellar thickness into: (1) less than native patella thickness; (2) equal to native patella thickness; and (3) greater than native patella thickness. Difference in postoperative range of motion (ROM), PPOs and clinical scores, and delta-Δ-change were assessed. MANCOVA was used to assess for differences.

RESULTS

No significant differences found based on postoperative patellar thickness (mean follow-up: 4.9 ± 2.1 years) for each ROM assessments. Those who reported more stiffness (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index stiffness; P = .011) and lower knee active flexion (P = .046) preoperatively had "greater than native patella thickness" after surgery. Postoperatively, the "equal to native patella thickness" group reported significantly better quality of life (quality of well-being scale 7 total; P = .008) as well as better physical score (Short Form-36 role physical score; P = .03). The amount of improvement (delta-Δ-change), when restoring patellar thickness equal to the native demonstrated greatest improvements in quality of life (quality of well-being scale 7 total; P = .016) physical measures (Short Form-36 role physical [P = .025], and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index stiffness scores [P = .006]).

CONCLUSION

When compared with the native patellar thickness, a final postoperative difference (delta thickness) that ranges from -1.06 to 2.58 mm provides satisfactory results and does not seem to affect ROM after surgery.

The predictive factors of secondary patellar resurfacing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. A prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The decision to resurface the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the outcome and survivorship of the native patella in computer-assisted TKA (CAS TKA) implanted for primary knee osteoarthritis, and to determine the predictive factors of secondary patellar resurfacing (SPR).

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 273 cementless ultra-congruent mobile-bearing CAS TKA implanted without patellar resurfacing was included in our total joint registry. Patients were evaluated with the International Knee Society (IKS) and Hospital for Special Surgery Patellar (HSSP) scores. Radiographic evaluation was focused on the patellofemoral (PF) compartment to assess: the patellar dysplasia (Wiberg classification), PF osteoarthritis (Iwano classification), femoral trochlear dysplasia (femoral sulcus angle), patellar maltracking (patellar tilt and lateralization), and patella height (Blackburne-Peel ratio).

RESULTS

At a six-year median follow-up, the CAS TKA survivorship using SPR as end-point was 95% (range, 91-99%). The IKS and HSSP improved significantly after SPR (p = 0.001 and 0.004, respectively). No significant difference in the IKS and HSSP was detected between TKA with native patella and SPR-TKA at latest follow-up. Importantly, four pre-operative radiographic PF parameters were significantly associated with SPR: higher stages of patellar dysplasia and PF osteoarthritis, and higher sulcus angle and patellar lateralization (hazard ratios = 5.1 to 11.6, p = 0.009 to 0.04).

CONCLUSION

When preserving the native patella, surgeons should be aware of pre-operative PF radiographic parameters that could influence the outcome and survivorship of CAS TKA leading to SPR. Particularly, evidence of PF dysplasia, osteoarthritis and maltracking should be determined pre-operatively to resurface the patella at the time of TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II (prospective cohort study).

Is Selectively Not Resurfacing the Patella an Acceptable Practice in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

To resurface or not to resurface the patella remains a controversy in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term outcomes associated with selectively not resurfacing the patella.

METHODS

This was a historical cohort study of 15,497 patients with 21,371 primary TKA procedures performed at a single institution between 1985 and 2010. The cohort included 402 (2%) knees with unresurfaced patellae and 20,969 knees with all-polyethylene patellae designs. Reasons for not resurfacing the patella were documented. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to estimate the risk of complications and revisions among procedures with unresurfaced patellae.

RESULTS

According to the surgeon, reasons for not resurfacing were normal cartilage (226, 56%), young patient (30, 8%), thin patella (53, 13%), and surgeons' choice (93, 23%). In age, sex, and calendar year-adjusted analyses, the risk of complications (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06, 1.46) and all-cause revisions (HR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.89) were significantly higher after TKA with unresurfaced patellae. However, after adjusting for femoral component types and operative diagnoses, these associations were no longer significant. The only group with significantly worse outcomes were those with a thin patellae with increased risk of complications (HR: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.70, 4.17) and revisions (HR: 5.94, 95% CI: 2.35, 15.02). Yet, the excess risk in the thin patellae group was mainly due to infections, and not related to unresurfaced patellae.

CONCLUSION

Selectively not resurfacing the patella seemed to provide similar results compared with routine resurfacing.