Advances and Update on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

[Influencing factors on effectiveness of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty]

Objective

To summarize the influencing factors on the effectiveness of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), so as to provide reference for clinical treatment.

Methods

The related research literature of RTSA at home and abroad was extensively consulted, and the factors that may affect the effectiveness were summarized from the aspects of surgical technique, muscle condition, general condition of patients, psychological expectation, and lifestyle.

Results

For surgical techniques, different surgical approaches have their own advantages. The glenoid notch, poor bone ingrowth, increased bone resorption, and infection would lead to the loosening of glenoid prosthesis. In addition, the neck shaft angle and inclination angle of humeral prosthesis affect the occurrence of glenoid notch and the range of motion of joint internal/external rotation after operation, respectively. For muscle condition, the quality of teres minor and deltoid muscle has an important influence on joint stability after operation. Moderate increase of deltoid muscle tension can improve joint mobility after operation, and suture repair of subscapular tendon during operation can relieve joint pain and improve function, range of motion, and strength. For the general condition of patients, gender, age, and body mass index are all related to postoperative joint function and complications, and different occupations and postoperative exercise levels affect the recovery. The patients with severe degenerative diseases, poor preoperative function, and long disease duration have lower expectations and higher satisfaction with the effectiveness, and bad lifestyle has a negative impact on the effectiveness.

Conclusion

The effectiveness of RTSA is related to surgical technique, muscle condition, general condition of patients, psychological expectation, and lifestyle. In order to avoid the loosening of glenoid prosthesis, the operator should choose humeral prosthesis with small neck shaft angle and large glenoid ball and put them down and inclined inferiorly during operation, and choose appropriate approach to eliminate space with drainage to reduce the risk of infection. After operation, patients should avoid activities that generate high anterior and posterior shear forces. In addition, the humeral prosthesis with a inclination angle of 10°-20° can achieve the best balance between the range of internal rotation and external rotation after operation. Proper deltoid tension can maintain joint stability and good range of motion. Suture of subscapular tendon is recommended.

Influence of Lateralization and Distalization on Joint Function after Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

The purpose of this study was to investigate how lateralization shoulder angle (LSA) and distalization shoulder angle (DSA) are related to clinical and kinematic outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Thirty-three patients were evaluated at least six months postoperatively. The Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Constant Murley Score (CMS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used. Shoulder kinematics was evaluated with a stereophotogrammetric system. LSA and DSA inter-rater reliability was analysed through the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Stepwise forward linear regression analysis was conducted between LSA and DSA with clinical scales and kinematic measures, between which a correlation analysis was conducted. The inter-rater reliability for LSA (mean ICC = 0.93) and DSA (mean ICC = 0.97) results were good to excellent. Greater LSA values were associated with higher peaks of internal rotation (p = 0.012, R2 = 0.188) and range of motion (ROM) (p = 0.037, R2 = 0.133). SANE (p = 0.009), CMS (p = 0.031), and SST (0.026) were positively correlated to external rotation, while VAS (p = 0.020) was negatively related. Abduction peaks were positively related to CMS (p = 0.011) and SANE (p = 0.037), as well as abduction ROM (SANE, p = 0.031; CMS, p = 0.014).

Improved functional, radiographic and patient-reported outcomes at midterm follow-up for shoulder arthroplasty patients 75 years and older

Background

Current discussion centers around the appropriateness of shoulder arthroplasty in elderly patients, and whether anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty yield acceptable results in this population. The purpose of this study was to examine midterm outcomes in patients 75 years and older who underwent either procedure.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) between 2000 and 2018. Inclusion criteria was patient age ≥75 years at time of surgery and ≥1 years postoperative follow-up. Primary outcomes were differences in Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score, and range of motion. A secondary outcome was revision surgery.

Results

22 patients who underwent aTSA and 17 patients who underwent rTSA were included. Mean age at surgery was 79 and 80 in the aTSA and rTSA groups, respectively. Mean postoperative follow-up was 6.6 years across both cohorts. Anatomic TSA patients experienced improvements in VAS (7 preop vs. 1 postop; p < 0.001), ASES (16 vs. 75; p < 0.001), and SST (2 vs. 8; p < 0.001) scores. Reverse TSA patients also experienced improvements in VAS (7 vs. 1; p < 0.001), ASES (29 vs. 74; p < 0.001), and SST (1 vs. 7; p < 0.001) scores. Anatomic TSA patients experienced improved external rotation (17° vs. 53°; p < 0.001), forward elevation (108° vs. 155°; p < 0.001), and internal rotation (L5 vs. T10; p < 0.001). Reverse TSA patients experienced improved forward elevation (52° vs. 126°; p < 0.001). 21 aTSA patients (100%) and 16 rTSA patients (94%) experienced survival free from revision. 100% of aTSA and rTSA patients experienced survival free from loosening.

Conclusion

Both aTSA and rTSA can be performed in the elderly population with acceptable midterm outcomes, suggesting that implant survival and patient satisfaction have the potential to endure through the end of life.

Level of evidence

IV.

Long-Term Results of Primary Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears Without Glenohumeral Arthritis with a Mean Follow up of 9.4 Years

Background

The aim of this single-center study was to analyze the long-term clinical results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears without glenohumeral arthritis.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of 105 patients (115 shoulders) was conducted. The mean age of the patient group was 76 years (range, 65 to 87 years). The mean clinical follow-up was 9.4 years (range, 5 to 17 years). Pain, range of motion, and complication rates were analyzed pre-operatively and at the last follow-up.

Results

The mean Constant-Murley score increased from 29 points (range, 21 to 34 points) preoperatively to 68.1 points (range, 57 to 81 points) postoperatively (p<0.05). Scapular notching was present in 50 shoulders (43.5%) and it was grade 1 or 2 in 47 of 115 cases (40.9%) and grade 3 or 4 in 3 of 115 cases (2.6%). Complications occurred in 19 patients (17%). Seven patients (6%) underwent revision surgery. The mean satisfaction rate was 94%.

Conclusions

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is a viable treatment for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears without glenohumeral arthritis with satisfactory clinical outcomes and low complication and reoperation rates with a mean follow up of 9.4 years after surgery.

Results after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty with and without subscapularis repair: a prospective-randomized trial

INTRODUCTION

Indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasties (rTSA) have increased since their development by Paul Grammont in 1985. Prosthesis design was enhanced over time, but the management of the tendon of the M. subscapularis (SSC-tendon) in primary rTSA is still a controversial subject with regard to perform a refixation or not.

METHODS

50 patients were randomized in a refixation group (A) and a non-refixation-group (B) of the SSC-tendon in a double-blinded fashion. SSC-function was assessed at baseline before surgery, such as 3 and 12 months after surgery. Constant-Murley-Shoulder Score (CS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES), strength, range of motion (ROM), and pain on numeric rating scale (NRS) were measured in all examinations. An ultrasound examination of the shoulder was performed for evaluation of subscapularis tendon integrity at 3 and 12 month follow-up visits. Pain was evaluated on NRS via phone 5 days after surgery. Surgery was performed by a single experienced senior surgeon in all patients.

RESULTS

Patients with a refixation of the SSC-tendon and primary rTSA had improved internal rotation [40° (20°-60°) vs. 32° (20°-45°); p = 0.03] at 12 months of follow-up. Additionally, the A-group had increased CS [74 (13-90) vs. 69.5 (40-79); p = 0.029] 1 year after surgery. Results were strengthened by subgroup analysis of successful refixation in ultrasound examination vs. no refixation. No differences were seen in ASES and NRS 1 year after rTSA.

CONCLUSION

SSC-tendon repair in rTSA improves CS and internal rotation 12 months after surgery.

Revision Rates and Associated Risk Factors after Shoulder Arthroplasty

This study aims at answering the following questions (1) How high is the revision rate after osteoarthritis-, and rotator cuff-related compared to proximal humerus fracture (PHF)-related shoulder arthroplasty? (2) What are the associated risk factors for a revision after shoulder arthroplasty? Shoulder arthroplasty procedures occurring between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2019 were identified from the Medicare database. First, revision rates for PHF patients and age- and sex-matched non-fracture patients, grouped into osteoarthritis-related and rotator cuff-related arthroplasty, were compared. Second, revision rates between total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty after PHF were compared. Semiparametric Cox regression was applied, incorporating 23 demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic covariates, to investigate risk factors for revision surgery. Between the considered time period from 2009 through 2019, a total number of 47,979 PHFs was identified. A shoulder arthroplasty procedure was performed in n = 2639 (5.5%, 95%CI: 4.8-6.1) of the cases. The five-year survivorship of the implant was 96.3 (95%CI: 93.8-97.9) after hemiarthroplasty and 96.1% (05%CI: 94.2-97.3) after total shoulder arthroplasty. To compare the revision rates, n = 14,775 patients with osteoarthritis and n = 4268 patients with rotator cuff arthropathy, who received a shoulder arthroplasty, served as a non-fracture control group. Patients receiving a rotator cuff-related arthroplasty were more likely to require a revision compared to patients treated for osteoarthritis (HR: 1.27, 95%CI: 1.04-1.44, p = 0.018). Identified significant risk factors for revision surgery after shoulder arthroplasty included age ≤ 75 years, male sex, and osteoporosis. High implant survival was found for hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of PHF in elderly patients. The risk of revision surgery was elevated in patients receiving a rotator cuff-related arthroplasty as well as in patients with osteoporosis, male patients and patients older than 75 years.

Glenoid neck length in a healthy population and its association with scapular notching

BACKGROUND

Scapular notching is a radiographic finding associated with the use of a reverse shoulder prosthesis. The morphological characteristics of the glenoid neck have been scarcely explored as a relevant factor in relation to scapular notching. The objective of this study is to measure the length of the glenoid neck in a three-dimensional CT reconstruction of a healthy population and to simulate the scapular notching free range of motion for the "long neck" and for the "short neck" groups.

METHODS

CT scans of 214 shoulders were reviewed, excluding incomplete, poor quality, or altered studies. 100 CT scans were finally processed. The mean age was 51.7 years (SD 19.4; range, 15-84 years), with 49 female and 51 male patients. For each of the scapulae, four morphometric measurements were obtained: anterior glenoid neck (AGN), middle glenoid neck (MGN), posterior glenoid neck (PGN) and alternative posterior glenoid neck (aPGN). Using 3D software, we simulated a reverse shoulder prosthesis, and the scapular notching free range of motion was registered. Differences between measurements were evaluated with an unpaired t-test using StataIC16®. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. The intraobserver and interobserver correlation was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The AGN measured 7.43 ± 2.52 mm (range, 1.72-13.3 mm); MGN measured 8.05 mm ± 1.93 (range, 2.92-13.2 mm); PGN measured 7.26 ± 2.6 mm (range, 2-13.4 mm); and aPGN measured 8.97 ± 2.3 mm (range, 4.08-15.4 mm). The scapular notching free range of motion for the "long neck" group was 74.98° ± 7.35 (range, 55-83°) and for the "short neck" group, it was 62.93° ± 6.84 (range, 45-70°) (p = 0.0004).

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of posterior glenoid neck length exhibits excellent reliability and reproducibility, as well as being associated to the scapular notching free range of motion.

STUDY DESIGN

Basic, retrospective, CT images research.

Outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty by year of index procedure: are we getting better?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine whether postoperative patient-reported outcomes improved over time following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected patient-reported outcomes from our institution's registry between 2008 and 2018 (N = 1899). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively were required. Univariable linear models were used to test the association between year of surgery and improvement in ASES scores at 2- and 5-year follow-up, as well as any association with age, sex, primary or revision surgery, hand dominance, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, rotator cuff status, primary diagnosis, and Walch classification. Multivariable models were created to analyze ASES score improvement by index year while controlling for significant factors.

RESULTS

In the univariable analysis, 5-year ASES difference scores increased each year by a mean of 1.65 (P < .001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-2.55) for TSA, 2.50 (P = .014; 95% CI, 0.52-4.49) for RTSA, and 1.64 (P < .001; 95% CI, 0.81-2.47) for the overall population. Patient sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, rotator cuff status, primary diagnosis, Walch classification, and revision procedures were also significant factors affecting ASES scores. On multivariable analysis controlling for these factors, 5-year ASES difference scores were still significantly associated with year of surgery, increasing each year by a mean of 2.20 (P < .001; 95% CI, 0.91-3.50) for TSA, 4.83 (P < .001; 95% CI, 1.17-8.49) for RTSA, and 1.66 (P < .001; 95% CI, 0.81-2.51) for the entire population.

CONCLUSION

Both anatomic TSA and RTSA patients reported increasing ASES difference scores at 5-year follow-up as time passed. These findings may indicate that advances in shoulder arthroplasty have resulted in better patient outcomes over time. Further research is needed to clarify which factors influence improvements in outcomes, particularly for revision procedures.

Cost-utility analysis of total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective health economic study using real-world data

BACKGROUND

With increasing health care expenditures, knowledge about the benefit and costs of surgical interventions such as total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) becomes important for orthopedic surgeons, social insurance programs, and health policy decision makers. We examined the impact of TSA on quality of life (QOL), direct medical costs, and productivity losses and evaluated the cost-utility ratio of TSA compared with ongoing nonoperative management using real-world data.

METHODS

Patients with shoulder osteoarthritis and/or rotator cuff tear arthropathy indicated for anatomic or reverse TSA were included in this prospective study. QOL (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5-Level questionnaire) and shoulder function (Constant score; Shoulder Pain and Disability Index; short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; and Subjective Shoulder Value) were assessed preoperatively and up to 2 years postoperatively. Health insurance companies provided all-diagnosis direct medical costs for 2018 in Swiss francs (CHF), where 1 CHF was equivalent to US $1.02. Indirect costs were assessed using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire. Baseline data at recruitment and the total costs of the preoperative year served as a proxy for nonoperative management. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as the total costs to gain 1 extra quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) based on both the health care system perspective and societal perspective. The relationship between QOL and shoulder function was assessed by regression analysis.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative utility index for the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5-Level questionnaire of 0.68 for a total of 150 patients (mean age, 71 years; 21% working; 58% women) increased to 0.89 and 0.87 at 1 and 2 years postoperatively, respectively. Mean direct medical costs were 11,771 CHF (preoperatively), 34,176 CHF (1 year postoperatively), and 11,763 CHF (2 years postoperatively). The ICER was 63,299 CHF/QALY (95% confidence interval, 44,391-82,206 CHF/QALY). The mean productivity losses for 29 working patients decreased from 40,574 CHF per patient (preoperatively) to 26,114 CHF at 1 year postoperatively and 10,310 CHF at 2 years postoperatively. When considering these productivity losses, the ICER was 35,549 CHF/QALY (95% confidence interval, 12,076-59,016 CHF/QALY). QOL was significantly associated with shoulder function (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Using real-world direct medical cost data, we calculated a cost-utility ratio of 63,299 CHF/QALY for TSA in Switzerland, which clearly falls below the often-suggested 100,000-CHF/QALY threshold for acceptable cost-effectiveness. In view of productivity losses, TSA becomes highly cost-effective with an ICER of 35,546 CHF/QALY.

Monitoring daily shoulder activity before and after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using inertial measurement units

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to use at-home, portable, continuous monitoring technologies to record arm motion and activity preoperatively and postoperatively after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA).

METHODS

Thirty-three patients indicated for RTSA were monitored preoperatively and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Inertial measurement units were placed on the sternum and upper arm of the operative limb, recording humeral motion relative to the torso for the duration of a waking day. Elevation events per hour (EE/h) > 90°, time spent at >90°, and activity intensity were calculated and compared between time points. Patient-reported outcome measures were also collected at all time points.

RESULTS

At 3 (P = .040) and 12 (P = .010) months after RTSA, patients demonstrated a significantly greater number of EE/h > 90° compared with preoperatively. There were no significant differences (P ≥ .242) in the amount of time spent at different elevation angles at any time point or in arm activity intensity. Overall, 95% of the day was spent at elevation angles < 60°, and 90% of the day was spent in a low- or moderate-intensity state. Pearson correlations demonstrated relationships between forward elevation and the number of EE/h (r = 0.395, P = .001) and the number of EE/h > 90° (r = 0.493, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

After RTSA, patients significantly increase the frequency of arm elevation to higher angles. However, we found no differences in the amount of time spent at different elevation angles. Overall, after RTSA, >95% of the day was spent at elevation angles < 60° and <1% of the day was spent at >90° of elevation.